[1]
Agbah, F. 1987. Ways of learning. Printing and Publishing Unit for Continuing Education.
[2]
Aldrich, R. and Crook, D. 2000. Mathematics, arithmetic and numeracy: an historical perspective. Why learn maths?. Institute of Education, University of London. 26–47.
[3]
Anghileri, J. 2006. Teaching number sense. Continuum.
[4]
Arthur, J. and Cremin, T. 2014. Learning to teach in the primary school. Routledge.
[5]
Askew, M. 2010. Chapter 2: It ain’t (just) what you do: effective teachers of numeracy. Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools. I. Thompson, ed. Open University Press. 31–44.
[6]
Askew, M. 2016. Chapter 9: Teaching tripod: tasks. Transforming primary mathematics: understanding classroom tasks, tools and talk. Routledge. 97–108.
[7]
Askew, M. 2016. Chapter 10: Teaching Tripod: Tools. Transforming primary mathematics: understanding classroom tasks, tools and talk. Routledge. 109–127.
[8]
Askew, M. 2016. Chapter 11: Teaching tripod: talk. Transforming primary mathematics. Routledge.
[9]
Askew, M. 2016. Transforming primary mathematics: understanding classroom tasks, tools and talk. Routledge.
[10]
Association of Teachers of Mathematics - ATM: https://www.atm.org.uk/.
[11]
Aubrey, K. and Riley, A. 2016. Understanding and using educational theories. SAGE.
[12]
Back, J. 2005. Creative Approaches to Mathematics Across the Curriculum : nrich.maths.org. (2005).
[13]
Barmby, P. et al. 2014. Chapter 5: Reasoning with problems. Understanding and enriching problem solving in primary mathematics. Critical Publishing. 46–61.
[14]
Barmby, P. et al. 2014. Chapter 6: Assessing Problem Solving. Understanding and enriching problem solving in primary mathematics. Critical Publishing. 74–88.
[15]
Barmby, P. et al. 2009. The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 70, 3 (Apr. 2009), 217–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9145-1.
[16]
Barmby, P. et al. 2014. Understanding and enriching problem solving in primary mathematics. Critical Publishing.
[17]
Barnes, J. 2015. Chapter 5: What does neuro-science tell us about cross-curricular learning? Cross-curricular learning 3-14. SAGE.
[18]
Barnes, J. 2015. Cross-curricular learning 3-14. SAGE.
[19]
Bates, B. 2016. Learning theories simplified: - and how to apply them to teaching. SAGE.
[20]
Beishuizen, M. 2010. The empty number line. Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools. I. Thompson, ed. OUP. 174–187.
[21]
Bell, J. and Waters, S. 2014. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. Open University Press.
[22]
Biggs, J.B. et al. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
[23]
Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy [Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome]. Academic Press.
[24]
Boaler, J. 2016. Chapter 9: Teaching mathematics for a growth mindset. Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints. 171–208.
[25]
Boaler, J. 2016. Chapter 9: What does neuro-science tell us about cross-cultural learning? Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints. 171–208.
[26]
Boaler, J. 2016. Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints.
[27]
Boaler, J. 2015. The Elephant in the Classroom: Helping Children Learn and Love Maths. Souvenir Press.
[28]
Boaler, J. 2005. The ‘Psychological Prisons’ from which They Never Escaped: the role of ability grouping in reproducing social class inequalities. FORUM. 47, 2 (2005).
[29]
Bonnett, A. 2011. How to argue. Pearson Education.
[30]
Boylan, M. and Povey, H. 2013. Ability Thinking. Debates in mathematics education. Routledge.
[31]
Briggs, S. 2016. Meeting special educational needs in primary classrooms: inclusion and how to do it. Routledge.
[32]
British Educational Research Association (BERA) Ethical guidelines.
[33]
British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics Research in mathematics education.
[34]
Brosnan, P. et al. 2013. Successful mathematics achievement is attainable. International guide to student achievement. Routledge.
[35]
Brown, M. 2013. Chapter 13: Debates in mathematical curriculum and assessment. Debates in mathematics education. Routledge.
[36]
Brown, T. 1998. Coordinating mathematics across the primary school. Falmer P.
