Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory BETA

Adam, B. (2002). Perceptions of time. In Companion encyclopedia of anthropology: Vol. Routledge world reference ([New ed.], pp. 503–526). Routledge. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

Adam, Barbara. (1995). Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Polity Press.

Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. (2004). Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of ‘The Origin of Species’. Evolution, 58(1), 1–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291

Alison Wylie. (2007). Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 209–216.

Andersson, C. (2011). Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution? PaleoAnthropology, 243–259. http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/

Andrén, Anders & Crozier, Alan. (1998). Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective: Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. Plenum Press.

Andrews, G., Barrett, J. C., & Lewis, J. S. C. (2000). Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology. Antiquity, 74(285), 525–530.

Arnold, B. (1990). The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity, 64(244), 464–478.

Arnold, D. E. (1985). Chapters 5, 8 and 9. In Ceramic theory and cultural process: Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Arnold III, P. J., & Wilkens, B. S. (2001). On the VanPools’ ‘scientific’ post-processualism. American Antiquity, 66(2), 361–366.

Arnold, P. (2003). Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology. In Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry (pp. 55–66). University of Utah Press.

Ashmore, W., & Knapp, A. B. (1999). Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 1–30). Blackwell Publishers.

Atkinson, R. J. C. (1960). Stonehenge: Vol. A pelican book. Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton.

Aunger, Robert. (2000). Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press.

Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002

Bamforth, D. B. (2002). Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity, 67(3), 435–452.

Bamforth, D. B. (2003). What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....). American Antiquity, 68(3), 581–584.

Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., & Scottish Archaeological Forum. (1996). Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Cruithne Press.

Barrett , J. C. (2012). Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 141–164). Polity.

Barrett, J. (1999). The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 253–265). Blackwell Publishers.

Barrett, J. C. (2014). The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues, 21(01), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000105

Barrett, John C. (1993a). Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Barrett, John C. (1993b). Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Bender, B. (1992a). Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man, 27(4), 735–755.

Bender, B. (1992b). Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man, 27(4), 735–755.

Bender, B., Hamilton, S., & Tilley, C. (1997). Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 63, 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002413

Bender, B., Tilley, C. Y., Anderson, E., & Hamilton, S. (2007a). Chapters 1 and 3. In Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true

Bender, B., Tilley, C. Y., Anderson, E., & Hamilton, S. (2007b). Chapters 1 and 3. In Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true

Bender, Barbara & Aitken, Paul. (1998). Stonehenge: making space: Vol. Materializing culture. Berg.

Bentley , A. (2011). ‘Style versus function’ 30 years on. In Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 83–104). Left Coast.

Bentley, A., & Maschner, H. D. G. (2008). Complexity theory. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 245–270). AltaMira Press.

Bentley, R. A., Maschner, H. D. G., & Chippindale, C. (2008). R. McGuire. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 73–93). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Bentley, R., & Alexander, M. (2008). Introduction on archaeological theories. In Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press.

Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., & Chippindale, Christopher. (2008). Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602

Berggren, A., & Hodder, I. (2003). Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity, 68(3), 421–434.

Bernbeck, R., & Pollock, S. (2004). The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 335–352). Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Bettinger, R. L. (1991). Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory: Vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. Plenum Press.

Binford, L. R. (1962a). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 217–225.

Binford, L. R. (1962b). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 217–225.

Binford, L. R. (1964a). A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity, 29(4), 425–441.

Binford, L. R. (1964b). A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity, 29(4), 425–441.

Binford, L. R. (1968). Archaeological perspectives. In New perspectives in archeology (pp. 5–32). Aldine.

Binford, L. R. (1977). General introduction. In For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling: Vol. Studies in archeology (pp. 1–10). Academic Press.

Binford, L. R. (1981a). Behavioural archaeological and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(3), 195–208.

Binford, L. R. (1981b). Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks. In Bones: ancient men and modern myths: Vol. Studies in archaeology (pp. 3–20). Academic Press.

Binford, L. R. (1983). Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument. In Working at archaeology: Vol. Studies in archeology (pp. 131–153). Academic Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

Binford, Lewis Roberts. (2001). Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. University of California Press.

Bintliff, J. L. (1991). The Annales school and archaeology. Leicester University Press.

Bintliff, J. L. & Pearce, Mark. (2011). The death of archaeological theory? Oxbow Books. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87

Boone, J. L., & Smith, E. A. (1998). Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology, 39(S1), S141–S174. https://doi.org/10.1086/204693

Borić, Dušan. (2010). Archaeology and memory. Oxbow Books.

Boyd, Robert & Richerson, Peter J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.

Bradley, Richard. (1998). The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge.

Bradley, Richard. (2002). The past in prehistoric societies. Routledge.

Bruce G. Trigger. (1993). Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 159–200.

Bruce G. Trigger. (1998). Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology, 102(1), 1–34.

Brück, J. (2001). Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00082

Brück, J. (2005a). Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues, 12(01), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583

Brück, J. (2005b). Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues, 12(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583

Brumfiel, E. M. (2000). On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem. In Agency in archaeology (pp. 249–255). Routledge.

Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, & Cox, Margaret. (2001). Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge.

Butzer, Karl W. (1982). Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge University Press.

Carr, Lydia. (2012). Tessa Verney Wheeler: women and archaeology before World War Two. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199640225.001.0001

Carrithers, M., Collins, S., & Lukes, S. (Eds.). (1985). The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge University Press.

