[1]
Adam, B. 2002. Perceptions of time. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Routledge. 503–526.
[2]
Adam, Barbara 1995. Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Polity Press.
[3]
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland 2004. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of ‘The Origin of Species’. Evolution. 58, 1 (2004), 1–11.
[4]
Alison Wylie 2007. Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 14, 3 (2007), 209–216.
[5]
Andersson, C. 2011. Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution? PaleoAnthropology. (2011), 243–259.
[6]
Andrén, Anders and Crozier, Alan 1998. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. Plenum Press.
[7]
Andrews, G. et al. 2000. Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology. Antiquity. 74, 285 (2000), 525–530.
[8]
Arnold, B. 1990. The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity. 64, 244 (1990), 464–478.
[9]
Arnold, D.E. 1985. Chapters 5, 8 and 9. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge University Press.
[10]
Arnold III, P.J. and Wilkens, B.S. 2001. On the VanPools’ ‘scientific’ post-processualism. American Antiquity. 66, 2 (2001), 361–366.
[11]
Arnold, P. 2003. Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology. Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. University of Utah Press. 55–66.
[12]
Ashmore, W. and Knapp, A.B. 1999. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Blackwell Publishers. 1–30.
[13]
Atkinson, R. J. C. 1960. Stonehenge. Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton.
[14]
Aunger, Robert 2000. Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Bailey, G. 2007. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 26, 2 (Jun. 2007), 198–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002.
[16]
Bamforth, D.B. 2002. Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity. 67, 3 (2002), 435–452.
[17]
Bamforth, D.B. 2003. What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....). American Antiquity. 68, 3 (2003), 581–584.
[18]
Banks, Iain et al. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Cruithne Press.
[19]
Barrett , J.C. 2012. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 141–164.
[20]
Barrett, J. 1999. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Blackwell Publishers. 253–265.
[21]
Barrett, J.C. 2014. The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues. 21, 01 (Jun. 2014), 65–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000105.
[22]
Barrett, John C. 1993. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Blackwell.
[23]
Barrett, John C. 1993. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Blackwell.
[24]
Bender, B. et al. 2007. Chapters 1 and 3. Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press.
[25]
Bender, B. et al. 2007. Chapters 1 and 3. Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press.
[26]
Bender, B. et al. 1997. Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 63, (1997), 147–178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002413.
[27]
Bender, B. 1992. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 27, 4 (1992), 735–755.
[28]
Bender, B. 1992. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 27, 4 (1992), 735–755.
[29]
Bender, Barbara and Aitken, Paul 1998. Stonehenge: making space. Berg.
[30]
Bentley , A. 2011. ‘Style versus function’ 30 years on. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast. 83–104.
[31]
Bentley, A. and Maschner, H.D.G. 2008. Complexity theory. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 245–270.
[32]
Bentley, R. Alexander et al. 2008. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press.
[33]
Bentley, R. and Alexander, M. 2008. Introduction on archaeological theories. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press.
[34]
Bentley, R.A. et al. 2008. R. McGuire. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 73–93.
[35]
Berggren, A. and Hodder, I. 2003. Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity. 68, 3 (2003), 421–434.
[36]
Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S. 2004. The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 335–352.
[37]
Bettinger, R.L. 1991. Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. Plenum Press.
[38]
Binford, Lewis Roberts 2001. Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. University of California Press.
[39]
Binford, L.R. 1964. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 29, 4 (1964), 425–441.
[40]
Binford, L.R. 1964. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 29, 4 (1964), 425–441.
[41]
Binford, L.R. 1968. Archaeological perspectives. New perspectives in archeology. Aldine. 5–32.
[42]
Binford, L.R. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 28, 2 (1962), 217–225.
[43]
Binford, L.R. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 28, 2 (1962), 217–225.
[44]
Binford, L.R. 1981. Behavioural archaeological and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research. 37, 3 (1981), 195–208.
[45]
Binford, L.R. 1977. General introduction. For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling. Academic Press. 1–10.
[46]
Binford, L.R. 1983. Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument. Working at archaeology. Academic Press. 131–153.
[47]
Binford, L.R. 1981. Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Academic Press. 3–20.
[48]
Bintliff, J. L. 1991. The Annales school and archaeology. Leicester University Press.
[49]
Bintliff, J. L. and Pearce, Mark 2011. The death of archaeological theory?. Oxbow Books.
[50]
Boone, J.L. and Smith, E.A. 1998. Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology. 39, S1 (Jun. 1998), S141–S174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/204693.
[51]
Borić, Dušan 2010. Archaeology and memory. Oxbow Books.
[52]
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
[53]
Bradley, Richard 2002. The past in prehistoric societies. Routledge.
[54]
Bradley, Richard 1998. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge.
[55]
Bruce G. Trigger 1998. Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology. 102, 1 (1998), 1–34.
[56]
Bruce G. Trigger 1993. Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory. 5, (1993), 159–200.
[57]
Brück, J. 2005. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 12, 01 (Aug. 2005), 45–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.
[58]
Brück, J. 2005. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 12, 1 (Aug. 2005), 45–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.
[59]
Brück, J. 2001. Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 7, 4 (Dec. 2001), 649–667. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00082.
[60]
Brumfiel, E.M. 2000. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem. Agency in archaeology. Routledge. 249–255.
[61]
Buchli, Victor et al. 2001. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge.
[62]
Butzer, Karl W. 1982. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge University Press.
[63]
Carr, Lydia 2012. Tessa Verney Wheeler: women and archaeology before World War Two. Oxford University Press.
[64]
Carrithers, M. et al. eds. 1985. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Casella, Eleanor Conlin and Fowler, Chris 2005. The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
[66]
Chadwick, A. 2003. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues. 10, 1 (2003), 97–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203803001107.
