1
Beer D. How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716646135
2
Rubio FD, Baert P, editors. Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. The politics of knowledge. London: Routledge 2012.
3
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. Data, now bigger and better!. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
4
Halpern O. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press 2015.
5
Kitchin R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
6
Beer D. Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society. 2015;2. doi: 10.1177/2053951715578951
7
Striphas T. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2015;18:395–412. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577392
8
Latour B. Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1999:24–79.
9
Rosenberg D. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L, ed. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 2013.
10
Chua L, Salmond A. Artefacts in anthropology. SAGE handbook of social anthropology. SAGE 2012:101–15.
11
Verran H. The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading ‘disciplinary’ society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent ‘control’ society. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:60–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x
12
Hacking I. The argument. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990:1–10.
13
Porter TM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1995.
14
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 2012;43:380–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
15
Halpern O. Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15:223–38. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320
16
Halpern O. Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 2014.
17
Riles A. Introduction: in response. Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2006:1–38.
18
Gitelman L. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2013.
19
Manovich L. Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 1999;5:80–99. doi: 10.1177/135485659900500206
20
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies. 2011;22:146–71. doi: 10.1215/10407391-1218274
21
Hogan M. Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society. 2015;2. doi: 10.1177/2053951715592429
22
Geismar H, Mohns W. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011;17:S133–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x
23
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.
24
Bowker G. Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s. Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2005:107–36.
25
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3. doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.002
26
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 1999.
27
Chun WHK. The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry. 2008;35:148–71. doi: 10.1086/595632
28
J. Holt, Patrick Vondereau. Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. Traffic signal timing manual. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation 2014.
29
Fuller M, Goffey A. Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29:311–33. doi: 10.1177/0263276412450466
30
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. 2015;44:436–7. doi: 10.1177/0094306115579192c
31
Haraway D. Chapter 4: Gene. Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge 1997.
32
Strathern M, University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press 1995.
33
Jensen CB, Morita A. Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. 2015;1:81–7.
34
Harvey P. The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29:76–92. doi: 10.1177/0263276412448827
35
Mackenzie A. Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15:189–207. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110
36
Verran H. On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2009;2:169–82. doi: 10.1080/17530350903064188
37
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3:1–32. doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.002
38
Laidlaw J. A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2000;6:617–34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00036
39
Tsing, Anna. Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3:21–43.
40
John NA. Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society. 2013;15:167–82. doi: 10.1177/1461444812450684
41
Maurer, W.M. Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago 2015:67–86.
42
Van Dijck J, Poell T. Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716654173
43
S. Day, C. Lury. Biosensing: Tracking Persons. Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press 2016.
44
Janet Carsten. Ch. 4: The person. After Kinship by Janet Carsten. Cambridge University Press :83–108.
45
Leonelli S. Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2013;33:6–11. doi: 10.1177/0270467613496768
46
M. Fortun. What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In: Richardson SS, Stevens H, eds. Postgenomics. Duke University Press 2015.
47
Biagioli M. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science. New York: Routledge 2013:253–81.
48
Richardson SS, Stevens H. Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome. Durham: Duke University Press 2015.
49
Weiner AB. Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: University of California Press 1992:23–43.
50
Weiner AB. Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: University of California Press 1992.
51
Lezaun J, Montgomery CM. The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2015;40:3–29. doi: 10.1177/0162243914542349
52
Hilgartner S. Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science. 2012;45:267–80. doi: 10.1017/S0007087412000106
53
Kelty CM. This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties. 2012;7:140–68. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.8
54
Hirsch E, Strathern M. Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books 2004.
55
Leach J. The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis. 2011;55. doi: 10.3167/sa.2011.550308
56
D. Miller. Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press 2001.
57
Gregg M. The Gift That Is Not Given. In: Boellstorff T, Maurer B, eds. Data, now bigger and better!. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
58
Antonia Walford. Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 2012;30:101–17.
59
Arturo Escobar. After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology. 1999;40:1–30.
60
Büscher B. Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society. 2016;18:726–43. doi: 10.1177/1461444814545841
61
Asdal K. Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum. 2008;39:123–32. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004
62
Kim Fortun. From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris. 2004;19:283–96.