[37]
Bruner, J.S. 1966. Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press.
[38]
Bruse, C.D. 2007. Student Interaction in the Math Classroom: Stealing Ideas or Building Understanding?
[39]
Bryan, H. et al. 2010. Learning and teaching at M-level: a guide for student teachers. SAGE.
[40]
Burkhardt, H. and Bell, A. 2007. Problem Solving in the United Kingdon. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education. 39, (2007).
[41]
Burton, L. 1994. Children learning mathematics: patterns and relationships. Simon & Schuster Education.
[42]
Cai, J. 2003. What research tells us about teaching mathematics through problem solving. Research and issues in teaching mathematics through problem solving. (2003), 241–254.
[43]
Cai, J. and Lester, F. Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning? Problem Solving Research Brief.
[44]
Carol Dweck 2017. Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Robinson.
[45]
Carraher, T.N. et al. 1985. Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 3, 1 (Mar. 1985), 21–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x.
[46]
Cohen, L. et al. 2011. Research methods in education. Routledge.
[47]
Collins, S. 2016. Chapter 8: Making learning meaningful and valuing intelligence. Neuroscience for learning and development: how to apply neuroscience and psychology for improved learning and training. Kogan Page Limited. 121–138.
[48]
Collins, S. 2016. Neuroscience for learning and development: how to apply neuroscience and psychology for improved learning and training. Kogan Page Limited.
[49]
Colwell, J. and Pollard, A. 2015. Readings for reflective teaching in early education. Bloomsbury Academic.
[50]
Cottrell, S. 2017. Critical thinking skills: developing effective analysis and argument. Palgrave Macmillan.
[51]
Cozolino, L.J. 2013. The social neuroscience of education: optimizing attachment and learning in the classroom. Norton.
[52]
David W Stinson 2004. Mathematics as ‘Gate-Keeper’ (?): Three Theoretical Perspectives that Aim Toward Empowering All Children With a Key to the Gate. The Mathematics Educator. 14, 1 (2004).
[53]
Delaney, K. 2010. Making connections: teachers and children using resources effectively. Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools. Open University Press. 72–83.
[54]
Denby, N. 2008. Masters level study in education. Open University Press.
[55]
Denscombe, M. 2017. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press.
[56]
Dewey, J. 1998. Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
[57]
DfES 2002. Access and engagement in mathematics: guidance for teaching EAL learners maths (KS3 National Strategy).
[58]
Donaldson, G. 2012. Becoming a primary mathematics specialist teacher. Routledge.
[59]
Donaldson, G. 2012. Becoming a primary mathematics specialist teacher. Routledge.
[60]
Drews, D. and Hansen, A. 2007. Using resources to support mathematical thinking: primary and early years. Learning Matters.
[61]
Dweck, C.S. 2012. Mindset. Robinson.
[62]
Ell, F. Strategies and thinking about number in children aged 9-11 Years.
[63]
Elton-Chalcraft, S. et al. 2008. Chapter 2: Moving from Reflective Practitioner to Practitioner Researcher. Doing classroom research: a step-by-step guide for student teachers. Open University Press. 11–26.
[64]
Ernest, P. 2000. Why teach mathematics? Why learn maths?. Institute of Education, University of London. 1–14.
[65]
Exploring children’s attitudes towards mathematics: 2009. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.530.8962&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[66]
Fielker, D. 1997. Chapter 3: Another approach. Extending mathematical ability through whole class teaching. Hodder & Stoughton.
[67]
Fox, S. and Surtees, L. 2010. Mathematics across the curriculum: problem-solving, reasoning, and numeracy in primary schools. Continuum.
[68]
Fox, S. and Surtees, L. 2010. Mathematics across the curriculum: problem-solving, reasoning, and numeracy in primary schools. Continuum.
[69]
Gagné, R.M. 1986. The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[70]
Gardner, H. 2006. Multiple intelligences: new horizons in theory and practice. BasicBooks.
[71]
Geake, J.G. 2009. The brain at school: educational neuroscience in the classroom. Open University Press.
[72]
Godfrey, J. 2013. How to use your reading in your essays. Palgrave Macmillan.
[73]
Gray, C. and MacBlain, S. 2015. Learning theories in childhood. SAGE.