Casella, Eleanor Conlin & Fowler, Chris. (2005). The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

Chadwick, A. (2003). Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues, 10(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203803001107

Childe, V. G. (1929). Preface and chapter 1. In The Danube in prehistory (pp. v-xii-1–7). Clarendon Press.

Childe, V. G. (1956). What happens in prehistory? In Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data (pp. 135–158). Routledge & Kegan Paul. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099

Chilton, Elizabeth S. (1999). Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press.

Chippindale, C. (1993). Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. In Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 27–36). Cambridge University Press.

Chippindale, Christopher. (1990). Who owns Stonehenge? Batsford.

Chippindale, Christopher. (2004). Stonehenge complete (New and expanded [3rd] ed). Thames & Hudson.

Chris Gosden. (2005). What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3), 193–211.

Clark, G. (1989). Economic approach to prehistory. In Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology (pp. 149–168). Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Grahame. (1960). Archaeology and society (3rd ed). Methuen.

Clarke, D. L. (1973a). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47(185), 6–18.

Clarke, D. L. (1973b). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47(185), 6–18.

Clarke, D. L. (1973c). Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47(185), 6–18.

Clarke, David L. & Chapman, Bob. (1978). Analytical archaeology (2nd ed). Methuen.

Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R., & English Heritage. (1995). Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations: Vol. Archaeological report / English Heritage. English Heritage.

Cochrane, E. E. (2001). Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern. In Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology (pp. 183–202). Bergin & Garvey.

Cochrane, Ethan E. & Gardner, Andrew. (2011a). Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast.

Cochrane, Ethan E. & Gardner, Andrew. (2011b). Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast.

Collis, John. (2001). Digging up the past: an introduction to archaeological excavation. Sutton.

Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. (2012). Archaeology and indigenous collaboration. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 267–291). Polity.

Conkey, M. W., & Gero, J. M. (1997). Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411

Conkey, M. W., & Spector, J. D. (1984). Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–38.

Conolly, J. (2000). Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object. In Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team: Vol. McDonald Institute monographs (pp. 51–56). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099

Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, & University of Leicester. (1996). Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives: Vol. Leicester archaeology monographs. School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester.

Cornell, P., & Fahlander, F. (2002). Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology, 10, 21–38.

Courbin, Paul. (1988). What is archaeology?: an essay on the nature of archaeological research. University of Chicago Press.

Coward, F., Shennan, S., Colledge, S., Conolly, J., & Collard, M. (2008). The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022

Cowgill, G. L. (1993). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, New Series, 95(3), 551–573.

Currie, T. E., & Mace, R. (2011). Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0318

David, B., & Thomas, J. (2008). Landscape archaeology: Introduction. In Handbook of landscape archaeology: Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology (pp. 27–43). Left Coast Press. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

David J. Meltzer. (1979). Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology. American Antiquity, 44(4), 644–657.

Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. (2005). The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. Routledge.

Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. (2007). A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford University Press. https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265

Diaz-Andreu, M. (2004). Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism. In History, nationhood, and the question of Britain (pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan.

Dobres, M.-A. (2000). Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology. In Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 127–163). Blackwell Publishers.

Dobres, M.-A., & Hoffman, C. R. (1994). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(3), 211–258.

Dobres, M.-A., & Robb, J. E. (2000). Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? In Agency in archaeology (pp. 3–17). Routledge.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. (2000a). Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. (2000b). Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers.

Dornan, J. L. (2002). Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 9(4), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021318432161

Dowson, T. A. (2000a). Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In Interpretive archaeology: a reader (pp. 283–289). Leicester University Press.

Dowson, T. A. (2000b). Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In Interpretive archaeology: a reader (pp. 283–289). Leicester University Press.

Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43(2), 192–202.

Dunnell, R. C. (1986). Five decades of American archaeology. In American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Dyson, Stephen L. (2006). In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Yale University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm

Earle et. al., T. K. (1987). Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology, 28(4), 501–538.

Edgeworth, Matt. (2003). Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice: Vol. BAR international series. Archaeopress.

Edgeworth, Matt. (2006). Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations: Vol. Worlds of archaeology series. Altamira Press.

Engelstad, E. (1991). Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity, 65(248), 502–514.

Englehardt, J. (2013). Agency in ancient writing. University Press of Colorado.

Fagan, Brian M. (2001). Grahame Clark: an intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Westview.

Fagan, Garrett G. (2006). Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. Routledge.

Ferguson, L. (1991). Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In The archaeology of inequality: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 28–39). Blackwell.

Fewster, K. J. (2006). The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89

Fisher, P., Farrelly, C., Maddocks, A., & Ruggles, C. (1997). Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(7), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0142

Flannery, K. V. (1967). Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology. Scientific American, 2(2), 119–122.

Flannery, K. V. (1968). Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In Anthropological archeology in the Americas (pp. 67–87). The Anthropological Society of Washington.

Flannery, K. V. (1982). The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist, 84(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010

Flannery, K. V. (1999a). Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183

Flannery, K. V. (1999b). Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183

Fleming, A. (1999). Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 18(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00074

Fleming, A. (2006). Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774306000163

Fowler, C. (2000). The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. In Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 107–122). Bricoleur Press.

Fowler, C. (2001). Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture, 6(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600202

Fowler, Chris. (2004). The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach: Vol. Themes in archaeology. Routledge.

