Bibliography for Systematic Reviews BETA

Anon. 2021. ‘PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S)’. Retrieved (https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search).

Anon. 2024. ‘JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis’. Retrieved (https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL).

Anon. n.d.-a. ‘EPPI Centre Home’. Retrieved (https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/).

Anon. n.d.-b. ‘ISSG Search Filters Resource’. Retrieved (https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home).

Anon. n.d.-c. ‘PRISMA 2020 Checklist’. Retrieved (https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist).

Anon. n.d.-d. ‘PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram’. Retrieved (https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram).

Anon. n.d.-e. ‘PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P)’. Retrieved (https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols).

Anon. n.d.-f. ‘Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES)’. Retrieved (https://www.roses-reporting.com/).

Anon. n.d.-g. ‘Right Review’. Retrieved (https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/).

Anon. n.d.-h. ‘Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide)’. Retrieved (https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm).

Anon. n.d.-i. ‘Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide)’. Retrieved (https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm).

Anon. n.d.-j. ‘The Systematic Review Toolbox’. Retrieved (https://systematicreviewtools.com/).

Arksey, Hilary, and Lisa O’Malley. 2005. ‘Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.

BMJ Best Practice. n.d. ‘Study Design Search Filters’. Retrieved (https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/).

Booth, Andrew, Anthea Sutton, Mark Clowes, and Marrissa Martyn-St James. 2022a. ‘Chapter 5: Searching the Literature’. in Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SAGE.

Booth, Andrew, Anthea Sutton, Mark Clowes, and Marrissa Martyn-St James. 2022b. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Third edition. London: SAGE.

Campbell Collaboration. 2021. ‘Campbell Systematic Reviews: Policies and Guidelines’.

Campbell Collaboration. n.d. ‘Campbell Collaboration: Start a Review or EGM’. Retrieved (https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/get-involved/start-a-review).

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. n.d. ‘Search Filters Database’. Retrieved (https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/).

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. University of York.

Cherry, M. G., A. Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024a. ‘Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review’. Pp. 29–38 in Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: SAGE.

Cherry, M. G., A. Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024b. ‘Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria’. in Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: SAGE.

Cherry, M. G., A. Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024c. ‘Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol’. in Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: SAGE.

Cherry, M. G., A. Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024d. ‘Chapter 5: Developing My Search Strategy’. in Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: SAGE.

Cherry, M. G., Angela Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024a. ‘Chapter 1: What Is a Systematic Review’. in Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: SAGE.

Cherry, M. G., Angela Boland, and R. Dickson, eds. 2024b. Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. London: SAGE.

City St George’s, University of London. 2024. ‘Formulate Your Question’. Retrieved (https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/formulate-your-question).

City St George’s, University of London. n.d. ‘Develop Your Protocol’. Retrieved (https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/protocol).

Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. n.d. ‘LMIC Filters’. Retrieved (https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters).

Gough, David, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas, eds. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Gough, David, James Thomas, and Sandy Oliver. 2012. ‘Clarifying Differences between Review Designs and Methods’. Systematic Reviews 1(1). doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.

Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. 2009. ‘A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies’. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2):91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Harrison, Hannah, Simon J. Griffin, Isla Kuhn, and Juliet A. Usher-Smith. 2020. ‘Software Tools to Support Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews in Healthcare: An Evaluation’. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.

Hart, Chris. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Second edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Krnic Martinic, Marina, Dawid Pieper, Angelina Glatt, and Livia Puljak. 2019. ‘Definition of a Systematic Review Used in Overviews of Systematic Reviews, Meta-Epidemiological Studies and Textbooks’. BMC Medical Research Methodology 19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0.

Kugley, Shannon, Anne Wade, James Thomas, Quenby Mahood, Anne‐Marie Klint Jørgensen, Karianne Hammerstrøm, and Nila Sathe. 2017. ‘Searching for Studies: A Guide to Information Retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews’. Campbell Systematic Reviews 13(1):1–73. doi: 10.4073/cmg.2016.1.