[67]
Childe, V.G. 1929. Preface and chapter 1. The Danube in prehistory. Clarendon Press. v-xii-1–7.
[68]
Childe, V.G. 1956. What happens in prehistory? Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 135–158.
[69]
Chilton, Elizabeth S. 1999. Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. University of Utah Press.
[70]
Chippindale, C. 1993. Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Cambridge University Press. 27–36.
[71]
Chippindale, Christopher 2004. Stonehenge complete. Thames & Hudson.
[72]
Chippindale, Christopher 1990. Who owns Stonehenge?. Batsford.
[73]
Chris Gosden 2005. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 12, 3 (2005), 193–211.
[74]
Clark, G. 1989. Economic approach to prehistory. Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 149–168.
[75]
Clark, Grahame 1960. Archaeology and society. Methuen.
[76]
Clarke, David L. and Chapman, Bob 1978. Analytical archaeology. Methuen.
[77]
Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (1973), 6–18.
[78]
Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (1973), 6–18.
[79]
Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (1973), 6–18.
[80]
Cleal, Rosamund et al. 1995. Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations. English Heritage.
[81]
Cochrane, E.E. 2001. Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern. Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. Bergin & Garvey. 183–202.
[82]
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew 2011. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast.
[83]
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew 2011. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast.
[84]
Collis, John 2001. Digging up the past: an introduction to archaeological excavation. Sutton.
[85]
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. 2012. Archaeology and indigenous collaboration. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 267–291.
[86]
Conkey, M.W. and Gero, J.M. 1997. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 26, 1 (Oct. 1997), 411–437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
[87]
Conkey, M.W. and Spector, J.D. 1984. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 7, (1984), 1–38.
[88]
Conolly, J. 2000. Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. 51–56.
[89]
Cooper, Nicholas et al. 1996. Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives. School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester.
[90]
Cornell, P. and Fahlander, F. 2002. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology. 10, (2002), 21–38.
[91]
Courbin, Paul 1988. What is archaeology?: an essay on the nature of archaeological research. University of Chicago Press.
[92]
Coward, F. et al. 2008. The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 35, 1 (Jan. 2008), 42–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022.
[93]
Cowgill, G.L. 1993. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, New Series. 95, 3 (1993), 551–573.
[94]
Currie, T.E. and Mace, R. 2011. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 366, 1567 (Feb. 2011), 1108–1117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0318.
[95]
David, B. and Thomas, J. 2008. Landscape archaeology: Introduction. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press. 27–43.
[96]
David J. Meltzer 1979. Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 44, 4 (1979), 644–657.
[97]
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford University Press.
[98]
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita 2005. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. Routledge.
[99]
Diaz-Andreu, M. 2004. Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism. History, nationhood, and the question of Britain. Palgrave Macmillan. 227–241.
[100]
Dobres, M.-A. 2000. Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Blackwell Publishers. 127–163.
[101]
Dobres, M.-A. and Hoffman, C.R. 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1, 3 (1994), 211–258.
[102]
Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J.E. 2000. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? Agency in archaeology. Routledge. 3–17.
[103]
Dobres, Marcia-Anne 2000. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Blackwell Publishers.
[104]
Dobres, Marcia-Anne 2000. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Blackwell Publishers.
[105]
Dornan, J.L. 2002. Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 9, 4 (2002), 303–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021318432161.
[106]
Dowson, T.A. 2000. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. Leicester University Press. 283–289.
[107]
Dowson, T.A. 2000. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. Leicester University Press. 283–289.
[108]
Dunnell, R.C. 1986. Five decades of American archaeology. American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. Smithsonian Institution Press.
[109]
Dunnell, R.C. 1978. Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity. 43, 2 (1978), 192–202.
[110]
Dyson, Stephen L. 2006. In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Yale University Press.
[111]
Earle et. al., T.K. 1987. Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology. 28, 4 (1987), 501–538.
[112]
Edgeworth, Matt 2003. Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice. Archaeopress.
[113]
Edgeworth, Matt 2006. Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations. Altamira Press.
[114]
Engelstad, E. 1991. Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity. 65, 248 (1991), 502–514.
[115]
Englehardt, J. 2013. Agency in ancient writing. University Press of Colorado.
[116]
Fagan, Brian M. 2001. Grahame Clark: an intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Westview.
[117]
Fagan, Garrett G. 2006. Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. Routledge.
[118]
Ferguson, L. 1991. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. The archaeology of inequality. Blackwell. 28–39.
[119]
Fewster, K.J. 2006. The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 20, 1 (Jun. 2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89.
[120]
Fisher, P. et al. 1997. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science. 24, 7 (Jul. 1997), 581–592. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0142.
[121]
Flannery, K.V. 1968. Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. Anthropological archeology in the Americas. The Anthropological Society of Washington. 67–87.
[122]
Flannery, K.V. 1967. Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology. Scientific American. 2, 2 (1967), 119–122.
[123]
Flannery, K.V. 1999. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 9, 1 (1999), 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.
[124]
Flannery, K.V. 1999. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 9, 1 (1999), 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.
[125]
Flannery, K.V. 1982. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist. 84, 2 (Jun. 1982), 265–278.
[126]
Fleming, A. 1999. Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 18, 2 (May 1999), 119–125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00074.
[127]
Fleming, A. 2006. Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 16, 3 (2006), 267–280. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774306000163.
[128]
Fowler, C. 2001. Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture. 6, 2 (Jul. 2001), 137–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600202.
[129]
Fowler, C. 2000. The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century. Bricoleur Press. 107–122.
[130]
Fowler, Chris 2004. The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. Routledge.
[131]
Fowler, D. 2008. Archaeological ethics in context and practice. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 409–422.