Fowler, D. (2008). Archaeological ethics in context and practice. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 409–422). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Frere, S. S. (1988). Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond. History and Archaeology Review, 3, 31–36.

Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, & Stovel, Emily. (2005). Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

G. N. Bailey. (1983). Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 12, 165–192. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645

Gardner, A. (2003). Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire. In TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002 (pp. 1–13). Oxbow Books.

Gardner, A. (2008). Agency. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 95–108). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Gardner, A. (2011). Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies. In Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 63–82). Left Coast.

Gardner, A. (2012). Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605312439971

Gardner, Andrew. (2007a). An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner

Gardner, Andrew. (2007b). An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner

Gaydarska, B. (2009). A brief history of TAG. Antiquity, 83(322), 1152–1162.

Gell, Alfred. (1992). The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images: Vol. Explorations in anthropology. Berg.

Geller, P. L. (2009). Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414

Geoff Emberling. (1997). Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research, 5(4), 295–344.

Gero, J. M. (1996). Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. In Gender and archaeology (pp. 251–280). University of Pennsylvania Press.

Gero, J. M., & Wright, M. (1991). Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory. In Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 3–30). Blackwell.

Gheorghiu, D., & Nash, G. (2013). Place as material culture: objects, geographies and the construction of time. Cambridge Scholars Pub.

Gilchrist, R. (1991). Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity, 65(248), 495–501.

Gilchrist, R. (2004). Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 142–160). Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Glenn R. Storey. (1999). Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data. Journal of Archaeological Research, 7(3), 203–248.

Gordon Childe, V. (1935). Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1, 1–15. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf

Gosden, C. (2004). The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 161–178). Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Gosden, C. (2012). Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 241–261). Polity.

Gosden, C., & Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2), 169–178.

Gosden, Chris. (1994). Social being and time. Blackwell.

Graves-Brown, P. (1996). In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. In Darwinian archaeologies: Vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology (pp. 165–181). Plenum Press.

Greene, K. (2010). Chapter 6: making sense of the past. In Archaeology: an introduction (5th ed, pp. 249–312). Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975

Greene, Kevin & Moore, Tom. (2010). Archaeology: an introduction (5th ed). Routledge.

Greg Woolf. (2004). The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment. American Journal of Archaeology, 108(3), 417–428.

Hales, Shelley & Hodos, Tamar. (2010). Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton et al., S. (2008). Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). In Handbook of landscape archaeology: Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology (pp. 176–186). Left Coast Press. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

Hamilton, S. (1999). Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 10, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.140

Hamilton, S. (2011). The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. In Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 263–280). Left Coast.

Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., Brown, K., Combes, P., Herring, E., & Thomas, M. S. (2006a). Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704

Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., Brown, K., Combes, P., Herring, E., & Thomas, M. S. (2006b). Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704

Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., & Wright, K. I. (2007). Introduction and section 1. In Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 13–40). Left Coast Press.

Hannah, Robert. (2009). Time in antiquity: Vol. Sciences of antiquity. Routledge.

Harding, J. (2005). Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 38(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650510032707

Harris, David R., Childe, V. Gordon, V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference, University College, London, & Prehistoric Society (London, England). (1994). The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives : proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. UCL Press.

Hassan, F. (1997). Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71(274), 1020–1025.

Hassan, F. A. (1997). Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity, 71(274), 1020–1025.

Hastorf, C. (1991). Gender, space and food in prehistory. In Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 132–159). Blackwell.

Hastorf, Christine Ann & Conkey, Margaret Wright. (1989). The uses of style in archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Hawkes, C. (1954). Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World. American Anthropologist, 56(2), 155–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357

Hayden, B., & Cannon, A. (1983). Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2(2), 117–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7

Hays-Gilpin, K. (2008). Gender. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 335–349). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505

Hegmon, M. (2003). Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity, 68(2), 213–243.

Henson, D. (2012). Doing archaeology: a subject guide for students. Routledge. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson

Higgs, E. S., & Vita-Finzi, C. (1972). Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. In Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture (pp. 27–36). Cambridge University Press.

Hill, E. (1998). Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417

Hill, J. N., & Evans, R. K. (1972). A model for classification and typology. In Models in archaeology (pp. 231–273). Methuen.

Hingley, R. (2000). Chapters 9 and 10. In Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. Routledge.

Hingley, R. (2008). Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas. In Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall (pp. 25–28). Arbeia Society.

Hingley, R. (2010). ‘The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland’: Genealogies of the Roman Walls. Classical Receptions Journal, 2(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clq001

Hingley, Richard. (2000). Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. Routledge.

Hodder, I. (1982). Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In Symbolic and structural archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 92–121). Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. (1985). Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 1–26.

Hodder, I. (1989). Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 64–78). Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic.

Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity, 56(1), 7–18.

Hodder, I. (1992a). Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In Theory and practice in archaeology: Vol. Material cultures (pp. 201–212). Routledge.

Hodder, I. (1992b). Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In Theory and practice in archaeology: Vol. Material cultures (pp. 201–212). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099

Hodder, I. (1992c). Writing archaeology: site reports in context. In Theory and practice in archaeology: Vol. Material cultures (pp. 263–274). Routledge.

Hodder, I. (1993). Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology. In Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings: Vol. Wordwide archaeology series (pp. xiii–xix). Avebury.

Hodder, I. (1997a). Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71(273), 691–700.

Hodder, I. (1997b). ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71(273), 691–700.

Hodder, I. (1998). Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity, 72(275), 213–217.

