‘» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five Recent Play Dates - EASST’ <https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/>
‘23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American’ <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/>
‘Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/Is the World in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology’ <https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data>
Adams, Vincanne, Metrics (Duke University Press, 2016) <https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480>
‘After Kinship by Janet Carsten’ <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9>
Amoore, L., ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’, Theory, Culture & Society, 28.6 (2011), 24–43 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430>
Amoore, Louise, ‘Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror’, Political Geography, 25.3 (2006), 336–51 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001>
Anderson, Chris, ‘The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete’, Wired <http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/>
Anderson, Ken, Dawn Nafus, Tye Rattenbury, and Ryan Aipperspach, ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009.1 (2009), 123–40 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x>
Anna Tsing, ‘The Global Situation’, Cultural Anthropology, 15.3 (2000), 327–60 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Annelise Riles, ‘Infinity within the Brackets’, American Ethnologist, 25.3 (1998), 378–98 <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Antonia Walford, ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 30.2 (2012), 101–17 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Arturo Escobar, ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’, Current Anthropology, 40.1 (1999), 1–30 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Asdal, Kristin, ‘Enacting Things through Numbers: Taking Nature into Account/Ing’, Geoforum, 39.1 (2008), 123–32 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004>
Beaulieu, Anne, ‘From Brainbank to Database: The Informational Turn in the Study of the Brain’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35.2 (2004), 367–90 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011>
Beer, D., and R. Burrows, ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30.4 (2013), 47–71 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542>
Beer, David, ‘How Should We Do the History of Big Data?’, Big Data & Society, 3.1 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135>
———, ‘Productive Measures: Culture and Measurement in the Context of Everyday Neoliberalism’, Big Data & Society, 2.1 (2015) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951>
Biagioli, M, ‘Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship’, in Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science (New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. 253–81 <http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270>
Birchall, Clare, ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between Open and Closed Data’, Big Data & Society, 3.2 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965>
Blok, A., and M. A. Pedersen, ‘Complementary Social Science? Quali-Quantitative Experiments in a Big Data World’, Big Data & Society, 1.2 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908>
Boellstorff, T, ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’, in Digital Anthropology (London: Berg, 2012) <https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922>
Boellstorff, Tom, ‘Making Big Data, in Theory’, First Monday, 18.10 (2013) <https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869>
Boellstorff, Tom, and Bill Maurer, eds., ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’, in Data, Now Bigger and Better! (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015), Paradigm
———, eds., ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’, in Data, Now Bigger and Better! (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015), Paradigm
Bowker, G, ‘Databasing the World: Biodiversity and the 2000s’, in Memory Practices in the Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005), Inside technology, 107–36 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
Bowker, Geoffrey C., ‘The Theory/Data Thing’, International Journal of Communication, 8 (2014) <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190>
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star, Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999), Inside technology <http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out>
boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford, ‘Critical Questions for Big Data’, Information, Communication & Society, 15.5 (2012), 662–79 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878>
Breiger, R. L., ‘Scaling Down’, Big Data & Society, 2.2 (2015) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497>
Browne, Simone, Dark Matters (Duke University Press, 2015) <https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302>
Büscher, Bram, ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and Theorizing the Links between New Media and Nature Conservation’, New Media & Society, 18.5 (2016), 726–43 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841>
Candea, Matei, ‘Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-Site’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13.1 (2007), 167–84 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x>
Chua, L., and A. Salmond, ‘Artefacts in Anthropology’, in SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology (SAGE, 2012), pp. 101–15 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong, ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’, Critical Inquiry, 35.1 (2008), 148–71 <https://doi.org/10.1086/595632>
Coopmans, Catelijne, ‘Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation’, in Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited, ed. by Catelijne Coopmans (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2014), Inside technology <http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Couldry, N., and A. Powell, ‘Big Data from the Bottom Up’, Big Data & Society, 1.2 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277>