[74]
Hansen, A. 2015. Primary professional studies. Learning Matters.
[75]
Hansen, A. and Vaukins, D. 2012. Chapter 1: Mathematics as a Core Skill. Primary mathematics across the curriculum. SAGE. 5–29.
[76]
Hansen, A. and Vaukins, D. 2012. Primary mathematics across the curriculum. SAGE.
[77]
Hattie, J. 2012. Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
[78]
Hattie, J. and Yates, G.C.R. 2014. Chapter 14: How knowledge is stored in the mind. Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge. 126–135.
[79]
Hattie, J. and Yates, G.C.R. 2014. Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge.
[80]
Haylock, D. and Manning, R. 2014. Mathematics explained for primary teachers. SAGE Publications.
[81]
Higgs, S. 2003. Chapter 5: Parlez-vous mathematics? Enhancing primary mathematics teaching. Open University Press. 54–64.
[82]
Hook, P. et al. 2014. SOLO taxonomy in mathematics: strategies for thinking like a mathematician. Essential Resources.
[83]
Hook, P. and Mills, J. 2012. SOLO taxonomy: a guide for schools: Book 1. A common language of learning. Essential Resources Ltd.
[84]
Hook, P. and Mills, J. 2012. SOLO taxonomy: a guide for schools: Book 2. Planning for differentiation. Essential Resources Ltd.
[85]
Hughes, M. 1986. Children and number: difficulties in learning mathematics. Basil Blackwell.
[86]
Illeris, K. 2009. Contemporary theories of learning: learning theorists - in their own words. Routledge.
[87]
Kyriacou, C. and Issitt, J. 2007. Teacher-pupil dialogue in mathematics lessons. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (2007).
[88]
Leslie, D. and Mendick, H. 2013. Debates in mathematics education. Routledge.
[89]
Lorenz, J.H. 1982. On some psychological aspects of mathematics achievement assessment and classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 13, 1 (Feb. 1982), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305495.
[90]
Marks, R. 2011. ‘Ability’ in primary mathematics education: patterns and implications. Research in Mathematics Education. 13, 3 (Dec. 2011), 305–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.624753.
[91]
Maslow, Abraham H The farther reaches of human nature. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1, 1.
[92]
Mathematical Association 1992. Maths talk. The Mathematical Association and Stanley Thornes.
[93]
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J.D.B. 2013. How to cite, reference & avoid plagiarism at university. Pearson Education.
[94]
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J.D.B. 2014. How to Write for University. Pearson.
[95]
Miller, L. and Pound, L. 2011. Theories and approaches to learning in the early years. SAGE.
[96]
Monaghan, F. 2005. ‘Don’t think in your head, think aloud’: ICT and exploratory talk in the primary mathematics classroom. Research in Mathematics Education. 7, 1 (Apr. 2005), 83–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520147.
[97]
Moore, A. 2012. Teaching and learning: pedagogy, curriculum and culture. Routledge.
[98]
Murphy, C. 2011. Comparing the use of the empty number line in England and the Netherlands. British Educational Research Journal. 37, 1 (Feb. 2011), 147–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903447423.
[99]
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1970. Journal for research in mathematics education. (1970).
[100]
NCETM Developing mathematics in Primary Schools.
[101]
NCETM Mathematics Matters Final Report.
[102]
NicMhuirí, S. Teacher, do you know the answer? Initial attempts at the facilitation of a discourse community. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 119–124.
[103]
Noyes, A. Mathematics counts... for what? Rethinking the mathematics curriculum in England. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal. 21.
[104]
Ofsted Mathematics : made to measure : messages from inspection evidence.
[105]
Pears, R. and Shields, G.J. 2016. Cite them right: the essential referencing guide. Palgrave.
[106]
Piaget, J. 1954. The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
[107]
Pitt, A. Mathematical thinking? Mathematics teaching. 181, 3–5.
[108]
Pollard, A. 2014. Readings for reflective teaching in schools. Bloomsbury Academic.
[109]
Pope, S. 2002. The use of origami in the teaching of geometry. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. 22, 3 (2002), 67–73.
[110]
Pratt, N. 2006. Chapter 5: Thinking, talking and acting mathematically. Interactive maths teaching in the primary school. Paul Chapman. 48–67.
