Bibliography for ANTH3001: Advanced Topics in Digital Culture BETA

‘» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five Recent Play Dates - EASST’. n.d. https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.

‘23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American’. n.d. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/.

‘Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/Is the World in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology’. n.d. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data.

Adams, Vincanne. 2016. Metrics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480.

‘After Kinship by Janet Carsten’. n.d. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

Amoore, L. 2011. ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430.

Amoore, Louise. 2006. ‘Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror’. Political Geography 25 (3): 336–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.

Anderson, Chris. n.d. ‘The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete’. Wired. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.

Anderson, Ken, Dawn Nafus, Tye Rattenbury, and Ryan Aipperspach. 2009. ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2009 (1): 123–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x.

Anna Tsing. 2000. ‘The Global Situation’. Cultural Anthropology 15 (3): 327–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Annelise Riles. 1998. ‘Infinity within the Brackets’. American Ethnologist 25 (3): 378–98. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Antonia Walford. 2012. ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 30 (2): 101–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Arturo Escobar. 1999. ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’. Current Anthropology 40 (1): 1–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Asdal, Kristin. 2008. ‘Enacting Things through Numbers: Taking Nature into Account/Ing’. Geoforum 39 (1): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004.

Beaulieu, Anne. 2004. ‘From Brainbank to Database: The Informational Turn in the Study of the Brain’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (2): 367–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011.

Beer, D., and R. Burrows. 2013. ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (4): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542.

Beer, David. 2015. ‘Productive Measures: Culture and Measurement in the Context of Everyday Neoliberalism’. Big Data & Society 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951.

———. 2016. ‘How Should We Do the History of Big Data?’ Big Data & Society 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135.

Biagioli, M. 2013. ‘Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship’. In Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, 253–81. New York: Routledge. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270.

Birchall, Clare. 2016. ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between Open and Closed Data’. Big Data & Society 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965.

Blok, A., and M. A. Pedersen. 2014. ‘Complementary Social Science? Quali-Quantitative Experiments in a Big Data World’. Big Data & Society 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908.

Boellstorff, T. 2012. ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’. In Digital Anthropology. London: Berg. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922.

Boellstorff, Tom. 2013. ‘Making Big Data, in Theory’. First Monday 18 (10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.

Boellstorff, Tom, and Bill Maurer, eds. 2015a. ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’,. In Data, Now Bigger and Better! Vol. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

———, eds. 2015b. ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’. In Data, Now Bigger and Better! Vol. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Bowker, G. 2005. ‘Databasing the World: Biodiversity and the 2000s’. In Memory Practices in the Sciences, Inside technology:107–36. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2014. ‘The Theory/Data Thing’. International Journal of Communication 8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190.

Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. Vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out.

boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. ‘Critical Questions for Big Data’. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Breiger, R. L. 2015. ‘Scaling Down’. Big Data & Society 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497.

Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302.

Büscher, Bram. 2016. ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and Theorizing the Links between New Media and Nature Conservation’. New Media & Society 18 (5): 726–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841.

Candea, Matei. 2007. ‘Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-Site’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13 (1): 167–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x.

Chua, L., and A. Salmond. 2012. ‘Artefacts in Anthropology’. In SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, 101–15. SAGE. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2008. ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’. Critical Inquiry 35 (1): 148–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/595632.

Coopmans, Catelijne. 2014. ‘Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation’. In Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited, edited by Catelijne Coopmans. Vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Couldry, N., and A. Powell. 2014. ‘Big Data from the Bottom Up’. Big Data & Society 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277.

D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, Kevin. 2000. ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.

D. Miller. 2001. ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’. In The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press.

Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2013. ‘The Commensurability of Carbon’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 80–98. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006.

Dalsgaard, Steffen, and Morten Nielsen. 2013. ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’. Social Analysis 57 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101.

Dawn Nafus. 2014. ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. International Journal of Communication 8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170.

Doe, George. 2014. ‘With Genetic Testing, I Gave My Parents the Gift of Divorce - Vox’. Vox Genetics. 9 September 2014. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.

‘Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.’ n.d. http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology.

Elizabeth A. Povinelli. 2011. ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies 22 (1): 146–71. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274.

Emily Martin. 1992. ‘The End of the Body?’ American Ethnologist 19 (1): 121–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Evelyn Ruppert. 2011. ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’. Sociology 45 (2): 218–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Fairhead, James, Melissa Leach, and Ian Scoones. 2012. ‘Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?’ Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 237–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.

Faubion, James D., and George E. Marcus. 2009. Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Ford, H. 2014. ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between Ethnographers and Data Scientists’. Big Data & Society 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337.

