1.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu./
2.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
3.
Baldwin T, Brownsword R, Schmidt H. Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts. Public Health Ethics. 2009 Apr 1;2(1):113–116.
4.
Dawson Angus, Verweij Marcel. The Steward of the Millian State. Public Health Ethics. 2008 Nov 1;1(3):193–195.
5.
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England .
6.
Mill, John Stuart, Gray, John. On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
7.
Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law [Internet]. Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
8.
Berlin, Isaiah. Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press; 1969.
9.
Cowling, Maurice. Mill and liberalism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
10.
Devlin, Patrick. The enforcement of morals. Oxford U.P; 1965.
11.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth; 1977.
12.
Hart, H. L. A. Law, liberty and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1963.
13.
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. On liberty and liberalism: the case of John Stuart Mill. New ed. San Francisco, Calif: ICS Press; 1990.
14.
Horton J. Toleration, Morality and Harm. Aspects of toleration: philosophical studies. London: Methuen; 1985. p. 113–135.
15.
MacCallum GC. Negative and Positive Freedom. The Philosophical Review. 1967 Jul;76(3):312–334.
16.
Mendus, Susan. Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1989.
17.
Ten, C. L. Mill on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1980.
18.
Waldron, Jeremy. Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
19.
Paternalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
20.
Miller, David. The Blackwell encyclopaedia of political thought. Oxford: Blackwell Reference; 1987.
21.
Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review. 2003 Autumn;70(4):1159–1202.
22.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review. 2003 May;93(2):175–179.
23.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin; 2009.
24.
Report published on Behaviour Change - News from Parliament - UK Parliament.
25.
Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2006;Oxford scholarship online. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001 
26.
Weale A. Invisible Hand or Fatherly Hand? Problems of Paternalism in the New Perspective on Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1983 Jan 1;7(4):784–807.
27.
Social Value Judgements. NICE; 2008.
28.
Daniels N. Accountability For Reasonableness: Establishing A Fair Process For Priority Setting Is Easier Than Agreeing On Principles. BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1300–1301.
29.
Rawlins MD. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224–227.
30.
Weale A. Rationing health care. BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):410–410.
31.
Evidence Based Medicine.
32.
Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A. QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics. 2005 Feb;14(2):197–208.
33.
Nord, Erik. Cost-value analysis in health care: making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
34.
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice and the High Cost of Health. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2000. p. 307–319.
35.
Dworkin R. ‘Will Clinton’s Plan Be Fair?’ The New York Review of Books; 1994.
36.
Battin MP. Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die? Ethics. 97(2):317–340.
37.
Buchanan, Allen E. Justice and health care: selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
38.
Callahan D. Rationing Medical Progress. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990 Jun 21;322(25):1810–1813.
39.
Callahan, Daniel. What kind of life: the limits of medical progress. London: Simon and Schuster; 1990.
40.
Daniels, Norman. Just health: meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
41.
Hadorn DC. Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-Effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;265(17):2218–2225.
42.
Menzel, Paul T. Medical costs, moral choices: a philosophy of health care economics in America. London: Yale University Press; 1983.
43.
Menzel, Paul T. Strong medicine: the ethical rationing of health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
44.
Oliver, Adam J., Health Equity Network (Great Britain). Health care priority setting: implications for health inequalities : proceedings from a meeting of the Health Equity Network. London: Nuffield Trust; 2003.
45.
Weale A. Cost and choice in health care: the ethical dimension. London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London; 1988.
46.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Washington: Brookings Institution; 1984.
47.
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B. The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. Washington: Brookings Institution; 1984.
48.
Klein, Rudolf, Redmayne, Sharon, Day, Patricia. Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996.
49.
Okma, Kieke G. H., Marmor, Theodore R., Freeman, Richard. Comparative studies and the politics of modern medical care. London: Yale University Press; 2009.
50.
Marmor, Theodore R. Understanding health care reform. London: Yale University Press; 1994.
51.
