1
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu./
2
Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
3
Baldwin T, Brownsword R, Schmidt H. Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts. Public Health Ethics 2009;2:113–6. doi:10.1093/phe/php007
4
Dawson Angus, Verweij Marcel. The Steward of the Millian State. Public Health Ethics 2008;1:193–5. doi:10.1093/phe/phn034
5
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England .
6
Mill, John Stuart, Gray, John. On liberty and other essays. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998.
7
Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford]: : Oxford Scholarship Online 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001
8
Berlin, Isaiah. Four essays on liberty. London: : Oxford University Press 1969.
9
Cowling, Maurice. Mill and liberalism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
10
Devlin, Patrick. The enforcement of morals. Oxford U.P 1965.
11
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking rights seriously. London: : Duckworth 1977.
12
Hart, H. L. A. Law, liberty and morality. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1963.
13
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. On liberty and liberalism: the case of John Stuart Mill. New ed. San Francisco, Calif: : ICS Press 1990.
14
Horton J. Toleration, Morality and Harm. In: Aspects of toleration: philosophical studies. London: : Methuen 1985. 113–35.
15
MacCallum GC. Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review 1967;76:312–34. doi:10.2307/2183622
16
Mendus, Susan. Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1989.
17
Ten, C. L. Mill on Liberty. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1980.
18
Waldron, Jeremy. Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
19
Paternalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
20
Miller, David. The Blackwell encyclopaedia of political thought. Oxford: : Blackwell Reference 1987.
21
Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review 2003;70:1159–202. doi:10.2307/1600573
22
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review 2003;93:175–9. doi:10.1257/000282803321947001
23
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: : Penguin 2009.
24
Report published on Behaviour Change - News from Parliament - UK Parliament.
25
Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law. 2006;Oxford scholarship online.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001
26
Weale A. Invisible Hand or Fatherly Hand? Problems of Paternalism in the New Perspective on Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1983;7:784–807. doi:10.1215/03616878-7-4-784
27
Social Value Judgements. 2008.
28
Daniels N. Accountability For Reasonableness: Establishing A Fair Process For Priority Setting Is Easier Than Agreeing On Principles. BMJ 2000;321:1300–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300
29
Rawlins MD. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ 2004;329:224–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224
30
Weale A. Rationing health care. BMJ 1998;316:410–410. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.410
31
Evidence Based Medicine.
32
Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, et al. QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics 2005;14:197–208. doi:10.1002/hec.924
33
Nord, Erik. Cost-value analysis in health care: making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
34
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice and the High Cost of Health. In: Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2000. 307–19.
35
Dworkin R. ‘Will Clinton’s Plan Be Fair?’ 1994.
36
Battin MP. Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die? Ethics;97:317–40.
37
Buchanan, Allen E. Justice and health care: selected essays. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
38
Callahan D. Rationing Medical Progress. New England Journal of Medicine 1990;322:1810–3. doi:10.1056/NEJM199006213222511
39
Callahan, Daniel. What kind of life: the limits of medical progress. London: : Simon and Schuster 1990.
40
Daniels, Norman. Just health: meeting health needs fairly. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
41
Hadorn DC. Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-Effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991;265:2218–25.
42
Menzel, Paul T. Medical costs, moral choices: a philosophy of health care economics in America. London: : Yale University Press 1983.
43
Menzel, Paul T. Strong medicine: the ethical rationing of health care. New York: : Oxford University Press 1990.
44
Oliver, Adam J., Health Equity Network (Great Britain). Health care priority setting: implications for health inequalities : proceedings from a meeting of the Health Equity Network. London: : Nuffield Trust 2003.
45
Weale A. Cost and choice in health care: the ethical dimension. London: : King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London 1988.
46
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Washington: : Brookings Institution 1984.
47
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Washington: : Brookings Institution 1984.
48
Klein, Rudolf, Redmayne, Sharon, Day, Patricia. Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: : Open University Press 1996.
49
Okma, Kieke G. H., Marmor, Theodore R., Freeman, Richard. Comparative studies and the politics of modern medical care. London: : Yale University Press 2009.
