1
Greene, Kevin, Moore, Tom. Archaeology: an introduction. 5th ed. London: : Routledge 2010.
2
Henson D. Doing archaeology: a subject guide for students. London: : Routledge 2012. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson
3
Hodder I, Hutson S. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Third edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211
4
Hodder, Ian. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
5
Hodder, Ian. Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
6
Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
7
Trigger, Bruce G. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
8
Urban, Patricia A., Schortman, Edward M. Archaeological theory in practice. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2012.
9
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999. 80–104.
10
Johnson M. Common sense is not enough. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. 1–11.
11
Redman C. The development of archaeological theory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 48–80.
12
Bentley R, Alexander M. Introduction on archaeological theories. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008.
13
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18.
14
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2007;14:285–310.
15
Greene K. Chapter 6: making sense of the past. In: Archaeology: an introduction. London: : Routledge 2010. 249–312.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975
16
Hodder I. Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. 1–13.https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
17
Meskell, Lynn, Preucel, Robert W. A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
18
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2005.
19
Praetzellis, Adrian. Death by theory: a tale of mystery and archaeological theory. Oxford: : AltaMira Press 2000.
20
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: : Routledge 1994. 343–62.
21
Trigger, Bruce G. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
22
VanPool, Todd L., VanPool, Christine S. Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2003.
23
Yoffee, Norman, Sherratt, Andrew. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
24
Childe VG. What happens in prehistory? In: Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1956. 135–58.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
25
Hawkes C. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World. American Anthropologist 1954;56:155–68.https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357
26
Trigger BG. Culture-historical archaeology. In: A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. 211–313.
27
Childe VG. Preface and chapter 1. In: The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1929. v-xii-1–7.
28
Gordon Childe V. Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1935;1:1–15.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf
29
Clark, Grahame. Archaeology and society. 3rd ed. London: : Methuen 1960.
30
Diaz-Andreu M. Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism. In: History, nationhood, and the question of Britain. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2004. 227–41.
31
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265
32
Fagan, Brian M. Grahame Clark: an intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Boulder, Colo: : Westview 2001.
33
Harris, David R., Childe, V. Gordon, V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference, et al. The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives : proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. London: : UCL Press 1994.
34
Hingley R. Chapters 9 and 10. In: Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: : Routledge 2000.
35
Jones S. Chapter 2. In: The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: : Routledge 1997.
36
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., Dunnell, Robert C. The rise and fall of culture history. London: : Plenum Press 1997.
37
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of archaeological method and theory 2004;11:369–96.
38
Patterson, Thomas Carl. Marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. Oxford: : Berg 2003.
39
Renfrew C. Beyond diffusion. In: Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: : Pimlico 1999. 109–19.
40
Schnapp A. Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures. Antiquity 2002;76:134–40.
41
Shennan SJ. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. London: : Routledge 1994. 1–32.
42
Spaulding AC. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity 1953;18:305–13.
43
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: : American Anthropological Association 1948.
44
Webster G. Culture history: a culture-historical approach. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 11–27.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
45
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. Archaeology from the earth. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1954.
46
Binford LR. Archaeological perspectives. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 5–32.
47
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity 1964;29:425–41.
48
Trigger BG. Current trends in American archaeology. In: Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1978. 2–18.
49
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 1962;28:217–25.
50
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18.
51
Clarke, David L., Chapman, Bob. Analytical archaeology. 2nd ed. London: : Methuen 1978.
52
Clark G. Economic approach to prehistory. In: Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 149–68.
53
Dunnell RC. Five decades of American archaeology. In: American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1986.
54
Flannery KV. Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology. Scientific American 1967;2:119–22.
55
Flannery KV. Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In: Anthropological archeology in the Americas. Washington, DC: : The Anthropological Society of Washington 1968. 67–87.
56
Lyman RL. What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology? Anthropological Theory 2007;7:217–50. doi:10.1177/1463499607077299
57
David J. Meltzer. Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology. American Antiquity 1979;44:644–57.
58
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2005.
59
Plog F. Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 649–61.
60
Redman CL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology. American Anthropologist 1991;93:295–307.
61
Renfrew C. Culture systems and the multiplier effect. In: The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. London: : Methuen 1972. 19–44.
62
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 539–58.
