1
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716646135.
2
F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, Eds., in The politics of knowledge, Routledge, London, 2012.
3
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
4
O. Halpern, Beautiful Data, Duke University Press, 2015.
5
R. Kitchin, The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2014.
6
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715578951.
7
T. Striphas, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2015, 18, 395–412.
8
B. Latour, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, pp. 24–79.
9
D. Rosenberg, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, ed. L. Gitelman, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
10
L. Chua and A. Salmond, in SAGE handbook of social anthropology, SAGE, 2012, pp. 101–115.
11
H. Verran, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 60–72.
12
I. Hacking, in The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, vol. Ideas in Context, pp. 1–10.
13
T. M. Porter, Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1995.
14
Y. Hui, Metaphilosophy, 2012, 43, 380–395.
15
O. Halpern, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 223–238.
16
O. Halpern, Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2014, vol. Experimental futures.
17
A. Riles, in Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2006, pp. 1–38.
18
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
19
L. Manovich, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1999, 5, 80–99.
20
Elizabeth A. Povinelli, Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, 2011, 22, 146–171.
21
M. Hogan, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715592429.
22
H. Geismar and W. Mohns, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2011, 17, S133–S155.
23
24
G. Bowker, in Memory practices in the sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2005, vol. Inside technology, pp. 107–136.
25
A. J. M. Salmond, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, , DOI:10.14318/hau3.3.002.
26
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, vol. Inside technology.
27
W. H. K. Chun, Critical Inquiry, 2008, 35, 148–171.
28
J. Holt and Patrick Vondereau, in Traffic signal timing manual, U.S. Department of Transportation, [Washington, D.C.], 2014.
29
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 311–333.
30
Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 2015, 44, 436–437.
31
D. Haraway, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience, Routledge, New York, 1997.
32
M. Strathern and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology, The relation: issues in complexity and scale, Prickly Pear Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995, vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet.
33
C. B. Jensen and A. Morita, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2015, 1, 81–87.
34
P. Harvey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 76–92.
35
A. Mackenzie, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 189–207.
36
H. Verran, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2009, 2, 169–182.
37
A. J. M. Salmond, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 1–32.
38
J. Laidlaw, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2000, 6, 617–634.
39
Tsing, Anna, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 21–43.
40
N. A. John, New Media & Society, 2013, 15, 167–182.
41
Maurer, W.M., Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015, pp. 67–86.
42
J. Van Dijck and T. Poell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716654173.
43
S. Day and C. Lury, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, 2016.
44
Janet Carsten, in After Kinship by Janet Carsten, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–108.
45
S. Leonelli, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2013, 33, 6–11.
46
M. Fortun, in Postgenomics, eds. S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Duke University Press, 2015.
47
M. Biagioli, in Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science, Routledge, New York, 2013, pp. 253–281.
48
S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome, Duke University Press, Durham, 2015.
49
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992, pp. 23–43.
50
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
51
J. Lezaun and C. M. Montgomery, Science, Technology & Human Values, 2015, 40, 3–29.
52
S. Hilgartner, The British Journal for the History of Science, 2012, 45, 267–280.
53
C. M. Kelty, BioSocieties, 2012, 7, 140–168.
54
E. Hirsch and M. Strathern, Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia, Berghahn Books, New York, 2004.
55
J. Leach, Social Analysis, , DOI:10.3167/sa.2011.550308.
56
D. Miller, in The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, N.M., 2001, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series.
57
M. Gregg, in Data, now bigger and better!, eds. T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
58
Antonia Walford, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2012, 30, 101–117.
59
Arturo Escobar, Current Anthropology, 1999, 40, 1–30.
60
B. Büscher, New Media & Society, 2016, 18, 726–743.
61
K. Asdal, Geoforum, 2008, 39, 123–132.
62
Kim Fortun, Osiris, 2004, 19, 283–296.