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, Kevin, ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’, British Journal of Sociology, 51.4 (2000), 605–22 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280>
D. Miller, ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’, in The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture (Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press, 2001), School of American Research advanced seminar series
Dalsgaard, Steffen, ‘The Commensurability of Carbon’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3.1 (2013), 80–98 <https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006>
Dalsgaard, Steffen, and Morten Nielsen, ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’, Social Analysis, 57.1 (2013), 1–19 <https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101>
Dawn Nafus, ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’, International Journal of Communication, 8 (2014) <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170>
Doe, George, ‘With Genetic Testing, I Gave My Parents the Gift of Divorce - Vox’, Vox Genetics, 2014 <http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme>
‘Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.’ <http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology>
Elizabeth A. Povinelli, ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’, Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, 22.1 (2011), 146–71 <https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274>
Emily Martin, ‘The End of the Body?’, American Ethnologist, 19.1 (1992), 121–40 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Evelyn Ruppert, ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’, Sociology, 45.2 (2011), 218–33 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Fairhead, James, Melissa Leach, and Ian Scoones, ‘Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39.2 (2012), 237–61 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770>
Faubion, James D., and George E. Marcus, Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009)
Ford, H., ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between Ethnographers and Data Scientists’, Big Data & Society, 1.2 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337>
Fortun, Kim, Lindsay Poirier, Alli Morgan, Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, and Mike Fortun, ‘Pushback: Critical Data Designers and Pollution Politics’, Big Data & Society, 3.2 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903>
Franklin, S., ‘Biologization Re-Visited: Kinship Theory’, in Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies (Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 302–25 <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0>
———, ‘Re-Thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics’, Anthropological Theory, 3.1 (2003), 65–85 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752>
Fujimara, J., ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’, in The Practices of Human Genetics (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999), Sociology of the sciences, 49–87
Fuller, M., and A. Goffey, ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29.4–5 (2012), 311–33 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466>
Fuller, M, and A Goffey, ‘Leak Early, Leak Often’, in Evil Media (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2012), pp. 100–104 <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>
Gabrys, Jennifer, ‘Powering the Digital: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism’, in Media and the Ecological Crisis, ed. by Richard Maxwell, Jon Raundalen, and Nina Lager Vestberg (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 3–18
———, Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016), Electronic mediations <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq>
Gabrys, Jennifer, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt, ‘Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories’, Big Data & Society, 3.2 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677>
Garnett, Emma, ‘Developing a Feeling for Error: Practices of Monitoring and Modelling Air Pollution Data’, Big Data & Society, 3.2 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061>
Geismar, Haidy, and William Mohns, ‘Social Relationships and Digital Relationships: Rethinking the Database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17 (2011), S133–55 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x>
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro, ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’, Cultural Anthropology, 23.1 (2008), 1–14 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Gerlitz, Carolin, and Celia Lury, ‘Social Media and Self-Evaluating Assemblages: On Numbers, Orderings and Values’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15.2 (2014), 174–88 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267>
Gilles Deleuze, ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59 (1992), 3–7 <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Gitelman, Lisa, ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013), Infrastructures series <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327>
Grebowicz, Margret, ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The Social Effects of Climate Change as Internet Spectacle’, Environmental Humanities, 5 (2014), 1–11 <https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388>
‘Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In “Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life” Ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press’ <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter>
Gregg, M., ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’, in Data, Now Bigger and Better!, ed. by Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015), Paradigm
Gross, Ana, ‘The Economy of Social Data: Exploring Research Ethics as Device’, The Sociological Review, 59 (2011), 113–29 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x>
Hacking, I, ‘The Argument’, in The Taming of Chance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), Ideas in Context, 1–10 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766>
Halpern, Orit, Beautiful Data (Duke University Press, 2015) <https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010>
———, Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2014), Experimental futures
