1.
University College London. Systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews
2.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024.
3.
Booth A, Sutton A, Clowes M, Martyn-St James M. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Third edition. SAGE; 2022.
4.
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J, eds. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. 2nd edition. SAGE; 2017.
5.
Hart C. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Second edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018.
6.
Levay P, Craven J, eds. Systematic Searching: Practical Ideas for Improving Results. Facet Publishing; 2019.
7.
PRISMA 2020 Checklist. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist
8.
The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.; 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
9.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. University of York; 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/
10.
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Published 2024. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
11.
Krnic Martinic M, Pieper D, Glatt A, Puljak L. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0
12.
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration: Start a review or EGM. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/get-involved/start-a-review
13.
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines. Published online 2021. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Campbell-Policies-and-Guidelines-_May3-2022.docx.pdf
14.
EPPI Centre Home. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
15.
Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell; 2006.
16.
Whaley P, Aiassa E, Beausoleil C, et al. Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International. Published online 2020. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926
17.
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES). https://www.roses-reporting.com/
18.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. In: Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
19.
Wang J. Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review. 2019;18(1):3-15. doi:10.1177/1534484319828857
20.
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
21.
Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews. 2012;1(1). doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
22.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
23.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
24.
Right Review. https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/
25.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. In: Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
26.
City St George’s, University of London. Formulate your question. Published 2024. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/formulate-your-question
27.
University of Leeds. Search concept tools. https://information-specialists.leeds.ac.uk/information-specialists/search-concept-tools/
28.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. In: Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
29.
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P). https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols
30.
City St George’s, University of London. Develop your protocol. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/protocol
31.
University College London. Publishing or registering a protocol for your systematic or scoping review. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/NHS-skills/publishing-protocol
32.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. In: Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
33.
Booth A, Sutton A, Clowes M, Martyn-St James M. Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. In: Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Third edition. SAGE; 2022.
34.
University College London. Developing your search. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/developing
35.
University College London. Advanced searching techniques. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/advanced
36.
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.3 Sources to Search. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ; 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-3
37.
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ; 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4
38.
Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2017;13(1):1-73. doi:10.4073/cmg.2016.1
39.
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.4.7 Search Filters. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ; 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4-7
40.
ISSG Search Filters Resource. https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home
41.
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. LMIC Filters. https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters
42.
BMJ Best Practice. Study design search filters. https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/
43.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN search filters. https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/
44.
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Search filters Database. https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/
45.
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm
46.
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm
47.
University College London. ACM Digital Library. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ACM-Digital-Library/introduction
48.
University College London. Cochrane Library. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/cochrane
49.
University College London. EBSCOhost databases. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ebscohost
50.
University College London. Ovid. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/OvidSP
51.
University College London. ProQuest databases. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/proquest
52.
University College London. PubMed. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/PubMed
53.
University College London. Scopus. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/scopus
54.
University College London. Web of Science. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/web-of-science/what-is-web-of-science
55.
Levay P, Craven J, eds. Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. In: Systematic Searching: Practical Ideas for Improving Results. Facet Publishing; 2018. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303755
56.
University College London. Grey literature. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature
57.
University College London. Clinical Trials Databases. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ich/support-services/library/resources-a-to-z/clinical-trials
58.
University College London. Recording your search methodology. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/record-methodology
59.
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ; 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-5
60.
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
61.
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S). Published 2021. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search
62.
Rethlefsen ML, Page MJ. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2021;110(2). doi:10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
63.
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, eds. Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. In: Doing a Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide. Third edition. SAGE; 2024:29-38. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
64.
The Systematic Review Toolbox. https://systematicreviewtools.com/
65.
University College London. Using EndNote for systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic
66.
University College London. Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic
67.
University College London. Zotero: Dealing with duplicates. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates
68.
Washington State University Libraries. Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view
69.
Harrison H, Griffin SJ, Kuhn I, Usher-Smith JA. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2020;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3