[132]
Frere, S.S. 1988. Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond. History and Archaeology Review. 3, (1988), 31–36.
[133]
Funari, Pedro Paulo A. et al. 2005. Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
[134]
G. N. Bailey 1983. Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology. 12, (1983), 165–192.
[135]
Gardner, A. 2011. Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast. 63–82.
[136]
Gardner, A. 2008. Agency. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 95–108.
[137]
Gardner, A. 2003. Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire. TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxbow Books. 1–13.
[138]
Gardner, A. 2012. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology. 12, 2 (Jun. 2012), 145–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605312439971.
[139]
Gardner, Andrew 2007. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press.
[140]
Gardner, Andrew 2007. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press.
[141]
Gaydarska, B. 2009. A brief history of TAG. Antiquity. 83, 322 (2009), 1152–1162.
[142]
Gell, Alfred 1992. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Berg.
[143]
Geller, P.L. 2009. Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 38, 1 (Oct. 2009), 65–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414.
[144]
Geoff Emberling 1997. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research. 5, 4 (1997), 295–344.
[145]
Gero, J.M. 1996. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. Gender and archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press. 251–280.
[146]
Gero, J.M. and Wright, M. 1991. Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. 3–30.
[147]
Gheorghiu, D. and Nash, G. 2013. Place as material culture: objects, geographies and the construction of time. Cambridge Scholars Pub.
[148]
Gilchrist, R. 2004. Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 142–160.
[149]
Gilchrist, R. 1991. Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity. 65, 248 (1991), 495–501.
[150]
Glenn R. Storey 1999. Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data. Journal of Archaeological Research. 7, 3 (1999), 203–248.
[151]
Gordon Childe, V. 1935. Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1, (1935), 1–15.
[152]
Gosden, C. 2012. Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 241–261.
[153]
Gosden, C. 2004. The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 161–178.
[154]
Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology. 31, 2 (1999), 169–178.
[155]
Gosden, Chris 1994. Social being and time. Blackwell.
[156]
Graves-Brown, P. 1996. In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. Darwinian archaeologies. Plenum Press. 165–181.
[157]
Greene, K. 2010. Chapter 6: making sense of the past. Archaeology: an introduction. Routledge. 249–312.
[158]
Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom 2010. Archaeology: an introduction. Routledge.
[159]
Greg Woolf 2004. The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment. American Journal of Archaeology. 108, 3 (2004), 417–428.
[160]
Hales, Shelley and Hodos, Tamar 2010. Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge University Press.
[161]
Hamilton et al., S. 2008. Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Handbook of landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press. 176–186.
[162]
Hamilton, S. et al. 2007. Introduction and section 1. Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Left Coast Press. 13–40.
[163]
Hamilton, S. 1999. Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 10, (Aug. 1999), 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.140.
[164]
Hamilton, S. et al. 2006. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 9, 1 (Apr. 2006), 31–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.
[165]
Hamilton, S. et al. 2006. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 9, 1 (Apr. 2006), 31–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.
[166]
Hamilton, S. 2011. The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast. 263–280.
[167]
Hannah, Robert 2009. Time in antiquity. Routledge.
[168]
Harding, J. 2005. Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 38, 2 (Nov. 2005), 88–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650510032707.
[169]
Harris, David R. et al. 1994. The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives : proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. UCL Press.
[170]
Hassan, F. 1997. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 71, 274 (1997), 1020–1025.
[171]
Hassan, F.A. 1997. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 71, 274 (1997), 1020–1025.
[172]
Hastorf, C. 1991. Gender, space and food in prehistory. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. 132–159.
[173]
Hastorf, Christine Ann and Conkey, Margaret Wright 1989. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[174]
Hawkes, C. 1954. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World. American Anthropologist. 56, 2 (1954), 155–168.
[175]
Hayden, B. and Cannon, A. 1983. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2, 2 (Jun. 1983), 117–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
[176]
Hays-Gilpin, K. 2008. Gender. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 335–349.
[177]
Hegmon, M. 1992. Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21, (1992), 517–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505.
[178]
Hegmon, M. 2003. Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity. 68, 2 (2003), 213–243.
[179]
Henson, D. 2012. Doing archaeology: a subject guide for students. Routledge.
[180]
Higgs, E.S. and Vita-Finzi, C. 1972. Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press. 27–36.
[181]
Hill, E. 1998. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 5, 1 (Mar. 1998), 99–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417.
[182]
Hill, J.N. and Evans, R.K. 1972. A model for classification and typology. Models in archaeology. Methuen. 231–273.
[183]
Hingley, R. 2000. Chapters 9 and 10. Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. Routledge.
[184]
Hingley, R. 2008. Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas. Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. Arbeia Society. 25–28.
[185]
Hingley, R. 2010. ‘The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland’: Genealogies of the Roman Walls. Classical Receptions Journal. 2, 1 (May 2010), 25–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clq001.
[186]
Hingley, Richard 2000. Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. Routledge.
[187]
Hodder, I. et al. 2008. 40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 41, 1 (Jun. 2008), 26–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650802181154.
[188]
Hodder, I. 1997. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 71, 273 (1997), 691–700.
[189]
Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 71, 273 (1997), 691–700.
[190]
Hodder, I. 1993. Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology. Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings. Avebury. xiii–xix.
[191]
Hodder, I. 2003. Chapter 1: The problem. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 1–19.
[192]
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell.
[193]
Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17, 1 (2011), 154–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
[194]
Hodder, I. 1991. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity. 56, 1 (1991), 7–18.
[195]
Hodder, I. 2001. Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 1–13.
[196]
Hodder, I. 2012. Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 1–14.
[197]
Hodder, I. 1992. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. Theory and practice in archaeology. Routledge. 201–212.