[111]
Pratt, N. 2006. Interactive maths teaching in the primary school. Paul Chapman.
[112]
Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (BSRLM): http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/.
[113]
Radford, J. et al. Opening up and closing down: comparing teacher and TA talk in mathematics lessons.
[114]
Reynolds, D. and Muijs, D. 2010. Numeracy matters: contemporary policy issues in the teaching of mathematics. Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools. Open University Press. 17–26.
[115]
RICHARD R. SKEMP 2006. Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 12, 2 (2006), 88–95.
[116]
Rowland, T. et al. Chapter 2: Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics: introducing the knowledge quartet framework. Developing Primary Mathematics Teaching : Reflecting on Practice with the Knowledge Quartet. 18–40.
[117]
Rowland, T. et al. 2009. Chapter 3: Transformation: using and understanding representations in mathematics teaching. Developing primary mathematics teaching: reflecting on practice with the Knowledge Quartet. SAGE. 41–66.
[118]
Ruthven, K. 1987. Ability stereotyping in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 18, 3 (Aug. 1987), 243–253. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386197.
[119]
Sancisi, L. and Edgington, M. 2015. Developing high quality observation, assessment and planning in the early years: made to measure. Routledge.
[120]
Sangster, M. The rise and fall of an investigative approach to mathematics in primary education. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
[121]
Sewell, K. 2012. Doing your PGCE at M-level: a guide for students. SAGE.
[122]
Sousa, D.A. 2010. Mind, brain, and education: neuroscience implications for the classroom. Solution Tree Press.
[123]
Sriraman, B. and English, L. 2010. Problem solving for the 21st Century. Theories of mathematics education: seeking new frontiers. Springer.
[124]
Stein, M.K. et al. 2008. Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 10, 4 (Oct. 2008), 313–340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675.
[125]
Susan J. Lamon, 1949- Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers / Susan J. Lamon.
[126]
Sutherland, R. 2007. Teaching for learning mathematics. Open University P.
[127]
Swatridge, C. 2014. The Oxford guide to effective argument and critical thinking. Oxford University Press.
[128]
Tarrant, P. and Holt, D. 2016. Chapter 10: Becoming better learners. Metacognition in the primary classroom: a practical guide to helping children understand how they learn best. Routledge. 123–134.
[129]
Victoria R. Jacobs, Lisa L. C. Lamb and Randolph A. Philipp 2010. Professional Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 41, 2 (2010), 169–202.
[130]
Vygotskii, L.S. et al. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
[131]
Vygotsky, L. 1962. Thought and language. MIT Press.
[132]
Wallace, M. and Wray, A. 2016. Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. SAGE.
[133]
WATSON, A. 1999. Paradigmatic Conflicts in Informal Mathematics Assessment as Sources of Social Inequity. Educational Review. 51, 2 (Jun. 1999), 105–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131919997551.
[134]
Watson, A. and Mason, J. 2005. Mathematics as a constructive activity: learners generating examples. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[135]
Wheeldon, Irene 2006. Peer Talk. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath. 199, (2006), 39–41.
[136]
Whitehorn, Tara School support staff topic paper.
[137]
Wickham, L. 2008. Generating mathematical talk in the key stage 2 classroom.
[138]
Williams, Helen 2012. To What Extent Might Role Play Be a Useful Tool for Learning Mathematics? Mathematics Teaching. 230 (2012), 17–20.
[139]
Wilson, E. 2012. Introduction: Why should teachers do school-based research? School-based research: a guide for education students. London. 1–10.
[140]
Wyse, D. 2012. The good writing guide for education students. SAGE.
[141]
Beyond levels: alternative assessment approaches developed by teaching schools - GOV.UK.
[142]
Educational studies in mathematics.
[143]
Learning Outside the Classroom Manifesto.
[144]
2009. Scaffolding Students’ Thinking in Mathematical Investigations. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom. 14, 3 (2009), 27–32.
[145]
2009. Scaffolding Students’ Thinking in Mathematical Investigations. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom. 14, 3 (2009), 27–32.
[146]
2007. What We Can Do about Achievement Disparities. Educational Leadership. 65, 3 (2007), 54–59.
