» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST. (n.d.). https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American. (n.d.). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology. (n.d.). https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data
Adams, V. (2016). Metrics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. (n.d.). https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
Amoore, L. (2011). Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430
Anderson, C. (n.d.). The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
Anderson, K., Nafus, D., Rattenbury, T., & Aipperspach, R. (2009). Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x
Anna Tsing. (2000). The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology, 15(3), 327–360. http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Annelise Riles. (1998). Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist, 25(3), 378–398. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Antonia Walford. (2012). Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 30(2), 101–117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Arturo Escobar. (1999). After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology, 40(1), 1–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Asdal, K. (2008). Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum, 39(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004
Beaulieu, A. (2004). From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011
Beer, D. (2015). Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951
Beer, D. (2016). How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135
Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2013). Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542
Biagioli, M. (2013). Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science (pp. 253–281). Routledge. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270
Birchall, C. (2016). Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965
Blok, A., & Pedersen, M. A. (2014). Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908
Boellstorff, T. (2012). Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In Digital anthropology. Berg. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
Boellstorff, T. (2013). Making big data, in theory. First Monday, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869
Boellstorff, T., & Maurer, B. (Eds.). (2015a). Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. In Data, now bigger and better! Vol. Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press.
Boellstorff, T., & Maurer, B. (Eds.). (2015b). Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. In Data, now bigger and better! Vol. Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press.
Bowker, G. (2005). Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s. In Memory practices in the sciences: Vol. Inside technology (pp. 107–136). MIT Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Bowker, G. C. (2014). The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication, 8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences: Vol. Inside technology. MIT Press. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Breiger, R. L. (2015). Scaling down. Big Data & Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497
Browne, S. (2015). Dark Matters. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302
Büscher, B. (2016). Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society, 18(5), 726–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841
Candea, M. (2007). Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x
Chua, L., & Salmond, A. (2012). Artefacts in anthropology. In SAGE handbook of social anthropology (pp. 101–115). SAGE. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Chun, W. H. K. (2008). The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry, 35(1), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/595632
Coopmans, C. (2014). Visual analytics as artful revelation. In C. Coopmans (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice revisited: Vol. Inside technology. The MIT Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Couldry, N., & Powell, A. (2014). Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, K. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280
D. Miller. (2001). Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. In The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture: Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. School of American Research Press.
Dalsgaard, S. (2013). The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006
Dalsgaard, S., & Nielsen, M. (2013). Introduction: Time and the Field. Social Analysis, 57(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101
Dawn Nafus. (2014). Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication, 8. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
Doe, G. (2014, September 9). With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. Vox Genetics. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4. (n.d.). http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. (2011). The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, 22(1), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274
Emily Martin. (1992). The End of the Body? American Ethnologist, 19(1), 121–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Evelyn Ruppert. (2011). Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology, 45(2), 218–233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
Faubion, J. D., & Marcus, G. E. (2009). Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Cornell University Press.
Ford, H. (2014). Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337
Fortun, K., Poirier, L., Morgan, A., Costelloe-Kuehn, B., & Fortun, M. (2016). Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903
Franklin, S. (2001). Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. In Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 302–325). Duke University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0
Franklin, S. (2003). Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory, 3(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752
Fujimara, J. (1999). The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. In The practices of human genetics: Vol. Sociology of the sciences (pp. 49–87). Kluwer Academic.
Fuller, M., & Goffey, A. (2012a). Leak early, leak often. In Evil media (pp. 100–104). The MIT Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
Fuller, M., & Goffey, A. (2012b). Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466
Gabrys, J. (2016). Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet: Vol. Electronic mediations. University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq
Gabrys, J. (2017). Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism. In R. Maxwell, J. Raundalen, & N. L. Vestberg (Eds.), Media and the Ecological Crisis (pp. 3–18). Routledge.
Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
Garnett, E. (2016). Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061
Geismar, H., & Mohns, W. (2011). Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, S133–S155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. (2008). The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 1–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Gerlitz, C., & Lury, C. (2014). Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
Gilles Deleuze. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Gitelman, L. (2013). ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron: Vol. Infrastructures series. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
Grebowicz, M. (2014). Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press. (n.d.). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
Gregg, M. (2015). The Gift That Is Not Given. In T. Boellstorff & B. Maurer (Eds.), Data, now bigger and better! Vol. Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press.
Gross, A. (2011). The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review, 59, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x
Hacking, I. (1990). The argument. In The Taming of Chance: Vol. Ideas in Context (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
Halpern, O. (2014a). Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945: Vol. Experimental futures. Duke University Press.
Halpern, O. (2014b). Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320
Halpern, O. (2015). Beautiful Data. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010
Haraway, D. (1997). Chapter 4: Gene. In Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
Harvey, P. (2012). The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago P.
Helmreich, S. (2002). Kinship in Hypertext. In Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 116–143). Duke University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222
Helmreich, S. (2007). Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties, 2(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753
Hilgartner, S. (2012). Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science, 45(02), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus. (n.d.). http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
Hirsch, E., & Strathern, M. (2004). Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. Berghahn Books. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk
Hogan, M. (2015). Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429
Hui, Y. (2012). What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
Igoe, J. (2010). The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology, 30(4), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468
Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2017). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication, 11. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642
J. Holt, & Patrick Vondereau. (2014). Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. In Traffic signal timing manual (Issue FHWA-HOP-08-024). U.S. Department of Transportation. http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024
Jackson Jr., J. L. (n.d.). Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t. Cultural Anthropology, 27(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x
Janet Carsten. (n.d.). Ch. 4: The person. In After Kinship by Janet Carsten (pp. 83–108). Cambridge University Press. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
Jensen, C. B., & Morita, A. (2015). Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 81–87. http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21
John, N. A. (2013). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684
Kaufmann, M. (2015). Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society, 37(7), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101
Kelty, C., Coleman, G., & Strassler, K. (2012, December 13). Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
Kelty, C. M. (2012). This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties, 7(2), 140–168. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8
Kim Fortun. (2004). From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris, 19, 283–296. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. (n.d.). Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949
Kitchin, R. (2014a). The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml
Kitchin, R. (2014b). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Knox, H. (2015). Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In H. Appel, A. Mason, & M. Watts (Eds.), Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas. Cornell University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0
Laidlaw, J. (2000). A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036
Lake, R. W. (2017). Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537
Lash, S. (2007). Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956
Latour, B. (1999). Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference. In Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 24–79). Harvard University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Latour, B., Jensen, P., Venturini, T., Grauwin, S., & Boullier, D. (2012). ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 590–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x
Leach, J. (2011). The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308
Lehning, M., Dawes, N., & Bavay et. al., M. (n.d.). Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. In The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery (pp. 45–51). Microsoft Research.
Leonelli, S. (2013). Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(1–2), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768
Lezaun, J., & Montgomery, C. M. (2015). The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349
Lippert, I. (2015). Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum, 66, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009
Lupton, D. (n.d.). Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices. In Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549
Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
Lupton, D. (2014). The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), 856–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109
Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data. (n.d.).
LYON, D. (2008). BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics, 22(9), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
Lyon, D. (2008). Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics, 22(9), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
Lyon, D. (2010). Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology, 4(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
M. Fortun. (2015). What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In S. S. Richardson & H. Stevens (Eds.), Postgenomics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
Mackenzie, A. (2003). These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science, 33(3), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003
Mackenzie, A. (2014). Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110
Manovich, L. (1999). Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 5(2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206
Marcus, G. (2010). Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. In Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology (pp. 28–46). Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
MARCUS, G. E. (2012). THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch. Cultural Anthropology, 27(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x
Marr, B. (21 C.E.). The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. Data Informed. http://data-informed.com/
Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
Maurer, W.M. (2015). Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data (pp. 67–86). Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161
M’charek, A., Schramm, K., & Skinner, D. (2014). Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(4), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. (2007). The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Nadim, T. (2016). Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301
Nafus, D. (2014). Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266
Nafus, D. (2015, May 15). Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC. EPIC; EPICPeople.org. https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. (n.d.). This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab. (n.d.). http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
Rabinow, P. (1996). Essays on the anthropology of reason: Vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton University Press.