63
J. Gabrys, H. Pritchard and B. Barratt, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716679677.
64
J. Whitington, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 2016, 39, 46–63.
65
T. Nadim, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716666301.
66
E. Garnett, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716658061.
67
K. Fortun, L. Poirier, A. Morgan, B. Costelloe-Kuehn and M. Fortun, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716668903.
68
I. Lippert, Geoforum, 2015, 66, 126–135.
69
S. Dalsgaard, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 80–98.
70
M. Grebowicz, Environmental Humanities, 2014, 5, 1–11.
71
Stefan Helmreich, Social Research, 2011, 78, 1211–1242.
72
J. Gabrys, Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2016, vol. Electronic mediations.
73
H. Verran, in Inventive methods: the happening of the social, eds. C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Routledge, Abingdon, 2014, vol. Culture, economy and the social.
74
H. Knox, in Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas, eds. H. Appel, A. Mason and M. Watts, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2015.
75
J. Gabrys, in Media and the Ecological Crisis, eds. R. Maxwell, J. Raundalen and N. L. Vestberg, Routledge, London, 2017, pp. 3–18.
76
Sabina Leonelli, Philosophy of Science, 2015, 82, 810–821.
77
M. Strathern, After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures.
78
S. Shackley and B. Wynne, Science, Technology & Human Values, 1996, 21, 275–302.
79
J. Fairhead, M. Leach and I. Scoones, Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012, 39, 237–261.
80
J. Igoe, Critique of Anthropology, 2010, 30, 375–397.
81
S. Helmreich, BioSocieties, 2007, 2, 287–302.
82
M. Lehning, N. Dawes and M. Bavay et. al., in The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash, pp. 45–51.
83
S. Franklin, Anthropological Theory, 2003, 3, 65–85.
84
R. Rapp, BioSocieties, , DOI:10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.
85
86
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.
87
R. Tutton and B. Prainsack, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2011, 33, 1081–1095.
88
Emily Martin, American Ethnologist, 1992, 19, 121–140.
89
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/.
90
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox, http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.
91
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus, http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/.
92
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0.
93
N. K. Hayles, How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics, University of Chicago P., Chicago, 1999.
94
After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
95
M. Ruckenstein, Societies, 2014, 4, 68–84.
96
D. Lupton, Critical Public Health, 2013, 23, 393–403.
97
E. Thacker, Configurations, 2003, 11, 47–79.
98
A. Beaulieu, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2004, 35, 367–390.
99
S. Helmreich, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2002, pp. 116–143.
100
S. Franklin, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham [N.C.], 2001, pp. 302–325.
101
N. Singer, The New York Times.
102
D. Lupton, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2014, 36, 856–869.
103
Dawn Nafus, International Journal of Communication.
104
G. Doe, With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox, http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.
105
J. Fujimara, in The practices of human genetics, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999, vol. Sociology of the sciences, pp. 49–87.
106
P. Rabinow, Essays on the anthropology of reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1996, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history.
107
A. Gross, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 113–129.
108
J. Van Dijck, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2000, 31, 271–285.
109
C. Gerlitz and C. Lury, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 174–188.
110
M. Kaufmann, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 972–987.
111
D. Nafus, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 208–222.
112
L. A. Sharp, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2000, 29, 287–328.
113
M. Strathern, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. 111–134.
114
G. Steinmetz, in State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1999, vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture.
115
S. Browne, Dark Matters, Duke University Press, 2015.
116
L. Amoore, Political Geography, 2006, 25, 336–351.
117
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.
118
C. Birchall, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716663965.
119
Gilles Deleuze, October, 1992, 59, 3–7.
120
V. Adams, Metrics, Duke University Press, 2016.
121
K. D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, British Journal of Sociology, 2000, 51, 605–622.
122
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J, .
123
E. Ruppert and M. Savage, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 73–92.
124
L. Roderick, Critical Sociology, 2014, 40, 729–746.
125
A. M’charek, K. Schramm and D. Skinner, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2014, 39, 468–487.
126
A. Sharma and A. Gupta, in The anthropology of the state: a reader, Blackwell, Malden, Mass, 2006, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology.