Hodder, I. (1999a). Towards a reflexive method. In The archaeological process: an introduction (pp. 80–104). Blackwell.

Hodder, I. (1999b). Towards a reflexive method. In The archaeological process: an introduction (pp. 80–104). Blackwell.

Hodder, I. (2001). Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In Archaeological theory today (pp. 1–13). Polity. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

Hodder, I. (2003). Chapter 1: The problem. In Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (3rd ed, pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. (2011). Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x

Hodder, I. (2012a). Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hodder, I. (2012b). Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 1–14). Polity.

Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211

Hodder, I., Karlsson, H., & Olsen, B. (2008). 40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650802181154

Hodder, Ian. (1982). Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture: Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, Ian. (1994). Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. Routledge.

Hodder, Ian. (1999). The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell.

Hodder, Ian. (2001). Archaeological theory today. Polity. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

Hoffman, Christopher R. & Dobres, Marcia-Anne. (1999). The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Holdaway, Simon & Wandsnider, LuAnn. (2008). Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. University of Utah Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820

Hutson, S. R. (2001). Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool. American Antiquity, 66(2), 349–360.

Ian Hodder. (1985). Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 1–26.

Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. (1971). The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns. Man, 6(3), 391–407.

Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174.

Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127

James R. Sackett. (1977). The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model. American Antiquity, 42(3), 369–380.

James, S. (1998). Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology. Antiquity, 72(275), 200–209.

James, S. (2002). Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal, 159(1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514

James, S. (2003). Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution. Antiquity, 77(295), 178–184. http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511

James, Simon. (1999). The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention? British Museum Press.

James, Simon, Millett, Martin, Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, & Council for British Archaeology. (2001). Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda: Vol. CBA research report. Council for British Archaeology.

Johnson, M. (2006). On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues, 13(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020380621208X

Johnson, M. (2010a). Chapters 6 and 7. In Archaeological theory: an introduction (2nd ed). Wiley-Blackwell.

Johnson, M. (2010b). Common sense is not enough. In Archaeological theory: an introduction (2nd ed, pp. 1–11). Wiley-Blackwell.

Johnson, M. H. (1989). Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 8(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X

Johnson, M. H. (1999). Rethinking historical archaeology. In Historical archaeology: back from the edge: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 23–36). Routledge.

Johnson, Matthew. (2010). Archaeological theory: an introduction (2nd ed). Wiley-Blackwell.

Jones, Andrew. (2001). Archaeological theory and scientific practice: Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Jones, S. (1997). Chapter 2. In The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. Routledge.

Jones, S. (1997). The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. Routledge.

Jones, S. (2000). Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In Interpretive archaeology: a reader (pp. 445–457). Leicester University Press.

Jones, S. (2008). Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 321–333). AltaMira Press.

Joyce, R. (2004). Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 82–95). Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Joyce, R. A. (2004). Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11(1), 5–29.

Joyce, R. A. (2005). Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729

Karlin, C., & Julien, M. (1994). Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? In The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 152–163). Cambridge University Press.

Karlsson, Håkan. (2001). It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Bricoleur.

Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. (1998). Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity, 63(2), 199–222.

Knapp, A. B., & Meskell, L. (1997). Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 7(02), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931

Knapp, A. B., & van Dommelen, P. (2008). Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000024

Knappet, C. (2012). Materiality. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 188–207). Polity.

Knappett, C. (2002). Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture, 7(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001307

Knappett, Carl. (2005). Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective: Vol. Archaeology, culture, and society. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Knappett, Carl. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/1407

Knappett, Carl & Malafouris, Lambros. (2008). Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer.

Kohl, P. L. (1998a). Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223

Kohl, P. L. (1998b). Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223

Kohl, P. L., & Fawcett, C. (1995). Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations. In Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology (pp. 3–18). Cambridge University Press.

Kristiansen, K. (2004a). Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, 11(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509

Kristiansen, K. (2004b). Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues, 11(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509

Lake, M. (2007). Viewing space. World Archaeology, 39(1), 1–3.

LaMotta, V., & Schiffer, M. (2001). Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In Archaeological theory today. Polity. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

LaMotta, V., & Schiffer, M. (2012). Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In Archaeological theory today (Rev. and updated ed, pp. 14–64). Polity.

Layton, R. (2006). Structuralism and semiotics. In Handbook of material culture (pp. 29–42). SAGE. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430

Layton, Robert. (1994). Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology: Vol. One world archaeology. Routledge.

Lemonnier, P. (1986). The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(2), 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7

Leone et al., M. (1994). Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past (pp. 110–124). Routledge.

Leone, M. (1986). Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985 (pp. 415–438). Smithsonian Institution Press.

Leone, M. (1987). Towards a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology, 28(3), 283–302.

Leone, M., & Preucel, R. (1992). Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. In Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future: Vol. Occasional paper / Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (pp. 115–135). Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Leone, Mark P. (1972). Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Feffer & Simons.

Leone, Mark P. (2005). The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g

Lipo, Carl P. & Society for American Archaeology. (2006). Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. Aldine Transaction.

Llobera, M. (1996). Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity, 70(269), 612–622.

Lucas, G. (2001). Introduction: archaeology and the field. In Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice (pp. 1–17). Routledge.

Lucas, G. (2008). Time and Archaeological Event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430800005X

Lucas, G. (2012). Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772

Lucas, Gavin. (2005). The archaeology of time: Vol. Themes in archaeology. Routledge.