63
Gabrys J, Pritchard H, Barratt B. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716679677
64
Whitington J. Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2016;39:46–63. doi: 10.1111/plar.12130
65
Nadim T. Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716666301
66
Garnett E. Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716658061
67
Fortun K, Poirier L, Morgan A, et al. Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716668903
68
Lippert I. Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum. 2015;66:126–35. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009
69
Dalsgaard S. The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013;3:80–98. doi: 10.14318/hau3.1.006
70
Grebowicz M. Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities. 2014;5:1–11.
71
Stefan Helmreich. From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research. 2011;78:1211–42.
72
Gabrys J. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2016.
73
Verran H. Number as Generative Device. In: Lury C, Wakeford N, eds. Inventive methods: the happening of the social. Abingdon: Routledge 2014.
74
Knox H. Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In: Appel H, Mason A, Watts M, eds. Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2015.
75
Gabrys J. Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism. In: Maxwell R, Raundalen J, Vestberg NL, eds. Media and the Ecological Crisis. London: Routledge 2017:3–18.
76
Sabina Leonelli. What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science. 2015;82:810–21.
77
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
78
Shackley S, Wynne B. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 1996;21:275–302. doi: 10.1177/016224399602100302
79
Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012;39:237–61. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
80
Igoe J. The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology. 2010;30:375–97. doi: 10.1177/0308275X10372468
81
Helmreich S. Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties. 2007;2:287–302. doi: 10.1017/S1745855207005753
82
Lehning M, Dawes N, Bavay et. al. M. Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research :45–51.
83
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory. 2003;3:65–85. doi: 10.1177/1463499603003001752
84
Rapp R. Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains. BioSocieties. Published Online First: 26 October 2015. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2015.33
85
Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.
86
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
87
Tutton R, Prainsack B. Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011;33:1081–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x
88
Emily Martin. The End of the Body? American Ethnologist. 1992;19:121–40.
89
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
90
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
91
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus. http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
92
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
93
Hayles NK. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago P. 1999.
94
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
95
Ruckenstein M. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies. 2014;4:68–84. doi: 10.3390/soc4010068
96
Lupton D. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health. 2013;23:393–403. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
97
Thacker E. What is Biomedia? Configurations. 2003;11:47–79. doi: 10.1353/con.2004.0014
98
Beaulieu A. From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2004;35:367–90. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011
99
Helmreich S. Kinship in Hypertext. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 2002:116–43.
100
Franklin S. Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press 2001:302–25.
101
Singer N. From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times. 2015.
102
Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014;36:856–69. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12109
103
Dawn Nafus. Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication. 2014;8.
104
Doe G. With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. Vox Genetics. 2014. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
105
Fujimara J. The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. The practices of human genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 1999:49–87.
106
Rabinow P. Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1996.
107
Gross A. The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:113–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x
108
Van Dijck J. Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2000;31:271–85. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5
109
Gerlitz C, Lury C. Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15:174–88. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
110
Kaufmann M. Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society. 2015;37:972–87. doi: 10.1177/0163443715584101
111
Nafus D. Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014;15:208–22. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266
112
Sharp LA. The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2000;29:287–328. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287
113
Strathern M. Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005:111–34.
114
Steinmetz G. Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1999.
115
Browne S. Dark Matters. Duke University Press 2015.
116
Amoore L. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography. 2006;25:336–51. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
117
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
118
Birchall C. Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716663965
119
Gilles Deleuze. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October. 1992;59:3–7.
120
Adams V. Metrics. Duke University Press 2016.
121
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson K. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology. 2000;51:605–22. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280
122
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice.
123
Ruppert E, Savage M. Transactional politics. The Sociological Review. 2011;59:73–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x
124
Roderick L. Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology. 2014;40:729–46. doi: 10.1177/0896920513501350
125
M’charek A, Schramm K, Skinner D. Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2014;39:468–87. doi: 10.1177/0162243913509493
126
Sharma A, Gupta A. Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. The anthropology of the state: a reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell 2006.
127
Universitetet i Oslo. State formation: anthropological perspectives. London: Pluto Press 2005.
128
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies.
129
Lyon D. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. 2014;1. doi: 10.1177/2053951714541861
130
Isin E, Ruppert E. Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication. 2017;11.
