[1]
D. Beer, ‘How should we do the history of Big Data?’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716646135.
[2]
F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, Eds., ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: knowledge freely available”: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’.’, in The politics of knowledge, London: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386
[3]
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’, in Data, now bigger and better!, vol. Paradigm, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
[4]
O. Halpern, Beautiful Data. Duke University Press, 2015.
[5]
R. Kitchin, The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml
[6]
D. Beer, ‘Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism’, Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 1, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2053951715578951.
[7]
T. Striphas, ‘Algorithmic culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 18, no. 4–5, pp. 395–412, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1367549415577392.
[8]
B. Latour, ‘Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference’, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 24–79 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[9]
D. Rosenberg, ‘Data before the fact’, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, vol. Infrastructures series, L. Gitelman, Ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327
[10]
L. Chua and A. Salmond, ‘Artefacts in anthropology’, in SAGE handbook of social anthropology, SAGE, 2012, pp. 101–115 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[11]
H. Verran, ‘The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading “disciplinary” society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent “control” society’, The Sociological Review, vol. 59, pp. 60–72, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x.
[12]
I. Hacking, ‘The argument’, in The Taming of Chance, vol. Ideas in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 1–10 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
[13]
T. M. Porter, Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1995.
[14]
Y. Hui, ‘What is a Digital Object?’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 380–395, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.
[15]
O. Halpern, ‘Cybernetic rationality’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 223–238, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320.
[16]
O. Halpern, Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945, vol. Experimental futures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2014.
[17]
A. Riles, ‘Introduction: in response’, in Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006, pp. 1–38.
[18]
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
[19]
L. Manovich, ‘Database as Symbolic Form’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 80–99, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1177/135485659900500206.
[20]
Elizabeth A. Povinelli, ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’, Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 146–171, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1215/10407391-1218274. [Online]. Available: http://differences.dukejournals.org/content/22/1/146.short
[21]
M. Hogan, ‘Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center’, Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2053951715592429.
[22]
H. Geismar and W. Mohns, ‘Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, pp. S133–S155, May 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x.
[23]
‘Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.’ [Online]. Available: http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology
[24]
G. Bowker, ‘Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s’, in Memory practices in the sciences, vol. Inside technology, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005, pp. 107–136 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[25]
A. J. M. Salmond, ‘Transforming translations (part I)’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.002.
[26]
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out
[27]
W. H. K. Chun, ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 148–171, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1086/595632.
[28]
J. Holt and Patrick Vondereau, ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’, in Traffic signal timing manual, no. FHWA-HOP-08-024, [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024
[29]
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4–5, pp. 311–333, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0263276412450466.
[30]
‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 436–437, May 2015, doi: 10.1177/0094306115579192c.
[31]
D. Haraway, ‘Chapter 4: Gene’, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience, New York: Routledge, 1997.
[32]
M. Strathern and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology, The relation: issues in complexity and scale, vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press, 1995.
[33]
C. B. Jensen and A. Morita, ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, vol. 1, pp. 81–87, Nov. 2015 [Online]. Available: http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21
[34]
P. Harvey, ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4–5, pp. 76–92, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0263276412448827.
[35]
A. Mackenzie, ‘Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 189–207, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110.
[36]
H. Verran, ‘On assemblage’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 169–182, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1080/17530350903064188.
[37]
A. J. M. Salmond, ‘Transforming translations (part I): “The owner of these bones”’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–32, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.002.
[38]
J. Laidlaw, ‘A free gift makes no friends’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 617–634, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00036.
[39]
Tsing, Anna, ‘Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts’, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–43, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[40]
N. A. John, ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword’, New Media & Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167–182, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1461444812450684.
[41]
Maurer, W.M., ‘Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data’, Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015, pp. 67–86 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161
[42]
J. Van Dijck and T. Poell, ‘Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716654173.
[43]
S. Day and C. Lury, ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
[44]
Janet Carsten, ‘Ch. 4: The person’, in After Kinship by Janet Carsten, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–108 [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
[45]
S. Leonelli, ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 6–11, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0270467613496768.