[198]
Hodder, I. 1992. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. Theory and practice in archaeology. Routledge. 201–212.
[199]
Hodder, I. 1989. Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic. 64–78.
[200]
Hodder, I. 1985. Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 8, (1985), 1–26.
[201]
Hodder, I. 1982. Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 92–121.
[202]
Hodder, I. 1999. Towards a reflexive method. The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell. 80–104.
[203]
Hodder, I. 1999. Towards a reflexive method. The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell. 80–104.
[204]
Hodder, I. 1998. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 72, 275 (1998), 213–217.
[205]
Hodder, I. 1992. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. Theory and practice in archaeology. Routledge. 263–274.
[206]
Hodder, I. and Hutson, S. 2003. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[207]
Hodder, Ian 2001. Archaeological theory today. Polity.
[208]
Hodder, Ian 1994. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. Routledge.
[209]
Hodder, Ian 1982. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge University Press.
[210]
Hodder, Ian 1999. The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell.
[211]
Hoffman, Christopher R. and Dobres, Marcia-Anne 1999. The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. Smithsonian Institution Press.
[212]
Holdaway, Simon and Wandsnider, LuAnn 2008. Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. University of Utah Press.
[213]
Hutson, S.R. 2001. Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool. American Antiquity. 66, 2 (2001), 349–360.
[214]
Ian Hodder 1985. Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 8, (1985), 1–26.
[215]
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall 1971. The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns. Man. 6, 3 (1971), 391–407.
[216]
Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues. 14, 1 (2007), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127.
[217]
Ingold, T. 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology. 25, 2 (1993), 152–174.
[218]
James R. Sackett 1977. The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model. American Antiquity. 42, 3 (1977), 369–380.
[219]
James, S. 1998. Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology. Antiquity. 72, 275 (1998), 200–209.
[220]
James, S. 2003. Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution. Antiquity. 77, 295 (2003), 178–184.
[221]
James, S. 2002. Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal. 159, 1 (Jan. 2002), 1–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514.
[222]
James, Simon et al. 2001. Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda. Council for British Archaeology.
[223]
James, Simon 1999. The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention?. British Museum Press.
[224]
Johnson, M. 2010. Chapters 6 and 7. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
[225]
Johnson, M. 2010. Common sense is not enough. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. 1–11.
[226]
Johnson, M. 2006. On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues. 13, 2 (2006), 117–132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020380621208X.
[227]
Johnson, Matthew 2010. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
[228]
Johnson, M.H. 1989. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 8, 2 (Jun. 1989), 189–211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X.
[229]
Johnson, M.H. 1999. Rethinking historical archaeology. Historical archaeology: back from the edge. Routledge. 23–36.
[230]
Jones, Andrew 2001. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge University Press.
[231]
Jones, S. 1997. Chapter 2. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. Routledge.
[232]
Jones, S. 2000. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. Leicester University Press. 445–457.
[233]
Jones, S. 2008. Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 321–333.
[234]
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. Routledge.
[235]
Joyce, R. 2004. Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 82–95.
[236]
Joyce, R.A. 2005. Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology. 34, 1 (Oct. 2005), 139–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729.
[237]
Joyce, R.A. 2004. Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 11, 1 (2004), 5–29.
[238]
Karlin, C. and Julien, M. 1994. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 152–163.
[239]
Karlsson, Håkan 2001. It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Bricoleur.
[240]
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff 1998. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity. 63, 2 (1998), 199–222.
[241]
Knapp, A.B. and van Dommelen, P. 2008. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 18, 01 (Feb. 2008), 15–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000024.
[242]
Knapp, A.B. and Meskell, L. 1997. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 7, 02 (1997), 183–204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931.
[243]
Knappet, C. 2012. Materiality. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 188–207.
[244]
Knappett, C. 2002. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture. 7, 1 (Mar. 2002), 97–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001307.
[245]
Knappett, Carl 2011. An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford University Press.
[246]
Knappett, Carl 2005. Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[247]
Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros 2008. Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer.
[248]
Kohl, P.L. 1998. Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 27, 1 (Oct. 1998), 223–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
[249]
Kohl, P.L. 1998. Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 27, 1 (Oct. 1998), 223–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
[250]
Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. 1995. Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 3–18.
[251]
Kristiansen, K. 2004. Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 11, 2 (2004), 77–99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.
[252]
Kristiansen, K. 2004. Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 11, 2 (Dec. 2004), 77–99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.
[253]
Lake, M. 2007. Viewing space. World Archaeology. 39, 1 (2007), 1–3.
[254]
LaMotta, V. and Schiffer, M. 2001. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. Archaeological theory today. Polity.
[255]
LaMotta, V. and Schiffer, M. 2012. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 14–64.
[256]
Layton, R. 2006. Structuralism and semiotics. Handbook of material culture. SAGE. 29–42.
[257]
Layton, Robert 1994. Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology. Routledge.
[258]
van der Leeuw, S. 1984. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Universiteit van Amsterdam. 709–733.
[259]
Lemonnier, P. 1986. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 5, 2 (Jun. 1986), 147–186. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.
[260]
Leone et al., M. 1994. Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. Routledge. 110–124.
[261]
Leone, M. 1986. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. Smithsonian Institution Press. 415–438.
[262]
Leone, M. 1987. Towards a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology. 28, 3 (1987), 283–302.
[263]
Leone, M. and Preucel, R. 1992. Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. 115–135.
[264]
Leone, Mark P. 1972. Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Feffer & Simons.
[265]
Leone, Mark P. 2005. The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press.
[266]
Lipo, Carl P. and Society for American Archaeology 2006. Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. Aldine Transaction.
[267]
Llobera, M. 1996. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity. 70, 269 (1996), 612–622.