63
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: : American Anthropological Association 1948.
64
Taylor WW. Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable. In: Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: : Feffer & Simons 1972. 28–33.
65
Trigger BG. Chapter 7. In: A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
66
Trigger BG. Aims in prehistoric archaeology. Antiquity 1970;44:26–37.
67
Watson PJ. Processualism and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 29–38.
68
Binford LR. Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks. In: Bones: ancient men and modern myths. London: : Academic Press 1981. 3–20.
69
Flannery KV. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 1982;84:265–78.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010
70
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 1972;37:156–65.
71
Arnold P. Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology. In: Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2003. 55–66.
72
Binford LR. General introduction. In: For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling. London: : Academic Press 1977. 1–10.
73
Binford LR. Behavioural archaeological and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.
74
Binford, Lewis Roberts. Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2001.
75
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.
76
Courbin, Paul. What is archaeology?: an essay on the nature of archaeological research. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1988.
77
Robert C. Dunnell. The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 1982;38:1–25.
78
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
79
Higgs ES, Vita-Finzi C. Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. In: Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: : Cambridge University Press 1972. 27–36.
80
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
81
Leone, Mark P. Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: : Feffer & Simons 1972.
82
Patrik LE. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1985;8:27–62.
83
Price BJ. Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity 1982;47:709–41.
84
Renfrew, Colin, Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973.
85
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology. London: : Academic Press 1976.
86
Schiffer MB. Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 1985;41:18–41.
87
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995.
88
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.
89
Shott MJ. Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of archaeological research 1998;6:299–329.
90
Trigger BG. Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity 1995;69:449–58.
91
Wylie A. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1985;8:63–111.
92
Hodder I. Chapter 1: The problem. In: Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. 1–19.
93
Leone M. Towards a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology 1987;28:283–302.
94
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology. In: Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. London: : Routledge 1992. 46–67.
95
Wylie A. The interpretive dilemma. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 18–27.
96
Review by: Lewis R. Binford. American Antiquity. ;Vol. 53:875–6.
97
Cowgill GL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, New Series 1993;95:551–73.
98
Earle et. al. TK. Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology 1987;28:501–38.
99
Hodder I. Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 92–121.
100
Hodder I. Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1985;8:1–26.
101
Johnson M. Chapters 6 and 7. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
102
Leone M. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In: American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1986. 415–38.
103
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Archaeology and the politics of theory. In: Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Blackwell 1987. 186–208.
104
Shanks, Michael, Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 1992.
105
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 133–44.
106
Tilley CY. Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. In: Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984. 111–45. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511897443
107
Trigger BG. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation. American Anthropologist 1991;93:551–69.
108
Trigger BG. Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New? Annual Review of Anthropology 1984;13:275–300. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423
109
Trigger BG. Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism. In: A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
110
Wylie A. On ‘heavily decomposing red herrings’. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In: Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992. 145–57.
111
Shanks M, Hodder I. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1994. 3–29.
112
Shanks M, Tilley C. Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review 1989;22:12–54.https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList
113
Barrett, John C. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Cambridge, Mass: : Blackwell 1993.
114
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues 2005;12:45–72. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583
115
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, Cox, Margaret. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001.
116
Chippindale C. Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. In: Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. 27–36.
117
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 2000.
118
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 283–9.
119
Gero JM, Wright M. Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 3–30.
120
Hegmon M. Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 2003;68:213–43.
121
Hodder I. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 1991;56:7–18.
122
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992. 201–12.
123
Hodder, Ian. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1994.
124
Hodder I, Karlsson H, Olsen B. 40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2008;41:26–42. doi:10.1080/00293650802181154
125
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 14–64.
126
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: : Avebury 1994.
127
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
128
Preucel RW. The postprocessual condition. Journal of Archaeological Research 1995;3:147–75.
129
Renfrew C. Towards a cognitive archaeology. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 3–12.
130
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 133–44.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602
131
Tarlow, Sarah, West, Susie. The familiar past?: archaeologies of later historical Britain. London: : Routledge 1999.
132
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: : Routledge 1994. 343–62.
133
Thomas, Julian. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: : Routledge 1996.
134
Tilley C. Interpreting material culture. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Routledge 1989. 185–94.
135
Tilley, Christopher Y. Interpretative archaeology. New York: : Berg 1992.
136
Trigger BG. Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 1991;24:65–76.
137
Trigger BG. Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. In: Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. London: : Transaction 2003. 113–31.
138
Trigger BG. Chapter 9 and 10. In: A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
139
Michelle Hegmon. Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity 2003;68:213–43.
140
Johnson M. On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues 2006;13:117–32. doi:10.1017/S138020380621208X
141
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 2004;11:77–99. doi:10.1017/S1380203805211509
142
Barrett JC. The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues 2014;21:65–74. doi:10.1017/S1380203814000105
143
Bentley A, Maschner HDG. Complexity theory. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 245–70.
144
Bintliff, J. L., Pearce, Mark. The death of archaeological theory? Oakville: : Oxbow Books 2011. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87
145
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011.
146
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, Stovel, Emily. Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. London: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2005.
147
Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., Funari, Pedro Paulo A. Memories from darkness: archaeology of repression and resistance in Latin America. London: : Springer 2009. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3
148
Gaydarska B. A brief history of TAG. Antiquity 2009;83:1152–62.
149
Michelle Hegmon. No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss. American Antiquity 2005;70:588–90.
150
Hodder I. Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 1–14.
151
Lydon, Jane, Rizvi, Uzma Z. Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816
152
Knappett, Carl. An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. https://academic.oup.com/book/1407
153
Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
154
Madonna L. Moss. Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins. American Antiquity 2005;70:581–7.
155
Olsen B. Symmetical archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 208–28.
156
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory 2001;1:73–98. doi:10.1177/146349960100100105
157
Preucel RW, Mrozowski SA. The new pragmatism. In: Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Oxford: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. 3–49.
158
Robb J, Pauketat TR. Big histories, human lives: tackling problems of scale in archaeology. Santa Fe, N.M.: : School for Advanced Research Press 2013.
159
Michael Shanks. Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology 2007;39:589–96.
160
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: : Routledge 2004.
161
Spriggs M. Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology 2008;40:538–52. doi:10.1080/00438240802453161
162
Bruce G. Trigger. Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology 1998;102:1–34.
163
Ucko, Peter J., Theoretical Archaeology Group. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: : Routledge 1994.
164
Watts CM. Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. London: : Routledge 2013.
165
Webmoor T, Witmore CL. Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2008;41:53–70. doi:10.1080/00293650701698423
166
Andrews G, Barrett JC, Lewis JSC. Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology. Antiquity 2000;74:525–30.
167
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999. 80–104.
168
Lucas G. Introduction: archaeology and the field. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: : Routledge 2001. 1–17.
169
Roskams S. Future prospects. In: Excavation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. 267–90.
170
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, et al. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
171
Berggren A, Hodder I. Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity 2003;68:421–34.
172
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity 1964;29:425–41.
173
Chadwick A. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues 2003;10:97–117. doi:10.1017/S1380203803001107
174
Collis, John. Digging up the past: an introduction to archaeological excavation. Stroud: : Sutton 2001.
175
Conolly J. Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000. 51–6.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099
176
Edgeworth, Matt. Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2003.
177
Edgeworth, Matt. Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations. Lanham: : Altamira Press 2006.
178
Gero JM. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. In: Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1996. 251–80.
179
Hamilton S. Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 1999;10:1–8. doi:10.5334/pia.140
180
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, et al. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 2006;9:31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
181
Hassan FA. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity 1997;71:1020–5.
182
Hodder I. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992. 263–74.
183
Hodder I. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 1997;71:691–700.
184
Jones, Andrew. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
185
Lucas G. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
186
Moshenska, Gabriel, Dhanjal, Sarah. Community archaeology: themes, methods and practices. Oxford: : Oxbow 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191
187
Papaconstantinou, Demetra. Deconstructing context: a critical approach to archaeological practice. Oxford: : Oxbow 2006.
188
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity 1998;72:308–26.
189
Scarre G, Coningham R. Appropriating the past: philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932
190
Quirke, Stephen. Hidden hands: Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 1880-1924. London: : Gerald Duckworth 2010.
191
Shanks M, McGuire RH. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity 1996;61:75–88.
192
Tilley C. Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity 1989;63:275–80.
193
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity 1998;72:308–26.
194
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Who was buried at Stonehenge? Antiquity 2009;83:23–39.
195
Pearson MP. Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries. Journal of Material Culture 2006;11:227–61. doi:10.1177/1359183506063024
196
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 539–58.
197
Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. Harmondsworth: : Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton 1960.
198
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man 1992;27:735–55.
199
Bender, Barbara, Aitken, Paul. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: : Berg 1998.
200
Bradley, Richard. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: : Routledge 1998.
201
Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. [London]: : Thames & Hudson 2004.
202
Chippindale, Christopher. Who owns Stonehenge? London: : Batsford 1990.
203
Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R., et al. Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations. London: : English Heritage 1995.
204
Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., British Academy. Science and Stonehenge. Oxford: : Oxford University Press for the British Academy 1997.
205
Parker Pearson et. al. M. The age of Stonehenge. Antiquity 2007;81:617–39.
206
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 2006;1:237–58.
207
Richards, Julian C., English Heritage. English Heritage book of Stonehenge. London: : B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage 1991.
208
Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, English Heritage. The Stonehenge environs project. London: : Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England 1990.
209
James S. Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution. Antiquity 2003;77:178–84.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511
210
Witcher R, Tolia-Kelly DP, Hingley R. Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall. Journal of Material Culture 2010;15:105–28. doi:10.1177/1359183510355228
211
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. London: : Plenum Press 1998.
212
Dyson, Stephen L. In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. London: : Yale University Press 2006. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm
213
Frere SS. Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond. History and Archaeology Review 1988;3:31–6.
214
Gardner A. Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire. In: TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2003. 1–13.
215
Hingley, Richard. Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: : Routledge 2000.
216
Hingley R. Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas. In: Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. South Shields: : Arbeia Society 2008. 25–8.
217
Hingley R. ‘The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland’: Genealogies of the Roman Walls. Classical Receptions Journal 2010;2:25–43. doi:10.1093/crj/clq001
218
Hodder I. Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology. In: Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings. Aldershot: : Avebury 1993. xiii–xix.
219
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns. Man 1971;6:391–407.
220
James S. Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal 2002;159:1–58. doi:10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514
221
James, Simon, Millett, Martin, Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, et al. Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda. York: : Council for British Archaeology 2001.
222
Johnson MH. Rethinking historical archaeology. In: Historical archaeology: back from the edge. New York: : Routledge 1999. 23–36.
223
Moore T. Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies. Journal of Social Archaeology 2011;11:334–60. doi:10.1177/1469605311403861
224
Nesbitt C, Tolia-Kelly D. Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument. Journal of Social Archaeology 2009;9:368–90. doi:10.1177/1469605309338428
225
Glenn R. Storey. Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data. Journal of Archaeological Research 1999;7:203–48.
226
Mason, David J. P., Symonds, Matthew F. A. Frontiers of knowledge: a research framework for Hadrian’s Wall, part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage site. Durham: : Durham County Council and Durham University 2009.
227
Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, University of Leicester. Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives. Leicester: : School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester 1996.
228
Wilmott T. Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald. In: Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings. Aldershot: : Avebury 1995. 59–69.
229
Wilmott, Tony, English Heritage. Hadrian’s Wall: archaeological research by English Heritage 1976-2000. Swindon: : English Heritage 2009.
230
Witcher R. The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall. Public Archaeology 2010;9:126–52. doi:10.1179/146551810X12822101587138
231
Greg Woolf. The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment. American Journal of Archaeology 2004;108:417–28.
232
Tim Ingold. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 1993;25:152–74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811
233
Lucas G. Time and Archaeological Event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2008;18:59–65. doi:10.1017/S095977430800005X
234
Mytum H. Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain. Antiquity 2007;81:381–96.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511
235
Adam B. Perceptions of time. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 503–26.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
236
Adam, Barbara. Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1995.
237
G. N. Bailey. Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology 1983;12:165–92.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645
238
Bailey G. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2007;26:198–223. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002
239
Barrett, John C. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: : Blackwell 1993.
240
Rosen, Ralph Mark, University of Pennsylvania. Time and temporality in the ancient world. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology 2004.
241
Bintliff, J. L. The Annales school and archaeology. London: : Leicester University Press 1991.
242
Borić, Dušan. Archaeology and memory. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2010.
