1
University College London. Systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/systematic-reviews
2
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. Third edition. London: : SAGE 2024.
3
Booth A, Sutton A, Clowes M, et al. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Third edition. London: : SAGE 2022.
4
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J, editors. An introduction to systematic reviews. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2017.
5
Hart C. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. Second edition. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2018.
6
Levay P, Craven J, editors. Systematic Searching: Practical ideas for improving results. London: : Facet Publishing 2019.
7
PRISMA 2020 Checklist. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist
8
The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
9
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/
10
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2024.https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
11
Krnic Martinic M, Pieper D, Glatt A, et al. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019;19. doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0855-0
12
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration: Start a review or EGM. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/get-involved/start-a-review
13
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell systematic reviews: Policies and guidelines. 2021.https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Campbell-Policies-and-Guidelines-_May3-2022.docx.pdf
14
EPPI Centre Home. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
15
Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.
16
Whaley P, Aiassa E, Beausoleil C, et al. Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER). Environment International Published Online First: 2020. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926
17
Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES). https://www.roses-reporting.com/
18
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Chapter 1: What is a Systematic Review. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: : SAGE 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
19
Wang J. Demystifying Literature Reviews: What I Have Learned From an Expert? Human Resource Development Review 2019;18:3–15. doi:10.1177/1534484319828857
20
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2009;26:91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
21
Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews 2012;1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
22
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2018;18. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
23
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005;8:19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
24
Right Review. https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/
25
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Chapter 3: Defining My Review Question and Identifying Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: : SAGE 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
26
City St George’s, University of London. Formulate your question. 2024.https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/formulate-your-question
27
University of Leeds. Search concept tools. https://information-specialists.leeds.ac.uk/information-specialists/search-concept-tools/
28
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Chapter 4: Writing a Protocol. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: : SAGE 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
29
PRISMA for Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA-P). https://www.prisma-statement.org/protocols
30
City St George’s, University of London. Develop your protocol. https://libguides.city.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/protocol
31
University College London. Publishing or registering a protocol for your systematic or scoping review. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/NHS-skills/publishing-protocol
32
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Chapter 5: Developing my search strategy. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: : SAGE 2024. https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
33
Booth A, Sutton A, Clowes M, et al. Chapter 5: Searching the Literature. In: Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: : SAGE 2022.
34
University College London. Developing your search. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/developing
35
University College London. Advanced searching techniques. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/advanced
36
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.3 Sources to Search. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-3
37
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.4 Designing Search Strategies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4
38
Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2017;13:1–73. doi:10.4073/cmg.2016.1
39
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.4.7 Search Filters. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-4-7
40
ISSG Search Filters Resource. https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home
41
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. LMIC Filters. https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters
42
BMJ Best Practice. Study design search filters. https://dev-bestpractice.bmjgroup.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/
43
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN search filters. https://www.sign.ac.uk/using-our-guidelines/methodology/search-filters/
44
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Search filters Database. https://searchfilters.cda-amc.ca/
45
Special Ovid Filters for Embase (Ovid Embase Database Guide). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/embase.htm
46
Special Ovid Filters for Medline (Ovid Medline Database Guide). https://ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/medline.htm
47
University College London. ACM Digital Library. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ACM-Digital-Library/introduction
48
University College London. Cochrane Library. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/cochrane
49
University College London. EBSCOhost databases. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/ebscohost
50
University College London. Ovid. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/OvidSP
51
University College London. ProQuest databases. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/proquest
52
University College London. PubMed. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/PubMed
53
University College London. Scopus. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/scopus
54
University College London. Web of Science. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/web-of-science/what-is-web-of-science
55
Levay P, Craven J, editors. Chapter 5: Gathering evidence from grey literature and unpublished data. In: Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. London: : Facet Publishing 2018. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303755
56
University College London. Grey literature. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/planning-search/grey-literature
57
University College London. Clinical Trials Databases. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ich/support-services/library/resources-a-to-z/clinical-trials
58
University College London. Recording your search methodology. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/searching-information/record-methodology
59
The Cochrane Collaboration. 4.5 Documenting and reporting the search process. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2024. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-5
60
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
61
PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S). 2021.https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-search
62
Rethlefsen ML, Page MJ. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2021;110. doi:10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
63
Cherry MG, Boland A, Dickson R, editors. Chapter 2: Planning and Managing My Review. In: Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: : SAGE 2024. 29–38.https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/2494509
64
The Systematic Review Toolbox. https://systematicreviewtools.com/
65
University College London. Using EndNote for systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/endnote/systematic
66
University College London. Using Mendeley Desktop for systematic reviews. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/mendeley-desktop/systematic
67
University College London. Zotero: Dealing with duplicates. https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/zotero/desktop-duplicates
68
Washington State University Libraries. Using Zotero for Systematic Reviews [Video]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TEzwcwxO1tl8gtVt9WhZ5Fzc9TPsV07B/view
69
Harrison H, Griffin SJ, Kuhn I, et al. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2020;20. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3