[268]
Lucas, G. 2001. Introduction: archaeology and the field. Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. Routledge. 1–17.
[269]
Lucas, G. 2008. Time and Archaeological Event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 18, 01 (Feb. 2008), 59–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430800005X.
[270]
Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge University Press.
[271]
Lucas, Gavin 2005. The archaeology of time. Routledge.
[272]
Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma Z. 2010. Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. Left Coast Press.
[273]
Lyman, R. Lee et al. 1997. The rise and fall of culture history. Plenum Press.
[274]
Lyman, R.L. 2007. What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology? Anthropological Theory. 7, 2 (Jun. 2007), 217–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607077299.
[275]
Lyman, R.L. and O’Brien, M.J. 2004. A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 11, 4 (2004), 369–396.
[276]
Lyman, R.L. and O’Brien, M.J. 2000. Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 19, 1 (Mar. 2000), 39–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1999.0339.
[277]
Mace, Ruth et al. 2005. The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach. UCL Press.
[278]
MacGregor, G. 1994. Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent. Archaeological theory: progress or posture?. Avebury. 79–91.
[279]
Mackenzie, Iain M. 1994. Archaeological theory: progress or posture?. Avebury.
[280]
Mackenzie, Iain M. 1994. Archaeological theory: progress or posture?. Avebury.
[281]
Madonna L. Moss 2005. Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins. American Antiquity. 70, 3 (2005), 581–587.
[282]
Margaret W. Conkey 2007. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 14, 3 (2007), 285–310.
[283]
Margaret W. Conkey 2007. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 14, 3 (2007), 285–310.
[284]
Martinón-Torres, M. 2002. Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology. Gallaecia. 21, (2002), 29–43.
[285]
Maschner, Herbert D. G. et al. 2008. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press.
[286]
Mason, David J. P. and Symonds, Matthew F. A. 2009. Frontiers of knowledge: a research framework for Hadrian’s Wall, part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage site. Durham County Council and Durham University.
[287]
McGlade, J. 1999. Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. Routledge. 458–482.
[288]
McGuire, R. 2004. Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 374–395.
[289]
McGuire, Randall H. 2008. Archaeology as political action. University of California Press.
[290]
Megaw, J.V.S. and Megaw, M.R. 1996. Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity. Antiquity. 70, 267 (1996), 175–181.
[291]
Meskell, L. 2012. Archaeologies of identity. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 187–213.
[292]
Meskell, L. 2002. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 31, 1 (Oct. 2002), 279–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457.
[293]
Meskell, Lynn 2006. Archaeologies of materiality. Blackwell.
[294]
Meskell, Lynn 1999. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Blackwell.
[295]
Meskell, Lynn 1999. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Blackwell.
[296]
Meskell, Lynn 1999. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Blackwell.
[297]
Meskell, Lynn 1998. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge.
[298]
Meskell, Lynn 2004. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Berg.
[299]
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. 2003. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. Routledge.
[300]
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. 2003. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. Routledge.
[301]
Meskell, Lynn and Preucel, Robert W. 2004. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
[302]
Michael Shanks 2007. Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology. 39, 4 (2007), 589–596.
[303]
Michelle Hegmon 2005. No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss. American Antiquity. 70, 3 (2005), 588–590.
[304]
Michelle Hegmon 2003. Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 68, 2 (2003), 213–243.
[305]
Miller, D. 2002. Artefacts and the meaning of things. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Routledge. 396–419.
[306]
Miller, D. and Tilley, C.Y. 1984. Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge University Press. 1–15.
[307]
Miller, Daniel 2005. Materiality. Duke University Press.
[308]
Mithen, S.J. 1996. The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. Thames & Hudson.
[309]
Mithen, S.J. 1990. Thoughtful foragers: a study of prehistoric decision making. Cambridge University Press.
[310]
Mizoguchi, Kōji 2006. Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Cambridge University Press.
[311]
Moore, H.L. 1994. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Polity. 71–85.
[312]
Moore, T. 2011. Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies. Journal of Social Archaeology. 11, 3 (Oct. 2011), 334–360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605311403861.
[313]
Moshenska, Gabriel and Dhanjal, Sarah 2012. Community archaeology: themes, methods and practices. Oxbow.
[314]
Murray, T. 1993. Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Cambridge University Press. 105–116.
[315]
Murray, Tim and World Archaeological Congress 1999. Time and archaeology. Routledge.
[316]
Mytum, H. 2007. Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain. Antiquity. 81, 312 (2007), 381–396.
[317]
Nancy D. Munn 1992. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21, (1992), 93–123.
[318]
Nanni, G. 2011. Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria. Time & Society. 20, 1 (Mar. 2011), 5–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10369765.
[319]
Nelson, M.C. 1991. The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory. 3, (1991), 57–100.
[320]
Nelson, Sarah M. 2006. Handbook of gender in archaeology. AltaMira Press.
[321]
Nesbitt, C. and Tolia-Kelly, D. 2009. Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument. Journal of Social Archaeology. 9, 3 (Sep. 2009), 368–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605309338428.
[322]
O’Brien, Michael J. et al. 2005. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. University of Utah Press.
[323]
O’Brien, Michael J. et al. 2005. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. University of Utah Press.
[324]
O’Brien, M.J. 2003. Style, function, transmission: an introduction. Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. University of Utah Press. 1–32.
[325]
O’Brien, M.J. et al. 2003. What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity. 68, 3 (2003), 573–580.
[326]
Olsen, B. 2012. Archaeology: the discipline of things. University of California Press.
[327]
Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 36, 2 (Oct. 2003), 87–104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650.
[328]
Olsen, B. 2012. Symmetical archaeology. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 208–228.
[329]
Papaconstantinou, Demetra 2006. Deconstructing context: a critical approach to archaeological practice. Oxbow.
[330]
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2006. Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. 1, (2006), 237–258.
[331]
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2007. The age of Stonehenge. Antiquity. 81, 313 (2007), 617–639.
[332]
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2009. Who was buried at Stonehenge? Antiquity. 83, 319 (2009), 23–39.
[333]
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 72, 276 (1998), 308–326.
[334]
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 72, 276 (1998), 308–326.
[335]
Patrik, L.E. 1985. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 8, (1985), 27–62.
[336]
Patterson, T. 2004. Social archaeology and Marxist social thought. A companion to social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 66–81.
[337]
Patterson, Thomas Carl 2003. Marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. Berg.
[338]
Pauketat, T.R. 2001. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 1, 1 (Mar. 2001), 73–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.
[339]
Pauketat, T.R. 2001. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 1, 1 (Mar. 2001), 73–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.
[340]
Pearson, M.P. 2006. Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries. Journal of Material Culture. 11, 1–2 (Jul. 2006), 227–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063024.
[341]
Pearson, M.P. et al. 2011. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 21, (2011), 5–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.369.
[342]
Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21, 1 (Oct. 1992), 491–516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423.
[343]
Plog, F. 1973. Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. Duckworth. 649–661.
[344]
Pluciennik, Mark et al. 2002. Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
[345]
Pope, R. 2011. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 18, 1 (2011), 59–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.
[346]
Pope, R. 2011. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 18, 01 (Apr. 2011), 59–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.
[347]
Powell, A. et al. 2009. Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior. Science. 324, 5932 (Jun. 2009), 1298–1301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165.
[348]
Praetzellis, Adrian 2000. Death by theory: a tale of mystery and archaeological theory. AltaMira Press.
[349]
Preucel, R. and Bauer, A. 2001. Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 34, 2 (2001), 85–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469.
[350]
Preucel, Robert W. 2006. Archaeological semiotics. Blackwell.
[351]
Preucel, R.W. 1995. The postprocessual condition. Journal of Archaeological Research. 3, 2 (1995), 147–175.
[352]
Preucel, R.W. and Mrozowski, S.A. 2010. The new pragmatism. Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Wiley-Blackwell. 3–49.
[353]
Price, B.J. 1982. Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity. 47, 4 (1982), 709–741.
[354]
Quirke, Stephen 2010. Hidden hands: Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 1880-1924. Gerald Duckworth.
[355]
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan 2004. Random Drift and Culture Change. Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 271, 1547 (2004), 1443–1450.
[356]
Ratnagar, S. 2004. Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology. 45, 2 (Apr. 2004), 239–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/381044.
[357]
Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference 2000. Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[358]
Redman, C. 1999. The development of archaeological theory. Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. Routledge. 48–80.
[359]
Redman, Charles L. 1978. Social archeology: beyond subsistence and dating. Academic Press.
[360]
Redman, C.L. 1991. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology. American Anthropologist. 93, 2 (1991), 295–307.
[361]
Rega, E. 1996. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. Leicester University Press. 229–247.
[362]
Reid, Donald M. 2002. Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. University of California Press.
[363]
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock 1996. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology. 37, 1 (1996), S138–S142.
[364]
Renfrew, C. 1999. Beyond diffusion. Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. Pimlico. 109–119.
[365]
Renfrew, C. 1972. Culture systems and the multiplier effect. The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. Methuen. 19–44.
[366]
Renfrew, C. 1973. Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. Duckworth. 539–558.
[367]
Renfrew, C. 1973. Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. Duckworth. 539–558.
[368]
Renfrew, C. 1994. Towards a cognitive archaeology. The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 3–12.
[369]
Renfrew, Colin et al. 2004. Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
[370]
Renfrew, Colin et al. 1997. Science and Stonehenge. Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
[371]
Renfrew, Colin and Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects 1973. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. Duckworth.
[372]
Review by: Lewis R. Binford American Antiquity. Vol. 53, No. 4, 875–876.
[373]
Richards, Julian C. et al. 1990. The Stonehenge environs project. Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England.
[374]
Richards, Julian C. and English Heritage 1991. English Heritage book of Stonehenge. B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage.
[375]
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert 2005. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.
[376]
Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. 2005. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.
[377]
Robb, J. and Pauketat, T.R. 2013. Big histories, human lives: tackling problems of scale in archaeology. School for Advanced Research Press.
[378]
Robb, J.E. 1998. The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology. 27, (1998), 329–346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329.
[379]
Robb, J.E. and Dobres, M.-A. 2000. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? Agency in archaeology. Routledge. 3–17.
[380]
Robert C. Dunnell 1982. The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research. 38, 1 (1982), 1–25.
[381]
Rosen, Ralph Mark and University of Pennsylvania 2004. Time and temporality in the ancient world. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.
[382]
Roskams, S. 2001. Future prospects. Excavation. Cambridge University Press. 267–290.
[383]
Ross, Jennifer C. and Steadman, Sharon R. 2010. Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. Equinox.
[384]
Rowley-Conwy, P. et al. 2001. Hunter-gatherers: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[385]
Saitta, Dean J. 2007. The archaeology of collective action. University Press of Florida.
[386]
Scarre, G. and Coningham, R. 2013. Appropriating the past: philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[387]
Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity. 37, 2 (1972), 156–165.
[388]
Schiffer, M.B. 1985. Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research. 41, 1 (1985), 18–41.
[389]
Schiffer, M.B. and Skibo, J.M. 1997. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity. 62, 1 (1997), 27–50.
[390]
Schiffer, Michael B. 1976. Behavioral archaeology. Academic Press.
[391]
Schiffer, Michael B. 1995. Behavioral archaeology: first principles. University of Utah Press.
