1
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
2
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
3
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr. Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media. Michigan Law Review;75:1–42.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849
4
US Supreme Court. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
5
High Court of Australia. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
6
Jacob Rowbottom. Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review;69:489–513.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
7
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
8
Stewart P. Or of the press. Hastings Law Journal;26:631–7.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals
9
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
10
Thomas Gibbons. Freedom of the press: ownership and editorial values. Public Law 1992;:279–99.
11
House of Lords Communications Committee. The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122. 2008.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm
12
European Convention on Human Rights & fundamental freedoms. 1950.http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
13
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153. Court: European Court of Human Rights 1991. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
14
McGregor OR, Great Britain. Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report. London: : H.M.S.O. 1977.
15
Lichtenberg J. Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
16
Anderson DA. Freedom of the Press. Texas Law Review 2002;80:429–530.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site
17
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207. 2002. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
18
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
19
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: : Penguin 2008.
20
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court). R on the application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5. 2002. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
21
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779. 2012.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
22
Barendt E. Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson. Journal of Media Law 2013;5.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals
23
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report, Executive Summary. 2012.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
24
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
25
The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO). https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html
26
IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice. https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html
27
Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice. http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html
28
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report. 2012.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
29
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report. 2012.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
30
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
31
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
32
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: : Penguin 2008.
33
British Board of Film Classification guidelines. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/
34
British Board of Film Classification. BBFC policy statement, sexual and sadistic violence. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
35
UK Government. Video Recordings Act 1984. 1984.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents
36
European Court of Human Rights. Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1. 1997. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
37
Williams B. Report of the Committee on obscenity and film censorship. London: : H.M.S.O. 1979.
38
British Board of Film Classification. Report on effects of sexual and sadistic violence in films. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
39
European Court of Human Rights. Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34. 1994. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
40
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, ex parte the BBFC, EMLR 850. 2000. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
41
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
42
A public service for all: the BBC in the digital age (Cm 6763, 2006). 2006.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age
43
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review. The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1). 2005.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm
44
Dept of National Heritage, British Broadcasting Corporation. Broadcasting: copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation. London: : HMSO 1996.
45
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport. Broadcasting: an agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC. London: : TSO 2006.
46
Communications Act 2003. 2003.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
47
BBC. BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview. 2013.http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html
48
Born G, Prosser T. Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations. The Modern Law Review;64:657–87.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275
49
Vick DW. Regulatory convergence? Legal Studies;26:26–64. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x
50
Queen’s Bench Division. R v BBC, ex parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605. 1997. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
51
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport. Details of Culture, Media and Sport select committee inquiry - The Future of the BBC. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/
52
Culture, Media & Sport Committee. BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report. 2011.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm
53
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
54
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: : Penguin 2008.
55
Communications Act 2003. 2003.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
56
OFCOM. OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
57
OFCOM. OFCOM dismissal of complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera. 9AD.http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/
58
House of Lords. R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott). 2004. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
59
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355. 2011. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
60
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
61
OFCOM. OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
62
BBC Trust. From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: safeguarding impartiality in the 21st century. 2007.http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html
63
UK Government. Broadcasting Act 1990. 1990.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents
64
Hare I. Insulting Politicians on the Radio? Journal of Media Law;4:29–34. doi:10.5235/175776312802483899
65
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Convergence - Second Report. 2013.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
66
Fielden L. Regulating for trust in journalism: standards regulation in the age of blended media. Oxford: : Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2011. http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1
67
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
68
Queen’s Bench Division. R v ASA, ex parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463. 2000. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
69
Committee of Advertising Practice. UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx
70
OFCOM. Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/
71
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
72
VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4. 2002. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
73
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312. 2008. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
74
European Court of Human Rights. Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court decision of 22 April 2013. 22AD.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244
75
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: : Penguin 2008.
76
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
77
Chancery Division. DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517. 1989. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
78
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court). R v ASA, ex parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581. 2001. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
79
Colin R. Munro. Self-regulation in the media. Public Law;:6–17.
80
Committee of Advertising Practice. BCAP Television Advertising Code. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx
81
European Court of Human Rights. TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51. 2009. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
82
Andrew Scott. ‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising. The Modern Law Review;66:224–44.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625
83
Rowbottom J. Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg. Journal of Media Law;5:1–13. doi:10.5235/17577632.5.1.1
84
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
85
Communications Act 2003. 2003.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
86
House of Lords Communications Committee. The Ownership of News. 2008;HL 122.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm
87
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2. 2010. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
88
Smith RC, Tambini D. Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges. Journal of Media Law;4:35–63. doi:10.5235/175776312802483862
89
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Plurality. 2014.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm
90
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
91
Rowbottom J. Democracy distorted: wealth, influence and democratic politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.
92
Craufurd Smith R. Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations? Journal of Media Law;5:332–44. doi:10.5235/17577632.5.2.332
93
Arnott C. Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts. Journal of Media Law;2:245–75. doi:10.5235/175776310794389373
94
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. OFCOM Report and other documents on News Corporation acquisition of BSkyB. 2011.http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx
95
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. Media ownership and plurality. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality
96
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
97
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
98
Murray A. Information technology law: the law and society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
99
US Supreme Court. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
100
Divisional Court. Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB). 2012. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
101
Communications Act 2003. 2003.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
102
Jacob Rowbottom. Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review;69:489–513.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
103
Internet Watch Foundation. http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking
104
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Convergence - Second Report. 2013.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
105
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
106
Price ME. The Newness of New Technology. Cardozo Law Review;22:1885–913.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals
107
Edwards L, Waelde C. Law and the Internet. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Hart 2009.
108
Jack L. Goldsmith. Against Cyberanarchy. The University of Chicago Law Review;65:1199–250.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262
109
The Authority for Television on Demand. Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules. http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance
110
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: : Pearson 2014.
111
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
112
High Court of Australia. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
113
Queen’s Bench Division. Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336. 2006. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
114
Queen’s Bench Division. Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27. 2009. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
115
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14. 2013. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
116
Defamation Act 2013. 2013.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted
117
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar). 2002. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
118
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418. 2000. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
119
Birnhack MD, Rowbottom JH. Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults. Chicago-Kent Law Review 2004;79:175–227.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals
120
BBC News. Google and Microsoft agree steps to block abuse images. 18AD.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765
121
Muir Watt H. Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law). Michigan Journal Of International Law;24:673–96.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals
122
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201. 2001. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
123
Divisional Court. Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425. 2000. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
124
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625. 2006. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
