Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
BMJ Best Practice. (n.d.-a). Study design search filters. https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022a). Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. In Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (Third edition). SAGE.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022b). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (Third edition). SAGE.
Campbell Collaboration. (n.d.-b). Campbell Collaboration: Start a review or EGM. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/get-involved/start-a-review
Campbell Collaboration. (2021). Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Campbell-Policies-and-Guidelines-_May3-2022.docx.pdf
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. (n.d.-c). Search filters Database. https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024a). Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. In Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition). SAGE. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024b). Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. In Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition, pp. 29–38). SAGE. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024c). Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. In Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition). SAGE. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024d). Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. In Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition). SAGE. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024e). Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. In Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition). SAGE. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
Cherry, M. G., Boland, A., & Dickson, R. (Eds.). (2024f). Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide (Third edition). SAGE.
City St George’s, University of London. (n.d.). Develop your protocol. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/protocol
City St George’s, University of London. (2024). Formulate your question. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/formulate-your-question
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. (n.d.-d). LMIC Filters. https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters
EPPI Centre Home. (n.d.). https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd edition). SAGE.
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Harrison, H., Griffin, S. J., Kuhn, I., & Usher-Smith, J. A. (2020). Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination (Second edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
ISSG Search Filters Resource. (n.d.). https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. (2024). https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
Krnic Martinic, M., Pieper, D., Glatt, A., & Puljak, L. (2019). Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0
Kugley, S., Wade, A., Thomas, J., Mahood, Q., Jørgensen, A. K., Hammerstrøm, K., & Sathe, N. (2017). Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1
Levay, P., & Craven, J. (Eds.). (2018). Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. In Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303755
Levay, P., & Craven, J. (Eds.). (2019). Systematic Searching: Practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell.
PRISMA 2020 Checklist. (n.d.). https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram. (n.d.). https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S). (2021). https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P). (n.d.). https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES). (n.d.). https://www.roses-reporting.com/
Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2021). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
Right Review. (n.d.). https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. (n.d.). SIGN search filters. https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide). (n.d.). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide). (n.d.). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm
The Cochrane Collaboration. (2024a). 4.3 Sources to Search. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-3
The Cochrane Collaboration. (2024b). 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4
The Cochrane Collaboration. (2024c). 4.4.7 Search Filters. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4-7
The Cochrane Collaboration. (2024d). 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-5
The Cochrane Collaboration. (2024e). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
The Systematic Review Toolbox. (n.d.). https://systematicreviewtools.com/
University College London. (n.d.-e). ACM Digital Library. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ACM-Digital-Library/introduction
University College London. (n.d.-f). Advanced searching techniques. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/advanced
University College London. (n.d.-g). Clinical Trials Databases. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ich/support-services/library/resources-a-to-z/clinical-trials
University College London. (n.d.-h). Cochrane Library. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/cochrane
University College London. (n.d.-i). Developing your search. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/developing
University College London. (n.d.-j). EBSCOhost databases. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ebscohost
University College London. (n.d.-k). Grey literature. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature
University College London. (n.d.-l). Ovid. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/OvidSP
University College London. (n.d.-m). ProQuest databases. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/proquest
University College London. (n.d.-n). Publishing or registering a protocol for your systematic or scoping review. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/NHS-skills/publishing-protocol
University College London. (n.d.-o). PubMed. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/PubMed
University College London. (n.d.-p). Recording your search methodology. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/record-methodology
University College London. (n.d.-q). Scopus. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/scopus
University College London. (n.d.-r). Systematic reviews. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews
University College London. (n.d.-s). Using EndNote for systematic reviews. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic
University College London. (n.d.-t). Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic
University College London. (n.d.-u). Web of Science. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/web-of-science/what-is-web-of-science
University College London. (n.d.-v). Zotero: Dealing with duplicates. University College London. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates
University of Leeds. (n.d.-w). Search concept tools. https://information-specialists.leeds.ac.uk/information-specialists/search-concept-tools/
Wang, J. (2019). Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857
Washington State University Libraries. (n.d.-x). Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view
Whaley, P., Aiassa, E., Beausoleil, C., Beronius, A., Bilotta, G., Boobis, A., de Vries, R., Hanberg, A., Hoffmann, S., Hunt, N., Kwiatkowski, C. F., Lam, J., Lipworth, S., Martin, O., Randall, N., Rhomberg, L., Rooney, A. A., Schünemann, H. J., Wikoff, D., … Halsall, C. (2020). Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926