‘A Public Service for All: The BBC in the Digital Age (Cm 6763, 2006)’ (UK Government, 2006) <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-public-service-for-all-the-bbc-in-the-digital-age>
Anderson, David A., ‘Freedom of the Press’, Texas Law Review, 80.3 (2002), 429–530 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=6306076&site=ehost-live&scope=site>
Andrew Scott, ‘“A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement”?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising’, The Modern Law Review, 66.2, 224–44 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097625>
Arnott, Craig, ‘Media Mergers and the Meaning of Sufficient Plurality: A Tale of Two Acts’, Journal of Media Law, 2.2, 245–75 <https://doi.org/10.5235/175776310794389373>
Association Ekin v France (Application No 39288/98) 35 EHRR 1207, Court: European Court of Human Rights, 2002 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7XP6-W3W0-Y9D2-B0M5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Barendt, E.M., Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
———, Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
———, Freedom of Speech, 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225811.001.0001>
Barendt, Eric, ‘Statutory Underpinning: A Threat to Press Freedom Media Law after Leveson’, Journal of Media Law, 5.2 (2013) <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjoomaw&collection=journals>
Barendt, Eric M., and et al, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
———, Media Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Harlow: Pearson, 2014), Longman law series
BBC, ‘BBC Annual Report 2012/13 - Overview’ (BBC Trust, 2013) <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2013/annual_report.html>
BBC News, ‘Google and Microsoft Agree Steps to Block Abuse Images’ (BBC News, 18AD) <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765>
BBC Trust, ‘From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century’, 2007 <http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/our_work/editorial_standards/impartiality/safeguarding_impartiality.html>
Birnhack, Michael D., and Jacob H. Rowbottom, ‘Shielding Children: The European Way Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79.1 (2004), 175–227 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fchknt&collection=journals>
Born, Georgina, and Tony Prosser, ‘Culture and Consumerism: Citizenship, Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC’s Fair Trading Obligations’, The Modern Law Review, 64.5, 657–87 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097275>
British Board of Film Classification, ‘BBFC Policy Statement, Sexual and Sadistic Violence’ <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>
———, ‘Report on Effects of Sexual and Sadistic Violence in Films’ <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/research>
‘British Board of Film Classification Guidelines’ <http://www.bbfc.co.uk/>
Chancery Division, DGFT v Tobyward, 2 All ER 266 - [1989] 1 W.L.R. 517, 1989 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9943DD31E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Colin R. Munro, ‘Self-Regulation in the Media’, Public Law, 1, 6–17
Committee of Advertising Practice, ‘BCAP Television Advertising Code’ <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Broadcast.aspx>
———, ‘UK Code of Non-Broadcasting Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing’ <http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-Broadcast.aspx>
‘Communications Act 2003’, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
‘———’, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
‘———’, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
‘———’, 2003 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents>
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), BSkyB v Competition Commission, EWCA Civ 2, 2010 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7F645240070B11DFBAF4824E29209369&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, Gaunt v OFCOM, EWCA Civ 692, 1 WLR 2355, 2011 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I5F0750B0993B11E0AD16BA3024D1BECD&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, Tamiz v Google Inc, EWCA Civ 308, EMLR 14, 2013 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA400CDA0771911E2BDD5EE83071B65AA&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Craufurd Smith, Rachael, ‘Reviewing Media Ownership Rules in the UK and Europe: Competing or Complementary Investigations?’, Journal of Media Law, 5.2, 332–44 <https://doi.org/10.5235/17577632.5.2.332>
Culture, Media & Sport Committee, ‘BBC Licence Fee Settlement and Annual Report - Fourth Report’, 2011 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/454/45402.htm>
‘Defamation Act 2013’ (UK Government, 2013) <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/contents/enacted>
Dept for Culture, Media & Sport, ‘Media Ownership and Plurality’, 2013 <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/media-ownership-and-plurality>
———, ‘OFCOM Report and Other Documents on News Corporation Acquisition of BSkyB’, 2011 <http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/7737.aspx>
Dept for Culture, Media and Sport, Broadcasting: An Agreement between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the BBC (London: TSO, 2006), Cm 6872
Dept of Culture, Media and Sport, ‘Details of Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee Inquiry - The Future of the BBC’ <http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/131022-future-of-the-bbc-tor/>
