A Public Service for All: The BBC in the Digital Age (Cm 6763, 2006), UK Government, 2006 <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age>
Anderson, David A., ‘Freedom of the Press’, Texas Law Review, 80.3 (2002), pp. 429–530 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site>
Andrew Scott, ‘“A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement”?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising’, The Modern Law Review, 66.2 (n.d.), pp. 224–44 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625>
Arnott, Craig, ‘Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts’, Journal of Media Law, 2.2 (n.d.), pp. 245–75, doi:10.5235/175776310794389373
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207, in Court: European Court of Human Rights (2002) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Barendt, E.M., Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
——, Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
——, Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
Barendt, Eric, ‘Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson’, Journal of Media Law, 5.2 (2013) <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals>
Barendt, Eric M., and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
——, and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
BBC, ‘BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview’, BBC Trust, 2013 <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html>
BBC News, ‘Google and Microsoft Agree Steps to Block Abuse Images’, BBC News, 18 AD <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765>
BBC Trust, From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century, 2007 <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html>
Birnhack, Michael D., and Jacob H. Rowbottom, ‘Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79.1 (2004), pp. 175–227 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals>
Born, Georgina, and Tony Prosser, ‘Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations’, The Modern Law Review, 64.5 (n.d.), pp. 657–87 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275>
British Board of Film Classification, BBFC Policy Statement, Sexual and Sadistic Violence, n.d. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>
——, Report on Effects of Sexual and Sadistic Violence in Films, n.d. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>
‘British Board of Film Classification Guidelines’, n.d. <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/>
Chancery Division, DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517, 1989 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Colin R. Munro, ‘Self-Regulation in the Media’, Public Law (100 Avenue Road Swiss Cottage London NW3 3PF), no. 1 (n.d.), pp. 6–17
Committee of Advertising Practice, ‘BCAP Television Advertising Code’, n.d. <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx>
——, ‘UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing’, n.d. <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx>
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
——, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
——, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
——, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2, 2010 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355, 2011 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14, 2013 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Craufurd Smith, Rachael, ‘Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations?’, Journal of Media Law, 5.2 (n.d.), pp. 332–44, doi:10.5235/17577632.5.2.332
Culture, Media & Sport Committee, BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report, 2011 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm>
‘Defamation Act 2013’, UK Government, 2013 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted>
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport, ‘Media Ownership and Plurality’, 2013 <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality>
——, ‘OFCOM Report and Other Documents on News Corporation Acquisition of BSkyB’, 2011 <http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx>
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport, Broadcasting: An Agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC (TSO, 2006), Cm 6872
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport, ‘Details of Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee Inquiry - The Future of the BBC’, n.d. <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/>
Dept of National Heritage and British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting: Copy of Royal Charter for the Continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation (HMSO, 1996), Cm 6925
Divisional Court, Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425, 2000 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB), 2012 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Edwards, Lilian, and Charlotte Waelde, Law and the Internet, 3rd ed (Hart, 2009)
European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms, European Court of Human Rights, 1950 <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer>
European Court of Human Rights, ‘Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court Decision of 22 April 2013’, 22 AD <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244>
——, Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34, 1994 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51, 2009 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1, 1997 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
Fielden, Lara, Regulating for Trust in Journalism: Standards Regulation in the Age of Blended Media (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2011) <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1>
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201, (2001) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Hare, Ivan, ‘Insulting Politicians on the Radio?’, Journal of Media Law, 4.1 (n.d.), pp. 29–34, doi:10.5235/175776312802483899
High Court of Australia, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368 (2002) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368 (2002) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Hitchens, Lesley, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
——, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
——, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
——, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
——, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
House of Lords, R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott), 2004 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>
——, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>