———, ‘Cybernetic Rationality’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15.2 (2014), 223–38 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320>
Haraway, D., ‘Chapter 4: Gene’, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience (New York: Routledge, 1997)
Harvey, P., ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29.4–5 (2012), 76–92 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827>
Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago P., 1999)
Helmreich, S., ‘Kinship in Hypertext’, in Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002), pp. 116–43 <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222>
Helmreich, Stefan, ‘Blue-Green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’, BioSocieties, 2.3 (2007), 287–302 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753>
Hilgartner, Stephen, ‘Selective Flows of Knowledge in Technoscientific Interaction: Information Control in Genome Research’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 45.02 (2012), 267–80 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106>
‘Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus’ <http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/>
Hirsch, Eric, and Marilyn Strathern, Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia (New York: Berghahn Books, 2004) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk>
Hogan, Mél, ‘Data Flows and Water Woes: The Utah Data Center’, Big Data & Society, 2.2 (2015) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429>
Hui, Yuk, ‘What Is a Digital Object?’, Metaphilosophy, 43.4 (2012), 380–95 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x>
Igoe, J., ‘The Spectacle of Nature in the Global Economy of Appearances: Anthropological Engagements with the Spectacular Mediations of Transnational Conservation’, Critique of Anthropology, 30.4 (2010), 375–97 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468>
Isin, Engin, and Evelyn Ruppert, ‘Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden’, International Journal of Communication, 11 (2017) <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642>
J. Holt, and Patrick Vondereau, ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’, in Traffic Signal Timing Manual ([Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014) <http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024>
Jackson Jr., John L., ‘Ethnography Is, Ethnography Ain’t’, Cultural Anthropology, 27.3, 480–97 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x>
Janet Carsten, ‘Ch. 4: The Person’, in After Kinship by Janet Carsten (Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–108 <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9>
Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Atsuro Morita, ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1 (2015), 81–87 <http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21>
John, Nicholas A., ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword’, New Media & Society, 15.2 (2013), 167–82 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684>
Kaufmann, M., ‘Resilience 2.0: Social Media Use and (Self-)Care during the 2011 Norway Attacks’, Media, Culture & Society, 37.7 (2015), 972–87 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101>
Kelty, Christopher, Gabriella Coleman, and Karen Strassler, ‘Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection’, Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online, 2012 <http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection>
Kelty, Christopher M, ‘This Is Not an Article: Model Organism Newsletters and the Question of “Open Science”’, BioSocieties, 7.2 (2012), 140–68 <https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8>
Kim Fortun, ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’, Osiris, 19 (2004), 283–96 <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon, ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949>
Kitchin, R., ‘Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts’, Big Data & Society, 1.1 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481>
Kitchin, Rob, The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014) <http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml>
Knox, H., ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’, in Subterranean Estates: Life Worlds of Oil and Gas, ed. by Hannah Appel, Arthur Mason, and Michael Watts (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015) <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0>
Laidlaw, James, ‘A Free Gift Makes No Friends’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6.4 (2000), 617–34 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036>
Lake, Robert W, ‘Big Data, Urban Governance, and the Ontological Politics of Hyperindividualism’, Big Data & Society, 4.1 (2017) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537>
Lash, S., ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’, Theory, Culture & Society, 24.3 (2007), 55–78 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956>
Latour, Bruno, ‘Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference’, in Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 24–79 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
Latour, Bruno, Pablo Jensen, Tommaso Venturini, Sébastian Grauwin, and Dominique Boullier, ‘“The Whole Is Always Smaller than Its Parts” - a Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads’, The British Journal of Sociology, 63.4 (2012), 590–615 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x>
Leach, James, ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’, Social Analysis, 55.3 (2011) <https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308>
Lehning, M., N. Dawes, and M. Bavay et. al., ‘Instrumenting the Earth: Next-Generation Sensor Networks and Environmental Science’, in The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research), pp. 45–51
Leonelli, S., ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33.1–2 (2013), 6–11 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768>
Lezaun, J., and C. M. Montgomery, ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 40.1 (2015), 3–29 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349>
Lippert, Ingmar, ‘Environment as Datascape: Enacting Emission Realities in Corporate Carbon Accounting’, Geoforum, 66 (2015), 126–35 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009>
‘Lupton, D. 2016 You Are Your Data: Self-Tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.’
