[1]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[2]
L. Hitchens, Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.
[3]
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr., ‘Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media’, Michigan Law Review, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1–42 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849
[4]
US Supreme Court, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[5]
High Court of Australia, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[6]
Jacob Rowbottom, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 489–513 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
[7]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[8]
P. Stewart, ‘Or of the press’, Hastings Law Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 631–637 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals
[9]
E. M. Barendt, Freedom of speech, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
[10]
Thomas Gibbons, ‘Freedom of the press: ownership and editorial values’, Public Law, pp. 279–299, 1992.
[11]
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm
[12]
‘European Convention on Human Rights & fundamental freedoms’. European Court of Human Rights, 1950 [Online]. Available: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
[13]
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153. Court: European Court of Human Rights, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[14]
O. R. McGregor and Great Britain, Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report, vol. Cmnd 6810. London: H.M.S.O., 1977.
[15]
J. Lichtenberg, Democracy and the mass media: a collection of essays, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[16]
D. A. Anderson, ‘Freedom of the Press’, Texas Law Review, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 429–530, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[17]
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[18]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[19]
G. Robertson and A. G. L. Nicol, Media law, 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008.
[20]
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), R on the application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[21]
L. J. Leveson, ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779’. National Archives, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
[22]
E. Barendt, ‘Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals
[23]
L. J. Leveson, ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary’. National Archives, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
[24]
‘Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
[25]
‘The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO)’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html
[26]
‘IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html
[27]
‘Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html
[28]
L. J. Leveson, ‘The Leveson Report’. National Archives, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
[29]
L. J. Leveson, ‘The Leveson Report’. National Archives, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/
[30]
‘Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter
[31]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[32]
G. Robertson and A. G. L. Nicol, Media law, 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008.
[33]
‘British Board of Film Classification guidelines’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/
[34]
British Board of Film Classification, ‘BBFC policy statement, sexual and sadistic violence’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
[35]
UK Government, ‘Video Recordings Act 1984’, 1984. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents
[36]
European Court of Human Rights, Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
[37]
B. Williams, Report of the Committee on obscenity and film censorship, vol. Cmnd 7772. London: H.M.S.O., 1979.
[38]
British Board of Film Classification, ‘Report on effects of sexual and sadistic violence in films’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research
[39]
European Court of Human Rights, Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34. 1994 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[40]
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, ex parte the BBFC, EMLR 850. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[41]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[42]
‘A public service for all: the BBC in the digital age (Cm 6763, 2006)’. UK Government, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age
[43]
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review, ‘The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1)’, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm
[44]
Dept of National Heritage and British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting: copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation, vol. Cm 6925. London: HMSO, 1996.
[45]
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport, Broadcasting: an agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC, vol. Cm 6872. London: TSO, 2006.
[46]
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
[47]
BBC, ‘BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html
[48]
G. Born and T. Prosser, ‘Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 657–687 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275
[49]
D. W. Vick, ‘Regulatory convergence?’, Legal Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 26–64, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x.
[50]
Queen’s Bench Division, R v BBC, ex parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[51]
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport, ‘Details of Culture, Media and Sport select committee inquiry - The Future of the BBC’. [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/
[52]
Culture, Media & Sport Committee, ‘BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm
[53]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[54]
G. Robertson and A. G. L. Nicol, Media law, 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008.
[55]
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
[56]
OFCOM, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’. [Online]. Available: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
[57]
OFCOM, ‘OFCOM dismissal of complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera’, 9AD. [Online]. Available: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/
[58]
House of Lords, R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott). 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[59]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[60]
L. Hitchens, Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.
[61]
OFCOM, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’. [Online]. Available: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/
[62]
BBC Trust, ‘From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: safeguarding impartiality in the 21st century’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html
[63]
UK Government, ‘Broadcasting Act 1990’, 1990. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents
[64]
I. Hare, ‘Insulting Politicians on the Radio?’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–34, doi: 10.5235/175776312802483899.
[65]
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
[66]
L. Fielden, Regulating for trust in journalism: standards regulation in the age of blended media. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1
[67]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[68]
Queen’s Bench Division, R v ASA, ex parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[69]
Committee of Advertising Practice, ‘UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx
[70]
OFCOM, ‘Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising’. [Online]. Available: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/
[71]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[72]
VGT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
[73]
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
[74]
European Court of Human Rights, ‘Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court decision of 22 April 2013’, 22AD. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244
[75]
G. Robertson and A. G. L. Nicol, Media law, 5th ed. London: Penguin, 2008.
[76]
L. Hitchens, Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.
[77]
Chancery Division, DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517. 1989 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[78]
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), R v ASA, ex parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[79]
Colin R. Munro, ‘Self-regulation in the media’, Public Law, no. 1, pp. 6–17.
[80]
Committee of Advertising Practice, ‘BCAP Television Advertising Code’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx
[81]
European Court of Human Rights, TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[82]
Andrew Scott, ‘“A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement”?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 224–244 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625
[83]
J. Rowbottom, ‘Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.5235/17577632.5.1.1.
[84]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[85]
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
[86]
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘The Ownership of News’, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm
[87]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[88]
R. C. Smith and D. Tambini, ‘Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–63, doi: 10.5235/175776312802483862.
[89]
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘Media Plurality’, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm
[90]
L. Hitchens, Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.
[91]
J. Rowbottom, Democracy distorted: wealth, influence and democratic politics, vol. The law in context series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[92]
R. Craufurd Smith, ‘Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations?’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 332–344, doi: 10.5235/17577632.5.2.332.
[93]
C. Arnott, ‘Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts’, Journal of Media Law, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 245–275, doi: 10.5235/175776310794389373.
[94]
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport, ‘OFCOM Report and other documents on News Corporation acquisition of BSkyB’, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx
[95]
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport, ‘Media ownership and plurality’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality
[96]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[97]
E. M. Barendt, Freedom of speech, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
[98]
A. Murray, Information technology law: the law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[99]
US Supreme Court, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[100]
Divisional Court, Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB). 2012 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[101]
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents
[102]
Jacob Rowbottom, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 489–513 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224
[103]
‘Internet Watch Foundation’. [Online]. Available: http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking
[104]
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm
[105]
L. Hitchens, Broadcasting pluralism and diversity: a comparative study of policy and regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.
[106]
M. E. Price, ‘The Newness of New Technology’, Cardozo Law Review, vol. 22, no. 5–6, pp. 1885–1913 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals
[107]
L. Edwards and C. Waelde, Law and the Internet, 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart, 2009.
[108]
Jack L. Goldsmith, ‘Against Cyberanarchy’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1199–1250 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262
[109]
The Authority for Television on Demand, ‘Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules’. [Online]. Available: http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance
[110]
E. M. Barendt and et al, Media law: text, cases and materials, vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
[111]
E. M. Barendt, Freedom of speech, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001
[112]
High Court of Australia, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[113]
Queen’s Bench Division, Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[114]
Queen’s Bench Division, Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[115]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[116]
‘Defamation Act 2013’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted
[117]
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar). 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[118]
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[119]
M. D. Birnhack and J. H. Rowbottom, ‘Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 175–227, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals
[120]
BBC News, ‘Google and Microsoft agree steps to block abuse images’, 18AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765
[121]
H. Muir Watt, ‘Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law)’, Michigan Journal Of International Law, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 673–696 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals
[122]
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[123]
Divisional Court, Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[124]
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
