[1]
‘Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu./
[2]
‘Nuffield Council on Bioethics’. .
[3]
T. Baldwin, R. Brownsword, and H. Schmidt, ‘Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts’, Public Health Ethics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 113–116, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1093/phe/php007.
[4]
Angus. Dawson and Marcel. Verweij, ‘The Steward of the Millian State’, Public Health Ethics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 193–195, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1093/phe/phn034.
[5]
‘Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England ’. .
[6]
Mill, John Stuart and Gray, John, On liberty and other essays, vol. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[7]
Feinberg, Joel, The moral limits of the criminal law, vol. Oxford scholarship online. Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
[8]
Berlin, Isaiah, Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press, 1969.
[9]
Cowling, Maurice, Mill and liberalism, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[10]
Devlin, Patrick, The enforcement of morals. Oxford U.P, 1965.
[11]
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.
[12]
Hart, H. L. A., Law, liberty and morality, vol. Harry Camp lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
[13]
Himmelfarb, Gertrude, On liberty and liberalism: the case of John Stuart Mill, New ed. San Francisco, Calif: ICS Press, 1990.
[14]
J. Horton , ‘Toleration, Morality and Harm’, in Aspects of toleration: philosophical studies, London: Methuen, 1985, pp. 113–135.
[15]
G. C. MacCallum, ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 312–334, Jul. 1967, doi: 10.2307/2183622.
[16]
Mendus, Susan, Toleration and the limits of liberalism, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.
[17]
Ten, C. L., Mill on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
[18]
Waldron, Jeremy, Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[19]
‘Paternalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. .
[20]
Miller, David, The Blackwell encyclopaedia of political thought. Oxford: Blackwell Reference, 1987.
[21]
C. R. Sunstein and R. H. Thaler, ‘Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1159–1202, Autumn 2003, doi: 10.2307/1600573.
[22]
R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein, ‘Libertarian Paternalism’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 175–179, May 2003, doi: 10.1257/000282803321947001.
[23]
Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R., Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin, 2009.
[24]
‘Report published on Behaviour Change - News from Parliament - UK Parliament’. .
[25]
Feinberg, Joel, ‘The moral limits of the criminal law’, vol. Oxford scholarship online, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
[26]
A. Weale, ‘Invisible Hand or Fatherly Hand? Problems of Paternalism in the New Perspective on Health’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 784–807, Jan. 1983, doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-4-784.
[27]
‘Social Value Judgements’. NICE, 2008.
[28]
N. Daniels, ‘Accountability For Reasonableness: Establishing A Fair Process For Priority Setting Is Easier Than Agreeing On Principles’, BMJ, vol. 321, no. 7272, pp. 1300–1301, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300.
[29]
M. D. Rawlins, ‘National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments’, BMJ, vol. 329, no. 7459, pp. 224–227, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
[30]
A. Weale, ‘Rationing health care’, BMJ, vol. 316, no. 7129, pp. 410–410, Feb. 1998, doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410.
[31]
‘Evidence Based Medicine’. .
[32]
P. Dolan, R. Shaw, A. Tsuchiya, and A. Williams, ‘QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature’, Health Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 197–208, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1002/hec.924.
[33]
Nord, Erik, Cost-value analysis in health care: making sense out of QALYs, vol. Cambridge studies in philosphy and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[34]
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Justice and the High Cost of Health’, in Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp. 307–319.
[35]
R. Dworkin, ‘“Will Clinton’s Plan Be Fair?”’, Jan. 13, 1994. .
[36]
M. P. Battin, ‘Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die?’, Ethics, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 317–340.
[37]
Buchanan, Allen E., Justice and health care: selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[38]
D. Callahan, ‘Rationing Medical Progress’, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 322, no. 25, pp. 1810–1813, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006213222511.
[39]
Callahan, Daniel, What kind of life: the limits of medical progress. London: Simon and Schuster, 1990.
[40]
Daniels, Norman, Just health: meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[41]
D. C. Hadorn, ‘Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-Effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue’, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 265, no. 17, pp. 2218–2225, 1991.
[42]
Menzel, Paul T., Medical costs, moral choices: a philosophy of health care economics in America. London: Yale University Press, 1983.
[43]
Menzel, Paul T., Strong medicine: the ethical rationing of health care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[44]
Oliver, Adam J. and Health Equity Network (Great Britain), Health care priority setting: implications for health inequalities : proceedings from a meeting of the Health Equity Network. London: Nuffield Trust, 2003.
[45]
A. Weale, Cost and choice in health care: the ethical dimension. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London, 1988.
[46]
Aaron, Henry J. and Schwartz, William B., The painful prescription: rationing hospital care, vol. Studies in social economics. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1984.
[47]
Aaron, Henry J. and Schwartz, William B., The painful prescription: rationing hospital care, vol. Studies in social economics. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1984.
[48]
Klein, Rudolf, Redmayne, Sharon, and Day, Patricia, Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service, vol. State of health series. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996.
