1.
Beer D. How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society. 2016 Jan 5;3(1).
2.
Rubio FD, Baert P, editors. Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. The politics of knowledge [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386
3.
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
4.
Halpern O. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press; 2015.
5.
Kitchin R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences [Internet]. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml
6.
Beer D. Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society. 2015 Jun 10;2(1).
7.
Striphas T. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2015 Aug;18(4–5):395–412.
8.
Latour B. Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1999. p. 24–79. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
9.
Rosenberg D. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L, editor. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2013. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327
10.
Chua L, Salmond A. Artefacts in anthropology. SAGE handbook of social anthropology [Internet]. SAGE; 2012. p. 101–115. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
11.
Verran H. The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading ‘disciplinary’ society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent ‘control’ society. The Sociological Review. 2011 Dec;59:60–72.
12.
Hacking I. The argument. The Taming of Chance [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
13.
Porter TM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1995.
14.
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 2012 Jul;43(4):380–395.
15.
Halpern O. Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014 May;15(2):223–238.
16.
Halpern O. Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2014.
17.
Riles A. Introduction: in response. Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2006. p. 1–38.
18.
Gitelman L. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2013. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
19.
Manovich L. Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 1999 Jun;5(2):80–99.
20.
Elizabeth A. Povinelli. The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2011 Jan 1;22(1):146–171. Available from: http://differences.dukejournals.org/content/22/1/146.short
21.
Hogan M. Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society. 2015 Dec 27;2(2).
22.
Geismar H, Mohns W. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011 May;17:S133–S155.
23.
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4. Available from: http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology
24.
Bowker G. Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s. Memory practices in the sciences [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005. p. 107–136. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
25.
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013 Dec 23;3(3).
26.
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1999. Available from: http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out
27.
Chun WHK. The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry. 2008 Sep;35(1):148–171.
28.
J. Holt, Patrick Vondereau. Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. Traffic signal timing manual [Internet]. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2014. Available from: http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024
29.
Fuller M, Goffey A. Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012 Jul 1;29(4–5):311–333.
30.
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. 2015 May 1;44(3):436–437.
31.
Haraway D. Chapter 4: Gene. Modest₋Witness@Second₋MillenniumFemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge; 1997.
32.
Strathern M, University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press; 1995.
33.
Jensen CB, Morita A. Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society [Internet]. 2015 Nov 8;1:81–87. Available from: http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21
34.
Harvey P. The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012 Jul 1;29(4–5):76–92.
35.
Mackenzie A. Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014 May 4;15(2):189–207.
36.
Verran H. On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2009 Jul;2(1–2):169–182.
37.
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013 Dec 23;3(3):1–32.
38.
Laidlaw J. A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2000 Dec;6(4):617–634.
39.
Tsing, Anna. Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory [Internet]. 2013;3(1):21–43. Available from: https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
40.
John NA. Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society. 2013 Mar;15(2):167–182.
41.
Maurer, W.M. Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago; 2015. p. 67–86. Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161
42.
Van Dijck J, Poell T. Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society. 2016 Jan 5;3(1).
43.
S. Day, C. Lury. Biosensing: Tracking Persons. Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life [Internet]. MIT Press; 2016. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
44.
Janet Carsten. Ch. 4: The person. After Kinship by Janet Carsten [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; p. 83–108. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
45.
Leonelli S. Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2013 Feb 1;33(1–2):6–11.
46.
M. Fortun. What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In: Richardson SS, Stevens H, editors. Postgenomics [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2015. Available from: https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/160/
47.
Biagioli M. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2013. p. 253–281. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270
48.
Richardson SS, Stevens H. Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
49.
Weiner AB. Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992. p. 23–43. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
50.
Weiner AB. Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.
51.
Lezaun J, Montgomery CM. The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2015 Jan 1;40(1):3–29.
52.
Hilgartner S. Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science. 2012 Jun;45(02):267–280.
53.
Kelty CM. This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties. 2012 Jun;7(2):140–168.
54.
Hirsch E, Strathern M. Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia [Internet]. New York: Berghahn Books; 2004. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk
55.
Leach J. The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis. 2011 Jan 1;55(3).
56.
D. Miller. Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press; 2001.
57.
Gregg M. The Gift That Is Not Given. In: Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
58.
Antonia Walford. Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology [Internet]. Berghahn BooksBerghahn Books; 2012;30(2):101–117. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
Arturo Escobar. After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology [Internet]. 1999;40(1):1–30. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Büscher B. Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society. 2016 May;18(5):726–743.
61.
Asdal K. Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum. 2008 Jan;39(1):123–132.
62.
Kim Fortun. From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 2004;19:283–296. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Gabrys J, Pritchard H, Barratt B. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society. 2016 Nov;3(2).
64.
Whitington J. Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2016 May;39(1):46–63.
65.
Nadim T. Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society. 2016 Nov;3(2).