243
Bradley, Richard. The past in prehistoric societies. London: : Routledge 2002.
244
Gardner A. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology 2012;12:145–66. doi:10.1177/1469605312439971
245
Gell, Alfred. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: : Berg 1992.
246
Gosden, Chris. Social being and time. Oxford: : Blackwell 1994.
247
Hannah, Robert. Time in antiquity. Abingdon: : Routledge 2009.
248
Harding J. Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2005;38:88–101. doi:10.1080/00293650510032707
249
Holdaway, Simon, Wandsnider, LuAnn. Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820
250
Karlsson, Håkan. It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Göteborg: : Bricoleur 2001.
251
Redman, Charles L. Social archeology: beyond subsistence and dating. New York: : Academic Press 1978.
252
Lucas, Gavin. The archaeology of time. London: : Routledge 2005.
253
Nancy D. Munn. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:93–123.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982
254
Murray, Tim, World Archaeological Congress. Time and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999.
255
Nanni G. Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria. Time & Society 2011;20:5–33. doi:10.1177/0961463X10369765
256
Shanks M, Tilley C. Abstract and Substantial Time. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 1987;6:32–41.
257
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: : Avebury 1994.
258
Thomas, Julian. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. New York: : Routledge 1996.
259
Van Dyke, Ruth, Alcock, Susan E. Archaeologies of memory. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2003.
260
Whittle A, Bayliss A, Healy F. The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2008;18:65–70. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000061
261
David B, Thomas J. Landscape archaeology: Introduction. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. 27–43.https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
262
Hamilton S. The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 263–80.
263
Thomas J. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 165–86.
264
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994. 7–34.
265
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1999. 1–30.
266
Barrett J. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1999. 253–65.
267
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man 1992;27:735–55.
268
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, et al. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
269
Bender B, Hamilton S, Tilley C. Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1997;63:147–78. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00002413
270
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues 2005;12:45–72. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583
271
Thomas, Julian, David, Bruno. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
272
Fleming A. Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1999;18:119–25. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00074
273
Fleming A. Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2006;16:267–80. doi:10.1017/S0959774306000163
274
Gheorghiu D, Nash G. Place as material culture: objects, geographies and the construction of time. Newcastle: : Cambridge Scholars Pub 2013.
275
Hamilton et al. S. Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). In: Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. 176–86.https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
276
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, et al. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 2006;9:31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
277
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987.
278
Ingold T. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 1993;25:152–74.
279
Lake M. Viewing space. World Archaeology 2007;39:1–3.
280
Llobera M. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity 1996;70:612–22.
281
McGlade J. Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: : Routledge 1999. 458–82.
282
Thomas JS. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In: Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: : Berg 1993. 19–48.
283
Tilley C, Bennett W. An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2001;7:335–62.
284
Tilley CY. The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology 1996;28:161–76.
285
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2004;14:185–203. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000125
286
Tilley CY. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. 271–6.https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
287
Ucko PJ, Layton R. Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: : Routledge 1999. 1–20.
288
Wheatley D. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication. In: Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Bristol, PA: : Taylor & Francis 1995. 171–86.
289
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument. In: Working at archaeology. New York: : Academic Press 1983. 131–53.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
290
Dobres M-A, Hoffman CR. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:211–58.
291
Schiffer MB, Skibo JM. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity 1997;62:27–50.
292
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x
293
Arnold DE. Chapters 5, 8 and 9. In: Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
294
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 1962;28:217–25.
295
Hastorf, Christine Ann, Conkey, Margaret Wright. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
296
Dobres M-A. Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology. In: Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 2000. 127–63.
297
Hoffman, Christopher R., Dobres, Marcia-Anne. The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1999.
298
Robb JE, Dobres M-A. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? In: Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000. 3–17.
299
Dunnell RC. Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity 1978;43:192–202.
300
Hegmon M. Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:517–36. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505
301
Hill JN, Evans RK. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in archaeology. London: : Methuen 1972. 231–73.
302
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992. 201–12.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
303
Hodder, Ian. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.
304
Hodder I. Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic 1989. 64–78.
305
Karlin C, Julien M. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 152–63.
306
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1986;5:147–86. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7
307
Martinón-Torres M. Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology. Gallaecia 2002;21:29–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092
308
Nelson MC. The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:57–100.