White, Joseph. Competing solutions: American health care proposals and international experience. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution; 1995.
52.
Richards M. Improving Access to Medicines for NHS Patients: A Report to the Secretary of State for Health.  . 2008.
53.
Jackson E. Top-up Payments for Expensive Cancer Drugs: Rationing, Fairness and the NHS. Modern Law Review. 2010 May;73(3):399–427.
54.
Weale A, Clark S. Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2009 Sep 1;5(02):225–246.
55.
Gubb J. Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes. BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1104–1104.
56.
Finlay I, Crisp N. Drugs for cancer and copayments. BMJ. 2008 Jun 30;337(jun30 2):a527–a527.
57.
Top-up Fees. Fourth Report. House of Commons Health Committee ; 2008.
58.
Richards C, Dingwall R, Watson A. Should NHS patients be allowed to contribute extra money to their care? BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):563–565.
59.
Axelrod, Robert M. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books; 1984.
60.
Barry, Brian. Sociologists, economists and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1978.
61.
Hardin, Russell, Resources for the Future. Collective action. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press; 1982.
62.
McLean, Iain. Public Choice: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987.
63.
Moe, Terry M. The organization of interests: incentives and the internal dynamics of the political interest groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
64.
Olson, Mancur. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1971.
65.
Olson, Mancur. The rise and decline of nations. London: Yale University Press;
66.
Sandler T. Collective action: theory and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1992.
67.
Sandler, Todd. Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic problems. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
68.
Bolin, Bert. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
69.
Jordan, Andrew. Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
70.
Rowlands, Ian H. The politics of global atmospheric change. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1995.
71.
Climate change - Met Office.
72.
Environment and energy - UK Parliament.
73.
Bolin, Bert. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
74.
Carter, R. M. Climate: the counter consensus : a palaeoclimatologist speaks. London: Stacey International; 2010.
75.
Hulme, M. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
76.
Pearce, Fred. The climate files: the battle for the truth about global warming. London: Guardian Books; 2010.
77.
Weale A. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Policies . The SAGE handbook of environment and society. London: SAGE; 2007. p. 590–600.
78.
Beckerman, Wilfred. Small is stupid: blowing the whistle on the Greens. London: Duckworth; 1995.
79.
Funtowicz, Silvio O., Ravetz, Jerome R. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub; 1990.
80.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, Best Practicable Environmental Option . London: HMSO; 1988.
81.
North, Richard D. Life on a modern planet: a manifesto for progress. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1995.
82.
Roberts, L. E. J., Weale, Albert. Innovation and environmental risk. London: Belhaven; 1991.
83.
Sunstein, Cass R. Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
84.
Tudge C. Where to Draw the Line. New Scientist . 2003;(2395).
85.
Wildavsky, Aaron B. But is it true?: a citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1995.
86.
Beckerman W, Hepburn C. Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics. 2007;8(1):187–210.
87.
Dietz et. al. S. Reflections on the Stern Review (1): A Robust Case for Strong Action to Reduce the Risks of Climate Change. World Economics. 2007;8(1):121–168.
88.
Henderson D. Economists and Climate Science: A Critique. World Economics. 2009;10(1):59–90.
89.
Nordhaus W. ECONOMICS: Critical Assumptions in the Stern Review on Climate Change. Science. 2007 Jul 13;317(5835):201–202.
90.
Simmonds I, Steffen W. Response to ‘The Stern Review: A Dual Critique - Part I: The Science. World Economics. 2007;8(2):133–141.
91.
BROOME J. Discounting the Future. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1994 Apr;23(2):128–156.
92.
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon; 1984.
93.
Barry B. Justice between Generations. Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989. p. 494–510.
94.
Barry B. The Ethics of Resource Depletion. Democracy, power and justice: essays in political theory. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989. p. 511–525.
95.
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010 Mar;13(1):203–228.
96.
Meyer LH, Roser D. Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010 Mar;13(1):229–253.
97.
Thompson DF. Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010 Mar;13(1):17–37.
98.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org./