——, ‘Media Plurality’, 2014 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm>
——, ‘The Ownership of News’, 2008, HL 122 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm>
——, The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122, 2008 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm>
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review, ‘The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1)’, 2005 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm>
‘Internet Watch Foundation’, n.d. <http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking>
‘IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice’, IPSO, n.d. <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html>
Jack L. Goldsmith, ‘Against Cyberanarchy’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 65.4 (n.d.), pp. 1199–250 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262>
Jacob Rowbottom, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, 69.4 (n.d.), pp. 489–513 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>
——, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, 69.4 (n.d.), pp. 489–513 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr., ‘Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media’, Michigan Law Review, 75.1 (n.d.), pp. 1–42 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849>
Leveson, Lord Justice, The Leveson Report, National Archives, 2012 <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
——, The Leveson Report, National Archives, 2012 <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
——, The Leveson Report, Executive Summary, National Archives, 2012 <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
——, The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779, National Archives, 2012 <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
‘Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter’, UK Government, 2013 <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>
——, UK Government, 2013 <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>
Lichtenberg, Judith, Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays (Cambridge University Press, 1990), Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy
McGregor, O.R. and Great Britain, Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report (H.M.S.O., 1977), Cmnd 6810
Muir Watt, Horatia, ‘Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law)’, Michigan Journal Of International Law, 24.3 (n.d.), pp. 673–96 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals>
Murray, Andrew, Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153, in Observer and Guardian v UK (Court: European Court of Human Rights, 1991) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
OFCOM, ‘Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising’, n.d. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/>
——, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’, n.d. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>
——, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’, n.d. <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>
——, ‘OFCOM Dismissal of Complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera’, OFCOM Broadcasting Bulletin, 9 AD <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/>
‘Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice’, Press Complaints Commission, n.d. <http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html>
Price, Monroe E., ‘The Newness of New Technology’, Cardozo Law Review, 22.5–6 (n.d.), pp. 1885–913 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals>
Queen’s Bench Division, Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336, 2006 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27, 2009 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, R v ASA, Ex Parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463 (2000) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, R v BBC, Ex Parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605, 1997 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), R on the Application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5, 2002 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, R v ASA, Ex Parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581, 2001 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312, in Official Transcript (2008) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418, (2000) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar), in Court: Court of Appeal (2002) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625, in Court: Court of Appeal (2006) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, Ex Parte the BBFC, EMLR 850, (2000) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Robertson, Geoffrey, and Andrew G.L. Nicol, Media Law, 5th ed (Penguin, 2008)
——, and Andrew G.L. Nicol, Media Law, 5th ed (Penguin, 2008)
——, and Andrew G.L. Nicol, Media Law, 5th ed (Penguin, 2008)
——, and Andrew G.L. Nicol, Media Law, 5th ed (Penguin, 2008)
Rowbottom, Jacob, ‘Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg’, Journal of Media Law, 5.1 (n.d.), pp. 1–13, doi:10.5235/17577632.5.1.1
——, Democracy Distorted: Wealth, Influence and Democratic Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2010), The law in context series
Smith, Rachael Craufurd, and Damian Tambini, ‘Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges’, Journal of Media Law, 4.1 (n.d.), pp. 35–63, doi:10.5235/175776312802483862
Stewart, Potter, ‘Or of the Press’, Hastings Law Journal, 26.3 (n.d.), pp. 631–37 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals>
The Authority for Television on Demand, ‘Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules’, n.d. <http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance>
‘The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO)’, IPSO, n.d. <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html>
Thomas Gibbons, ‘Freedom of the Press: Ownership and Editorial Values’, Public Law (100 Avenue Road Swiss Cottage London NW3 3PF), 1992, pp. 279–99
UK Government, ‘Broadcasting Act 1990’, 1990 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents>
——, ‘Video Recordings Act 1984’, 1984 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents>
US Supreme Court, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844 (1997) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844 (1997) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4, in VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland (2002) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
Vick, Douglas W., ‘Regulatory Convergence?’, Legal Studies, 26.1 (n.d.), pp. 26–64, doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x
Williams, Bernard, Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship (H.M.S.O., 1979), Cmnd 7772
