1.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu./.
2.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
3.
Baldwin, T., Brownsword, R., Schmidt, H.: Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts. Public Health Ethics. 2, 113–116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/php007.
4.
Dawson, Angus., Verweij, Marcel.: The Steward of the Millian State. Public Health Ethics. 1, 193–195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phn034.
5.
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England .
6.
Mill, John Stuart, Gray, John: On liberty and other essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998).
7.
Feinberg, Joel: The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford] (2006).
8.
Berlin, Isaiah: Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press, London (1969).
9.
Cowling, Maurice: Mill and liberalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
10.
Devlin, Patrick: The enforcement of morals. Oxford U.P (1965).
11.
Dworkin, Ronald: Taking rights seriously. Duckworth, London (1977).
12.
Hart, H. L. A.: Law, liberty and morality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1963).
13.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude: On liberty and liberalism: the case of John Stuart Mill. ICS Press, San Francisco, Calif (1990).
14.
Horton , J.: Toleration, Morality and Harm. In: Aspects of toleration: philosophical studies. pp. 113–135. Methuen, London (1985).
15.
MacCallum, G.C.: Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review. 76, 312–334 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183622.
16.
Mendus, Susan: Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1989).
17.
Ten, C. L.: Mill on Liberty. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1980).
18.
Waldron, Jeremy: Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).
19.
Paternalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
20.
Miller, David: The Blackwell encyclopaedia of political thought. Blackwell Reference, Oxford (1987).
21.
Sunstein, C.R., Thaler, R.H.: Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review. 70, 1159–1202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/1600573.
22.
Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review. 93, 175–179 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001.
23.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R.: Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin, London (2009).
24.
Report published on Behaviour Change - News from Parliament - UK Parliament.
25.
Feinberg, Joel: The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford scholarship online, (2006).
26.
Weale, A.: Invisible Hand or Fatherly Hand? Problems of Paternalism in the New Perspective on Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 7, 784–807 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-7-4-784.
27.
Social Value Judgements, (2008).
28.
Daniels, N.: Accountability For Reasonableness: Establishing A Fair Process For Priority Setting Is Easier Than Agreeing On Principles. BMJ. 321, 1300–1301 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300.
29.
Rawlins, M.D.: National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ. 329, 224–227 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
30.
Weale, A.: Rationing health care. BMJ. 316, 410–410 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410.
31.
Evidence Based Medicine.
32.
Dolan, P., Shaw, R., Tsuchiya, A., Williams, A.: QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics. 14, 197–208 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.924.
33.
Nord, Erik: Cost-value analysis in health care: making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
34.
Dworkin, Ronald: Justice and the High Cost of Health. In: Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. pp. 307–319. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).
35.
Dworkin, R.: ‘Will Clinton’s Plan Be Fair?’
36.
Battin, M.P.: Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die? Ethics. 97, 317–340.
37.
Buchanan, Allen E.: Justice and health care: selected essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
38.
Callahan, D.: Rationing Medical Progress. New England Journal of Medicine. 322, 1810–1813 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199006213222511.
39.
Callahan, Daniel: What kind of life: the limits of medical progress. Simon and Schuster, London (1990).
40.
Daniels, Norman: Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008).
41.
Hadorn, D.C.: Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-Effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue. Journal of the American Medical Association. 265, 2218–2225 (1991).
42.
Menzel, Paul T.: Medical costs, moral choices: a philosophy of health care economics in America. Yale University Press, London (1983).
43.
Menzel, Paul T.: Strong medicine: the ethical rationing of health care. Oxford University Press, New York (1990).
44.
Oliver, Adam J., Health Equity Network (Great Britain): Health care priority setting: implications for health inequalities : proceedings from a meeting of the Health Equity Network. Nuffield Trust, London (2003).
45.
Weale, A.: Cost and choice in health care: the ethical dimension. King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London, London (1988).
46.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B.: The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Brookings Institution, Washington (1984).
47.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B.: The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Brookings Institution, Washington (1984).
48.
Klein, Rudolf, Redmayne, Sharon, Day, Patricia: Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Open University Press, Buckingham (1996).
49.
