A public service for all: the BBC in the digital age (Cm 6763, 2006). (2006). UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age
Anderson, D. A. (2002). Freedom of the Press. Texas Law Review, 80(3), 429–530. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Andrew Scott. (n.d.). ‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising. The Modern Law Review, 66(2), 224–244. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625
Arnott, C. (n.d.). Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts. Journal of Media Law, 2(2), 245–275. https://doi.org/10.5235/175776310794389373
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207. (2002). In Court: European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Barendt, E. (2013). Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson. Journal of Media Law, 5(2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals
Barendt, E. M. (2007a). Freedom of speech (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
Barendt, E. M. (2007b). Freedom of speech (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
Barendt, E. M. (2007c). Freedom of speech (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014a). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014b). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014c). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014d). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014e). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014f). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014g). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014h). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014i). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014j). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
Barendt, E. M., & et al. (2014k). Media law: text, cases and materials: Vol. Longman law series. Pearson.
BBC. (2013a). BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview. BBC Trust. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html
BBC News. (18 C.E.). Google and Microsoft agree steps to block abuse images. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765
BBC Trust. (2007). From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: safeguarding impartiality in the 21st century. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html
Birnhack, M. D., & Rowbottom, J. H. (2004). Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79(1), 175–227. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals
Born, G., & Prosser, T. (n.d.). Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations. The Modern Law Review, 64(5), 657–687. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275
British Board of Film Classification. (n.d.-a). BBFC policy statement, sexual and sadistic violence. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
British Board of Film Classification. (n.d.-b). Report on effects of sexual and sadistic violence in films. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
British Board of Film Classification guidelines. (n.d.). http://www.bbfc.co.uk/
DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517, (1989). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Colin R. Munro. (n.d.). Self-regulation in the media. Public Law, 1, 6–17.
Committee of Advertising Practice. (n.d.-c). BCAP Television Advertising Code. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx
Committee of Advertising Practice. (n.d.-d). UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx
Communications Act 2003. (2003a). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
Communications Act 2003. (2003b). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
Communications Act 2003. (2003c). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
Communications Act 2003. (2003d). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2, (2010). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355, (2011). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14, (2013). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Craufurd Smith, R. (n.d.). Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations? Journal of Media Law, 5(2), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.5235/17577632.5.2.332
Culture, Media & Sport Committee. (2011a). BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm
Defamation Act 2013. (2013). UK Government. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. (2011b). OFCOM Report and other documents on News Corporation acquisition of BSkyB. http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. (2013b). Media ownership and plurality. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport. (2006). Broadcasting: an agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC: Vol. Cm 6872. TSO.
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport. (n.d.-e). Details of Culture, Media and Sport select committee inquiry - The Future of the BBC. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/
Dept of National Heritage & British Broadcasting Corporation. (1996). Broadcasting: copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation: Vol. Cm 6925. HMSO.
Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425, (2000). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB), (2012). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Edwards, L., & Waelde, C. (2009). Law and the Internet (3rd ed). Hart.
European Convention on Human Rights & fundamental freedoms. (1950). European Court of Human Rights. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
European Court of Human Rights. (22 C.E.). Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court decision of 22 April 2013. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244
Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34, (1994). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1, (1997). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51, (2009). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Fielden, L. (2011). Regulating for trust in journalism: standards regulation in the age of blended media. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201. (2001). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Hare, I. (n.d.). Insulting Politicians on the Radio? Journal of Media Law, 4(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.5235/175776312802483899
High Court of Australia. (2002a). Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
High Court of Australia. (2002b). Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Hitchens, L. (2006a). Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Hart Publishing.
Hitchens, L. (2006b). Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Hart Publishing.
Hitchens, L. (2006c). Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Hart Publishing.
Hitchens, L. (2006d). Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Hart Publishing.
Hitchens, L. (2006e). Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Hart Publishing.