[392]
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation processes of the archaeological record. University of New Mexico Press.
[393]
Schlanger , N. 1994. Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind. The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 143–151.
[394]
Schnapp, A. 2002. Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures. Antiquity. 76, 291 (2002), 134–140.
[395]
Shanks, M. 2008. Post-processual archaeology and after. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 133–144.
[396]
Shanks, M. 2008. Post-processual archaeology and after. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 133–144.
[397]
Shanks, M. and Hodder, I. 1994. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. Routledge. 3–29.
[398]
Shanks, M. and McGuire, R.H. 1996. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity. 61, 1 (1996), 75–88.
[399]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. 1987. Abstract and Substantial Time. Archaeological Review From Cambridge. 6, 1 (1987), 32–41.
[400]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. 1989. Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 22, 1 (1989), 12–54.
[401]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C.Y. 1987. Archaeology and the politics of theory. Social theory and archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell. 186–208.
[402]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C.Y. 1992. Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Routledge. 46–67.
[403]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C.Y. 1987. The individual and the social. Social theory and archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell. 61–78.
[404]
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. 1992. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Routledge.
[405]
Shennan, S. 2011. Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 366, 1567 (Apr. 2011), 1070–1079. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380.
[406]
Shennan, S. 2008. Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 37, 1 (Oct. 2008), 75–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153.
[407]
Shennan, S.J. 2011. An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast. 325–344.
[408]
Shennan, S.J. 1994. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity. Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. Routledge. 1–32.
[409]
Shennan, Stephen 2002. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. Thames & Hudson.
[410]
Shennan, Stephen 2002. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. Thames & Hudson.
[411]
Shennan, Stephen 2009. Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press.
[412]
Shott, M.J. 1998. Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of archaeological research. 6, 4 (1998), 299–329.
[413]
Sigault, F. 2002. Technology. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Routledge. 420–459.
[414]
Sillar, B. 2009. The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 19, 03 (Oct. 2009), 367–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000559.
[415]
SILLAR, B. and TITE, M.S. 2000. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry. 42, 1 (Feb. 2000), 2–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x.
[416]
Sinclair, A. 2000. Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology. Agency in archaeology. Routledge. 196–212.
[417]
Smith, Laurajane 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. Routledge.
[418]
Smith, Laurajane 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. Routledge.
[419]
Smith, Stuart Tyson 2003. Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire. Routledge.
[420]
Sofaer, Joanna R. 2006. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[421]
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig 2000. Gender archaeology. Polity Press.
[422]
Sørensen, M.L.S. 1997. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology. 5, 1 (1997), 93–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656.
[423]
Spaulding, A.C. 1953. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity. 18, 4 (1953), 305–313.
[424]
Spector, J. 1991. What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. 388–406.
[425]
Spriggs, M. 2008. Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology. 40, 4 (2008), 538–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802453161.
[426]
Stark, Miriam T. 1998. The archaeology of social boundaries. Smithsonian Institution Press.
[427]
Steven Mithen 1995. Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology? Anthropology Today. 11, 6 (1995), 3–7.
[428]
Stottman, M. Jay 2010. Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world?. University of Alabama Press.
[429]
Strauss, C. 2007. Blaming for Columbine. Current Anthropology. 48, 6 (Dec. 2007), 807–832. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/520975.
[430]
Tarlow, S. and Stutz, L.N. 2013. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual? Archaeological Dialogues. 20, 01 (Jun. 2013), 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203813000032.
[431]
Tarlow, Sarah and West, Susie 1999. The familiar past?: archaeologies of later historical Britain. Routledge.
[432]
Taylor, T. 2008. Materiality. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 297–320.
[433]
Taylor, W.W. 1948. Chapter 6. A study of archaeology. American Anthropological Association.
[434]
Taylor, W.W. 1948. Chapter 6. A study of archaeology. American Anthropological Association.
[435]
Taylor, W.W. 1972. Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable. Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Feffer & Simons. 28–33.
[436]
Thomas, David Hurst 2000. Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. Basic Books.
[437]
Thomas, J. 2012. Archaeologies of place and landscape. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 165–186.
[438]
Thomas, J. 2004. Chapter 6. Archaeology and modernity. Routledge.
[439]
Thomas, J. 1999. Culture and identity. Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. Routledge. 431–469.
[440]
Thomas, J. 1999. Culture and identity. Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. Routledge. 431–469.
[441]
Thomas, J. 2004. Humanism and the individual: chapter 6. Archaeology and modernity. Routledge. 119–148.
[442]
Thomas, J. 1994. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. Routledge. 343–362.
[443]
Thomas, J. 1994. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. Routledge. 343–362.
[444]
Thomas, J.S. 1993. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Berg. 19–48.
[445]
Thomas, Julian 2004. Archaeology and modernity. Routledge.
[446]
Thomas, Julian et al. 2007. Overcoming the modern invention of material culture: proceedings of the TAG session, Exeter 2006. ADECAP.
[447]
Thomas, Julian 1996. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. Routledge.
[448]
Thomas, Julian 1996. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. Routledge.
[449]
Thomas, Julian and David, Bruno 2008. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press.
[450]
Tilley, C. 1989. Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity. 63, 239 (1989), 275–280.
[451]
Tilley, C. 1989. Interpreting material culture. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Routledge. 185–194.
[452]
Tilley, C. 2004. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 14, 2 (Oct. 2004), 185–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.
[453]
Tilley, C. 2004. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 14, 2 (Oct. 2004), 185–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.
[454]
Tilley, C. and Bennett, W. 2001. An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 7, 2 (2001), 335–362.
[455]
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1992. Interpretative archaeology. Berg.
[456]
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1999. Metaphor and material culture. Blackwell Publishers.