Lydon, Jane & Rizvi, Uzma Z. (2010). Handbook of postcolonial archaeology: Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816

Lyman, R. L. (2007). What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology? Anthropological Theory, 7(2), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607077299

Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (2000). Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19(1), 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1999.0339

Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (2004). A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11(4), 369–396.

Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., & Dunnell, Robert C. (1997). The rise and fall of culture history. Plenum Press.

Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, & Shennan, Stephen. (2005). The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach. UCL Press.

MacGregor, G. (1994). Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent. In Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series (pp. 79–91). Avebury.

Mackenzie, Iain M. (1994a). Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury.

Mackenzie, Iain M. (1994b). Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury.

Madonna L. Moss. (2005). Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins. American Antiquity, 70(3), 581–587.

Margaret W. Conkey. (2007a). Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 285–310.

Margaret W. Conkey. (2007b). Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), 285–310.

Martinón-Torres, M. (2002). Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology. Gallaecia, 21, 29–43. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092

Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, & Bentley, R. Alexander. (2008). Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press.

Mason, David J. P. & Symonds, Matthew F. A. (2009). Frontiers of knowledge: a research framework for Hadrian’s Wall, part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage site. Durham County Council and Durham University.

McGlade, J. (1999). Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. In The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 458–482). Routledge.

McGuire, R. (2004). Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 374–395). Blackwell Pub. Ltd.

McGuire, Randall H. (2008). Archaeology as political action: Vol. California series in public anthropology. University of California Press.

Megaw, J. V. S., & Megaw, M. R. (1996). Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity. Antiquity, 70(267), 175–181.

Meskell, L. (2002). The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457

Meskell, L. (2012). Archaeologies of identity. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 187–213). Polity.

Meskell, Lynn. (1998). Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge.

Meskell, Lynn. (1999a). Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Meskell, Lynn. (1999b). Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Meskell, Lynn. (1999c). Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Meskell, Lynn. (2004). Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present: Vol. Materializing culture. Berg.

Meskell, Lynn. (2006). Archaeologies of materiality. Blackwell.

Meskell, Lynn & Joyce, Rosemary A. (2003a). Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. Routledge.

Meskell, Lynn & Joyce, Rosemary A. (2003b). Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. Routledge.

Meskell, Lynn & Preucel, Robert W. (2004). A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Michael Shanks. (2007). Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology, 39(4), 589–596.

Michelle Hegmon. (2003). Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity, 68(2), 213–243.

Michelle Hegmon. (2005). No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss. American Antiquity, 70(3), 588–590.

Miller, D. (2002). Artefacts and the meaning of things. In Companion encyclopedia of anthropology: Vol. Routledge world reference ([New ed.], pp. 396–419). Routledge. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

Miller, D., & Tilley, C. Y. (1984). Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. In Ideology, power and prehistory: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.

Miller, Daniel. (2005). Materiality. Duke University Press.

Mithen, S. J. (1990). Thoughtful foragers: a study of prehistoric decision making: Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Mithen, S. J. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. Thames & Hudson.

Mizoguchi, Kōji. (2006). Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan: Vol. Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, H. L. (1994). Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender (pp. 71–85). Polity.

Moore, T. (2011). Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies. Journal of Social Archaeology, 11(3), 334–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605311403861

Moshenska, Gabriel & Dhanjal, Sarah. (2012). Community archaeology: themes, methods and practices. Oxbow. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191

Murray, T. (1993). Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? In Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 105–116). Cambridge University Press.

Murray, Tim & World Archaeological Congress. (1999). Time and archaeology: Vol. One world archaeology. Routledge.

Mytum, H. (2007). Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain. Antiquity, 81(312), 381–396. http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511

Nancy D. Munn. (1992). The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 93–123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982

Nanni, G. (2011). Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria. Time & Society, 20(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10369765

Nelson, M. C. (1991). The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 57–100.

Nelson, Sarah M. (2006). Handbook of gender in archaeology: Vol. Gender and archaeology series. AltaMira Press.

Nesbitt, C., & Tolia-Kelly, D. (2009). Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument. Journal of Social Archaeology, 9(3), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605309338428

O’Brien, M. J. (2003). Style, function, transmission: an introduction. In Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry (pp. 1–32). University of Utah Press.

O’Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., & Leonard, R. D. (2003). What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity, 68(3), 573–580.

O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, & Schiffer, Michael B. (2005a). Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. University of Utah Press.

O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, & Schiffer, Michael B. (2005b). Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. University of Utah Press.

Olsen, B. (2003). Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650

Olsen, B. (2012a). Archaeology: the discipline of things. University of California Press.

Olsen, B. (2012b). Symmetical archaeology. In Archaeological theory today (2nd ed, pp. 208–228). Polity.

Papaconstantinou, Demetra. (2006). Deconstructing context: a critical approach to archaeological practice. Oxbow.

Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2006). Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt Zum Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 1, 237–258.

Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2007). The age of Stonehenge. Antiquity, 81(313), 617–639.

Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2009). Who was buried at Stonehenge? Antiquity, 83(319), 23–39.

Parker Pearson, M. & Ramilisonina. (1998a). Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity, 72(276), 308–326.

Parker Pearson, M. & Ramilisonina. (1998b). Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity, 72(276), 308–326.

Patrik, L. E. (1985). Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 27–62.

Patterson, T. (2004). Social archaeology and Marxist social thought. In A companion to social archaeology: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 66–81). Blackwell Pub. Ltd. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

Patterson, Thomas Carl. (2003). Marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. Berg.