127
Universitetet i Oslo, State formation: anthropological perspectives, Pluto Press, London, 2005, vol. Anthropology, culture, and society.
128
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies.
129
D. Lyon, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714541861.
130
E. Isin and E. Ruppert, International Journal of Communication.
131
D. LYON, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
132
Evelyn Ruppert, Sociology, 2011, 45, 218–233.
133
D. Lupton, Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015.
134
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, in Evil media, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2012, pp. 100–104.
135
J. Vertesi, Time.com, 2014, 1–1.
136
L. Amoore, Theory, Culture & Society, 2011, 28, 24–43.
137
M. Strathern, in Conceptualizing society, Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 75–106.
138
E. Ruppert, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 116–136.
139
D. Lyon, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
140
D. Lyon, International Political Sociology, 2010, 4, 325–338.
141
Anna Tsing, Cultural Anthropology, 2000, 15, 327–360.
142
C. Coopmans, in Representation in scientific practice revisited, ed. C. Coopmans, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2014, vol. Inside technology.
143
C. Anderson, The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
144
Annelise Riles, American Ethnologist, 1998, 25, 378–398.
145
146
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
147
B. Latour, P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin and D. Boullier, The British Journal of Sociology, 2012, 63, 590–615.
148
R. W. Lake, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716682537.
149
D. boyd and K. Crawford, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15, 662–679.
150
N. Seaver, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 1101–1109.
151
R. L. Breiger, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715602497.
152
R. Kitchin, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714528481.
153
M. Strathern, Partial connections, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, Updated ed., 2004.
154
M. Strathern, in Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, vol. The Linacre lectures, pp. 44–71.
155
M. Strathern, in Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices, Duke University Press, Durham, 2002, vol. Science and cultural theory.
156
B. Marr, The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data, http://data-informed.com/.
157
G. Marcus, in Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, 2010, pp. 28–46.
158
N. Couldry and A. Powell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714539277.
159
S. Lash, Theory, Culture & Society, 2007, 24, 55–78.
160
G. C. Bowker, International Journal of Communication.
161
D. Beer and R. Burrows, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 47–71.
162
T. Boellstorff, First Monday, , DOI:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
163
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2000.
164
Wendy F. Hsu, , DOI:10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.
165
A. Mackenzie, Social Studies of Science, 2003, 33, 365–387.
166
N. Seaver, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951717738104.
167
G. E. Marcus, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1995, 24, 95–117.
168
M. Candea, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2007, 13, 167–184.
169
M. Strathern, in Anthropology at home, Tavistock Publications, London, 1987, vol. A.S.A. monographs, pp. 16–37.
170
M. Strathern, in Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things, Athlone, London, 1999.
171
S. Dalsgaard and M. Nielsen, Social Analysis, 2013, 57, 1–19.
172
N. M. Underberg and E. Zorn, Visual Anthropology, 2013, 26, 1–17.
173
T. Boellstorff, in Digital anthropology, Berg, London, 2012.
174
G. E. MARCUS, Cultural Anthropology, 2012, 27, 427–445.
175
J. L. Jackson Jr., Cultural Anthropology, 27, 480–497.
176
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro, Cultural Anthropology, 2008, 23, 1–14.
177
N. Seaver, Studying up: the ethnography of technologists, http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/.
178
J. D. Faubion and G. E. Marcus, Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2009.
179
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment, http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm.
180
C. Kelty, G. Coleman and K. Strassler, Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection, http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.
181
A. Blok and M. A. Pedersen, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714543908.
182
K. Anderson, D. Nafus, T. Rattenbury and R. Aipperspach, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009, 2009, 123–140.
183
N. Marres and E. Weltevrede, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2013, 6, 313–335.
184
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows, Sociology, 2007, 41, 885–899.
185
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium, https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.
186
E. Ruppert, J. Law and M. Savage, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 22–46.
187
H. Ford, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714544337.
188
D. Nafus, Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC, https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.
189
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST, https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.
190
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab, http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.