131
LYON D. BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics. 2008;22:499–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
132
Evelyn Ruppert. Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology. 2011;45:218–33.
133
Lupton D. Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015.
134
Fuller M, Goffey A. Leak early, leak often. Evil media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 2012:100–4.
135
Vertesi J. My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.com. 2014;1–1.
136
Amoore L. Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011;28:24–43. doi: 10.1177/0263276411417430
137
Strathern M. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. Conceptualizing society. London: Routledge 1992:75–106.
138
Ruppert E. The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012;29:116–36. doi: 10.1177/0263276412439428
139
Lyon D. Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics. 2008;22:499–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
140
Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology. 2010;4:325–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x
141
Anna Tsing. The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology. 2000;15:327–60.
142
Coopmans C. Visual analytics as artful revelation. In: Coopmans C, ed. Representation in scientific practice revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press 2014.
143
Anderson C. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
144
Annelise Riles. Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist. 1998;25:378–98.
145
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology.
146
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. Data, now bigger and better!. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
147
Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, et al. ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology. 2012;63:590–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x
148
Lake RW. Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society. 2017;4. doi: 10.1177/2053951716682537
149
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15:662–79. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
150
Seaver N. The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society. 2015;37:1101–9. doi: 10.1177/0163443715594102
151
Breiger RL. Scaling down. Big Data & Society. 2015;2. doi: 10.1177/2053951715602497
152
Kitchin R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society. 2014;1. doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481
153
Strathern M. Partial connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press 2004.
154
Strathern M. Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000:44–71.
155
Strathern M. On Space and Depth. Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices. Durham: Duke University Press 2002.
156
Marr B. The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. 21 AD. http://data-informed.com/
157
Marcus G. Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell 2010:28–46.
158
Couldry N, Powell A. Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society. 2014;1. doi: 10.1177/2053951714539277
159
Lash S. Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society. 2007;24:55–78. doi: 10.1177/0263276407075956
160
Bowker GC. The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication. 2014;8.
161
Beer D, Burrows R. Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013;30:47–71. doi: 10.1177/0263276413476542
162
Boellstorff T. Making big data, in theory. First Monday. 2013;18. doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869
163
Riles A. The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press 2000.
164
Wendy F. Hsu. Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. Published Online First: 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
165
Mackenzie A. These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science. 2003;33:365–87. doi: 10.1177/03063127030333003
166
Seaver N. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society. 2017;4. doi: 10.1177/2053951717738104
167
Marcus GE. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1995;24:95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
168
Candea M. Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2007;13:167–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x
169
Strathern M. The Limits of Auto-anthropology. Anthropology at home. London: Tavistock Publications 1987:16–37.
170
Strathern M. Chapter 1. Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. London: Athlone 1999.
171
Dalsgaard S, Nielsen M. Introduction: Time and the Field. Social Analysis. 2013;57:1–19. doi: 10.3167/sa.2013.570101
172
Underberg NM, Zorn E. Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography. Visual Anthropology. 2013;26:1–17. doi: 10.1080/08949468.2013.734760
173
Boellstorff T. Rethinking Digital Anthropology. Digital anthropology. London: Berg 2012.
174
MARCUS GE. THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch. Cultural Anthropology. 2012;27:427–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x
175
Jackson Jr. JL. Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t. Cultural Anthropology. ;27:480–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x
176
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology. 2008;23:1–14.
177
Seaver N. Studying up: the ethnography of technologists. Ethnography Matters. 2014. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
178
Faubion JD, Marcus GE. Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2009.
179
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment. http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
180
Kelty C, Coleman G, Strassler K. Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. 2012. http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
181
Blok A, Pedersen MA. Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society. 2014;1. doi: 10.1177/2053951714543908
182
Anderson K, Nafus D, Rattenbury T, et al. Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2009;2009:123–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x
183
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy. 2013;6:313–35. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
184
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology. 2007;41:885–99.
185
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium. https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
186
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013;30:22–46. doi: 10.1177/0263276413484941
187
Ford H. Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society. 2014;1. doi: 10.1177/2053951714544337
188
Nafus D. Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC. EPIC. 2015. https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
189
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST. https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
190
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