Pauketat, T. R. (2001a). Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory, 1(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105

Pauketat, T. R. (2001b). Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory, 1(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105

Pearson, M. P. (2006). Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1–2), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063024

Pearson, M. P., Schadla-Hall, T., & Moshenska, G. (2011). Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 21, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.369

Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 491–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423

Plog, F. (1973). Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation. In The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory (pp. 649–661). Duckworth.

Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, & Hamilakis, Yannis. (2002). Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Pope, R. (2011a). Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues, 18(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134

Pope, R. (2011b). Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues, 18(01), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134

Powell, A., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior. Science, 324(5932), 1298–1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165

Praetzellis, Adrian. (2000). Death by theory: a tale of mystery and archaeological theory. AltaMira Press.

Preucel, R., & Bauer, A. (2001). Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 34(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469

Preucel, R. W. (1995). The postprocessual condition. Journal of Archaeological Research, 3(2), 147–175.

Preucel, R. W., & Mrozowski, S. A. (2010). The new pragmatism. In Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism (2nd ed, pp. 3–49). Wiley-Blackwell.

Preucel, Robert W. (2006). Archaeological semiotics: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell.

Price, B. J. (1982). Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity, 47(4), 709–741.

Quirke, Stephen. (2010). Hidden hands: Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 1880-1924: Vol. Duckworth egyptology. Gerald Duckworth.

R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. (2004). Random Drift and Culture Change. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 271(1547), 1443–1450. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981

Ratnagar, S. (2004). Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology, 45(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1086/381044

Rautman, Alison E. & Gender and Archaeology Conference. (2000). Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record: Vol. Regendering the past. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Redman, C. (1999). The development of archaeological theory. In Companion encyclopedia of archaeology (pp. 48–80). Routledge.

Redman, C. L. (1991). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, 93(2), 295–307.

Redman, Charles L. (1978). Social archeology: beyond subsistence and dating: Vol. Studies in archeology. Academic Press.

Rega, E. (1996). Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology (pp. 229–247). Leicester University Press.

Reid, Donald M. (2002). Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. University of California Press.

Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. (1996). Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology, 37(1), S138–S142.

Renfrew, C. (1972). Culture systems and the multiplier effect. In The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C.: Vol. Studies in prehistory (pp. 19–44). Methuen.

Renfrew, C. (1973a). Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex. In The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory (pp. 539–558). Duckworth.

Renfrew, C. (1973b). Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. In The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory (pp. 539–558). Duckworth.

Renfrew, C. (1994). Towards a cognitive archaeology. In The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 3–12). Cambridge University Press.

Renfrew, C. (1999). Beyond diffusion. In Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe (pp. 109–119). Pimlico.

Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., & British Academy. (1997). Science and Stonehenge: Vol. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy.

Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, & Gosden, Chris. (2004). Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world: Vol. McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Renfrew, Colin & Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. (1973). The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. Duckworth.

Review by: Lewis R. Binford. (n.d.). American Antiquity. Vol. 53(No. 4), 875–876.

Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, & English Heritage. (1990). The Stonehenge environs project: Vol. Archaeological report. Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England.

Richards, Julian C. & English Heritage. (1991). English Heritage book of Stonehenge. B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage.

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.

Richerson, Peter J. & Boyd, Robert. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.

Robb, J. E. (1998). The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329

Robb, J. E., & Dobres, M.-A. (2000). Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? In Agency in archaeology (pp. 3–17). Routledge.

Robb, J., & Pauketat, T. R. (2013). Big histories, human lives: tackling problems of scale in archaeology: Vol. School for Advanced Research advanced seminar series. School for Advanced Research Press.

Robert C. Dunnell. (1982). The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38(1), 1–25.

Rosen, Ralph Mark & University of Pennsylvania. (2004). Time and temporality in the ancient world. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.

Roskams, S. (2001). Future prospects. In Excavation: Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology (pp. 267–290). Cambridge University Press.

Ross, Jennifer C. & Steadman, Sharon R. (2010). Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward: Vol. Approaches to anthropological archaeology. Equinox.

Rowley-Conwy, P., Layton, R., & Panter-Brick, C. (2001). Hunter-gatherers: an interdisciplinary perspective: Vol. The Biosocial Society symposium series. Cambridge University Press.

Saitta, Dean J. (2007). The archaeology of collective action: Vol. The American experience in archaeological perspective. University Press of Florida.

Scarre, G., & Coningham, R. (2013). Appropriating the past: philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932

Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37(2), 156–165.

Schiffer, M. B. (1985). Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research, 41(1), 18–41.

Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity, 62(1), 27–50.

Schiffer, Michael B. (1976). Behavioral archaeology: Vol. Studies in archaeology. Academic Press.

Schiffer, Michael B. (1987). Formation processes of the archaeological record. University of New Mexico Press.

Schiffer, Michael B. (1995). Behavioral archaeology: first principles: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press.

Schlanger , N. (1994). Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind. In The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 143–151). Cambridge University Press.

Schnapp, A. (2002). Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures. Antiquity, 76(291), 134–140.

Shanks, M. (2008a). Post-processual archaeology and after. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 133–144). AltaMira Press.

Shanks, M. (2008b). Post-processual archaeology and after. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 133–144). AltaMira Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602

Shanks, M., & Hodder, I. (1994). Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past (pp. 3–29). Routledge.

