1.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu./
2.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
3.
Baldwin T, Brownsword R, Schmidt H. Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts. Public Health Ethics. 2009;2(1):113-116. doi:10.1093/phe/php007
4.
Dawson Angus, Verweij Marcel. The Steward of the Millian State. Public Health Ethics. 2008;1(3):193-195. doi:10.1093/phe/phn034
5.
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England .
6.
Mill, John Stuart, Gray, John. On Liberty and Other Essays. Vol Oxford world’s classics. Oxford University Press; 1998.
7.
Feinberg, Joel. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Vol Oxford scholarship online. Oxford Scholarship Online; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
8.
Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press; 1969.
9.
Cowling, Maurice. Mill and Liberalism. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
10.
Devlin, Patrick. The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford U.P; 1965.
11.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth; 1977.
12.
Hart, H. L. A. Law, Liberty and Morality. Vol Harry Camp lectures. Oxford University Press; 1963.
13.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. New ed. ICS Press; 1990.
14.
Horton J. Toleration, Morality and Harm. In: Aspects of Toleration: Philosophical Studies. Methuen; 1985:113-135.
15.
MacCallum GC. Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review. 1967;76(3):312-334. doi:10.2307/2183622
16.
Mendus, Susan. Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1989.
17.
Ten, C. L. Mill on Liberty. Clarendon Press; 1980.
18.
Waldron, Jeremy. Liberal Rights: Collected Papers, 1981-1991. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
19.
Paternalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
20.
Miller, David. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Blackwell Reference; 1987.
21.
Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review. 2003;70(4):1159-1202. doi:10.2307/1600573
22.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review. 2003;93(2):175-179. doi:10.1257/000282803321947001
23.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Penguin; 2009.
24.
Report published on Behaviour Change - News from Parliament - UK Parliament.
25.
Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law. 2006;Oxford scholarship online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
26.
Weale A. Invisible Hand or Fatherly Hand? Problems of Paternalism in the New Perspective on Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1983;7(4):784-807. doi:10.1215/03616878-7-4-784
27.
Social Value Judgements. Published online 2008.
28.
Daniels N. Accountability For Reasonableness: Establishing A Fair Process For Priority Setting Is Easier Than Agreeing On Principles. BMJ. 2000;321(7272):1300-1301. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300
29.
Rawlins MD. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ. 2004;329(7459):224-227. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224
30.
Weale A. Rationing health care. BMJ. 1998;316(7129):410-410. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410
31.
Evidence Based Medicine.
32.
Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A. QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics. 2005;14(2):197-208. doi:10.1002/hec.924
33.
Nord, Erik. Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense out of QALYs. Vol Cambridge studies in philosphy and public policy. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
34.
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice and the High Cost of Health. In: Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Harvard University Press; 2000:307-319.
35.
Dworkin R. ‘Will Clinton’s Plan Be Fair?’
36.
Battin MP. Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die? Ethics. 97(2):317-340.
37.
Buchanan, Allen E. Justice and Health Care: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press; 2009.
38.
Callahan D. Rationing Medical Progress. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322(25):1810-1813. doi:10.1056/NEJM199006213222511
39.
Callahan, Daniel. What Kind of Life: The Limits of Medical Progress. Simon and Schuster; 1990.
40.
Daniels, Norman. Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press; 2008.
41.
Hadorn DC. Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-Effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;265(17):2218-2225.
42.
Menzel, Paul T. Medical Costs, Moral Choices: A Philosophy of Health Care Economics in America. Yale University Press; 1983.
43.
Menzel, Paul T. Strong Medicine: The Ethical Rationing of Health Care. Oxford University Press; 1990.
44.
Oliver, Adam J., Health Equity Network (Great Britain). Health Care Priority Setting: Implications for Health Inequalities : Proceedings from a Meeting of the Health Equity Network. Nuffield Trust; 2003.
45.
Weale A. Cost and Choice in Health Care: The Ethical Dimension. King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London; 1988.
46.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care. Vol Studies in social economics. Brookings Institution; 1984.
47.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care. Vol Studies in social economics. Brookings Institution; 1984.
48.
Klein, Rudolf, Redmayne, Sharon, Day, Patricia. Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service. Vol State of health series. Open University Press; 1996.
49.
Okma, Kieke G. H., Marmor, Theodore R., Freeman, Richard. Comparative Studies and the Politics of Modern Medical Care. Yale University Press; 2009.
50.
Marmor, Theodore R. Understanding Health Care Reform. Yale University Press; 1994.
