1.
Beer D. How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society. 2016;3(1). doi:10.1177/2053951716646135
2.
Rubio FD, Baert P, eds. Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. In: The Politics of Knowledge. Routledge; 2012. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386
3.
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, eds. Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. In: Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Vol Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
4.
Halpern O. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press; 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822376323-010
5.
Kitchin R. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. SAGE; 2014. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml
6.
Beer D. Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society. 2015;2(1). doi:10.1177/2053951715578951
7.
Striphas T. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2015;18(4-5):395-412. doi:10.1177/1367549415577392
8.
Latour B. Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference. In: Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press; 1999:24-79. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
9.
Rosenberg D. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L, ed. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Vol Infrastructures series. The MIT Press; 2013. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327
10.
Chua L, Salmond A. Artefacts in anthropology. In: SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology. SAGE; 2012:101-115. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
11.
Verran H. The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading ‘disciplinary’ society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent ‘control’ society. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:60-72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x
12.
Hacking I. The argument. In: The Taming of Chance. Vol Ideas in Context. Cambridge University Press; 1990:1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
13.
Porter TM. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press; 1995.
14.
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 2012;43(4):380-395. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
15.
Halpern O. Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15(2):223-238. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320
16.
Halpern O. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Vol Experimental futures. Duke University Press; 2014.
17.
Riles A. Introduction: in response. In: Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. University of Michigan Press; 2006:1-38.
18.
Gitelman L. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Vol Infrastructures series. MIT Press; 2013. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
19.
Manovich L. Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 1999;5(2):80-99. doi:10.1177/135485659900500206
20.
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies. 2011;22(1):146-171. doi:10.1215/10407391-1218274
21.
Hogan M. Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society. 2015;2(2). doi:10.1177/2053951715592429
22.
Geismar H, Mohns W. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011;17:S133-S155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x
23.
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4. http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology
24.
Bowker G. Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s. In: Memory Practices in the Sciences. Vol Inside technology. MIT Press; 2005:107-136. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
25.
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3(3). doi:10.14318/hau3.3.002
26.
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. Vol Inside technology. MIT Press; 1999. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out
27.
Chun WHK. The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry. 2008;35(1):148-171. doi:10.1086/595632
28.
J. Holt, Patrick Vondereau. Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. In: Traffic Signal Timing Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation; 2014. http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024
29.
Fuller M, Goffey A. Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29(4-5):311-333. doi:10.1177/0263276412450466
30.
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. 2015;44(3):436-437. doi:10.1177/0094306115579192c
31.
Haraway D. Chapter 4: Gene. In: Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge; 1997.
32.
Strathern M, University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Vol Prickly Pear pamphlet. Prickly Pear Press; 1995.
33.
Jensen CB, Morita A. Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. 2015;1:81-87. http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21
34.
Harvey P. The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29(4-5):76-92. doi:10.1177/0263276412448827
35.
Mackenzie A. Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15(2):189-207. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110
36.
Verran H. On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2009;2(1-2):169-182. doi:10.1080/17530350903064188
37.
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3(3):1-32. doi:10.14318/hau3.3.002
38.
Laidlaw J. A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2000;6(4):617-634. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00036
39.
Tsing, Anna. Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3(1):21-43. https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
40.
John NA. Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society. 2013;15(2):167-182. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684
41.
Maurer, W.M. Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. In: Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago; 2015:67-86. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161
42.
Van Dijck J, Poell T. Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(1). doi:10.1177/2053951716654173
43.
S. Day, C. Lury. Biosensing: Tracking Persons. In: Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press; 2016. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
44.
Janet Carsten. Ch. 4: The person. In: After Kinship by Janet Carsten. Cambridge University Press; :83-108. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
45.
Leonelli S. Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2013;33(1-2):6-11. doi:10.1177/0270467613496768
46.
M. Fortun. What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In: Richardson SS, Stevens H, eds. Postgenomics. Duke University Press; 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822375449
47.
Biagioli M. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In: Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. Routledge; 2013:253-281. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270
48.
Richardson SS, Stevens H. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Duke University Press; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
49.
Weiner AB. Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. In: Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. University of California Press; 1992:23-43. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
50.
Weiner AB. Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. In: Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. University of California Press; 1992.
51.
Lezaun J, Montgomery CM. The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2015;40(1):3-29. doi:10.1177/0162243914542349
52.
Hilgartner S. Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science. 2012;45(02):267-280. doi:10.1017/S0007087412000106
53.
Kelty CM. This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties. 2012;7(2):140-168. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2012.8
54.
Hirsch E, Strathern M. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. Berghahn Books; 2004. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk
55.
Leach J. The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis. 2011;55(3). doi:10.3167/sa.2011.550308
56.
D. Miller. Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. In: The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Vol School of American Research advanced seminar series. School of American Research Press; 2001.
57.
Gregg M. The Gift That Is Not Given. In: Boellstorff T, Maurer B, eds. Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Vol Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
58.
Antonia Walford. Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 2012;30(2):101-117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
Arturo Escobar. After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology. 1999;40(1):1-30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Büscher B. Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society. 2016;18(5):726-743. doi:10.1177/1461444814545841
61.
Asdal K. Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum. 2008;39(1):123-132. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004
62.
Kim Fortun. From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris. 2004;19:283-296. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Gabrys J, Pritchard H, Barratt B. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716679677
64.
Whitington J. Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2016;39(1):46-63. doi:10.1111/plar.12130
65.
Nadim T. Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716666301
66.
Garnett E. Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716658061
67.
Fortun K, Poirier L, Morgan A, Costelloe-Kuehn B, Fortun M. Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716668903
68.
Lippert I. Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum. 2015;66:126-135. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009
69.
Dalsgaard S. The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3(1):80-98. doi:10.14318/hau3.1.006
70.
Grebowicz M. Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities. 2014;5:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388
71.
Stefan Helmreich. From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research. 2011;78(4):1211-1242. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
72.
Gabrys J. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Vol Electronic mediations. University of Minnesota Press; 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq
73.
Verran H. Number as Generative Device. In: Lury C, Wakeford N, eds. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Vol Culture, economy and the social. Routledge; 2014.
74.
Knox H. Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In: Appel H, Mason A, Watts M, eds. Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas. Cornell University Press; 2015. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0
75.
Gabrys J. Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism. In: Maxwell R, Raundalen J, Vestberg NL, eds. Media and the Ecological Crisis. Routledge; 2017:3-18.
76.
Sabina Leonelli. What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science. 2015;82(5):810-821. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
77.
Strathern M. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Vol The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
78.
Shackley S, Wynne B. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 1996;21(3):275-302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302
79.
Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39(2):237-261. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
80.
Igoe J. The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology. 2010;30(4):375-397. doi:10.1177/0308275X10372468
81.
Helmreich S. Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties. 2007;2(3):287-302. doi:10.1017/S1745855207005753
82.
Lehning M, Dawes N, Bavay et. al. M. Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. In: The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research; :45-51.
83.
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory. 2003;3(1):65-85. doi:10.1177/1463499603003001752
84.
Rapp R. Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains. BioSocieties. Published online 26 October 2015. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2015.33
85.
Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.
86.
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
87.
Tutton R, Prainsack B. Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011;33(7):1081-1095. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x
88.
Emily Martin. The End of the Body? American Ethnologist. 1992;19(1):121-140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
89.
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
90.
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
91.
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus. http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
92.
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
93.
Hayles NK. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago P.; 1999.
94.
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
95.
Ruckenstein M. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies. 2014;4(1):68-84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068
96.
Lupton D. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health. 2013;23(4):393-403. doi:10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
97.
Thacker E. What is Biomedia? Configurations. 2003;11(1):47-79. doi:10.1353/con.2004.0014
98.
Beaulieu A. From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2004;35(2):367-390. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011
99.
Helmreich S. Kinship in Hypertext. In: Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Duke University Press; 2002:116-143. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222
100.
Franklin S. Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. In: Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Duke University Press; 2001:302-325. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0
101.
Singer N. From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times. Published online 19 April 2015.
102.
Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014;36(6):856-869. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12109
103.
Dawn Nafus. Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication. 2014;8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
104.
Doe G. With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. Vox Genetics. Published 9 September 2014. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
105.
Fujimara J. The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. In: The Practices of Human Genetics. Vol Sociology of the sciences. Kluwer Academic; 1999:49-87.
106.
Rabinow P. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Vol Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton University Press; 1996.
107.
Gross A. The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:113-129. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x
108.
Van Dijck J. Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2000;31(2):271-285. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5
109.
Gerlitz C, Lury C. Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15(2):174-188. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
110.
Kaufmann M. Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society. 2015;37(7):972-987. doi:10.1177/0163443715584101
111.
Nafus D. Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15(2):208-222. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266
112.
Sharp LA. The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2000;29(1):287-328. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287
113.
Strathern M. Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In: Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge University Press; 2005:111-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514
114.
Steinmetz G. Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. In: State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Vol The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Cornell University Press; 1999. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
115.
Browne S. Dark Matters. Duke University Press; 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822375302
116.
Amoore L. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography. 2006;25(3):336-351. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
117.
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
118.
Birchall C. Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716663965
119.
Gilles Deleuze. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October. 1992;59:3-7. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
120.
Adams V. Metrics. Duke University Press; 2016. doi:10.1215/9780822374480
121.
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson K. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology. 2000;51(4):605-622. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280
122.
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056
123.
Ruppert E, Savage M. Transactional politics. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:73-92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x
124.
Roderick L. Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology. 2014;40(5):729-746. doi:10.1177/0896920513501350
125.
M’charek A, Schramm K, Skinner D. Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2014;39(4):468-487. doi:10.1177/0162243913509493
126.
Sharma A, Gupta A. Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. In: The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Vol Blackwell readers in anthropology. Blackwell; 2006.
127.
Universitetet i Oslo. State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives. Vol Anthropology, culture, and society. (Krohn-Hansen C, Nustad KG, eds.). Pluto Press; 2005. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7
128.
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. In: Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. doi:10.4324/9780203814949
129.
Lyon D. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(2). doi:10.1177/2053951714541861
130.
Isin E, Ruppert E. Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication. 2017;11. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642
131.
LYON D. BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics. 2008;22(9):499-508. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
132.
Evelyn Ruppert. Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology. 2011;45(2):218-233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
133.
Lupton D. Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549
134.
Fuller M, Goffey A. Leak early, leak often. In: Evil Media. The MIT Press; 2012:100-104. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
135.
Vertesi J. My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.com. Published online 2014:1-1. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site
136.
Amoore L. Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011;28(6):24-43. doi:10.1177/0263276411417430
137.
Strathern M. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. In: Conceptualizing Society. Routledge; 1992:75-106. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244
138.
Ruppert E. The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29(4-5):116-136. doi:10.1177/0263276412439428
139.
Lyon D. Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics. 2008;22(9):499-508. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
140.
Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology. 2010;4(4):325-338. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x
141.
Anna Tsing. The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology. 2000;15(3):327-360. http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142.
Coopmans C. Visual analytics as artful revelation. In: Coopmans C, ed. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Vol Inside technology. The MIT Press; 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
143.
Anderson C. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
144.
Annelise Riles. Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist. 1998;25(3):378-398. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
145.
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data
146.
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, eds. Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. In: Data, Now Bigger and Better!. Vol Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
147.
Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, Grauwin S, Boullier D. ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology. 2012;63(4):590-615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x
148.
Lake RW. Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society. 2017;4(1). doi:10.1177/2053951716682537
149.
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):662-679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
150.
Seaver N. The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society. 2015;37(7):1101-1109. doi:10.1177/0163443715594102
151.
Breiger RL. Scaling down. Big Data & Society. 2015;2(2). doi:10.1177/2053951715602497
152.
Kitchin R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(1). doi:10.1177/2053951714528481
153.
Strathern M. Partial Connections. Updated ed. AltaMira Press; 2004.
154.
Strathern M. Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. In: Culture, Landscape, and the Environment: The Linacre Lectures, 1997. Vol The Linacre lectures. Oxford University Press; 2000:44-71.
155.
Strathern M. On Space and Depth. In: Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Vol Science and cultural theory. Duke University Press; 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550
156.
Marr B. The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. Published 21AD. http://data-informed.com/
157.
Marcus G. Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. In: Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:28-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426
158.
Couldry N, Powell A. Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(2). doi:10.1177/2053951714539277
159.
Lash S. Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society. 2007;24(3):55-78. doi:10.1177/0263276407075956
160.
Bowker GC. The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication. 2014;8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190
161.
Beer D, Burrows R. Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013;30(4):47-71. doi:10.1177/0263276413476542
162.
Boellstorff T. Making big data, in theory. First Monday. 2013;18(10). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869
163.
Riles A. The Network inside out: Annelise Riles. The University of Michigan Press; 2000.
164.
Wendy F. Hsu. Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. Published online 2016. doi:10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
165.
Mackenzie A. These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science. 2003;33(3):365-387. doi:10.1177/03063127030333003
166.
Seaver N. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society. 2017;4(2). doi:10.1177/2053951717738104
167.
Marcus GE. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1995;24(1):95-117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
168.
Candea M. Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2007;13(1):167-184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x
169.
Strathern M. The Limits of Auto-anthropology. In: Anthropology at Home. Vol A.S.A. monographs. Tavistock Publications; 1987:16-37.
170.
Strathern M. Chapter 1. In: Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. Athlone; 1999.
171.
Dalsgaard S, Nielsen M. Introduction: Time and the Field. Social Analysis. 2013;57(1):1-19. doi:10.3167/sa.2013.570101
172.
Underberg NM, Zorn E. Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography. Visual Anthropology. 2013;26(1):1-17. doi:10.1080/08949468.2013.734760
173.
Boellstorff T. Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In: Digital Anthropology. Berg; 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
174.
MARCUS GE. THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch. Cultural Anthropology. 2012;27(3):427-445. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x
175.
Jackson Jr. JL. Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t. Cultural Anthropology. 27(3):480-497. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x
176.
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology. 2008;23(1):1-14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
177.
Seaver N. Studying up: the ethnography of technologists. Ethnography Matters. Published 10 March 2014. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
178.
Faubion JD, Marcus GE. Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Cornell University Press; 2009.
179.
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment. http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
180.
Kelty C, Coleman G, Strassler K. Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. Published 13 December 2012. http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
181.
Blok A, Pedersen MA. Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(2). doi:10.1177/2053951714543908
182.
Anderson K, Nafus D, Rattenbury T, Aipperspach R. Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2009;2009(1):123-140. doi:10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x
183.
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy. 2013;6(3):313-335. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
184.
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology. 2007;41(5):885-899. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
185.
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium. https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
186.
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013;30(4):22-46. doi:10.1177/0263276413484941
187.
Ford H. Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(2). doi:10.1177/2053951714544337
188.
Nafus D. Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC. EPIC. Published 15 May 2015. https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
189.
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST. https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
190.
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