Shanks, M., & McGuire, R. H. (1996). The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity, 61(1), 75–88.

Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1987a). Abstract and Substantial Time. Archaeological Review From Cambridge, 6(1), 32–41.

Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1989). Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 22(1), 12–54. https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList

Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. Y. (1987b). Archaeology and the politics of theory. In Social theory and archaeology (pp. 186–208). Polity in association with Blackwell.

Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. Y. (1987c). The individual and the social. In Social theory and archaeology (pp. 61–78). Polity in association with Blackwell.

Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. Y. (1992). Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology. In Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice (2nd ed, pp. 46–67). Routledge.

Shanks, Michael & Tilley, Christopher Y. (1992). Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice (2nd ed). Routledge.

Shennan, S. (2008). Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153

Shennan, S. (2011). Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380

Shennan, S. J. (1994). Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In Archaeological approaches to cultural identity: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 1–32). Routledge.

Shennan, S. J. (2011). An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology. In Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 325–344). Left Coast.

Shennan, Stephen. (2002a). Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. Thames & Hudson.

Shennan, Stephen. (2002b). Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. Thames & Hudson.

Shennan, Stephen. (2009). Pattern and process in cultural evolution: Vol. Origins of human behavior and culture. University of California Press.

Shott, M. J. (1998). Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of Archaeological Research, 6(4), 299–329.

Sigault, F. (2002). Technology. In Companion encyclopedia of anthropology: Vol. Routledge world reference ([New ed.], pp. 420–459). Routledge. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

Sillar, B. (2009). The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(03), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000559

SILLAR, B., & TITE, M. S. (2000). THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry, 42(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

Sinclair, A. (2000). Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology. In Agency in archaeology (pp. 196–212). Routledge.

Smith, Laurajane. (2004a). Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. Routledge.

Smith, Laurajane. (2004b). Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. Routledge.

Smith, Stuart Tyson. (2003). Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire. Routledge.

Sofaer, Joanna R. (2006). The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology: Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666

Sørensen, M. L. S. (1997). Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 5(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. (2000). Gender archaeology. Polity Press.

Spaulding, A. C. (1953). Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity, 18(4), 305–313.

Spector, J. (1991). What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology. In Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 388–406). Blackwell.

Spriggs, M. (2008). Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology, 40(4), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802453161

Stark, Miriam T. (1998). The archaeology of social boundaries: Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Steven Mithen. (1995). Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology? Anthropology Today, 11(6), 3–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref

Stottman, M. Jay. (2010). Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world? University of Alabama Press.

Strauss, C. (2007). Blaming for Columbine. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1086/520975

Tarlow, S., & Stutz, L. N. (2013). Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual? Archaeological Dialogues, 20(01), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203813000032

Tarlow, Sarah & West, Susie. (1999). The familiar past?: archaeologies of later historical Britain. Routledge.

Taylor, T. (2008). Materiality. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 297–320). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Taylor, W. W. (1948a). Chapter 6. In A study of archaeology: Vol. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. American Anthropological Association.

Taylor, W. W. (1948b). Chapter 6. In A study of archaeology: Vol. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. American Anthropological Association.

Taylor, W. W. (1972). Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable. In Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions (pp. 28–33). Feffer & Simons.

Thomas, David Hurst. (2000). Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. Basic Books.

Thomas, J. (1994a). Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In Theory in archaeology: a world perspective (pp. 343–362). Routledge.

Thomas, J. (1994b). Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In Theory in archaeology: a world perspective (pp. 343–362). Routledge.

Thomas, J. (1999a). Culture and identity. In Companion encyclopedia of archaeology (pp. 431–469). Routledge.

Thomas, J. (1999b). Culture and identity. In Companion encyclopedia of archaeology (pp. 431–469). Routledge.

Thomas, J. (2004a). Chapter 6. In Archaeology and modernity. Routledge.

Thomas, J. (2004b). Humanism and the individual: chapter 6. In Archaeology and modernity (pp. 119–148). Routledge.

Thomas, J. (2012). Archaeologies of place and landscape. In Archaeological theory today (Rev. and updated ed, pp. 165–186). Polity.

Thomas, J. S. (1993). The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In Landscape: politics and perspectives: Vol. Explorations in anthropology (pp. 19–48). Berg.

Thomas, Julian. (1996a). Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. Routledge.

Thomas, Julian. (1996b). Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. Routledge.

Thomas, Julian. (2004). Archaeology and modernity. Routledge.

Thomas, Julian & David, Bruno. (2008). Handbook of landscape archaeology: Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, & Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). (2007). Overcoming the modern invention of material culture: proceedings of the TAG session, Exeter 2006: Vol. Journal of Iberian archaeology. ADECAP.

Tilley, C. (1989a). Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity, 63(239), 275–280.

Tilley, C. (1989b). Interpreting material culture. In The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 185–194). Routledge.

Tilley, C. (2004a). Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125

Tilley, C. (2004b). Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125

Tilley, C., & Bennett, W. (2001). An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(2), 335–362.

Tilley, C. Y. (1984). Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. In Ideology, power and prehistory: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 111–145). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897443

Tilley, C. Y. (1989). Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 104–116). Cambridge University Press.

Tilley, C. Y. (1994). Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments: Vol. Explorations in anthropology (pp. 7–34). Berg.

Tilley, C. Y. (1996). The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology, 28(2), 161–176.