51.
White, Joseph. Competing Solutions: American Health Care Proposals and International Experience. Brookings Institution; 1995.
52.
Richards M. Improving Access to Medicines for NHS Patients: A Report to the Secretary of State for Health.  . Published online 2008.
53.
Jackson E. Top-up Payments for Expensive Cancer Drugs: Rationing, Fairness and the NHS. Modern Law Review. 2010;73(3):399-427. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00801.x
54.
Weale A, Clark S. Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2009;5(02):225-246. doi:10.1017/S1744133109990211
55.
Gubb J. Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1104-1104. doi:10.1136/bmj.39563.453183.AD
56.
Finlay I, Crisp N. Drugs for cancer and copayments. BMJ. 2008;337(jun30 2):a527-a527. doi:10.1136/bmj.a527
57.
Top-up Fees. 2008;(2008-9).
58.
Richards C, Dingwall R, Watson A. Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care? BMJ. 2001;323(7312):563-565. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563
59.
Axelrod, Robert M. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books; 1984.
60.
Barry, Brian. Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. University of Chicago Press; 1978.
61.
Hardin, Russell, Resources for the Future. Collective Action. Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press; 1982.
62.
McLean, Iain. Public Choice: An Introduction. Basil Blackwell; 1987.
63.
Moe, Terry M. The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of the Political Interest Groups. University of Chicago Press; 1980.
64.
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol Harvard economic studies. Harvard University Press; 1971.
65.
Olson, Mancur. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press
66.
Sandler T. Collective Action: Theory and Applications. University of Michigan Press; 1992.
67.
Sandler, Todd. Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
68.
Bolin, Bert. A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2007.
69.
Jordan, Andrew. Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation? Cambridge University Press; 2010.
70.
Rowlands, Ian H. The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. Vol Issues in environmental politics. Manchester University Press; 1995.
71.
Climate change - Met Office.
72.
Environment and energy - UK Parliament.
73.
Bolin, Bert. A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2007.
74.
Carter, R. M. Climate: The Counter Consensus : A Palaeoclimatologist Speaks. Vol Independent minds. Stacey International; 2010.
75.
Hulme, M. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
76.
Pearce, Fred. The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming. Guardian Books; 2010.
77.
Weale A. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Policies . In: The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society. SAGE; 2007:590-600.
78.
Beckerman, Wilfred. Small Is Stupid: Blowing the Whistle on the Greens. Duckworth; 1995.
79.
Funtowicz, Silvio O., Ravetz, Jerome R. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Vol Theory and decision library. Kluwer Academic Pub; 1990.
80.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, Best Practicable Environmental Option . Published online 1988.
81.
North, Richard D. Life on a Modern Planet: A Manifesto for Progress. Manchester University Press; 1995.
82.
Roberts, L. E. J., Weale, Albert. Innovation and Environmental Risk. Belhaven; 1991.
83.
Sunstein, Cass R. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Vol The Seeley lectures. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
84.
Tudge C. Where to Draw the Line. New Scientist . 2003;(2395).
85.
Wildavsky, Aaron B. But Is It True?: A Citizen’s Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Issues. Harvard University Press; 1995.
86.
Beckerman W, Hepburn C. Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics. 2007;8(1):187-210.
87.
Dietz et. al. S. Reflections on the Stern Review (1): A Robust Case for Strong Action to Reduce the Risks of Climate Change. World Economics. 2007;8(1):121-168.
88.
Henderson D. Economists and Climate Science: A Critique. World Economics. 2009;10(1):59-90.
89.
Nordhaus W. ECONOMICS: Critical Assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change. Science. 2007;317(5835):201-202. doi:10.1126/science.1137316
90.
Simmonds I, Steffen W. Response to ‘The Stern Review: A Dual Critique - Part I: The Science. World Economics. 2007;8(2):133-141.
91.
BROOME J. Discounting the Future. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1994;23(2):128-156. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.x
92.
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Clarendon; 1984.
93.
Barry B. Justice between Generations. In: Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory. Clarendon; 1989:494-510.
94.
Barry B. The Ethics of Resource Depletion. In: Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory. Clarendon; 1989:511-525.
95.
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010;13(1):203-228. doi:10.1080/13698230903326331
96.
Meyer LH, Roser D. Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010;13(1):229-253. doi:10.1080/13698230903326349
97.
Thompson DF. Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010;13(1):17-37. doi:10.1080/13698230903326232
98.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org./