Lupton, Deborah, ‘Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of mHealth Technologies’, Critical Public Health, 23.4 (2013), 393–403 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931>
———, ‘Self-Tracking Modes: Relflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices’, Social Life of Big Data Symposium 2nd June 2015 (School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549>
———, ‘The Commodification of Patient Opinion: The Digital Patient Experience Economy in the Age of Big Data’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 36.6 (2014), 856–69 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109>
LYON, DAVID, ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’, Bioethics, 22.9 (2008), 499–508 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x>
Lyon, David, ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’, Bioethics, 22.9 (2008), 499–508 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x>
———, ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’, International Political Sociology, 4.4 (2010), 325–38 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x>
———, ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique’, Big Data & Society, 1.2 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861>
M. Fortun, ‘What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’, in Postgenomics, ed. by Sarah S. Richardson and Hallam Stevens (Duke University Press, 2015) <https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449>
Mackenzie, Adrian, ‘Multiplying Numbers Differently: An Epidemiology of Contagious Convolution’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15.2 (2014), 189–207 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110>
———, ‘These Things Called Systems’, Social Studies of Science, 33.3 (2003), 365–87 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003>
Manovich, L., ‘Database as Symbolic Form’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 5.2 (1999), 80–99 <https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206>
Marcus, G., ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’, in Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 28–46 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426>
Marcus, George E., ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24.1 (1995), 95–117 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523>
MARCUS, GEORGE E., ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’, Cultural Anthropology, 27.3 (2012), 427–45 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x>
Marr, Bernard, ‘The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data’ (Data Informed, 21AD) <http://data-informed.com/>
Marres, Noortje, and Esther Weltevrede, ‘Scraping the Social?’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 6.3 (2013), 313–35 <https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070>
Maurer, W.M., ‘Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data’ (Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015), pp. 67–86 <http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161>
M’charek, Amade, Katharina Schramm, and David Skinner, ‘Topologies of Race’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39.4 (2014), 468–87 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493>
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows, ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology, 41.5 (2007), 885–99 <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Nadim, Tahani, ‘Blind Regards: Troubling Data and Their Sentinels’, Big Data & Society, 3.2 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301>
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J, ‘This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’ <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056>
Nafus, Dawn, ‘Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC’, EPIC (EPICPeople.org, 2015) <https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/>
———, ‘Stuck Data, Dead Data, and Disloyal Data: The Stops and Starts in Making Numbers into Social Practices’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15.2 (2014), 208–22 <https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266>
Porter, Theodore M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1995)
‘Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab’ <http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/>
Rabinow, Paul, Essays on the Anthropology of Reason (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1996), Princeton studies in culture/power/history
Rapp, Rayna, ‘Big Data, Small Kids: Medico-Scientific, Familial and Advocacy Visions of Human Brains’, BioSocieties, 2015 <https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33>
Richardson, Sarah S., and Hallam Stevens, Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449>
Riles, A, ‘Introduction: In Response’, in Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006), pp. 1–38
Riles, Annelise, The Network inside out: Annelise Riles (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2000)
Roderick, Leanne, ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’, Critical Sociology, 40.5 (2014), 729–46 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350>
Rosenberg, D, ‘Data before the Fact’, in ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron, ed. by Lisa Gitelman (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2013), Infrastructures series <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327>
Rubio, Fernando Dominguez, and Patrick Baert, eds., ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: Knowledge Freely Available”: The Politics of (Making) Knowledge-Objects’.’, in The Politics of Knowledge (London: Routledge, 2012) <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386>
Ruckenstein, Minna, ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’, Societies, 4.1 (2014), 68–84 <https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068>
Ruppert, E., ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29.4–5 (2012), 116–36 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428>
Ruppert, E., J. Law, and M. Savage, ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30.4 (2013), 22–46 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941>
Ruppert, Evelyn, and Mike Savage, ‘Transactional Politics’, The Sociological Review, 59 (2011), 73–92 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x>
S. Day, and C. Lury, ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life (MIT Press, 2016) <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter>
Sabina Leonelli, ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’, Philosophy of Science, 82.5 (2015), 810–21 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Salmond, Amiria J. M., ‘Transforming Translations (Part I)’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3.3 (2013) <https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002>
———, ‘Transforming Translations (Part I): “The Owner of These Bones”’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3.3 (2013), 1–32 <https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002>
Seaver, N, ‘Studying up: The Ethnography of Technologists’, Ethnography Matters, 2014 <http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/>
Seaver, Nick, ‘Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems’, Big Data & Society, 4.2 (2017) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104>
———, ‘The Nice Thing about Context Is That Everyone Has It’, Media, Culture & Society, 37.7 (2015), 1101–9 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102>
Shackley, S., and B. Wynne, ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 21.3 (1996), 275–302 <https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302>
Sharma, Aradhana, and Akhil Gupta, ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-Thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’, in The Anthropology of the State: A Reader (Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006), Blackwell readers in anthropology
Sharp, Lesley A., ‘The Commodification of the Body and Its Parts’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29.1 (2000), 287–328 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287>
Singer, Natasha, ‘From Knowing Yourself to Prodding Yourself’, The New York Times, 2015
Stefan Helmreich, ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’, Social Research, 78.4 (2011), 1211–42 <http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Steinmetz, George, ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’, in State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999), The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>
Strathern, M., ‘Environments within: An Ethnographic Commentary on Scale’, in Culture, Landscape, and the Environment: The Linacre Lectures, 1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), The Linacre lectures, 44–71
———, ‘On Space and Depth’, in Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002), Science and cultural theory <http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550>
Strathern, M, ‘The Limits of Auto-Anthropology’, in Anthropology at Home (London: Tavistock Publications, 1987), A.S.A. monographs, 16–37
‘Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an Anthropological Comment’ <http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm>
Strathern, Marilyn, After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures
———, ‘Chapter 1’, in Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things (London: Athlone, 1999)
———, ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 111–34 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514>
———, Partial Connections, Updated ed (Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004)
———, ‘Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-Plural World’, in Conceptualizing Society (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 75–106 <http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244>
Strathern, Marilyn and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology, The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale (Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press, 1995), Prickly Pear pamphlet
Striphas, Ted, ‘Algorithmic Culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18.4–5 (2015), 395–412 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392>
Thacker, Eugene, ‘What Is Biomedia?’, Configurations, 11.1 (2003), 47–79 <https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014>
‘The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times’ <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0>
‘The World of Indicators Edited by Richard Rottenburg’ <https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED>
‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44.3 (2015), 436–37 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c>
Tsing, Anna, ‘Sorting out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made through Gifts’, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3.1 (2013), 21–43 <https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>
Tutton, Richard, and Barbara Prainsack, ‘Enterprising or Altruistic Selves? Making up Research Subjects in Genetics Research’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 33.7 (2011), 1081–95 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x>
Underberg, Natalie M., and Elayne Zorn, ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’, Visual Anthropology, 26.1 (2013), 1–17 <https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760>
Universitetet i Oslo, State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives, ed. by Christian Krohn-Hansen and Knut G. Nustad (London: Pluto Press, 2005), Anthropology, culture, and society <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7>
Van Dijck, José, ‘Digital Cadavers: The Visible Human Project as Anatomical Theater’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31.2 (2000), 271–85 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5>
Van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell, ‘Understanding the Promises and Premises of Online Health Platforms’, Big Data & Society, 3.1 (2016) <https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173>
Verran, H., ‘Number as Generative Device’, in Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, ed. by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), Culture, economy and the social
Verran, Helen, ‘On Assemblage’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2.1–2 (2009), 169–82 <https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188>
———, ‘The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading “Disciplinary” Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent “Control” Society’, The Sociological Review, 59 (2011), 60–72 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x>
Vertesi, Janet, ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’, Time.Com, 2014, 1–1 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site>
Weiner, A. B., ‘Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension’, in Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), pp. 23–43 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
———, ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’, in Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992)
Wendy F. Hsu, ‘Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In “The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography” Eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge’, 2016 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4>
Whitington, Jerome, ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39.1 (2016), 46–63 <https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130>
‘Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium’ <https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7>
‘With Genetic Testing, I Gave My Parents the Gift of Divorce - Vox’ <http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme>
