‘A Public Service for All: The BBC in the Digital Age (Cm 6763, 2006)’. 2006. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age>.
Anderson, David A. ‘Freedom of the Press’. Texas Law Review 80.3 (2002): 429–530. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site>.
Andrew Scott. ‘“A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement”?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising’. The Modern Law Review 66.2 224–244. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625>.
Arnott, Craig. ‘Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts’. Journal of Media Law 2.2 245–275. Web.
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207. N.p., 2002. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Barendt, E.M. Freedom of Speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>.
---. Freedom of Speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>.
---. Freedom of Speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>.
Barendt, Eric. ‘Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson’. Journal of Media Law 5.2 (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals>.
Barendt, Eric M., and et al. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
---. Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014. Print.
BBC. ‘BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview’. BBC Trust, 2013. Web. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html>.
BBC News. ‘Google and Microsoft Agree Steps to Block Abuse Images’. BBC News, 18AD. Web. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765>.
BBC Trust. ‘From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century’. 2007. Web. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html>.
Birnhack, Michael D., and Jacob H. Rowbottom. ‘Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults’. Chicago-Kent Law Review 79.1 (2004): 175–227. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals>.
Born, Georgina, and Tony Prosser. ‘Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations’. The Modern Law Review 64.5 657–687. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275>.
British Board of Film Classification. ‘BBFC Policy Statement, Sexual and Sadistic Violence’. Web. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>.
---. ‘Report on Effects of Sexual and Sadistic Violence in Films’. Web. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>.
‘British Board of Film Classification Guidelines’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/>.
Chancery Division. DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517. N.p., 1989. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Colin R. Munro. ‘Self-Regulation in the Media’. Public Law 1 6–17. Print.
Committee of Advertising Practice. ‘BCAP Television Advertising Code’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx>.
---. ‘UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx>.
‘Communications Act 2003’. N.p., 2003. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>.
‘---’. N.p., 2003. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>.
‘---’. N.p., 2003. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>.
‘---’. N.p., 2003. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2. N.p., 2010. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355. N.p., 2011. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14. N.p., 2013. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Craufurd Smith, Rachael. ‘Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations?’ Journal of Media Law 5.2 332–344. Web.
Culture, Media & Sport Committee. ‘BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report’. 2011. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm>.
‘Defamation Act 2013’. UK Government, 2013. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted>.
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport. ‘Media Ownership and Plurality’. N.p., 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality>.
---. ‘OFCOM Report and Other Documents on News Corporation Acquisition of BSkyB’. N.p., 2011. Web. <http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx>.
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport. Broadcasting: An Agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC. Cm 6872. London: TSO, 2006. Print.
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport. ‘Details of Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee Inquiry - The Future of the BBC’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/>.
Dept of National Heritage and British Broadcasting Corporation. Broadcasting: Copy of Royal Charter for the Continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation. Cm 6925. London: HMSO, 1996. Print.
Divisional Court. Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425. N.p., 2000. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB). N.p., 2012. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Edwards, Lilian, and Charlotte Waelde. Law and the Internet. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart, 2009. Print.
‘European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms’. 1950. Web. <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer>.
European Court of Human Rights. ‘Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court Decision of 22 April 2013’. N.p., 22AD. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244>.
---. Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34. N.p., 1994. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51. N.p., 2009. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1. N.p., 1997. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>.
Fielden, Lara. Regulating for Trust in Journalism: Standards Regulation in the Age of Blended Media. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2011. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1>.
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201. N.p., 2001. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Hare, Ivan. ‘Insulting Politicians on the Radio?’ Journal of Media Law 4.1 29–34. Web.
High Court of Australia. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. N.p., 2002. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
---. Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. N.p., 2002. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Hitchens, Lesley. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. Print.
---. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. Print.
---. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. Print.
---. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. Print.
---. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006. Print.
House of Lords. R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott). N.p., 2004. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
House of Lords Communications Committee. ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’. N.p., 2013. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>.
---. ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’. N.p., 2013. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>.
---. ‘Media Plurality’. N.p., 2014. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm>.
---. ‘The Ownership of News’. N.p., 2008. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm>.
---. ‘The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122’. 2008. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm>.
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review. ‘The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1)’. N.p., 2005. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm>.
‘Internet Watch Foundation’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking>.
‘IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice’. IPSO, n.d. Web. <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html>.
Jack L. Goldsmith. ‘Against Cyberanarchy’. The University of Chicago Law Review 65.4 1199–1250. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262>.
Jacob Rowbottom. ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’. The Modern Law Review 69.4 489–513. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>.
---. ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’. The Modern Law Review 69.4 489–513. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>.
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr. ‘Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media’. Michigan Law Review 75.1 1–42. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849>.
Leveson, Lord Justice. ‘The Leveson Report’. 2012. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>.
---. ‘The Leveson Report’. 2012. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>.
---. ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary’. 2012. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>.
---. ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779’. 2012. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>.
‘Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter’. UK Government, 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>.
‘---’. UK Government, 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>.
Lichtenberg, Judith. Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays. Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Print.
McGregor, O.R. and Great Britain. Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report. Cmnd 6810. London: H.M.S.O., 1977. Print.
Muir Watt, Horatia. ‘Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law)’. Michigan Journal Of International Law 24.3 673–696. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals>.
Murray, Andrew. Information Technology Law: The Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153. Court: European Court of Human Rights, 1991. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
OFCOM. ‘Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/>.
---. ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>.
---. ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>.
---. ‘OFCOM Dismissal of Complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera’. OFCOM Broadcasting Bulletin, 9AD. Web. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/>.
‘Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice’. Press Complaints Commission, n.d. Web. <http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html>.
Price, Monroe E. ‘The Newness of New Technology’. Cardozo Law Review 22.5–6 1885–1913. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals>.
Queen’s Bench Division. Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336. N.p., 2006. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27. N.p., 2009. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. R v ASA, Ex Parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463. N.p., 2000. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. R v BBC, Ex Parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605. N.p., 1997. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court). R on the Application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5. N.p., 2002. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
---. R v ASA, Ex Parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581. N.p., 2001. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312. N.p., 2008. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>.
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418. N.p., 2000. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar). N.p., 2002. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625. N.p., 2006. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, Ex Parte the BBFC, EMLR 850. N.p., 2000. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Robertson, Geoffrey, and Andrew G.L. Nicol. Media Law. 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
---. Media Law. 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
---. Media Law. 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
---. Media Law. 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
Rowbottom, Jacob. ‘Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg’. Journal of Media Law 5.1 1–13. Web.
---. Democracy Distorted: Wealth, Influence and Democratic Politics. The law in context series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print.
Smith, Rachael Craufurd, and Damian Tambini. ‘Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges’. Journal of Media Law 4.1 35–63. Web.
Stewart, Potter. ‘Or of the Press’. Hastings Law Journal 26.3 631–637. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals>.
The Authority for Television on Demand. ‘Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance>.
‘The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO)’. IPSO, n.d. Web. <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html>.
Thomas Gibbons. ‘Freedom of the Press: Ownership and Editorial Values’. Public Law (1992): 279–299. Print.
UK Government. ‘Broadcasting Act 1990’. N.p., 1990. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents>.
---. ‘Video Recordings Act 1984’. N.p., 1984. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents>.
US Supreme Court. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. N.p., 1997. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
---. Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. N.p., 1997. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4. N.p., 2002. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>.
Vick, Douglas W. ‘Regulatory Convergence?’ Legal Studies 26.1 26–64. Web.
Williams, Bernard. Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. Cmnd 7772. London: H.M.S.O., 1979. Print.