66.
Garnett E. Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society. 2016 Nov;3(2).
67.
Fortun K, Poirier L, Morgan A, Costelloe-Kuehn B, Fortun M. Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society. 2016 Nov;3(2).
68.
Lippert I. Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum. 2015 Nov;66:126–135.
69.
Dalsgaard S. The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013 Jun 18;3(1):80–98.
70.
Grebowicz M. Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities [Internet]. 2014;5:1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388
71.
Stefan Helmreich. From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research [Internet]. The New School; 2011;78(4):1211–1242. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
72.
Gabrys J. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2016. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq
73.
Verran H. Number as Generative Device. In: Lury C, Wakeford N, editors. Inventive methods: the happening of the social. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014.
74.
Knox H. Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In: Appel H, Mason A, Watts M, editors. Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas [Internet]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2015. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0
75.
Gabrys J. Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism. In: Maxwell R, Raundalen J, Vestberg NL, editors. Media and the Ecological Crisis. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 3–18.
76.
Sabina Leonelli. What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science [Internet]. 2015;82(5):810–821. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
77.
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
78.
Shackley S, Wynne B. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 1996 Jul 1;21(3):275–302.
79.
Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies. 2012 Apr;39(2):237–261.
80.
Igoe J. The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology. 2010 Dec 1;30(4):375–397.
81.
Helmreich S. Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties. 2007 Sep;2(3):287–302.
82.
Lehning M, Dawes N, Bavay et. al. M. Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research; p. 45–51.
83.
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory. 2003 Mar 1;3(1):65–85.
84.
Rapp R. Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains. BioSocieties. 2015 Oct 26;
85.
Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.
86.
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press [Internet]. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
87.
Tutton R, Prainsack B. Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011 Nov;33(7):1081–1095.
88.
Emily Martin. The End of the Body? American Ethnologist [Internet]. Wiley; 1992;19(1):121–140. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
89.
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American [Internet]. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
90.
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox [Internet]. Available from: http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
91.
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus [Internet]. Available from: http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
92.
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
93.
Hayles NK. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago P.; 1999.
94.
After Kinship by Janet Carsten [Internet]. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
95.
Ruckenstein M. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies. 2014 Feb 18;4(1):68–84.
96.
Lupton D. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(4):393–403.
97.
Thacker E. What is Biomedia? Configurations. 2003;11(1):47–79.
98.
Beaulieu A. From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2004 Jun;35(2):367–390.
99.
Helmreich S. Kinship in Hypertext. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies [Internet]. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2002. p. 116–143. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222
100.
Franklin S. Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies [Internet]. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press; 2001. p. 302–325. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0
101.
Singer N. From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times. New York Times; 2015 Apr 19;
102.
Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014 Jul;36(6):856–869.
103.
Dawn Nafus. Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication [Internet]. 2014;8. Available from: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
104.
Doe G. With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox [Internet]. Vox Genetics. 2014. Available from: http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
105.
Fujimara J. The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. The practices of human genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1999. p. 49–87.
106.
Rabinow P. Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1996.
107.
Gross A. The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review. 2011 Dec;59:113–129.
108.
Van Dijck J. Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2000 Jun;31(2):271–285.
109.
Gerlitz C, Lury C. Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014 May 4;15(2):174–188.
110.
Kaufmann M. Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society. 2015 Oct 1;37(7):972–987.
111.
Nafus D. Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 2014 May 4;15(2):208–222.
112.
Sharp LA. The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2000 Oct 21;29(1):287–328.
113.
Strathern M. Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 111–134. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514
114.
Steinmetz G. Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn [Internet]. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 1999. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
115.
Browne S. Dark Matters [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2015. Available from: http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822375302
116.
Amoore L. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography. 2006 Mar;25(3):336–351.
117.
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg [Internet]. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
118.
Birchall C. Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society. 2016 Nov;3(2).
119.
Gilles Deleuze. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October [Internet]. The MIT PressThe MIT Press; 1992;59:3–7. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
120.
Adams V. Metrics [Internet]. Duke University Press; 2016. Available from: http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822374480
121.
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson K. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology. 2000 Dec 1;51(4):605–622.
122.
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056
123.
Ruppert E, Savage M. Transactional politics. The Sociological Review. 2011 Dec;59:73–92.
124.
Roderick L. Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology. 2014 Sep;40(5):729–746.
125.
M’charek A, Schramm K, Skinner D. Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2014 Jul;39(4):468–487.
126.
Sharma A, Gupta A. Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. The anthropology of the state: a reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006.
127.
Universitetet i Oslo. State formation: anthropological perspectives [Internet]. Krohn-Hansen C, Nustad KG, editors. London: Pluto Press; 2005. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7
128.
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies.
129.
Lyon D. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. 2014 Jul 10;1(2).
130.
Isin E, Ruppert E. Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication [Internet]. 2017;11. Available from: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642
131.
LYON D. BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics. 2008 Nov;22(9):499–508.
132.
Evelyn Ruppert. Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology [Internet]. 2011;45(2):218–233. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
133.
Lupton D. Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices [Internet]. Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia; Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549
134.
Fuller M, Goffey A. Leak early, leak often. Evil media [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2012. p. 100–104. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
135.
Vertesi J. My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.com [Internet]. 2014;1–1. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site
136.
Amoore L. Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011 Nov 1;28(6):24–43.
137.
Strathern M. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. Conceptualizing society [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 75–106. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244
138.
Ruppert E. The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2012 Jul 1;29(4–5):116–136.
139.
Lyon D. Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics. 2008 Nov;22(9):499–508.
140.
Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology. 2010 Dec;4(4):325–338.
141.
Anna Tsing. The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. 2000;15(3):327–360. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142.
Coopmans C. Visual analytics as artful revelation. In: Coopmans C, editor. Representation in scientific practice revisited [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2014. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
143.
Anderson C. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete [Internet]. Wired. Available from: http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
144.
Annelise Riles. Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist [Internet]. WileyAmerican Anthropological AssociationAmerican Anthropological Association; 1998;25(3):378–398. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
145.
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology. Available from: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data
146.
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press; 2015.
147.
Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, Grauwin S, Boullier D. ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology. 2012 Dec;63(4):590–615.
148.
Lake RW. Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society. 2017 Jun;4(1).
149.
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society. 2012 Jun;15(5):662–679.
150.
Seaver N. The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society. 2015 Oct;37(7):1101–1109.
151.
Breiger RL. Scaling down. Big Data & Society. 2015 Dec;2(2).
152.
Kitchin R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society. 2014 Apr 1;1(1).
153.
Strathern M. Partial connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 2004.
154.
Strathern M. Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 44–71.
155.
Strathern M. On Space and Depth. Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550
156.
Marr B. The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data [Internet]. Data Informed; 21AD. Available from: http://data-informed.com/
157.
Marcus G. Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 28–46. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426
158.
Couldry N, Powell A. Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society. 2014 Jul 1;1(2).
159.
Lash S. Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society. 2007 May 1;24(3):55–78.
160.
Bowker GC. The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication [Internet]. 2014;8. Available from: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190
161.
Beer D, Burrows R. Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013 Jul 1;30(4):47–71.
162.
Boellstorff T. Making big data, in theory. First Monday. 2013 Oct 7;18(10).
163.
Riles A. The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 2000.
164.
Wendy F. Hsu. Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. 2016; Available from: https://www-routledgehandbooks-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
165.
Mackenzie A. These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science. 2003 Jun;33(3):365–387.
166.
Seaver N. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society. 2017 Dec;4(2).
167.
Marcus GE. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1995 Oct;24(1):95–117.
168.
Candea M. Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2007 Mar;13(1):167–184.
169.
Strathern M. The Limits of Auto-anthropology. Anthropology at home. London: Tavistock Publications; 1987. p. 16–37.
170.
Strathern M. Chapter 1. Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. London: Athlone; 1999.
171.
Dalsgaard S, Nielsen M. Introduction: Time and the Field. Social Analysis. 2013 Mar 1;57(1):1–19.
172.
Underberg NM, Zorn E. Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography. Visual Anthropology. 2013 Jan;26(1):1–17.
173.
Boellstorff T. Rethinking Digital Anthropology. Digital anthropology [Internet]. London: Berg; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
174.
MARCUS GE. THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch. Cultural Anthropology. 2012 Aug;27(3):427–445.
175.
Jackson Jr. JL. Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t. Cultural Anthropology. 27(3):480–497.
176.
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. 2008;23(1):1–14. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
177.
Seaver N. Studying up: the ethnography of technologists [Internet]. Ethnography Matters. 2014. Available from: http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
178.
Faubion JD, Marcus GE. Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2009.
179.
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment [Internet]. Available from: http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
180.
Kelty C, Coleman G, Strassler K. Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection [Internet]. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. 2012. Available from: http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
181.
Blok A, Pedersen MA. Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society. 2014 Jul 1;1(2).
182.
Anderson K, Nafus D, Rattenbury T, Aipperspach R. Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2009 Aug;2009(1):123–140.
183.
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy. 2013 Aug;6(3):313–335.
184.
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology [Internet]. Sage Publications, Ltd.Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2007;41(5):885–899. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
185.
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium [Internet]. Available from: https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
186.
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013 Jul 1;30(4):22–46.
187.
Ford H. Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society. 2014 Jul 1;1(2).
188.
Nafus D. Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC [Internet]. EPIC. EPICPeople.org; 2015. Available from: https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
189.
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST [Internet]. Available from: https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
190.
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab [Internet]. Available from: http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
