[1]
Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8, 1 (2005), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
[2]
Booth, A. et al. 2022. Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
[3]
Booth, A. et al. 2022. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
[4]
Campbell Collaboration 2021. Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines.
[5]
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York.
[6]
Chapter 5: Collecting data: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-05.
[7]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[8]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE. 29–38.
[9]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[10]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[11]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[12]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 6: Applying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[13]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 7: Data Extraction. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[14]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 8: Quality Assessment. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[15]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 10: Understanding and Synthesizing Numerical Data from Intervention Studies. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[16]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 11: Understanding and Synthesizing Qualitative Data. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[17]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 13: Writing My Discussion and Conclusions. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[18]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 14: Disseminating My Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[19]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[20]
Covidence 2024. A practical guide: Protocol Development for Systematic Reviews.
[21]
Erin Roga 2025. Appraising. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[22]
Erin Roga 2025. Extracting. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[23]
Erin Roga 2025. Introduction to reviews. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[24]
Erin Roga 2025. Protocols. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[25]
Erin Roga 2025. Publishing. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[26]
Erin Roga 2025. Publishing. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[27]
Erin Roga 2025. Screening. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[28]
Erin Roga 2025. Searching. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[29]
Erin Roga 2025. Synthesising. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[30]
Formulate your question: 2024. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/formulate-your-question.
[31]
Gough, D. et al. eds 2017. An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE.
[32]
Gough, D. et al. 2012. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews. 1, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
[33]
Grant, M.J. and Booth, A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26, 2 (2009), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
[34]
Grey literature: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature.
[35]
Gurusamy, K. 2025. A Guide to Performing Systematic Reviews of Health and Disease. Gardners Books.
[36]
Harrison, H. et al. 2020. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 20, 1 (Dec. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.
[37]
Hart, C. 2025. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. Sage.
[38]
Hart, C. 2018. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[39]
ISSG Search Filters Resource: https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home.
[40]
JBI Institute guidance for scoping reviews: https://jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources.
[41]
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: 2024. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL.
[42]
Krnic Martinic, M. et al. 2019. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19, 1 (Dec. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0.
[43]
Kugley, S. et al. 2017. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 13, 1 (2017), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1.
[44]
Levay, P. and Craven, J. eds 2018. Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing.
[45]
Levay, P. and Craven, J. eds 2019. Systematic Searching: Practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing.
[46]
LMIC Filters: https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters.
[47]
Munn, Z. et al. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
[48]
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell.
[49]
Pieper, D. and Rombey, T. 2022. Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 11, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01877-1.
[50]
PRISMA 2020 Checklist: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist.
[51]
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.
[52]
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S): 2021. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search.
[53]
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P): https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols.
[54]
Recording your search methodology: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/record-methodology.
[55]
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES): https://www.roses-reporting.com/.
[56]
Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. 2021. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
[57]
Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. 2021. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
[58]
Right Review: https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/.
[59]
Roga, E. and Pruis, K. 2024. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews. Federation University.
[60]
Scoping — PRISMA statement: https://www.prisma-statement.org/scoping.
[61]
Search concept tools: https://information-specialists.leeds.ac.uk/information-specialists/search-concept-tools/.
[62]
Search filters Database: https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/.
[63]
SIGN search filters: https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/.
[64]
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide): https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm.
[65]
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide): https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm.
[66]
Study design search filters: https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/.
[67]
Systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews.
[68]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.3 Sources to Search. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[69]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[70]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.4.7 Search Filters. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[71]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[72]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[73]
The Systematic Review Toolbox: https://systematicreviewtools.com/.
[74]
Using EndNote for systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic.
[75]
Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic.
[76]
Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view.
[77]
Wang, J. 2019. Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review. 18, 1 (Mar. 2019), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857.
[78]
Whaley, P. et al. 2020. Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926.
[79]
WHO repository of search strategies in the Virtual Health Library: https://bvsalud.org/queries/category/who-library/?l=en_US.
[80]
Zotero: Dealing with duplicates: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates.