1.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE, London (2024).
2.
Erin Roga: Introduction to reviews. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
3.
Wang, J.: Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review. 18, 3–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857.
4.
Krnic Martinic, M., Pieper, D., Glatt, A., Puljak, L.: Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0.
5.
EPPI Centre: Why is it Important to be Systematic?, https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=69.
6.
Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26, 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
7.
Gough, D., Thomas, J., Oliver, S.: Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews. 1, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
8.
Right Review, https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/.
9.
JBI Institute guidance for scoping reviews, https://jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources.
10.
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., Aromataris, E.: Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
11.
Arksey, H., O’Malley, L.: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8, 19–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
12.
Scoping Reviews - PRISMA statement, https://www.prisma-statement.org/scoping.
13.
University College London: Systematic reviews, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews.
14.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE, London (2024).
15.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Martyn-St James, M.: Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE, London (2022).
16.
Roga, E., Pruis, K.: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews. Federation University (2024). https://doi.org/10.35843/ISCASRV23.
17.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J. eds: An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
18.
Hart, C.: Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. Sage, London (2025).
19.
Hart, C.: Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2018).
20.
Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., Guyatt, G.H.: Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods. American Journal of Epidemiology. 194, 536–542 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232.
21.
Gurusamy, K.: A Guide to Performing Systematic Reviews of Health and Disease. Gardners Books (2025).
22.
Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2006).
23.
Levay, P., Craven, J. eds: Systematic Searching: Practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing, London (2019).
24.
Erin Roga: Planning. (2025).
25.
The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (2024).
26.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York (2009).
27.
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL.
28.
Campbell Collaboration: Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines, https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Campbell-Policies-and-Guidelines-_May3-2022.docx.pdf, (2021).
29.
Whaley, P., Aiassa, E., Beausoleil, C., Beronius, A., Bilotta, G., Boobis, A., de Vries, R., Hanberg, A., Hoffmann, S., Hunt, N., Kwiatkowski, C.F., Lam, J., Lipworth, S., Martin, O., Randall, N., Rhomberg, L., Rooney, A.A., Schünemann, H.J., Wikoff, D., Wolffe, T., Halsall, C.: Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926.
30.
Erin Roga: Reporting. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
31.
PRISMA 2020 Checklist, https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist.
32.
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S), https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search.
33.
Scoping Reviews - PRISMA statement, https://www.prisma-statement.org/scoping.
34.
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES), https://www.roses-reporting.com/.
35.
eMERGe, https://emergeproject.org/what-is-meta-ethnography/.
36.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE, London (2024).
37.
Systematic searching: Research question frameworks, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-searching/research-question-frameworks.
38.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE, London (2024).
39.
Erin Roga: Protocols. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
40.
Covidence: A practical guide: Protocol Development for Systematic Reviews, https://www.covidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/A_practical_guide_Protocol_Development_for_Systematic_Reviews.pdf, (2024).
41.
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P), https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols.
42.
Pieper, D., Rombey, T.: Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 11, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01877-1.
43.
UCL: Systematic searching, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-searching/.
44.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE, London (2024).
45.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Martyn-St James, M.: Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. In: Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE, London (2022).
46.
Erin Roga: Searching. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
47.
The Cochrane Collaboration: 4.3 Sources to Search. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2024).
48.
The Cochrane Collaboration: 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2024).
49.
Library, W.: WHO repository of search strategies in the Virtual Health Library, https://bvsalud.org/queries/category/who-library/?l=en_US.
50.
Kugley, S., Wade, A., Thomas, J., Mahood, Q., Jørgensen, A.K., Hammerstrøm, K., Sathe, N.: Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 13, 1–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1.
51.
The Cochrane Collaboration: 4.4.7 Search Filters. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2024).
52.
ISSG Search Filters Resource, https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home.
53.
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care: LMIC Filters, https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters.
54.
BMJ Best Practice: Study design search filters, https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/.
55.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: SIGN search filters, https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/.
56.
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health: Search filters Database, https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/.
57.
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide), https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm.
58.
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide), https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm.
59.
Levay, P., Craven, J. eds: Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. In: Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. Facet Publishing, London (2018).
60.
University College London: Grey literature, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature.
61.
The Cochrane Collaboration: 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2024).
62.
Rethlefsen, M.L., Page, M.J.: PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
63.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 6: Applying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
64.
Erin Roga: Screening. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
65.
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram, https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.
66.
Rethlefsen, M.L., Page, M.J.: PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110, (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
67.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 7: Data Extraction. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
68.
Erin Roga: Extracting. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
69.
Cochrane Collaboration: Chapter 5: Collecting data, https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-05.
70.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 8: Quality Assessment. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
71.
Erin Roga: Appraising. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
72.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 9: Understanding and Critically Appraising Data from Experimental and Correlational Studies. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
73.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 10: Understanding and Synthesizing Numerical Data from Intervention Studies. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
74.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 11: Understanding and Synthesizing Qualitative Data. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
75.
Stern, C., Lizarondo, L., Carrier, J., Godfrey, C., Rieger, K., Salmond, S., Apóstolo, J., Kirkpatrick, P., Loveday, H.: Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18, 2108–2118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
76.
Erin Roga: Synthesising. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
77.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 13: Writing My Discussion and Conclusions. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
78.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 14: Disseminating My Review. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. SAGE Publications, London (2024).
79.
Erin Roga: Publishing. In: Introducing scoping and systematic reviews (2025).
80.
Cherry, M.G., Boland, A., Dickson, R. eds: Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. pp. 29–38. SAGE, London (2024).
81.
University College London: Using EndNote for systematic reviews, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic.
82.
University College London: Zotero: Dealing with duplicates, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates.
83.
Washington State University Libraries: Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video], https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view.
84.
University College London: Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews, https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic.
85.
The Systematic Review Toolbox, https://systematicreviewtools.com/.
86.
Harrison, H., Griffin, S.J., Kuhn, I., Usher-Smith, J.A.: Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 20, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.
87.
van Mossel, S., Oude-Wolcherink, M.J., de Feria Cardet, R.E., de Geus-Oei, L.-F., Vriens, D., Koffijberg, H., Saing, S.: Artificial Intelligence as a New Research Ally? Performing AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Health Economics. PharmacoEconomics. 43, 647–650 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01481-4.
88.
Xuenan Pang: Comparing Artificial Intelligence and manual methods in systematic review processes: protocol for a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 181, (2025).
89.
Flemyng, E., Norl-Storr, A., Macura, B., Gartlehner, G., Thomas, J., Meerpohl, J.J., Jordan, Z., Minx, J., Eisele-Metzger, A., Hamel, C., Jemioło, P., Porritt, K., Grainger, M.: Position statement on artificial intelligence (AI) use in evidence synthesis across Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence 2025. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000178.
90.
Thomas, James: Responsible use of AI in evidence SynthEsis (RAISE): recommendations and guidance.
91.
Helms Andersen, T., Marcussen, T.M., Termannsen, A.D., Lawaetz, T.W.H., Nørgaard, O.: Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods. 3, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70036.