[46]
M. Fortun, ‘What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’, in Postgenomics, S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Eds. Duke University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/160/
[47]
M. Biagioli, ‘Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship’, in Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science, New York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 253–281 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270
[48]
S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
[49]
A. B. Weiner, ‘Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension’, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992, pp. 23–43 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[50]
A. B. Weiner, ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
[51]
J. Lezaun and C. M. Montgomery, ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 3–29, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0162243914542349.
[52]
S. Hilgartner, ‘Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research’, The British Journal for the History of Science, vol. 45, no. 02, pp. 267–280, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1017/S0007087412000106.
[53]
C. M. Kelty, ‘This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of “open science”’, BioSocieties, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 140–168, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.8.
[54]
E. Hirsch and M. Strathern, Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk
[55]
J. Leach, ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’, Social Analysis, vol. 55, no. 3, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.3167/sa.2011.550308.
[56]
D. Miller, ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’, in The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series, Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press, 2001.
[57]
M. Gregg, ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’, in Data, now bigger and better!, vol. Paradigm, T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
[58]
Antonia Walford, ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 101–117, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[59]
Arturo Escobar, ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’, Current Anthropology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
B. Büscher, ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation’, New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 726–743, May 2016, doi: 10.1177/1461444814545841.
[61]
K. Asdal, ‘Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing’, Geoforum, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 123–132, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004.
[62]
Kim Fortun, ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’, Osiris, vol. 19, pp. 283–296, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[63]
J. Gabrys, H. Pritchard, and B. Barratt, ‘Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716679677.
[64]
J. Whitington, ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 46–63, May 2016, doi: 10.1111/plar.12130.
[65]
T. Nadim, ‘Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716666301.
[66]
E. Garnett, ‘Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716658061.
[67]
K. Fortun, L. Poirier, A. Morgan, B. Costelloe-Kuehn, and M. Fortun, ‘Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716668903.
[68]
I. Lippert, ‘Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting’, Geoforum, vol. 66, pp. 126–135, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009.
[69]
S. Dalsgaard, ‘The commensurability of carbon’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80–98, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.1.006.
[70]
M. Grebowicz, ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle’, Environmental Humanities, vol. 5, pp. 1–11, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388
[71]
Stefan Helmreich, ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’, Social Research, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1211–1242, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[72]
J. Gabrys, Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet, vol. Electronic mediations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq
[73]
H. Verran, ‘Number as Generative Device’, in Inventive methods: the happening of the social, vol. Culture, economy and the social, C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Eds. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
[74]
H. Knox, ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’, in Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas, H. Appel, A. Mason, and M. Watts, Eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0
[75]
J. Gabrys, ‘Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism’, in Media and the Ecological Crisis, R. Maxwell, J. Raundalen, and N. L. Vestberg, Eds. London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 3–18.
[76]
Sabina Leonelli, ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 810–821, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[77]
M. Strathern, After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[78]
S. Shackley and B. Wynne, ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 275–302, Jul. 1996, doi: 10.1177/016224399602100302.
[79]
J. Fairhead, M. Leach, and I. Scoones, ‘Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 237–261, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
[80]
J. Igoe, ‘The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 375–397, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0308275X10372468.
[81]
S. Helmreich, ‘Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’, BioSocieties, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 287–302, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S1745855207005753.
[82]
M. Lehning, N. Dawes, and M. Bavay et. al., ‘Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science’, in The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery, Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research, pp. 45–51.
[83]
S. Franklin, ‘Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–85, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1177/1463499603003001752.
[84]
R. Rapp, ‘Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains’, BioSocieties, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.
[85]
‘Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.’
[86]
‘Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In “Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life” ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press’. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
[87]
R. Tutton and B. Prainsack, ‘Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research’, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1081–1095, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.
[88]
Emily Martin, ‘The End of the Body?’, American Ethnologist, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 121–140, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[89]
‘23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American’. [Online]. Available: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
[90]
‘With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox’. [Online]. Available: http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
[91]
‘Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus’. [Online]. Available: http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
[92]
‘The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
[93]
N. K. Hayles, How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago P., 1999.
[94]
‘After Kinship by Janet Carsten’. [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
[95]
M. Ruckenstein, ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’, Societies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.3390/soc4010068.
[96]
D. Lupton, ‘Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies’, Critical Public Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 393–403, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.
[97]
E. Thacker, ‘What is Biomedia?’, Configurations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–79, 2003, doi: 10.1353/con.2004.0014.
[98]
A. Beaulieu, ‘From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 367–390, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011.
[99]
S. Helmreich, ‘Kinship in Hypertext’, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002, pp. 116–143 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222
[100]
S. Franklin, ‘Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory’, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2001, pp. 302–325 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0
[101]
N. Singer, ‘From knowing yourself to prodding yourself’, The New York Times, Apr. 2015.
[102]
D. Lupton, ‘The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data’, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 856–869, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12109.
[103]
Dawn Nafus, ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
[104]
G. Doe, ‘With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox’, Vox Genetics, Sep. 09, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
[105]
J. Fujimara, ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’, in The practices of human genetics, vol. Sociology of the sciences, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999, pp. 49–87.
[106]
P. Rabinow, Essays on the anthropology of reason, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[107]
A. Gross, ‘The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device’, The Sociological Review, vol. 59, pp. 113–129, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x.
[108]
J. Van Dijck, ‘Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 271–285, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5.
[109]
C. Gerlitz and C. Lury, ‘Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 174–188, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.
[110]
M. Kaufmann, ‘Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 972–987, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0163443715584101.
[111]
D. Nafus, ‘Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 208–222, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266.
[112]
L. A. Sharp, ‘The Commodification of the Body and its Parts’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 287–328, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.
[113]
M. Strathern, ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 111–134 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514
[114]
G. Steinmetz, ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’, in State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn, vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[115]
S. Browne, Dark Matters. Duke University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822375302
[116]
L. Amoore, ‘Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror’, Political Geography, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 336–351, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.
[117]
‘The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg’. [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
[118]
C. Birchall, ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data’, Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951716663965.
[119]
Gilles Deleuze, ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, vol. 59, pp. 3–7, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[120]
V. Adams, Metrics. Duke University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822374480
[121]
K. D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, ‘The surveillant assemblage’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 605–622, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280.
[122]
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J, ‘This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’ [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056
[123]
E. Ruppert and M. Savage, ‘Transactional politics’, The Sociological Review, vol. 59, pp. 73–92, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x.
[124]
L. Roderick, ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’, Critical Sociology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 729–746, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0896920513501350.
[125]
A. M’charek, K. Schramm, and D. Skinner, ‘Topologies of Race’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 468–487, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913509493.
[126]
A. Sharma and A. Gupta, ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’, in The anthropology of the state: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006.
[127]
Universitetet i Oslo, State formation: anthropological perspectives, vol. Anthropology, culture, and society. London: Pluto Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7
[128]
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon, ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, .
[129]
D. Lyon, ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714541861.
[130]
E. Isin and E. Ruppert, ‘Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642
[131]
D. LYON, ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’, Bioethics, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 499–508, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.
[132]
Evelyn Ruppert, ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’, Sociology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 218–233, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[133]
D. Lupton, ‘Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices’, Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549
[134]
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, ‘Leak early, leak often’, in Evil media, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2012, pp. 100–104 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[135]
J. Vertesi, ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’, Time.com, pp. 1–1, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[136]
L. Amoore, ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 24–43, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0263276411417430.
[137]
M. Strathern, ‘Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world’, in Conceptualizing society, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 75–106 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244
[138]
E. Ruppert, ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4–5, pp. 116–136, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0263276412439428.
[139]
D. Lyon, ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’, Bioethics, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 499–508, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.
[140]
D. Lyon, ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’, International Political Sociology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 325–338, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.
[141]
Anna Tsing, ‘The Global Situation’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 327–360, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[142]
C. Coopmans, ‘Visual analytics as artful revelation’, in Representation in scientific practice revisited, vol. Inside technology, C. Coopmans, Ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[143]
C. Anderson, ‘The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete’, Wired. [Online]. Available: http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
[144]
Annelise Riles, ‘Infinity within the Brackets’, American Ethnologist, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 378–398, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[145]
‘Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology’ [Online]. Available: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data
[146]
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’, in Data, now bigger and better!, vol. Paradigm, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015.
[147]
B. Latour, P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin, and D. Boullier, ‘“The whole is always smaller than its parts” - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 590–615, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.
[148]
R. W. Lake, ‘Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism’, Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/2053951716682537.
[149]
D. boyd and K. Crawford, ‘Critical Questions for Big Data’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 662–679, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
[150]
N. Seaver, ‘The nice thing about context is that everyone has it’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1101–1109, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0163443715594102.
[151]
R. L. Breiger, ‘Scaling down’, Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2053951715602497.
[152]
R. Kitchin, ‘Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481.
[153]
M. Strathern, Partial connections, Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004.
[154]
M. Strathern, ‘Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale’, in Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997, vol. The Linacre lectures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 44–71.
[155]
M. Strathern, ‘On Space and Depth’, in Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices, vol. Science and cultural theory, Durham: Duke University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550
[156]
B. Marr, ‘The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data’, 21AD. [Online]. Available: http://data-informed.com/
[157]
G. Marcus, ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’, in Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 28–46 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426
[158]
N. Couldry and A. Powell, ‘Big Data from the bottom up’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714539277.
[159]
S. Lash, ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 55–78, May 2007, doi: 10.1177/0263276407075956.
[160]
G. C. Bowker, ‘The Theory/Data Thing’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190
[161]
D. Beer and R. Burrows, ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 47–71, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0263276413476542.
[162]
T. Boellstorff, ‘Making big data, in theory’, First Monday, vol. 18, no. 10, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
[163]
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2000.
[164]
Wendy F. Hsu, ‘Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In “The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography” eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge’, 2016, doi: 10.4324/9781315673974.ch4. [Online]. Available: https://www-routledgehandbooks-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
[165]
A. Mackenzie, ‘These Things Called Systems’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 365–387, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1177/03063127030333003.
[166]
N. Seaver, ‘Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems’, Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/2053951717738104.
[167]
G. E. Marcus, ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 95–117, Oct. 1995, doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
[168]
M. Candea, ‘Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 167–184, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x.
[169]
M. Strathern, ‘The Limits of Auto-anthropology’, in Anthropology at home, vol. A.S.A. monographs, London: Tavistock Publications, 1987, pp. 16–37.
[170]
M. Strathern, ‘Chapter 1’, in Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things, London: Athlone, 1999.
[171]
S. Dalsgaard and M. Nielsen, ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’, Social Analysis, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.3167/sa.2013.570101.
[172]
N. M. Underberg and E. Zorn, ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’, Visual Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1080/08949468.2013.734760.
[173]
T. Boellstorff, ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’, in Digital anthropology, London: Berg, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
[174]
G. E. MARCUS, ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 427–445, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x.
[175]
J. L. Jackson Jr., ‘Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 480–497, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x.
[176]
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro, ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[177]
N. Seaver, ‘Studying up: the ethnography of technologists’, Ethnography Matters, Mar. 10, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
[178]
J. D. Faubion and G. E. Marcus, Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.
[179]
‘Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment’. [Online]. Available: http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
[180]
C. Kelty, G. Coleman, and K. Strassler, ‘Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection’, Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online, Dec. 13, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
[181]
A. Blok and M. A. Pedersen, ‘Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714543908.
[182]
K. Anderson, D. Nafus, T. Rattenbury, and R. Aipperspach, ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, vol. 2009, no. 1, pp. 123–140, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x.
[183]
N. Marres and E. Weltevrede, ‘Scraping the social?’, Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 313–335, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.
[184]
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows, ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 885–899, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[185]
‘Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium’. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
[186]
E. Ruppert, J. Law, and M. Savage, ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 22–46, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0263276413484941.
[187]
H. Ford, ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714544337.
[188]
D. Nafus, ‘Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC’, EPIC, May 15, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
[189]
‘» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST’. [Online]. Available: https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
[190]
‘Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab’. [Online]. Available: http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