Rapp, R. (2015). Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains. BioSocieties. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33
Richardson, S. S., & Stevens, H. (2015). Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome. Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
Riles, A. (2000). The network inside out: Annelise Riles. The University of Michigan Press.
Riles, A. (2006). Introduction: in response. In Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge (pp. 1–38). University of Michigan Press.
Roderick, L. (2014). Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology, 40(5), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350
Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the fact. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron: Vol. Infrastructures series. The MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327
Rubio, F. D., & Baert, P. (Eds.). (2012). Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. In The politics of knowledge. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386
Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068
Ruppert, E. (2012). The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428
Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941
Ruppert, E., & Savage, M. (2011). Transactional politics. The Sociological Review, 59, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x
S. Day, & C. Lury. (2016). Biosensing: Tracking Persons. In Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
Sabina Leonelli. (2015). What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 810–821. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Salmond, A. J. M. (2013a). Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002
Salmond, A. J. M. (2013b). Transforming translations (part I): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002
Seaver, N. (2014, March 10). Studying up: the ethnography of technologists. Ethnography Matters. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
Seaver, N. (2015). The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society, 37(7), 1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102
Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104
Shackley, S., & Wynne, B. (1996). Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(3), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302
Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. In The anthropology of the state: a reader: Vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Blackwell.
Sharp, L. A. (2000). The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 287–328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287
Singer, N. (2015). From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times.
Stefan Helmreich. (2011). From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research, 78(4), 1211–1242. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Steinmetz, G. (1999). Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. In State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn: Vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Cornell University Press. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
Strathern, M. (1987). The Limits of Auto-anthropology. In Anthropology at home: Vol. A.S.A. monographs (pp. 16–37). Tavistock Publications.
Strathern, M. (1992a). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century: Vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures. Cambridge University Press.
Strathern, M. (1992b). Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. In Conceptualizing society (pp. 75–106). Routledge. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244
Strathern, M. (1999). Chapter 1. In Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. Athlone.
Strathern, M. (2000). Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. In Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997: Vol. The Linacre lectures (pp. 44–71). Oxford University Press.
Strathern, M. (2002). On Space and Depth. In Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices: Vol. Science and cultural theory. Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550
Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections (Updated ed). AltaMira Press.
Strathern, M. (2005). Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise (pp. 111–134). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment. (n.d.). http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
Strathern, M. & University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. (1995). The relation: issues in complexity and scale: Vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet. Prickly Pear Press.
Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392
Thacker, E. (2003). What is Biomedia? Configurations, 11(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times. (n.d.). http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg. (n.d.). https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. (2015). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44(3), 436–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c
Tsing, Anna. (2013). Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 21–43. https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Tutton, R., & Prainsack, B. (2011). Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(7), 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x
Underberg, N. M., & Zorn, E. (2013). Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography. Visual Anthropology, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760
Universitetet i Oslo. (2005). State formation: anthropological perspectives: Vol. Anthropology, culture, and society (C. Krohn-Hansen & K. G. Nustad, Eds.). Pluto Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7
Van Dijck, J. (2000). Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5
Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2016). Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173
Verran, H. (2009). On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2(1–2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188
Verran, H. (2011). The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading ‘disciplinary’ society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent ‘control’ society. The Sociological Review, 59, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x
Verran, H. (2014). Number as Generative Device. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: the happening of the social: Vol. Culture, economy and the social. Routledge.
Vertesi, J. (2014). My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.Com, 1–1. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Weiner, A. B. (1992a). Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. In Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving (pp. 23–43). University of California Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Weiner, A. B. (1992b). Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. In Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. University of California Press.
Wendy F. Hsu. (2016). Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
Whitington, J. (2016). Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium. (n.d.). https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. (n.d.). http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