Tilley, C. Y. (2008). Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In Handbook of landscape archaeology: Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology (pp. 271–276). Left Coast Press. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

Tilley, Christopher Y. (1992). Interpretative archaeology: Vol. Explorations in anthropology. Berg.

Tilley, Christopher Y. (1999). Metaphor and material culture: Vol. Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers.

Tim Ingold. (1993). The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811

Treherne, P. (1995). The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology: Journal of the European Association of Archaeologists, 3(1), 105–144.

Trigger, B. G. (1970). Aims in prehistoric archaeology. Antiquity, 44(173), 26–37.

Trigger, B. G. (1978). Current trends in American archaeology. In Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation (pp. 2–18). Edinburgh University Press.

Trigger, B. G. (1980). Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity, 45(4), 662–676.

Trigger, B. G. (1984a). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19(3), 355–370.

Trigger, B. G. (1984b). Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New? Annual Review of Anthropology, 13(1), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423

Trigger, B. G. (1991a). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation. American Anthropologist, 93(3), 551–569.

Trigger, B. G. (1991b). Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 24(2), 65–76.

Trigger, B. G. (1995). Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity, 69(264), 449–458.

Trigger, B. G. (2003). Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. In Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology (pp. 113–131). Transaction.

Trigger, B. G. (2006a). Chapter 7. In A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

Trigger, B. G. (2006b). Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism. In A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

Trigger, B. G. (2006c). Chapter 9 and 10. In A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

Trigger, B. G. (2006d). Culture-historical archaeology. In A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed, pp. 211–313). Cambridge University Press.

Trigger, Bruce G. (2006a). A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

Trigger, Bruce G. (2006b). A history of archaeological thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

Tringham, R. (2000). Engendered places in prehistory. In Interpretive archaeology: a reader (pp. 329–357). Leicester University Press.

Ucko, P. J., & Layton, R. (1999). Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. In The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 1–20). Routledge.

Ucko, Peter J. & Theoretical Archaeology Group. (1994). Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. Routledge.

Urban, Patricia A. & Schortman, Edward M. (2012). Archaeological theory in practice. Left Coast Press.

van der Leeuw, S. (1984). Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology: Vol. Cingula (pp. 709–733). Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Van Dyke, Ruth & Alcock, Susan E. (2003). Archaeologies of memory. Blackwell.

VanPool, C. S., & VanPool, T. L. (1999). The scientific nature of post-processualism. American Antiquity, 64(1), 33–53.

VanPool, T. L., & VanPool, C. S. (2001). Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens. American Antiquity, 66(2), 367–375.

VanPool, T. L., & VanPool, C. S. (2003). Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action. In Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry (pp. 89–113). University of Utah Press.

VanPool, Todd L. & VanPool, Christine S. (2003). Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press.

Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. (1987). Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Basil Blackwell.

Watson, P. J. (2008). Processualism and after. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 29–38). AltaMira Press.

Watts, C. M. (2013). Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. Routledge.

Webmoor, T., & Witmore, C. L. (2008). Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423

Webster, G. (2008). Culture history: a culture-historical approach. In Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 11–27). AltaMira Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

Wheatley, D. (1995). Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication. In Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective (pp. 171–186). Taylor & Francis.

Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. (1954). Archaeology from the earth. Clarendon Press.

Whitehouse, R. (1998). Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 9, 1–7.

Whitehouse, R. (2011). Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" . In Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue: Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London (pp. 227–244). Left Coast.

Whitley, J. (2013). Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(03), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431300053X

Whittle, A., Bayliss, A., & Healy, F. (2008). The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000061

Wiessner, P. (1989). Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression: Vol. One world archaeology (pp. 56–63). Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic.

Wilkinson, D. (2013). The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(03), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000541

Wilmott, T. (1995). Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald. In Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings: Vol. Worldwide archaeology series (pp. 59–69). Avebury.

Wilmott, Tony & English Heritage. (2009). Hadrian’s Wall: archaeological research by English Heritage 1976-2000. English Heritage.

Winterhalder, B., Kennett, D. J., Grote, M. N., & Bartruff, J. (2010). Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001

Witcher, R. (2010). The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall. Public Archaeology, 9(3), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1179/146551810X12822101587138

Witcher, R., Tolia-Kelly, D. P., & Hingley, R. (2010). Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall. Journal of Material Culture, 15(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510355228

Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior ad information exchange. In For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin: Vol. Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan (pp. 317–342). Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.

Wobst, H. M. (1999). Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. In Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture: Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry (pp. 118–132). University of Utah Press.

Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 63–111.

Wylie, A. (1989). The interpretive dilemma. In Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology: Vol. New directions in archaeology (pp. 18–27). Cambridge University Press.

Wylie, A. (1991). Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory: Vol. Social archaeology (pp. 31–54). Blackwell.

Wylie, A. (1992a). On ‘heavily decomposing red herrings’. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers: Vol. Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 145–157). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wylie, A. (1992b). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity, 57(1), 15–35.

Wylie, A. (1992c). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity, 57(1), 15–35.

Wylie, A. (1995). Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. In Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings: Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series (pp. 255–272). School of American Research Press.

Yates, T. (1992). Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In Interpretative archaeology: Vol. Explorations in anthropology (pp. 31–72). Berg.

Yoffee, Norman & Sherratt, Andrew. (1993). Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., & Funari, Pedro Paulo A. (2009). Memories from darkness: archaeology of repression and resistance in Latin America: Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. Springer. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3

Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., & Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. (2003). Ethical issues in archaeology. Altamira Press.