1
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
2
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006.
3
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr. Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media. Michigan Law Review. ;75:1–42.
4
US Supreme Court. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997.
5
High Court of Australia. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002.
6
Jacob Rowbottom. Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review. ;69:489–513.
7
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
8
Stewart P. Or of the press. Hastings Law Journal. ;26:631–7.
9
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
10
Thomas Gibbons. Freedom of the press: ownership and editorial values. Public Law. 1992;279–99.
11
House of Lords Communications Committee. The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122. 2008.
12
European Convention on Human Rights & fundamental freedoms. 1950.
13
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153. Court: European Court of Human Rights 1991.
14
McGregor OR, Great Britain. Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report. London: H.M.S.O. 1977.
15
Lichtenberg J. Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.
16
Anderson DA. Freedom of the Press. Texas Law Review. 2002;80:429–530.
17
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207. 2002.
18
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
19
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: Penguin 2008.
20
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court). R on the application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5. 2002.
21
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779. 2012.
22
Barendt E. Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson. Journal of Media Law. 2013;5.
23
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report, Executive Summary. 2012.
24
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
25
The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO). https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html
26
IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice. https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html
27
Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice. http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html
28
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report. 2012.
29
Leveson LJ. The Leveson Report. 2012.
30
Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
31
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
32
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: Penguin 2008.
33
British Board of Film Classification guidelines. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/
34
British Board of Film Classification. BBFC policy statement, sexual and sadistic violence.
35
UK Government. Video Recordings Act 1984. 1984. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents
36
European Court of Human Rights. Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1. 1997.
37
Williams B. Report of the Committee on obscenity and film censorship. London: H.M.S.O. 1979.
38
British Board of Film Classification. Report on effects of sexual and sadistic violence in films.
39
European Court of Human Rights. Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34. 1994.
40
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, ex parte the BBFC, EMLR 850. 2000.
41
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
42
A public service for all: the BBC in the digital age (Cm 6763, 2006). 2006.
43
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review. The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1). 2005. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm
44
Dept of National Heritage, British Broadcasting Corporation. Broadcasting: copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation. London: HMSO 1996.
45
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport. Broadcasting: an agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC. London: TSO 2006.
46
Communications Act 2003. 2003. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
47
BBC. BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview. 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html
48
Born G, Prosser T. Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations. The Modern Law Review. ;64:657–87.
49
Vick DW. Regulatory convergence? Legal Studies. ;26:26–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x
50
Queen’s Bench Division. R v BBC, ex parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605. 1997.
51
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport. Details of Culture, Media and Sport select committee inquiry - The Future of the BBC. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/
52
Culture, Media & Sport Committee. BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report. 2011.
53
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
54
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: Penguin 2008.
55
Communications Act 2003. 2003. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
56
OFCOM. OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
57
OFCOM. OFCOM dismissal of complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera. 9 AD. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/
58
House of Lords. R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott). 2004.
59
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355. 2011.
60
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006.
61
OFCOM. OFCOM Broadcasting Code. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
62
BBC Trust. From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: safeguarding impartiality in the 21st century. 2007.
63
UK Government. Broadcasting Act 1990. 1990. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents
64
Hare I. Insulting Politicians on the Radio? Journal of Media Law. ;4:29–34. doi: 10.5235/175776312802483899
65
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Convergence - Second Report. 2013. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
66
Fielden L. Regulating for trust in journalism: standards regulation in the age of blended media. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2011.
67
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
68
Queen’s Bench Division. R v ASA, ex parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463. 2000.
69
Committee of Advertising Practice. UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx
70
OFCOM. Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/
71
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
72
VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4. 2002.
73
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312. 2008.
74
European Court of Human Rights. Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court decision of 22 April 2013. 22 AD. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244
75
Robertson G, Nicol AGL. Media law. 5th ed. London: Penguin 2008.
76
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006.
77
Chancery Division. DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517. 1989.
78
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court). R v ASA, ex parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581. 2001.
79
Colin R. Munro. Self-regulation in the media. Public Law. ;6–17.
80
Committee of Advertising Practice. BCAP Television Advertising Code. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx
81
European Court of Human Rights. TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51. 2009.
82
Andrew Scott. ‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising. The Modern Law Review. ;66:224–44.
83
Rowbottom J. Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg. Journal of Media Law. ;5:1–13. doi: 10.5235/17577632.5.1.1
84
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
85
Communications Act 2003. 2003. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
86
House of Lords Communications Committee. The Ownership of News. 2008;HL 122. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm
87
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2. 2010.
88
Smith RC, Tambini D. Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges. Journal of Media Law. ;4:35–63. doi: 10.5235/175776312802483862
89
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Plurality. 2014. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm
90
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006.
91
Rowbottom J. Democracy distorted: wealth, influence and democratic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
92
Craufurd Smith R. Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations? Journal of Media Law. ;5:332–44. doi: 10.5235/17577632.5.2.332
93
Arnott C. Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts. Journal of Media Law. ;2:245–75. doi: 10.5235/175776310794389373
94
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. OFCOM Report and other documents on News Corporation acquisition of BSkyB. 2011. http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx
95
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. Media ownership and plurality. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality
96
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
97
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
98
Murray A. Information technology law: the law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
99
US Supreme Court. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997.
100
Divisional Court. Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB). 2012.
101
Communications Act 2003. 2003. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
102
Jacob Rowbottom. Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era. The Modern Law Review. ;69:489–513.
103
Internet Watch Foundation. http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking
104
House of Lords Communications Committee. Media Convergence - Second Report. 2013. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
105
Hitchens L. Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2006.
106
Price ME. The Newness of New Technology. Cardozo Law Review. ;22:1885–913.
107
Edwards L, Waelde C. Law and the Internet. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart 2009.
108
Jack L. Goldsmith. Against Cyberanarchy. The University of Chicago Law Review. ;65:1199–250.
109
The Authority for Television on Demand. Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules. http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance
110
Barendt EM, et al. Media law: text, cases and materials. Harlow: Pearson 2014.
111
Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
112
High Court of Australia. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002.
113
Queen’s Bench Division. Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336. 2006.
114
Queen’s Bench Division. Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27. 2009.
115
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14. 2013.
116
Defamation Act 2013. 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted
117
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar). 2002.
118
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418. 2000.
119
Birnhack MD, Rowbottom JH. Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults. Chicago-Kent Law Review. 2004;79:175–227.
120
BBC News. Google and Microsoft agree steps to block abuse images. 18 AD. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765
121
Muir Watt H. Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law). Michigan Journal Of International Law. ;24:673–96.
122
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201. 2001.
123
Divisional Court. Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425. 2000.
124
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625. 2006.