309
Pfaffenberger B. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:491–516. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423
310
James R. Sackett. The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model. American Antiquity 1977;42:369–80.
311
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 143–51.
312
Sigault F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
313
Sinclair A. Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology. In: Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000. 196–212.
314
Tilley, Christopher Y. Metaphor and material culture. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 1999.
315
van der Leeuw S. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam 1984. 709–33.
316
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic 1989. 56–63.
317
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior ad information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1977. 317–42.
318
Wobst HM. Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. In: Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1999. 118–32.
319
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2005;12:193–211.
320
Robb JE. The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology 1998;27:329–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329
321
Sillar B. The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2009;19:367–77. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000559
322
Bentley A. ‘Style versus function’ 30 years on. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 83–104.
323
Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1999.
324
Cochrane EE. Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern. In: Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. London: : Bergin & Garvey 2001. 183–202.
325
Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, Gosden, Chris. Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2004.
326
Ferguson L. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 28–39.
327
Gosden C, Marshall Y. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 1999;31:169–78.
328
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:154–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x
329
Hodder I. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
330
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 2007;14:1–16. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127
331
Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Overcoming the modern invention of material culture: proceedings of the TAG session, Exeter 2006. Porto: : ADECAP 2007.
332
Knappett C. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture 2002;7:97–117. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001307
333
Knappett, Carl. Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2005.
334
Knappet C. Materiality. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 188–207.
335
Knappett, Carl, Malafouris, Lambros. Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: : Springer 2008.
336
Layton R. Structuralism and semiotics. In: Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. 29–42.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430
337
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: : Berg 2004.
338
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.
339
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 396–419.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
340
Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2005.
341
O’Brien MJ. Style, function, transmission: an introduction. In: Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2003. 1–32.
342
Olsen B. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2003;36:87–104. doi:10.1080/00293650310000650
343
Olsen B. Archaeology: the discipline of things. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2012.
344
Preucel R, Bauer A. Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2001;34:85–96. doi:10.1080/00293650127469
345
Preucel, Robert W. Archaeological semiotics. Oxford: : Blackwell 2006.
346
Sørensen MLS. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology 1997;5:93–114. doi:10.1179/096576697800703656
347
Taylor T. Materiality. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 297–320.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
348
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 431–69.
349
Thomas, Julian. Archaeology and modernity. London: : Routledge 2004.
350
Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher. Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602
351
Steven Mithen. Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology? Anthropology Today 1995;11:3–7.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref
352
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.
353
Bettinger RL. Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. New York: : Plenum Press 1991.
354
Boone JL, Smith EA. Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 1998;39:S141–74. doi:10.1086/204693
355
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011.
356
Currie TE, Mace R. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011;366:1108–17. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0318
357
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 2004;11:77–99. doi:10.1017/S1380203805211509
358
Mithen SJ. The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. London: : Thames & Hudson 1996.
359
Mithen SJ. Thoughtful foragers: a study of prehistoric decision making. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
360
Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005.
361
Rowley-Conwy P, Layton R, Panter-Brick C. Hunter-gatherers: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
362
Winterhalder B, Kennett DJ, Grote MN, et al. Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2010;29:469–90. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001
363
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of ‘The Origin of Species’. Evolution 2004;58:1–11.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291
364
Shennan S. Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011;366:1070–9. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0380
365
Shennan S. Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2008;37:75–91. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153
366
Andersson C. Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution? PaleoAnthropology 2011;:243–59.http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/
367
Aunger, Robert. Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
368
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. Random Drift and Culture Change. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 2004;271:1443–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981
369
Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, Bentley, R. Alexander. Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008.
370
Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1985.
371
Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, Shennan, Stephen. The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach. London: : UCL Press 2005.
372
Coward F, Shennan S, Colledge S, et al. The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:42–56. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022
373
Lipo, Carl P., Society for American Archaeology. Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Aldine Transaction 2006.
374
Shennan, Stephen. Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2009.
375
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2000;19:39–74. doi:10.1006/jaar.1999.0339
376
Powell A, Shennan S, Thomas MG. Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior. Science 2009;324:1298–301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165
377
Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005.
378
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.
379
Dobres M-A, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? In: Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000. 3–17.
380
Dornan JL. Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of archaeological method and theory 2002;9:303–29. doi:10.1023/A:1021318432161
381
Gardner A. Agency. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2008. 95–108.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
382
Barrett JC. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 141–64.
383
Brumfiel EM. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem. In: Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000. 249–55.
384
Cornell P, Fahlander F. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology 2002;10:21–38.
385
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 2000.
386
Englehardt J. Agency in ancient writing. Boulder: : University Press of Colorado 2013.
387
Fewster KJ. The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 2006;20. doi:10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89
388
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1999;9:3–21. doi:10.1017/S0959774300015183
389
Gardner, Andrew. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner
390
Gardner A. Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 63–82.
391
Graves-Brown P. In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. In: Darwinian archaeologies. London: : Plenum Press 1996. 165–81.
392
Johnson MH. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1989;8:189–211. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X
393
Knapp AB, van Dommelen P. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2008;18:15–34. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000024
394
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity 1998;63:199–222.
395
MacGregor G. Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent. In: Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: : Avebury 1994. 79–91.
396
Bentley RA, Maschner HDG, Chippindale C. R. McGuire. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2008. 73–93.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
397
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: : Routledge 2003.
398
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
399
Miller D, Tilley CY. Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. In: Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984. 1–15.
400
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory 2001;1:73–98. doi:10.1177/146349960100100105
401
Patterson T. Social archaeology and Marxist social thought. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 66–81.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
402
Shanks M, Tilley CY. The individual and the social. In: Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Blackwell 1987. 61–78.
403
Shennan SJ. An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 325–44.
404
Thomas J. Humanism and the individual: chapter 6. In: Archaeology and modernity. London: : Routledge 2004. 119–48.
405
Strauss C. Blaming for Columbine. Current Anthropology 2007;48:807–32. doi:10.1086/520975
406
Bruce G. Trigger. Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory 1993;5:159–200.
407
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action. In: Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2003. 89–113.
408
Brück J. Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2001;7:649–67. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00082
409
Fowler C. Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture 2001;6:137–63. doi:10.1177/135918350100600202
410
Jones S. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 445–57.
411
Joyce RA. Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005;34:139–58. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729
412
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S, editors. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
413
Casella, Eleanor Conlin, Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. London: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum 2005.
414
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: : Routledge 2005.
415
Geoff Emberling. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research 1997;5:295–344.
416
Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. London: : Routledge 2004.
417
Fowler C. The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. In: Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century. Göteborg: : Bricoleur Press 2000. 107–22.
418
Gardner, Andrew. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner
419
Hales, Shelley, Hodos, Tamar. Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.
420
Jones, S. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: : Routledge 1997.
421
Jones S. Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 321–33.
422
Knapp AB, Meskell L. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1997;7:183–204. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001931
423
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
424
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: : Routledge 2003.
425
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 187–213.
426
Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis. Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. London: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2002.
427
Rautman, Alison E., Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2000.
428
Ross, Jennifer C., Steadman, Sharon R. Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. London: : Equinox 2010.
429
Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire. London: : Routledge 2003.
430
Sofaer, Joanna R. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666
431
Stark, Miriam T. The archaeology of social boundaries. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1998.
432
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 431–69.
433
Thomas J. Chapter 6. In: Archaeology and modernity. London: : Routledge 2004.
434
Whitehouse R. Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" . In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 227–44.
435
Whitley J. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2013;23:395–416. doi:10.1017/S095977431300053X
436
Wilkinson D. The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2013;23:417–32. doi:10.1017/S0959774313000541
437
Yates T. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In: Interpretative archaeology. New York: : Berg 1992. 31–72.
438
Conkey MW, Gero JM. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1997;26:411–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411
439
Whitehouse R. Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 1998;9:1–7.
440
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 1992;57:15–35.
441
Carr, Lydia. Tessa Verney Wheeler: women and archaeology before World War Two. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199640225.001.0001
442
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2007;14:285–310.
443
Conkey MW, Spector JD. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1984;7:1–38.
444
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 283–9.
445
Engelstad E. Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity 1991;65:502–14.
446
Geller PL. Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2009;38:65–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414
447
Gilchrist R. Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 142–60.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
448
Gilchrist R. Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity 1991;65:495–501.
449
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Wright KI. Introduction and section 1. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. 13–40.
450
Hastorf C. Gender, space and food in prehistory. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 132–59.