50
Marmor, Theodore R. Understanding health care reform. London: : Yale University Press 1994.
51
White, Joseph. Competing solutions: American health care proposals and international experience. Washington, D.C.: : Brookings Institution 1995.
52
Richards M. Improving Access to Medicines for NHS Patients: A Report to the Secretary of State for Health. . 2008.
53
Jackson E. Top-up Payments for Expensive Cancer Drugs: Rationing, Fairness and the NHS. Modern Law Review 2010;73:399–427. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00801.x
54
Weale A, Clark S. Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments. Health Economics, Policy and Law 2009;5:225–46. doi:10.1017/S1744133109990211
55
Gubb J. Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes. BMJ 2008;336:1104–1104. doi:10.1136/bmj.39563.453183.AD
56
Finlay I, Crisp N. Drugs for cancer and copayments. BMJ 2008;337:a527–a527. doi:10.1136/bmj.a527
58
Richards C, Dingwall R, Watson A. Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care? BMJ 2001;323:563–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7312.563
59
Axelrod, Robert M. The evolution of cooperation. New York: : Basic Books 1984.
60
Barry, Brian. Sociologists, economists and democracy. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1978.
61
Hardin, Russell, Resources for the Future. Collective action. Baltimore: : Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press 1982.
62
McLean, Iain. Public Choice: An Introduction. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987.
63
Moe, Terry M. The organization of interests: incentives and the internal dynamics of the political interest groups. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1980.
64
Olson, Mancur. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1971.
65
Olson, Mancur. The rise and decline of nations. London: : Yale University Press
66
Sandler T. Collective action: theory and applications. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1992.
67
Sandler, Todd. Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge, U.K: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
68
Bolin, Bert. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
69
Jordan, Andrew. Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010.
70
Rowlands, Ian H. The politics of global atmospheric change. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1995.
71
Climate change - Met Office.
72
Environment and energy - UK Parliament.
73
Bolin, Bert. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
74
Carter, R. M. Climate: the counter consensus : a palaeoclimatologist speaks. London: : Stacey International 2010.
75
Hulme, M. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
76
Pearce, Fred. The climate files: the battle for the truth about global warming. London: : Guardian Books 2010.
77
Weale A. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Policies . In: The SAGE handbook of environment and society. London: : SAGE 2007. 590–600.
78
Beckerman, Wilfred. Small is stupid: blowing the whistle on the Greens. London: : Duckworth 1995.
79
Funtowicz, Silvio O., Ravetz, Jerome R. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic Pub 1990.
80
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, Best Practicable Environmental Option . 1988.
81
North, Richard D. Life on a modern planet: a manifesto for progress. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1995.
82
Roberts, L. E. J., Weale, Albert. Innovation and environmental risk. London: : Belhaven 1991.
83
Sunstein, Cass R. Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
84
Tudge C. Where to Draw the Line. New Scientist 2003.
85
Wildavsky, Aaron B. But is it true?: a citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1995.
86
Beckerman W, Hepburn C. Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics 2007;8:187–210.
87
Dietz et. al. S. Reflections on the Stern Review (1): A Robust Case for Strong Action to Reduce the Risks of Climate Change. World Economics 2007;8:121–68.
88
Henderson D. Economists and Climate Science: A Critique. World Economics 2009;10:59–90.
89
Nordhaus W. ECONOMICS: Critical Assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change. Science 2007;317:201–2. doi:10.1126/science.1137316
90
Simmonds I, Steffen W. Response to ‘The Stern Review: A Dual Critique - Part I: The Science. World Economics 2007;8:133–41.
91
BROOME J. Discounting the Future. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1994;23:128–56. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.x
92
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and persons. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984.
93
Barry B. Justice between Generations. In: Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. Oxford: : Clarendon 1989. 494–510.
94
Barry B. The Ethics of Resource Depletion. In: Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. Oxford: : Clarendon 1989. 511–25.
95
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2010;13:203–28. doi:10.1080/13698230903326331
96
Meyer LH, Roser D. Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2010;13:229–53. doi:10.1080/13698230903326349
97
Thompson DF. Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2010;13:17–37. doi:10.1080/13698230903326232
98
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org./