Fortun, Kim, Lindsay Poirier, Alli Morgan, Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, and Mike Fortun. 2016. ‘Pushback: Critical Data Designers and Pollution Politics’. Big Data & Society 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903.

Franklin, S. 2001. ‘Biologization Re-Visited: Kinship Theory’. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, 302–25. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0.

———. 2003. ‘Re-Thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics’. Anthropological Theory 3 (1): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752.

Fujimara, J. 1999. ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’. In The Practices of Human Genetics, Sociology of the sciences:49–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Fuller, M, and A Goffey. 2012a. ‘Leak Early, Leak Often’. In Evil Media, 100–104. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Fuller, M., and A. Goffey. 2012b. ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 311–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466.

Gabrys, Jennifer. 2016. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Vol. Electronic mediations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq.

———. 2017. ‘Powering the Digital: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism’. In Media and the Ecological Crisis, edited by Richard Maxwell, Jon Raundalen, and Nina Lager Vestberg, 3–18. London: Routledge.

Gabrys, Jennifer, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. ‘Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories’. Big Data & Society 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677.

Garnett, Emma. 2016. ‘Developing a Feeling for Error: Practices of Monitoring and Modelling Air Pollution Data’. Big Data & Society 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061.

Geismar, Haidy, and William Mohns. 2011. ‘Social Relationships and Digital Relationships: Rethinking the Database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (May): S133–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x.

George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. 2008. ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’. Cultural Anthropology 23 (1): 1–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Gerlitz, Carolin, and Celia Lury. 2014. ‘Social Media and Self-Evaluating Assemblages: On Numbers, Orderings and Values’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 174–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.

Gilles Deleuze. 1992. ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’. October 59: 3–7. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Gitelman, Lisa. 2013. ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327.

Grebowicz, Margret. 2014. ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The Social Effects of Climate Change as Internet Spectacle’. Environmental Humanities 5: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388.

‘Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In “Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life” Ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press’. n.d. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.

Gregg, M. 2015. ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’. In Data, Now Bigger and Better!, edited by Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer. Vol. Paradigm. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Gross, Ana. 2011. ‘The Economy of Social Data: Exploring Research Ethics as Device’. The Sociological Review 59 (December): 113–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x.

Hacking, I. 1990. ‘The Argument’. In The Taming of Chance, Ideas in Context:1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766.

Halpern, Orit. 2014a. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Vol. Experimental futures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

———. 2014b. ‘Cybernetic Rationality’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320.

———. 2015. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010.

Haraway, D. 1997. ‘Chapter 4: Gene’. In Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Harvey, P. 2012. ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago P.

Helmreich, S. 2002. ‘Kinship in Hypertext’. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, 116–43. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222.

Helmreich, Stefan. 2007. ‘Blue-Green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’. BioSocieties 2 (3): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753.

Hilgartner, Stephen. 2012. ‘Selective Flows of Knowledge in Technoscientific Interaction: Information Control in Genome Research’. The British Journal for the History of Science 45 (02): 267–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106.

‘Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus’. n.d. http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/.

Hirsch, Eric, and Marilyn Strathern. 2004. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk.

Hogan, Mél. 2015. ‘Data Flows and Water Woes: The Utah Data Center’. Big Data & Society 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429.

Hui, Yuk. 2012. ‘What Is a Digital Object?’ Metaphilosophy 43 (4): 380–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.

Igoe, J. 2010. ‘The Spectacle of Nature in the Global Economy of Appearances: Anthropological Engagements with the Spectacular Mediations of Transnational Conservation’. Critique of Anthropology 30 (4): 375–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468.

Isin, Engin, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2017. ‘Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden’. International Journal of Communication 11. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642.

J. Holt, and Patrick Vondereau. 2014. ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’. In Traffic Signal Timing Manual. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation. http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024.

Jackson Jr., John L. n.d. ‘Ethnography Is, Ethnography Ain’t’. Cultural Anthropology 27 (3): 480–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x.

Janet Carsten. n.d. ‘Ch. 4: The Person’. In After Kinship by Janet Carsten, 83–108. Cambridge University Press. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Atsuro Morita. 2015. ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 1 (November): 81–87. http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21.

John, Nicholas A. 2013. ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword’. New Media & Society 15 (2): 167–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.

Kaufmann, M. 2015. ‘Resilience 2.0: Social Media Use and (Self-)Care during the 2011 Norway Attacks’. Media, Culture & Society 37 (7): 972–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101.

Kelty, Christopher, Gabriella Coleman, and Karen Strassler. 2012. ‘Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection’. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. 13 December 2012. http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.

Kelty, Christopher M. 2012. ‘This Is Not an Article: Model Organism Newsletters and the Question of “Open Science”’. BioSocieties 7 (2): 140–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8.

Kim Fortun. 2004. ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’. Osiris 19: 283–96. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. n.d. ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’ In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.

Kitchin, R. 2014. ‘Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts’. Big Data & Society 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.

Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. Los Angeles: SAGE. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml.

Knox, H. 2015. ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’. In Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas, edited by Hannah Appel, Arthur Mason, and Michael Watts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0.

Laidlaw, James. 2000. ‘A Free Gift Makes No Friends’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6 (4): 617–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036.

Lake, Robert W. 2017. ‘Big Data, Urban Governance, and the Ontological Politics of Hyperindividualism’. Big Data & Society 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537.

Lash, S. 2007. ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’ Theory, Culture & Society 24 (3): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.

Latour, Bruno. 1999. ‘Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference’. In Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, 24–79. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Latour, Bruno, Pablo Jensen, Tommaso Venturini, Sébastian Grauwin, and Dominique Boullier. 2012. ‘“The Whole Is Always Smaller than Its Parts” - a Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads’. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 590–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.

Leach, James. 2011. ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’. Social Analysis 55 (3). https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308.

Lehning, M., N. Dawes, and M. Bavay et. al. n.d. ‘Instrumenting the Earth: Next-Generation Sensor Networks and Environmental Science’. In The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, 45–51. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research.

Leonelli, S. 2013. ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 33 (1–2): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768.

Lezaun, J., and C. M. Montgomery. 2015. ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’. Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349.

Lippert, Ingmar. 2015. ‘Environment as Datascape: Enacting Emission Realities in Corporate Carbon Accounting’. Geoforum 66 (November): 126–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009.

‘Lupton, D. 2016 You Are Your Data: Self-Tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.’ n.d.

Lupton, Deborah. 2013. ‘Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of mHealth Technologies’. Critical Public Health 23 (4): 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.

———. 2014. ‘The Commodification of Patient Opinion: The Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data’. Sociology of Health & Illness 36 (6): 856–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109.

———. n.d. ‘Self-Tracking Modes: Relflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices’. Social Life of Big Data Symposium 2nd June 2015. School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549.

LYON, DAVID. 2008. ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’. Bioethics 22 (9): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

Lyon, David. 2008. ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’. Bioethics 22 (9): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

———. 2010. ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’. International Political Sociology 4 (4): 325–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.

———. 2014. ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique’. Big Data & Society 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.

M. Fortun. 2015. ‘What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’. In Postgenomics, edited by Sarah S. Richardson and Hallam Stevens. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449.

Mackenzie, Adrian. 2003. ‘These Things Called Systems’. Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003.

———. 2014. ‘Multiplying Numbers Differently: An Epidemiology of Contagious Convolution’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110.

Manovich, L. 1999. ‘Database as Symbolic Form’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 5 (2): 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206.

Marcus, G. 2010. ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’. In Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology, 28–46. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426.

Marcus, George E. 1995. ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.

MARCUS, GEORGE E. 2012. ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’. Cultural Anthropology 27 (3): 427–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x.

Marr, Bernard. 21AD. ‘The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data’. Data Informed. 21AD. http://data-informed.com/.

Marres, Noortje, and Esther Weltevrede. 2013. ‘Scraping the Social?’ Journal of Cultural Economy 6 (3): 313–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.

Maurer, W.M. 2015. ‘Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data’. In , 67–86. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161.

M’charek, Amade, Katharina Schramm, and David Skinner. 2014. ‘Topologies of Race’. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (4): 468–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493.

Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. 2007. ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’. Sociology 41 (5): 885–99. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Nadim, Tahani. 2016. ‘Blind Regards: Troubling Data and Their Sentinels’. Big Data & Society 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301.

Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. n.d. ‘This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056.

Nafus, Dawn. 2014. ‘Stuck Data, Dead Data, and Disloyal Data: The Stops and Starts in Making Numbers into Social Practices’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 208–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266.

———. 2015. ‘Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC’. EPIC. EPICPeople.org. 15 May 2015. https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.

Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

‘Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab’. n.d. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.

Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Rapp, Rayna. 2015. ‘Big Data, Small Kids: Medico-Scientific, Familial and Advocacy Visions of Human Brains’. BioSocieties, October. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.

Richardson, Sarah S., and Hallam Stevens. 2015. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Durham: Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449.

Riles, A. 2006. ‘Introduction: In Response’. In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, 1–38. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Roderick, Leanne. 2014. ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’. Critical Sociology 40 (5): 729–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350.

Rosenberg, D. 2013. ‘Data before the Fact’. In ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron, edited by Lisa Gitelman. Vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327.

Rubio, Fernando Dominguez, and Patrick Baert, eds. 2012. ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: Knowledge Freely Available”: The Politics of (Making) Knowledge-Objects’.’ In The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386.

Ruckenstein, Minna. 2014. ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’. Societies 4 (1): 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068.

Ruppert, E. 2012. ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 116–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428.

Ruppert, E., J. Law, and M. Savage. 2013. ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (4): 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941.

Ruppert, Evelyn, and Mike Savage. 2011. ‘Transactional Politics’. The Sociological Review 59 (December): 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x.

S. Day, and C. Lury. 2016. ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’ In Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.

Sabina Leonelli. 2015. ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’. Philosophy of Science 82 (5): 810–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Salmond, Amiria J. M. 2013a. ‘Transforming Translations (Part I)’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3). https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002.

———. 2013b. ‘Transforming Translations (Part I): “The Owner of These Bones”’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (3): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002.

Seaver, N. 2014. ‘Studying up: The Ethnography of Technologists’. Ethnography Matters. 10 March 2014. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/.

Seaver, Nick. 2015. ‘The Nice Thing about Context Is That Everyone Has It’. Media, Culture & Society 37 (7): 1101–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102.

———. 2017. ‘Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems’. Big Data & Society 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.

Shackley, S., and B. Wynne. 1996. ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’. Science, Technology & Human Values 21 (3): 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302.

Sharma, Aradhana, and Akhil Gupta. 2006. ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-Thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’. In The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.

Sharp, Lesley A. 2000. ‘The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts’. Annual Review of Anthropology 29 (1): 287–328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.

Singer, Natasha. 2015. ‘From Knowing Yourself to Prodding Yourself’. The New York Times, April.

Stefan Helmreich. 2011. ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’. Social Research 78 (4): 1211–42. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Steinmetz, George. 1999. ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’ In State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Strathern, M. 1987. ‘The Limits of Auto-Anthropology’. In Anthropology at Home, A.S.A. monographs:16–37. London: Tavistock Publications.

Strathern, M. 2000. ‘Environments within: An Ethnographic Commentary on Scale’. In Culture, Landscape, and the Environment: The Linacre Lectures, 1997, The Linacre lectures:44–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2002. ‘On Space and Depth’. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Vol. Science and cultural theory. Durham: Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550.

‘Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an Anthropological Comment’. n.d. http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm.

Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1992b. ‘Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-Plural World’. In Conceptualizing Society, 75–106. London: Routledge. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244.

———. 1999. ‘Chapter 1’. In Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone.

———. 2004. Partial Connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

———. 2005. ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’. In Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise, 111–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514.

Strathern, Marilyn and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. 1995. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press.

Striphas, Ted. 2015. ‘Algorithmic Culture’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5): 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.

Thacker, Eugene. 2003. ‘What Is Biomedia?’ Configurations 11 (1): 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014.

‘The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times’. n.d. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0.

‘The World of Indicators Edited by Richard Rottenburg’. n.d. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.

‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’. 2015. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 44 (3): 436–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c.

Tsing, Anna. 2013. ‘Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts’. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (1): 21–43. https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Tutton, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack. 2011. ‘Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making up Research Subjects in Genetics Research’. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (7): 1081–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.

Underberg, Natalie M., and Elayne Zorn. 2013. ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’. Visual Anthropology 26 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760.

Universitetet i Oslo. 2005. State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives. Edited by Christian Krohn-Hansen and Knut G. Nustad. Vol. Anthropology, culture, and society. London: Pluto Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7.

Van Dijck, José. 2000. ‘Digital Cadavers: The Visible Human Project as Anatomical Theater’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (2): 271–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5.

Van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. 2016. ‘Understanding the Promises and Premises of Online Health Platforms’. Big Data & Society 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173.

Verran, H. 2014. ‘Number as Generative Device’. In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford. Vol. Culture, economy and the social. Abingdon: Routledge.

Verran, Helen. 2009. ‘On Assemblage’. Journal of Cultural Economy 2 (1–2): 169–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188.

———. 2011. ‘The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading “Disciplinary” Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent “Control” Society’. The Sociological Review 59 (December): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x.

Vertesi, Janet. 2014. ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’ Time.Com, 1–1. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

Weiner, A. B. 1992a. ‘Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension’. In Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving, 23–43. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 1992b. ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’. In Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wendy F. Hsu. 2016. ‘Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In “The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography” Eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge’. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.

Whitington, Jerome. 2016. ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 39 (1): 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130.

‘Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium’. n.d. https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.

‘With Genetic Testing, I Gave My Parents the Gift of Divorce - Vox’. n.d. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.