[457]
Tilley, C.Y. 1989. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 104–116.
[458]
Tilley, C.Y. 1984. Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge University Press. 111–145.
[459]
Tilley, C.Y. 2008. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press. 271–276.
[460]
Tilley, C.Y. 1994. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Berg. 7–34.
[461]
Tilley, C.Y. 1996. The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology. 28, 2 (1996), 161–176.
[462]
Tim Ingold 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology. 25, 2 (1993), 152–174.
[463]
Treherne, P. 1995. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists. 3, 1 (1995), 105–144.
[464]
Trigger, B.G. 1970. Aims in prehistoric archaeology. Antiquity. 44, 173 (1970), 26–37.
[465]
Trigger, B.G. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man. 19, 3 (1984), 355–370.
[466]
Trigger, B.G. 1980. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity. 45, 4 (1980), 662–676.
[467]
Trigger, B.G. 1984. Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New? Annual Review of Anthropology. 13, 1 (Oct. 1984), 275–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423.
[468]
Trigger, B.G. 2006. Chapter 7. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[469]
Trigger, B.G. 2006. Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[470]
Trigger, B.G. 2006. Chapter 9 and 10. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[471]
Trigger, B.G. 2006. Culture-historical archaeology. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press. 211–313.
[472]
Trigger, B.G. 1978. Current trends in American archaeology. Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh University Press. 2–18.
[473]
Trigger, B.G. 1991. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation. American Anthropologist. 93, 3 (1991), 551–569.
[474]
Trigger, B.G. 1995. Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity. 69, 264 (1995), 449–458.
[475]
Trigger, B.G. 2003. Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. Transaction. 113–131.
[476]
Trigger, B.G. 1991. Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 24, 2 (Jan. 1991), 65–76.
[477]
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[478]
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Press.
[479]
Tringham, R. 2000. Engendered places in prehistory. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. Leicester University Press. 329–357.
[480]
Ucko, Peter J. and Theoretical Archaeology Group 1994. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. Routledge.
[481]
Ucko, P.J. and Layton, R. 1999. Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. Routledge. 1–20.
[482]
Urban, Patricia A. and Schortman, Edward M. 2012. Archaeological theory in practice. Left Coast Press.
[483]
Van Dyke, Ruth and Alcock, Susan E. 2003. Archaeologies of memory. Blackwell.
[484]
VanPool, C.S. and VanPool, T.L. 1999. The scientific nature of post-processualism. American Antiquity. 64, 1 (1999), 33–53.
[485]
VanPool, T.L. and VanPool, C.S. 2003. Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action. Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. University of Utah Press. 89–113.
[486]
VanPool, T.L. and VanPool, C.S. 2001. Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens. American Antiquity. 66, 2 (2001), 367–375.
[487]
VanPool, Todd L. and VanPool, Christine S. 2003. Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. University of Utah Press.
[488]
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm 1987. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Basil Blackwell.
[489]
Watson, P.J. 2008. Processualism and after. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 29–38.
[490]
Watts, C.M. 2013. Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. Routledge.
[491]
Webmoor, T. and Witmore, C.L. 2008. Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 41, 1 (Jun. 2008), 53–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423.
[492]
Webster, G. 2008. Culture history: a culture-historical approach. Handbook of archaeological theories. AltaMira Press. 11–27.
[493]
Wheatley, D. 1995. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication. Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Taylor & Francis. 171–186.
[494]
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer 1954. Archaeology from the earth. Clarendon Press.
[495]
Whitehouse, R. 2011. Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" . Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Left Coast. 227–244.
[496]
Whitehouse, R. 1998. Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 9, (1998), 1–7.
[497]
Whitley, J. 2013. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 23, 03 (Oct. 2013), 395–416. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431300053X.
[498]
Whittle, A. et al. 2008. The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 18, 01 (2008), 65–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000061.
[499]
Wiessner, P. 1989. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic. 56–63.
[500]
Wilkinson, D. 2013. The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 23, 03 (Oct. 2013), 417–432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000541.
[501]
Wilmott, T. 1995. Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald. Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings. Avebury. 59–69.
[502]
Wilmott, Tony and English Heritage 2009. Hadrian’s Wall: archaeological research by English Heritage 1976-2000. English Heritage.
[503]
Winterhalder, B. et al. 2010. Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 29, 4 (Dec. 2010), 469–490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001.
[504]
Witcher, R. et al. 2010. Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall. Journal of Material Culture. 15, 1 (Mar. 2010), 105–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510355228.
[505]
Witcher, R. 2010. The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall. Public Archaeology. 9, 3 (2010), 126–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1179/146551810X12822101587138.
[506]
Wobst, H.M. 1999. Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. University of Utah Press. 118–132.
[507]
Wobst, H.M. 1977. Stylistic behavior ad information exchange. For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. 317–342.
[508]
Wylie, A. 1995. Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. School of American Research Press. 255–272.
[509]
Wylie, A. 1991. Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Blackwell. 31–54.
[510]
Wylie, A. 1992. On ‘heavily decomposing red herrings’. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 145–157.
[511]
Wylie, A. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 57, 1 (1992), 15–35.
[512]
Wylie, A. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 57, 1 (1992), 15–35.
[513]
Wylie, A. 1989. The interpretive dilemma. Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 18–27.
[514]
Wylie, A. 1985. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 8, (1985), 63–111.
[515]
Yates, T. 1992. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. Interpretative archaeology. Berg. 31–72.
[516]
Yoffee, Norman and Sherratt, Andrew 1993. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Cambridge University Press.
[517]
Zarankin, Andrés et al. 2009. Memories from darkness: archaeology of repression and resistance in Latin America. Springer.
[518]
Zimmerman, Larry J. et al. 2003. Ethical issues in archaeology. Altamira Press.