Levay, Paul, and Jenny Craven, eds. 2018. ‘Chapter 5: Gathering Evidence from Grey Literature and Unpublished Data’. in Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. London: Facet Publishing.

Levay, Paul, and Jenny Craven, eds. 2019. Systematic Searching: Practical Ideas for Improving Results. London: Facet Publishing.

Munn, Zachary, Micah D. J. Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, and Edoardo Aromataris. 2018. ‘Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach’. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18(1). doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.

Petticrew, Mark, and Helen Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.

Rethlefsen, Melissa L., and Matthew J. Page. 2021. ‘PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: Common Questions on Tracking Records and the Flow Diagram’. Journal of the Medical Library Association 110(2). doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. n.d. ‘SIGN Search Filters’. Retrieved (https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/).

The Cochrane Collaboration. 2024a. ‘4.3 Sources to Search’. in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

The Cochrane Collaboration. 2024b. ‘4.4 Designing Search Strategies’. in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

The Cochrane Collaboration. 2024c. ‘4.4.7 Search Filters’. in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

The Cochrane Collaboration. 2024d. ‘4.5 Documenting and Reporting the Search Process’. in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

The Cochrane Collaboration. 2024e. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

University College London. n.d.-a. ‘ACM Digital Library’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ACM-Digital-Library/introduction).

University College London. n.d.-b. ‘Advanced Searching Techniques’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/advanced).

University College London. n.d.-c. ‘Clinical Trials Databases’. Retrieved (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ich/support-services/library/resources-a-to-z/clinical-trials).

University College London. n.d.-d. ‘Cochrane Library’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/cochrane).

University College London. n.d.-e. ‘Developing Your Search’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/developing).

University College London. n.d.-f. ‘EBSCOhost Databases’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ebscohost).

University College London. n.d.-g. ‘Grey Literature’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature).

University College London. n.d.-h. ‘Ovid’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/OvidSP).

University College London. n.d.-i. ‘ProQuest Databases’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/proquest).

University College London. n.d.-j. ‘Publishing or Registering a Protocol for Your Systematic or Scoping Review’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/NHS-skills/publishing-protocol).

University College London. n.d.-k. ‘PubMed’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/PubMed).

University College London. n.d.-l. ‘Recording Your Search Methodology’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/record-methodology).

University College London. n.d.-m. ‘Scopus’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/scopus).

University College London. n.d.-n. ‘Systematic Reviews’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews).

University College London. n.d.-o. ‘Using EndNote for Systematic Reviews’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic).

University College London. n.d.-p. ‘Using Mendeley Desktop for Systematic Reviews’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic).

University College London. n.d.-q. ‘Web of Science’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/web-of-science/what-is-web-of-science).

University College London. n.d.-r. ‘Zotero: Dealing with Duplicates’. Retrieved (https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates).

University of Leeds. n.d. ‘Search Concept Tools’. Retrieved (https://information-specialists.leeds.ac.uk/information-specialists/search-concept-tools/).

Wang, Jia. 2019. ‘Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert?’ Human Resource Development Review 18(1):3–15. doi: 10.1177/1534484319828857.

Washington State University Libraries. n.d. ‘Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]’. Retrieved (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view).

Whaley, Paul, Elisa Aiassa, Claire Beausoleil, Anna Beronius, Gary Bilotta, Alan Boobis, Rob de Vries, Annika Hanberg, Sebastian Hoffmann, Neil Hunt, Carol F. Kwiatkowski, Juleen Lam, Steven Lipworth, Olwenn Martin, Nicola Randall, Lorenz Rhomberg, Andrew A. Rooney, Holger J. Schünemann, Daniele Wikoff, Taylor Wolffe, and Crispin Halsall. 2020. ‘Recommendations for the Conduct of Systematic Reviews in Toxicology and Environmental Health Research (COSTER)’. Environment International. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926.