R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott), (2004). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
House of Lords Communications Committee. (2008a). The Ownership of News. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm
House of Lords Communications Committee. (2008b). The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm
House of Lords Communications Committee. (2013c). Media Convergence - Second Report. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
House of Lords Communications Committee. (2013d). Media Convergence - Second Report. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
House of Lords Communications Committee. (2014). Media Plurality. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review. (2005). The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm
Internet Watch Foundation. (n.d.). http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking
IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice. (n.d.). IPSO. https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html
Jack L. Goldsmith. (n.d.). Against Cyberanarchy. The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(4), 1199–1250. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262
Jacob Rowbottom. (n.d.-a). Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review, 69(4), 489–513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
Jacob Rowbottom. (n.d.-b). Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review, 69(4), 489–513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr. (n.d.). Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media. Michigan Law Review, 75(1), 1–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849
Leveson, L. J. (2012a). The Leveson Report. National Archives. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
Leveson, L. J. (2012b). The Leveson Report. National Archives. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
Leveson, L. J. (2012c). The Leveson Report, Executive Summary. National Archives. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
Leveson, L. J. (2012d). The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779. National Archives. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. (2013a). UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. (2013b). UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
Lichtenberg, J. (1990). Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays: Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy. Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, O. R. & Great Britain. (1977). Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report: Vol. Cmnd 6810. H.M.S.O.
Muir Watt, H. (n.d.). Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law). Michigan Journal Of International Law, 24(3), 673–696. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals
Murray, A. (2010). Information technology law: the law and society. Oxford University Press.
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153. (1991). In Observer and Guardian v UK. Court: European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
OFCOM. (n.d.-f). Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/
OFCOM. (n.d.-g). OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
OFCOM. (n.d.-h). OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
OFCOM. (9 C.E.). OFCOM dismissal of complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera. OFCOM Broadcasting Bulletin. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/
Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice. (n.d.). Press Complaints Commission. http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html
Price, M. E. (n.d.). The Newness of New Technology. Cardozo Law Review, 22(5–6), 1885–1913. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals
R v BBC, ex parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605, (1997). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Queen’s Bench Division. (2000). R v ASA, ex parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336, (2006). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27, (2009). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
R v ASA, ex parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581, (2001). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
R on the application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5, (2002). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312. (2008). In Official Transcript. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418. (2000). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar). (2002). In Court: Court of Appeal. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625. (2006). In Court: Court of Appeal. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, ex parte the BBFC, EMLR 850. (2000). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Robertson, G., & Nicol, A. G. L. (2008a). Media law (5th ed). Penguin.
Robertson, G., & Nicol, A. G. L. (2008b). Media law (5th ed). Penguin.
Robertson, G., & Nicol, A. G. L. (2008c). Media law (5th ed). Penguin.
Robertson, G., & Nicol, A. G. L. (2008d). Media law (5th ed). Penguin.
Rowbottom, J. (n.d.). Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg. Journal of Media Law, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5235/17577632.5.1.1
Rowbottom, J. (2010). Democracy distorted: wealth, influence and democratic politics: Vol. The law in context series. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R. C., & Tambini, D. (n.d.). Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges. Journal of Media Law, 4(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.5235/175776312802483862
Stewart, P. (n.d.). Or of the press. Hastings Law Journal, 26(3), 631–637. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals
The Authority for Television on Demand. (n.d.-i). Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules. http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance
The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO). (n.d.). IPSO. https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html
Thomas Gibbons. (1992). Freedom of the press: ownership and editorial values. Public Law, 279–299.
UK Government. (1984). Video Recordings Act 1984. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents
UK Government. (1990). Broadcasting Act 1990. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents
US Supreme Court. (1997a). Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
US Supreme Court. (1997b). Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4. (2002). In VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
Vick, D. W. (n.d.). Regulatory convergence? Legal Studies, 26(1), 26–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x
Williams, B. (1979). Report of the Committee on obscenity and film censorship: Vol. Cmnd 7772. H.M.S.O.