[49]
Okma, Kieke G. H., Marmor, Theodore R., and Freeman, Richard, Comparative studies and the politics of modern medical care. London: Yale University Press, 2009.
[50]
Marmor, Theodore R., Understanding health care reform. London: Yale University Press, 1994.
[51]
White, Joseph, Competing solutions: American health care proposals and international experience. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1995.
[52]
M. Richards, ‘Improving Access to Medicines for NHS Patients: A Report to the Secretary of State for Health.  ’. 2008.
[53]
E. Jackson, ‘Top-up Payments for Expensive Cancer Drugs: Rationing, Fairness and the NHS’, Modern Law Review, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 399–427, May 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00801.x.
[54]
A. Weale and S. Clark, ‘Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, vol. 5, no. 02, pp. 225–246, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990211.
[55]
J. Gubb, ‘Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes’, BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7653, pp. 1104–1104, May 2008, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39563.453183.AD.
[56]
I. Finlay and N. Crisp, ‘Drugs for cancer and copayments’, BMJ, vol. 337, no. jun30 2, pp. a527–a527, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a527.
[57]
‘Top-up Fees’, no. 2008–9. House of Commons Health Committee , 2008.
[58]
C. Richards, R. Dingwall, and A. Watson, ‘Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care?’, BMJ, vol. 323, no. 7312, pp. 563–565, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
[59]
Axelrod, Robert M., The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
[60]
Barry, Brian, Sociologists, economists and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.
[61]
Hardin, Russell and Resources for the Future, Collective action. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.
[62]
McLean, Iain, Public Choice: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
[63]
Moe, Terry M., The organization of interests: incentives and the internal dynamics of the political interest groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
[64]
Olson, Mancur, The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups, vol. Harvard economic studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1971.
[65]
Olson, Mancur, The rise and decline of nations. London: Yale University Press.
[66]
T. Sandler, Collective action: theory and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.
[67]
Sandler, Todd, Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[68]
Bolin, Bert, A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[69]
Jordan, Andrew, Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[70]
Rowlands, Ian H., The politics of global atmospheric change, vol. Issues in environmental politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.
[71]
‘Climate change - Met Office’. .
[72]
‘Environment and energy - UK Parliament’. .
[73]
Bolin, Bert, A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[74]
Carter, R. M., Climate: the counter consensus : a palaeoclimatologist speaks, vol. Independent minds. London: Stacey International, 2010.
[75]
Hulme, M., Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[76]
Pearce, Fred, The climate files: the battle for the truth about global warming. London: Guardian Books, 2010.
[77]
A. Weale, ‘The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Policies ’, in The SAGE handbook of environment and society, London: SAGE, 2007, pp. 590–600.
[78]
Beckerman, Wilfred, Small is stupid: blowing the whistle on the Greens. London: Duckworth, 1995.
[79]
Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Ravetz, Jerome R., Uncertainty and quality in science for policy, vol. Theory and decision library. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub, 1990.
[80]
‘Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, Best Practicable Environmental Option ’. HMSO, London, 1988.
[81]
North, Richard D., Life on a modern planet: a manifesto for progress. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.
[82]
Roberts, L. E. J. and Weale, Albert, Innovation and environmental risk. London: Belhaven, 1991.
[83]
Sunstein, Cass R., Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle, vol. The Seeley lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[84]
C. Tudge, ‘Where to Draw the Line’, New Scientist , no. 2395, 2003.
[85]
Wildavsky, Aaron B., But is it true?: a citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995.
[86]
W. Beckerman and C. Hepburn, ‘Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’, World Economics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 187–210, 2007.
[87]
S. Dietz et. al. , ‘Reflections on the Stern Review (1): A Robust Case for Strong Action to Reduce the Risks of Climate Change’, World Economics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 121–168, 2007.
[88]
D. Henderson , ‘Economists and Climate Science: A Critique’, World Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–90, 2009.
[89]
W. Nordhaus, ‘ECONOMICS: Critical Assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change’, Science, vol. 317, no. 5835, pp. 201–202, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1137316.
[90]
I. Simmonds and W. Steffen, ‘Response to ‘The Stern Review: A Dual Critique - Part I: The Science’, World Economics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 2007.
[91]
J. BROOME, ‘Discounting the Future’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 128–156, Apr. 1994, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.x.
[92]
Parfit, Derek, Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
[93]
B. Barry , ‘Justice between Generations’, in Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989, pp. 494–510.
[94]
B. Barry , ‘The Ethics of Resource Depletion’, in Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989, pp. 511–525.
[95]
S. Caney, ‘Climate change and the duties of the advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 203–228, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13698230903326331.
[96]
L. H. Meyer and D. Roser, ‘Climate justice and historical emissions’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 229–253, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13698230903326349.
[97]
D. F. Thompson, ‘Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 17–37, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13698230903326232.
[98]
‘Nuffield Council on Bioethics’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org./