Dept of National Heritage and British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting: Copy of Royal Charter for the Continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation (London: HMSO, 1996), Cm 6925
Divisional Court, Atkins, Goodland v DPP, 2 All ER 425, 2000 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I687E0E01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, Chambers v DPP, EWHC 2157 (QB), 2012 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I96CC0DB1D86411E18BFAEAE7E8BE854C&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Edwards, Lilian, and Charlotte Waelde, Law and the Internet, 3rd ed (Oxford: Hart, 2009)
‘European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms’ (European Court of Human Rights, 1950) <http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer>
European Court of Human Rights, ‘Animal Defenders International v UK, European Court Decision of 22 April 2013’, 22AD <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-119244>
———, Otto-Preminger Institute v Austria (A/295-A), 19 EHRR 34, 1994 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I14CC5090E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, TV Vest and Pensioners Party v Norway, 48 EHRR 51, 2009 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I8DD21A00403311DEB8B88BCF555915D2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, Wingrove v UK (17419/90), 24 EHRR 1, 1997 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I08BF5580E42911DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
Fielden, Lara, Regulating for Trust in Journalism: Standards Regulation in the Age of Blended Media (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2011) <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Regulating%20for%20Trust%20in%20Journalism&rn=1>
Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd, QB 201, 2001 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X0YC&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Hare, Ivan, ‘Insulting Politicians on the Radio?’, Journal of Media Law, 4.1, 29–34 <https://doi.org/10.5235/175776312802483899>
High Court of Australia, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368, 2002 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
———, Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick 1 LRC 368, 2002 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-T6P1-DYJ0-8137&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Hitchens, Lesley, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
———, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
———, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
———, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
———, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006)
House of Lords, R (On the Application of Pro-Life Alliance) v BBC, 1 AC 185 (Hoffmann, Scott), 2004 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7ECA41A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
House of Lords Communications Committee, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>
———, ‘Media Convergence - Second Report’, 2013 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldcomuni/154/15402.htm>
———, ‘Media Plurality’, 2014 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/12002.htm>
———, ‘The Ownership of News’, 2008 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12202.htm>
———, ‘The Ownership of the News - First Report of 2007-8, HL 122’, 2008 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/ldcomuni.htm>
House of Lords Select Committee on BBC Charter Review, ‘The Review of the BBC’s Royal Charter (2005, HL Paper 50-1)’, 2005 <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldbbc/50/5002.htm>
‘Internet Watch Foundation’ <http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking>
‘IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice’ (IPSO) <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html>
Jack L. Goldsmith, ‘Against Cyberanarchy’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 65.4, 1199–1250 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600262>
Jacob Rowbottom, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, 69.4, 489–513 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>
———, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’, The Modern Law Review, 69.4, 489–513 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877224>
Lee C. Bollinger, Jr., ‘Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media’, Michigan Law Review, 75.1, 1–42 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1287849>
Leveson, Lord Justice, ‘The Leveson Report’ (National Archives, 2012) <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
———, ‘The Leveson Report’ (National Archives, 2012) <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
———, ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary’ (National Archives, 2012) <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
———, ‘The Leveson Report, Executive Summary HC 779’ (National Archives, 2012) <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/the-report/>
‘Leveson Report: Cross Party Royal Charter’ (UK Government, 2013) <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>
‘———’ (UK Government, 2013) <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leveson-report-cross-party-royal-charter>
Lichtenberg, Judith, Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy
McGregor, O.R. and Great Britain, Royal Commission on the Press - Final Report (London: H.M.S.O., 1977), Cmnd 6810