451
Hays-Gilpin K. Gender. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 335–49.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
452
Hill E. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:99–128. doi:10.1007/BF02428417
453
Joyce R. Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 82–95.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
454
Moore HL. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Cambridge: : Polity 1994. 71–85.
455
Nelson, Sarah M. Handbook of gender in archaeology. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2006.
456
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues 2011;18:59–86. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000134
457
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues 2011;18:59–86. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000134
458
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: : Leicester University Press 1996. 229–47.
459
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2000.
460
Spector J. What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 388–406.
461
Treherne P. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists 1995;3:105–44.
462
Tringham R. Engendered places in prehistory. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 329–57.
463
Wylie A. Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 31–54.
464
Alison Wylie. Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2007;14:209–16.
465
Kohl PL. Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology 1998;27:223–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223
466
Tilley CY. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 104–16.
467
Trigger BG. Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man 1984;19:355–70.
468
Arnold B. The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 1990;64:464–78.
469
Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., et al. Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: : Cruithne Press 1996.
470
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology 1996;37:S138–42.
471
Bernbeck R, Pollock S. The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 335–52.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
472
Colwell-Chanthaphonh C. Archaeology and indigenous collaboration. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 267–91.
473
Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: : Routledge 2006.
474
Fowler D. Archaeological ethics in context and practice. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 409–22.https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
475
Gosden C. Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2012. 241–61.
476
Gosden C. The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 161–78.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
477
James, Simon. The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention? London: : British Museum Press 1999.
478
Kohl PL, Fawcett C. Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations. In: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. 3–18.
479
Kohl PL. Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology 1998;27:223–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223
480
Layton, Robert. Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1994.
481
Leone et al. M. Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1994. 110–24.
482
Leone, Mark P. The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2005. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g
483
Leone M, Preucel R. Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. In: Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. [Carbondale, Ill.]: : Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 1992. 115–35.
484
McGuire R. Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 374–95.
485
McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2008.
486
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: : Routledge 1998.
487
Meskell L. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2002;31:279–301. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457
488
Murray T. Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? In: Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. 105–16.
489
Pearson MP, Schadla-Hall T, Moshenska G. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 2011;21:5–9. doi:10.5334/pia.369
490
Ratnagar S. Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology 2004;45:239–59. doi:10.1086/381044
491
Reid, Donald M. Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2002.
492
Saitta, Dean J. The archaeology of collective action. Gainesville: : University Press of Florida 2007.
493
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: : Routledge 2004.
494
Stottman, M. Jay. Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world? Tuscaloosa: : University of Alabama Press 2010.
495
Tarlow S, Stutz LN. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual? Archaeological Dialogues 2013;20:1–5. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000032
496
Thomas, David Hurst. Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York, N.Y.: : Basic Books 2000.
497
Trigger BG. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity 1980;45:662–76.
498
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 1992;57:15–35.
499
Wylie A. Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. In: Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Santa Fe, N.M: : School of American Research Press 1995. 255–72.
500
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: : Altamira Press 2003.
501
Clarke DL. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18.
502
Ian Hodder. Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1985;8:1–26.
503
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2004;14:185–203. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000125
504
Fisher P, Farrelly C, Maddocks A, et al. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science 1997;24:581–92. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0142
505
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1999;9:3–21. doi:10.1017/S0959774300015183
506
Joyce RA. Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2004;11:5–29.
507
Megaw JVS, Megaw MR. Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity. Antiquity 1996;70:175–81.
508
James S. Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology. Antiquity 1998;72:200–9.
509
VanPool CS, VanPool TL. The scientific nature of post-processualism. American Antiquity 1999;64:33–53.
510
Arnold III PJ, Wilkens BS. On the VanPools’ ‘scientific’ post-processualism. American Antiquity 2001;66:361–6.
511
Hutson SR. Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool. American Antiquity 2001;66:349–60.
512
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens. American Antiquity 2001;66:367–75.
513
Hodder I. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 1997;71:691–700.
514
Hassan F. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 1997;71:1020–5.
515
Hodder I. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity 1998;72:213–7.
516
Bamforth DB. Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity 2002;67:435–52.
517
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL, Leonard RD. What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity 2003;68:573–80.
518
Bamforth DB. What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....). American Antiquity 2003;68:581–4.