Okma, Kieke G. H., Marmor, Theodore R., Freeman, Richard: Comparative studies and the politics of modern medical care. Yale University Press, London (2009).
50.
Marmor, Theodore R.: Understanding health care reform. Yale University Press, London (1994).
51.
White, Joseph: Competing solutions: American health care proposals and international experience. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (1995).
52.
Richards, M.: Improving Access to Medicines for NHS Patients: A Report to the Secretary of State for Health. , (2008).
53.
Jackson, E.: Top-up Payments for Expensive Cancer Drugs: Rationing, Fairness and the NHS. Modern Law Review. 73, 399–427 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00801.x.
54.
Weale, A., Clark, S.: Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 5, 225–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133109990211.
55.
Gubb, J.: Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes. BMJ. 336, 1104–1104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39563.453183.AD.
56.
Finlay, I., Crisp, N.: Drugs for cancer and copayments. BMJ. 337, a527–a527 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a527.
58.
Richards, C., Dingwall, R., Watson, A.: Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care? BMJ. 323, 563–565 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563.
59.
Axelrod, Robert M.: The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984).
60.
Barry, Brian: Sociologists, economists and democracy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1978).
61.
Hardin, Russell, Resources for the Future: Collective action. Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1982).
62.
McLean, Iain: Public Choice: An Introduction. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1987).
63.
Moe, Terry M.: The organization of interests: incentives and the internal dynamics of the political interest groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980).
64.
Olson, Mancur: The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1971).
65.
Olson, Mancur: The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, London.
66.
Sandler, T.: Collective action: theory and applications. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1992).
67.
Sandler, Todd: Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K (1997).
68.
Bolin, Bert: A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
69.
Jordan, Andrew: Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
70.
Rowlands, Ian H.: The politics of global atmospheric change. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1995).
71.
Climate change - Met Office.
72.
Environment and energy - UK Parliament.
73.
Bolin, Bert: A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
74.
Carter, R. M.: Climate: the counter consensus : a palaeoclimatologist speaks. Stacey International, London (2010).
75.
Hulme, M.: Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
76.
Pearce, Fred: The climate files: the battle for the truth about global warming. Guardian Books, London (2010).
77.
Weale, A.: The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Policies . In: The SAGE handbook of environment and society. pp. 590–600. SAGE, London (2007).
78.
Beckerman, Wilfred: Small is stupid: blowing the whistle on the Greens. Duckworth, London (1995).
79.
Funtowicz, Silvio O., Ravetz, Jerome R.: Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer Academic Pub, Dordrecht (1990).
80.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, Best Practicable Environmental Option , (1988).
81.
North, Richard D.: Life on a modern planet: a manifesto for progress. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1995).
82.
Roberts, L. E. J., Weale, Albert: Innovation and environmental risk. Belhaven, London (1991).
83.
Sunstein, Cass R.: Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
84.
Tudge, C.: Where to Draw the Line. New Scientist . (2003).
85.
Wildavsky, Aaron B.: But is it true?: a citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1995).
86.
Beckerman, W., Hepburn, C.: Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics. 8, 187–210 (2007).
87.
Dietz et. al. , S.: Reflections on the Stern Review (1): A Robust Case for Strong Action to Reduce the Risks of Climate Change. World Economics. 8, 121–168 (2007).
88.
Henderson , D.: Economists and Climate Science: A Critique. World Economics. 10, 59–90 (2009).
89.
Nordhaus, W.: ECONOMICS: Critical Assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change. Science. 317, 201–202 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137316.
90.
Simmonds , I., Steffen, W.: Response to ‘The Stern Review: A Dual Critique - Part I: The Science. World Economics. 8, 133–141 (2007).
91.
BROOME, J.: Discounting the Future. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 23, 128–156 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.x.
92.
Parfit, Derek: Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford (1984).
93.
Barry , B.: Justice between Generations. In: Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. pp. 494–510. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
94.
Barry , B.: The Ethics of Resource Depletion. In: Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. pp. 511–525. Clarendon, Oxford (1989).
95.
Caney, S.: Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13, 203–228 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.
96.
Meyer, L.H., Roser, D.: Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13, 229–253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326349.
97.
Thompson, D.F.: Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13, 17–37 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326232.
98.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org./.