Muir Watt, Horatia, ‘Yahoo Cyber-Collision of Cultures: Who Regulates (Special Feature - Cyberage Conflicts Law)’, Michigan Journal Of International Law, 24.3, 673–96 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmjil&collection=journals>
Murray, Andrew, Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (Application 13585/88) 14 EHRR 153, Observer and Guardian v UK (Court: European Court of Human Rights, 1991) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJM0-TWW4-21NF&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
OFCOM, ‘Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising’ <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/advert-code/>
———, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’ <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>
———, ‘OFCOM Broadcasting Code’ <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/>
———, ‘OFCOM Dismissal of Complaints against Jerry Springer - the Opera’ (OFCOM Broadcasting Bulletin, 9AD) <http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/pcb61/>
‘Press Complaints Commission Editors’ Code of Practice’ (Press Complaints Commission) <http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html>
Price, Monroe E., ‘The Newness of New Technology’, Cardozo Law Review, 22.5–6, 1885–1913 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcdozo&collection=journals>
Queen’s Bench Division, Bunt v Tilley, 3 All ER 336, 2006 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D5A7A71E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica EWHC 1765 (QB), EMLR 27, 2009 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I9AB8083075A111DE8908AB881D7C0247&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, R v ASA, Ex Parte Charles Robertson, EMLR 463, 2000 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I2ED2E991E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, R v BBC, ex parte Referendum Party, EMLR 605, 1997 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I333CFA70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), R on the application of Anna Ford v PCC EMLR 95 [2002] EMLR 5, 2002 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I79468360E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
———, R v ASA, ex parte Matthias Rath, EMLR 581, 2001 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7A529C30E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
R (On the Application of ADI) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, 1 AC 1312, Official Transcript, 2008 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF99845A0F0C211DC810BBB39FEDB30E7&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
R v Bowden, 2 All ER 418, 2000 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6013&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Perrin, EWCA Crim 747, All ER (D) 359 (Mar), Court: Court of Appeal, 2002 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXP-Y980-TWW4-20VV&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Porter, EWCA Crim 560, 2 All ER 625, Court: Court of Appeal, 2006 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JHK-XM70-TWW4-20H5&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
R v Video Appeals Committee of the BBFC, Ex Parte the BBFC, EMLR 850, 2000 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1FV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Robertson, Geoffrey, and Andrew G.L. Nicol, Media Law, 5th ed (London: Penguin, 2008)
———, Media Law, 5th ed (London: Penguin, 2008)
———, Media Law, 5th ed (London: Penguin, 2008)
———, Media Law, 5th ed (London: Penguin, 2008)
Rowbottom, Jacob, ‘Animal Defenders International: Speech, Spending, and a Change of Direction in Strasbourg’, Journal of Media Law, 5.1, 1–13 <https://doi.org/10.5235/17577632.5.1.1>
———, Democracy Distorted: Wealth, Influence and Democratic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), The law in context series
Smith, Rachael Craufurd, and Damian Tambini, ‘Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges’, Journal of Media Law, 4.1, 35–63 <https://doi.org/10.5235/175776312802483862>
Stewart, Potter, ‘Or of the Press’, Hastings Law Journal, 26.3, 631–37 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhastlj&collection=journals>
The Authority for Television on Demand, ‘Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) Rules’ <http://www.atvod.co.uk/rules-and-guidance>
‘The Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO)’ (IPSO) <https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/whoweare.html>
Thomas Gibbons, ‘Freedom of the Press: Ownership and Editorial Values’, Public Law, 1992, 279–99
UK Government, ‘Broadcasting Act 1990’, 1990 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/42/contents>
———, ‘Video Recordings Act 1984’, 1984 <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/39/contents>
US Supreme Court, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844, 1997 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
———, Reno v ACLU (1997) 521 US 844, 1997 <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BGK-W1K1-DYBP-W2KF&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 34 EHRR 4, VGT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v Switzerland, 2002 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE73CB0B0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth>
Vick, Douglas W., ‘Regulatory Convergence?’, Legal Studies, 26.1, 26–64 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00005.x>
Williams, Bernard, Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship (London: H.M.S.O., 1979), Cmnd 7772
