[1]
Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8, 1 (2005), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
[2]
Booth, A. et al. 2022. Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
[3]
Booth, A. et al. 2022. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
[4]
Brignardello-Petersen, R. et al. 2025. Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods. American Journal of Epidemiology. 194, 2 (Feb. 2025), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232.
[5]
Campbell Collaboration 2021. Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines.
[6]
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York.
[7]
Chapter 5: Collecting data: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-05.
[8]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[9]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE. 29–38.
[10]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[11]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[12]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[13]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 6: Applying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[14]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 7: Data Extraction. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[15]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 8: Quality Assessment. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[16]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 9: Understanding and Critically Appraising Data from Experimental and Correlational Studies. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[17]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 10: Understanding and Synthesizing Numerical Data from Intervention Studies. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[18]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 11: Understanding and Synthesizing Qualitative Data. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[19]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 13: Writing My Discussion and Conclusions. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[20]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Chapter 14: Disseminating My Review. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications.
[21]
Cherry, M.G. et al. eds 2024. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE.
[22]
Covidence 2024. A practical guide: Protocol Development for Systematic Reviews.
[23]
eMERGe: https://emergeproject.org/what-is-meta-ethnography/.
[24]
Erin Roga 2025. Appraising. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[25]
Erin Roga 2025. Extracting. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[26]
Erin Roga 2025. Introduction to reviews. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[27]
Erin Roga 2025. Planning. (2025).
[28]
Erin Roga 2025. Protocols. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[29]
Erin Roga 2025. Publishing. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[30]
Erin Roga 2025. Reporting. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[31]
Erin Roga 2025. Screening. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[32]
Erin Roga 2025. Searching. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[33]
Erin Roga 2025. Synthesising. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews.
[34]
Flemyng, E. et al. 2025. Position statement on artificial intelligence (AI) use in evidence synthesis across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. (Nov. 2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000178.
[35]
Gough, D. et al. eds 2017. An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE.
[36]
Gough, D. et al. 2012. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews. 1, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
[37]
Grant, M.J. and Booth, A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26, 2 (2009), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
[38]
Grey literature: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature.
[39]
Gurusamy, K. 2025. A Guide to Performing Systematic Reviews of Health and Disease. Gardners Books.
[40]
Harrison, H. et al. 2020. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 20, 1 (Dec. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.
[41]
Hart, C. 2025. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. Sage.
[42]
Hart, C. 2018. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[43]
Helms Andersen, T. et al. 2025. Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods. 3, 4 (July 2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70036.
[44]
ISSG Search Filters Resource: https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home.
[45]
JBI Institute guidance for scoping reviews: https://jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources.
[46]
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: 2024. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL.
[47]
Krnic Martinic, M. et al. 2019. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19, 1 (Dec. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0.
[48]
Kugley, S. et al. 2017. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 13, 1 (2017), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1.
[49]
Levay, P. and Craven, J. eds 2018. Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing.
[50]
Levay, P. and Craven, J. eds 2019. Systematic Searching: Practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing.
[51]
LMIC Filters: https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters.
[52]
van Mossel, S. et al. 2025. Artificial Intelligence as a New Research Ally? Performing AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Health Economics. PharmacoEconomics. 43, 6 (June 2025), 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01481-4.
[53]
Munn, Z. et al. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
[54]
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. 2006. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell.
[55]
Pieper, D. and Rombey, T. 2022. Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 11, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01877-1.
[56]
PRISMA 2020 Checklist: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist.
[57]
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.
[58]
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S): 2021. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search.
[59]
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P): https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols.
[60]
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES): https://www.roses-reporting.com/.
[61]
Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. 2021. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
[62]
Rethlefsen, M.L. and Page, M.J. 2021. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
[63]
Right Review: https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/.
[64]
Roga, E. and Pruis, K. 2024. Introducing scoping and systematic reviews. Federation University.
[65]
Scoping Reviews - PRISMA statement: https://www.prisma-statement.org/scoping.
[66]
Scoping Reviews - PRISMA statement: https://www.prisma-statement.org/scoping.
[67]
Search filters Database: https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/.
[68]
SIGN search filters: https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/.
[69]
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide): https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm.
[70]
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide): https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm.
[71]
Stern, C. et al. 2020. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18, 10 (Oct. 2020), 2108–2118. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
[72]
Study design search filters: https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/.
[73]
Systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews.
[74]
Systematic searching: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-searching/.
[75]
Systematic searching: Research question frameworks: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-searching/research-question-frameworks.
[76]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.3 Sources to Search. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[77]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[78]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.4.7 Search Filters. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[79]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[80]
The Cochrane Collaboration 2024. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
[81]
The Systematic Review Toolbox: https://systematicreviewtools.com/.
[82]
Thomas, James Responsible use of AI in evidence SynthEsis (RAISE): recommendations and guidance.
[83]
Using EndNote for systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic.
[84]
Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic.
[85]
Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view.
[86]
Wang, J. 2019. Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review. 18, 1 (Mar. 2019), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857.
[87]
Whaley, P. et al. 2020. Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926.
[88]
WHO repository of search strategies in the Virtual Health Library: https://bvsalud.org/queries/category/who-library/?l=en_US.
[89]
Why is it Important to be Systematic? https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=69.
[90]
Xuenan Pang 2025. Comparing Artificial Intelligence and manual methods in systematic review processes: protocol for a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 181, (2025).
[91]
Zotero: Dealing with duplicates: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates.