1
Loewenberg, Gerhard, Patterson, Samuel Charles. Comparing legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America 1979.
2
Olson, David M. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe 1994.
3
Norton, Philip. Legislatures and legislators. Aldershot: Ashgate 1998.
4
Norton, Philip. Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990.
5
Norton, Philip. Parliaments in Western Europe. London: Cass 1990.
6
Patterson, Samuel Charles, Copeland, Gary W. Parliaments in the modern world: changing institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1994.
7
Loewenberg G. On legislatures: the puzzle of representation. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers 2011.
8
Fish, M. Steven, Kroenig, Matthew. The handbook of national legislatures: a global survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009.
9
Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm K, editors. The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
10
Davidson, Roger H. The postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin’s Press 1992.
11
McCubbins, Mathew D., Sullivan, Terry. Congress: structure and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987.
12
Dodd, Lawrence C. Thinking about Congress: essays on Congressional change. London: Routledge 2012.
13
Power, Timothy J., Rae, Nicol C. Exporting Congress?: the influence of the U.S. Congress on world legislatures. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press 2006.
14
Norton P. Parliament in British politics. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
15
Rush, Michael. Parliament today. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2005.
16
Kopecky, Petr. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: party competition and parliamentary institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate 2001.
17
Olson, David M., Norton, Philip. The new parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. London: Frank Cass 1996.
18
Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing post-Soviet legislatures: a theory of institutional design and political conflict. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press 2000.
19
Uhr, John. Deliberative democracy in Australia: the changing place of Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
20
Bach S. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Department of the Senate, Canberra 2003.
21
Patapan, Haig, Wanna, John, Weller, Patrick Moray. Westminster legacies: democracy and responsible government in Asia and the Pacific. Sydney: UNSW Press 2005.
22
Norton, Philip, Ahmed, Nizam U. Parliaments in Asia. London: Frank Cass 1999.
23
B. L. Shankar, Valerian Rodrigues. The Indian Parliament : a democracy at work. 2011.
24
Rahman, Taiabur. Parliamentary control and government accountability in South Asia: a comparative analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. London: Routledge 2008.
25
Ruland, Jurgen, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Parliaments and political change in Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 2005.
26
Shankar, B. L., Rodrigues, Valerian. The Indian Parliament: a democracy at work. New Delhi: Oxford University Press 2011.
27
Barkan, Joel D. Legislative power in emerging African democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner 2009.
28
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. African parliaments: between governance and government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
29
Close, David. Legislatures and the new democracies in Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers 1995.
30
Morgenstern, Scott, Nacif, Benito. Legislative politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
31
Esaiasson, Peter, Heidar, Knut. Beyond Westminster and Congress: the Nordic experience. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press 2000.
32
Matthews, Donald R., Valen, Henry. Parliamentary representation: the case of the Norwegian Storting. Columbus [Ohio]: Ohio State University Press 1999.
33
Arter, David. The Nordic parliaments: a comparative analysis. London: Hurst 1984.
34
Damgaard, Erik. Parliamentary change in the Nordic countries. New York: Scandinavian University Press 1992.
35
Landman T. Comparing Many Countries. Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. London: Routledge 2003:51–65.
36
Landman T. Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. Fourth edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2017.
37
Dogan, Mattei, Pelassy, Dominique. How to compare nations: strategies in comparative politics. 2nd ed. Chatham, N.J: Chatham House 1990.
38
Burnham P, Gilland K, Grant W, et al. Comparative Methodology. Research methods in politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2004:58–79.
39
Sartori G. Compare why and how. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance. Oxford: Blackwell 1994:14–34.
40
Sartori G. Compare why and how. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance. Oxford: Blackwell 1994.
41
Sartori, Giovanni. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. 1970;64:1033–53.
42
Lijphart, Arendt. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative political studies. 1975;8:158–77.
43
Lijphart, Arend. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review. 1971;65:682–93.
44
Nassmacher H. The Dilemma of Depth Versus Breadth in Comparing Political Systems Empirically...and How to Overcome It. European Political Science. 2008;7:113–25. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210179
45
Legislative Studies Quarterly .
46
The Journal of Legislative Studies.
47
Parliamentary Affairs .
49
The Parliamentarian - The Journal of Commonwealth Parliamentarians and Legislatures. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
50
Constitutional and parliamentary information | ASGP. http://asgp.co/constitutional-and-parliamentary-information
51
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU).
52
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).
53
Research and Education – Parliament of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education
54
Legislative Studies Section | The American Political Science Association. http://legislativestudies.org/
55
Parliaments specialist group | The Political Studies Association (PSA). https://psaparliaments.org/
56
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. https://www.cpahq.org/
57
UK Parliament. http://www.parliament.uk/
58
Mezey, M. Defining the Legislature. Comparative legislatures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 1979:3–20.
59
Mezey M. Classifying legislatures. Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979:149–76.
60
Mezey, M. Classifying Legislatures. Comparative legislatures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 1979:149–76.
61
Norton P. Introduction: The institution of parliaments. Parliaments and governments in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass 1998:1–15.
62
Loewenberg, Gerhard, Patterson, Samuel Charles. Functions of Legislatures. Comparing legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America 1979.
63
Olson D. Legislatures in Today’s Democracies. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe 1994.
64
Hague R, Harrop M. Legislatures. Comparative government and politics: an introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2004:247–67.
65
Blondel J. Representation: legislatures and parliaments. Comparative government: an introduction. Harlow: Pearson Education 1995:248–66.
66
Paper 2. How Parliaments Work: Parliamentary processes and procedures. | Global Partners Governance. https://gpgovernance.net/publications/guide-to-parliaments-paper-2-how-parliaments-work-parliamentary-processes-and-procedures/
67
Kreppel A. Legislatures. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014:113–30.
68
Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW. Introduction. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
69
Kreppel A. Typologies and Classifications. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
70
Copeland G, Patterson SC. Parliaments and Legislatures. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
71
Judge D. Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow? Government and Opposition. 2003;38:497–516. doi: 10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00026
72
Rhodes RAW, Binder SA, Rockman BA. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
73
Laver M. Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
74
Mezey, M. L. Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance. Political science: the state of the discipline. London: W.W. Norton 2002.
75
Polsby N. Legislatures. Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1975.
76
Power G. Annex to the IPU’s Global Parliamentary Report.
77
Hibbing, John R. Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science. 1988;32:681–712.
78
Owens JE, Loomis BA. Qualified exceptionalism: The US Congress in comparative perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2006;12:258–90. doi: 10.1080/13572330600875464
79
Polsby, N. The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives. Legislatures and legislators. Aldershot: Ashgate 1998:76–101.
80
Norton P. Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis. Parliaments in Western Europe. London: Cass 1990.
81
Gamm G, Huber J. Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress. Political science: the state of the discipline. London: W.W. Norton 2002.
82
Przeworski A, Asadurian T, Thomas Bohlken A. The origins of parliamentary responsibility. Comparative constitutional design. New York: Cambridge University Press 2012.
83
Lijphart, Arend. Introduction . Parliamentary versus presidential government. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992:1–27.
84
Elgie R. From Linz to Tsebelis: three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization. 2005;12:106–22. doi: 10.1080/1351034042000317989
85
King, Anthony. Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1976;1.
86
M. S. S. Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
87
Sartori G. Presidentialism. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press 1997:83–100.
88
Lijphart A. Presidentialism and majoritarian democracy. The failure of presidential democracy: Vol. 1: Comparative perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1994.
89
Linz, J. J. The Virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1:84–91.
90
Linz, J.J. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1:51–69.
91
Stepan A, Skach C. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism. World Politics. 1993;46. doi: 10.2307/2950664
92
Shugart MS, Carey JM. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
93
Hiroi T, Omori S. Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited. Democratization. 2009;16:485–507. doi: 10.1080/13510340902884598
94
Bergman, Torbjorn, Muller, Wolfgang C., Strom, Kaare. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
95
Elgie R. What is divided government? Divided government in comparative perspective. [Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online 2001.
96
Mezey, M. L. Executive-legislative relations. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
97
Cheibub JA, Elkins Z, Ginsburg T. Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science. 2014;44:515–44. doi: 10.1017/S000712341300032X
98
David Samuels, Matthew Shugart. Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: how the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior. 2010.
99
Ganghof S. Is the ‘Constitution of Equality’ Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid? Political Studies. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12124
100
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Legislatures and executives: an investigation into the relationship at the heart of government. 2004;10.
101
Lijphart A. Executive-legislative relations. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press 1999.
102
Tsebelis, George, Russell Sage Foundation. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: Princeton University Press 2002.
103
Fiorina, Morris P., Mayhew, David R. Divided government. 2nd ed. London: Longman 2003.
104
Riggs, Fred W. Presidentialism versus Parliamentarism: Implications for Representativeness and Legitimacy . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 1997;18:253–78.
105
Mainwaring S. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies. 1993;26:198–228. doi: 10.1177/0010414093026002003
106
Cheibub JA, Limongi F. Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidental Democracies Reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science. 2002;5:151–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.102301.084508
107
Cheibub, Jose Antonio. Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
108
Mainwaring, Scott. Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review. 1995;25:157–79.
109
Mainwaring S, Shugart MS, editors. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
110
Mainwaring S. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America : rethinking the terms of the debate. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997:12–54.
111
Siaroff A. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review. 2003;24:445–64. doi: 10.1177/01925121030244003
112
Elgie R. The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated? Democratization. 2008;15:49–66. doi: 10.1080/13510340701768125
113
Schleiter P, Morgan-Jones E. Review Article: Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409990159
114
Fukuyama, Francis, Dressel, Bjorn, Chang, Boo-Seung. Facing the Perils of Presidentialism? Journal of Democracy. 2005;16:102–16. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0026
115
Huber, John D. The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. The American Political Science Review. 1996;90:269–82.
116
Strom K. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies. 1984;17:199–227. doi: 10.1177/0010414084017002004
117
Laver, Michael, Shepsle, Kenneth A. Making and breaking governments: cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.
118
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. 2nd ed. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press 2012.
119
Russell M. Bicameralism in Theory & Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
120
Russell M. What are Second Chambers for? Parliamentary Affairs. 2001;54:442–58.
121
Mughan, Anthony, Patterson, Samuel Charles. Senates: bicameralism in the contemporary world. Columbus: Ohio State University Press 1999.
122
Tsebelis G, Money J. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
123
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Second Chambers. 2001;7.
124
Russell M, Sandford M. Why are Second Chambers so Difficult to Reform? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2002;8:79–89. doi: 10.1080/714003926
125
Levmore S. Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one? International Review of Law and Economics. 1992;12:145–62. doi: 10.1016/0144-8188(92)90031-L
126
Tsebelis G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science. 1995;25. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007225
127
Druckman JN, Thies MF. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science. 2002;46. doi: 10.2307/3088432
128
Shell, D. Second chambers. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
129
Norton P. How many bicameral legislatures are there? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2004;10:1–9. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000322436
130
Mughan, Anthony, Patterson, Samuel Charles. Senates: bicameralism in the contemporary world. Columbus: Ohio State University Press 1999.
131
Russell M. Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2013;19:370–91. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2013.773639
132
Russell M. Elected Second Chambers and Their Powers: An International Survey. The Political Quarterly. 2012;83:117–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02275.x
133
Coakley J. The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2014;20:542–72. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168
134
The Journal of Legislative Studies . 2002;8.
135
Llanos M, Nolte D. Bicameralism in the Americas: around the extremes of symmetry and incongruence. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003;9:54–86. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000246864
136
Roller E. Reforming the Spanish Senate: Mission Impossible? West European Politics. 2002;25:69–92. doi: 10.1080/713601643
137
Hiroi T. The Dynamics of Lawmaking in a Bicameral Legislature: The Case of Brazil. Comparative Political Studies. 2008;41:1583–606. doi: 10.1177/0010414007308536
138
Bean C, Wattenberg M. Attitudes Towards Divided Government and Ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States. Australian Journal of Political Science. 1998;33:25–36. doi: 10.1080/10361149850705
139
Goot M. Whose Mandate? Policy Promises, Strong Bicameralism and Polled Opinion. Australian Journal of Political Science. 1999;34:327–52. doi: 10.1080/10361149950263
140
Sartori, Giovanni. Problems with Parliamentary Systems. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press 1997.
141
Swenden, Wilfried. Federalism and second chambers: regional representation in parliamentary federations : the Australian Senate and German Bundesrat compared. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang 2004.
142
Olson DM, Longley LD. Two into One: The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. San Francisco: Westview Press 1991.
143
Congleton RD. On the merits of bicameral legislatures: intragovernmental bargaining and policy stability. Democratic constitutional design and public policy: analysis and evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2006.
144
Riker, William H. The Justification of Bicameralism. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 1992;13:101–16.
145
Money, Jeannette, Tsebelis, George. Cicero’s Puzzle: Upper House Power in Comparative Perspective . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 1992;13:25–43.
146
Rogers JR. An Informational Rationale for Congruent Bicameralism. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2001;13:123–51. doi: 10.1177/0951692801013002001
147
Druckman J, Martin L, Thies M. Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2005;30:529–48. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201662
148
Vatter A. Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of cameral structure in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2005;11:194–215. doi: 10.1080/13572330500158607
149
Heller, William B. Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1997;22:485–516.
150
Norris P. Legislative recruitment. Comparing democracies: elections and voting in global perspectives. London: Sage Publications 1996:184–215.
151
Hazan RY, Rahaṭ G. Democracy within parties: candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
152
Cross W. Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account. Party Politics. 2008;14:596–619. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093392
153
Party Politics - Special Issue on Candidate Selection. 2001;7.
154
Gallagher M. Conclusion. Candidate selection in comparative perspective: the secret garden of politics. London: Sage 1988:236–83.
155
Field BN, Siavelis PM. Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note. Party Politics. 2008;14:620–39. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093393
156
Norris P, Lovenduski J. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
157
Norris P, Lovenduski J. Comparative candidate recruitment. Political recruitment: gender, race, and class in the British parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995:183–205.
158
Shomer Y. What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics. 2014;20:533–46. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436060
159
Norris P. Introduction: theories of recruitment. Passages to power: legislative recruitment in advanced democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997:1–14.
160
Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P., Farrell, D. M. From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties. Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies. [Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online 2002.
161
Indrithason IH, Kristinsson GH. Primary consequences: The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics. 2015;21:565–76. doi: 10.1177/1354068813487117
162
Ware A. The Selection of Candidates and Leaders. Political parties and party systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996.
163
Alvarez RM, Sinclair B. Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes. Political Research Quarterly. 2012;65:544–57. doi: 10.1177/1065912911411098
164
McGhee E, Masket S, Shor B, et al. A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58:337–51. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12070
165
Gallagher, Michael, Marsh, Michael. Candidate selection in comparative perspective: the secret garden of politics. London: Sage 1988.
166
Lundell K. Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective. Party Politics. 2004;10:25–47. doi: 10.1177/1354068804039119
167
Akirav O. Candidate Selection and a Crowded Parliament: The Israeli Knesset, 1988–2006. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:96–120. doi: 10.1080/13572330903542142
168
Barnea S, Rahat G. Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach. Party Politics. 2007;13:375–94. doi: 10.1177/1354068807075942
169
Rahat G. Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic? Government and Opposition. 2009;44:68–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.01276.x
170
Hazan RY. Candidate Selection: Implications and Challenges for Legislative Behaviour. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. 2014.
171
Shomer Y. Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:945–70. doi: 10.1177/0010414008330600
172
Hofnung M. Unaccounted Competition: The Finance of Intra-Party Elections. Party Politics. 2008;14:726–44. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093408
173
Bochel J, Denver D. Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek. British Journal of Political Science. 1983;13. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400003136
174
Shaw E. New Labour: new pathways to parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 2001;54:35–53. doi: 10.1093/pa/54.1.35
175
Russell M. Selection under Blair. Building new Labour: the politics of party organisation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2005:67–95.
176
Mikulska AB, Scarrow SE. Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2010;20:311–33. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2010.490712
177
Narud, Hanne Marthe, Pedersen, Mogens N., Valen, Henry. Party sovereignty and citizen control: selecting candidates for parliamentary elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark 2002.
178
Bruhn K. Electing Extremists? Party Primaries and Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Comparative Politics. 2013;45:398–417.
179
Gherghina S. One-Shot Party Primaries: The Case of the Romanian Social Democrats. Politics. 2013;33:185–95. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12007
180
Hellmann O. Outsourcing candidate selection: The fight against clientelism in East Asian parties. Party Politics. 2014;20:52–62. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436039
181
Spies DC, Kaiser A. Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics. Published Online First: 2012. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436066
182
Katz, Richard S. Democracy and elections. New York: Oxford University Press 1997.
183
Patzelt, Werner J. Recruitment and Retention in Western European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999;24:239–79.
184
Lawrence E, Donovan T, Bowler S. The adoption of direct primaries in the United States. Party Politics. 2013;19:3–18. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393264
185
Ichino N, Nathan NL. Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra-Party Conflict in Ghana. American Journal of Political Science. 2013;57:428–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00624.x
186
Mansbridge J. Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. The Journal of Politics. 1999;61.
187
Wangnerud L. Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science. 2009;12:51–69.
188
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press 1972.
189
Phillips A. The Politics of Presence. Oxford University Press 1998.
190
M. Brito Vieira, D. Runciman. Representing Individuals. Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press 2008:66–83.
191
Celis K, Childs S. The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? Political Studies. 2012;60:213–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x
192
Childs S. A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2004;6:3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00124.x
193
Wangnerud L. Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2000;23:67–91. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00031
194
Swers, Michele L. Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1998;23.
195
Schwindt-Bayer L. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2009;34:5–28. doi: 10.3162/036298009787500330
196
Reynolds A. Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Research Note. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2005;30:301–10.
197
Tate K. The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2001;26.
198
Broockman DE. Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives. American Journal of Political Science. 2013;57:521–36. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12018
199
Ruedin D. Why aren’t they there?: the political representation of women, ethnic groups and issue positions in legislatures. Colchester: Ecpr Press 2013.
200
Phillips A. Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should it Matter Who our Representatives Are? Feminism and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998:224–40.
201
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and democracy. 2000.
202
Norris, Pippa. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
203
Williams, Melissa S. Voice, trust, and memory: marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1998.
204
Urbinati, Nadia. Representative democracy: principles and genealogy. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 2006.
205
Mona Lena Krook. International Political Science Review. ;35:3–11.
206
Dovi S. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review. 2003;96. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000412
207
Cowley P. Why not ask the audience? Understanding the public’s representational priorities. British Politics. 2013;8:138–63. doi: 10.1057/bp.2012.28
208
Taylor-Robinson MM. Gender and Legislatures. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
209
Childs S, Krook ML. Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition. 2009;44:125–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x
210
Lovenduski, Joni. Feminizing politics. Cambridge: Polity Press 2005.
211
Tremblay, Manon, Trimble, Linda J., Sawer, Marian. Representing women in parliament: a comparative study. London: Routledge 2006.
212
Weldon SL. Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking. The Journal of Politics. 2008;64. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00167
213
Dahlerup D. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies. 1988;11:275–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x
214
Caul M. Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics. 1999;5:79–98. doi: 10.1177/1354068899005001005
215
Salmond R. Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2006;31:175–204. doi: 10.3162/036298006X201779
216
Fortin-Rittberger J, Rittberger B. Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics. 2014;15:496–520. doi: 10.1177/1465116514527179
217
Matland, Richard E. Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 1998;23:109–25.
218
Tremblay M. Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis. Democratization. 2007;14:533–53. doi: 10.1080/13510340701398261
219
Kenworthy , Lane, Malami, Melissa. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis . Social Forces. 1999;78:235–68.
220
Kittilson, Miki Caul. Challenging parties, changing parliaments: women and elected office in contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press 2006.
221
Roberts A, Seawright J, Cyr J. Do Electoral Laws Affect Women’s Representation? Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46:1555–81. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463906
222
Schneider MC, Bos AL. Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians. Political Psychology. 2014;35:245–66. doi: 10.1111/pops.12040
223
Mendelberg T, Karpowitz CF, Goedert N. Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58:291–306. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12077
224
Rai SM. Political representation, democratic institutions and women’s empowerment: the quota. Rethinking empowerment: gender and development in a global/local world. London: Routledge 2002:133–46.
225
Mateo Diaz, Mercedes. Representing women?: female legislators in West European parliaments. Colchester: ECPR Press 2005.
226
Swers, Michele L. The difference women make: the policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2002.
227
Pearson K, Dancey L. Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era. Politics & Gender. 2011;7:493–519. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X1100033X
228
Grey S. Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs. 2002;55:19–29. doi: 10.1093/parlij/55.1.19
229
Matland, Richard E., Montgomery, Kathleen A. Women’s access to political power in post-communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
230
Schwindt-Bayer LA. Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:570–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x
231
Piscopo JM. Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates. Parliamentary Affairs. 2011;64:448–72. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsq061
232
Bauer G. ‘Let there be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments. Political Studies Review. 2012;10:370–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00272.x
233
Devlin C, Elgie R. The Effect of Increased Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs. 2008;61:237–54. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn007
234
Barnes TD, Burchard SM. ‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46:767–90. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463884
235
Stockemer D. Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments. Political Studies. 2011;59:693–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x
236
Sater JN. Changing Politics from Below? Women Parliamentarians in Morocco. Democratization. 2007;14:723–42. doi: 10.1080/13510340701398352
237
Griffin JD. When and Why Minority Legislators Matter. Annual Review of Political Science. 2014;17:327–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-205028
238
Canon, David T. Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly . 1999;24:331–85.
239
Maddison S. White Parliament, Black Politics: The Dilemmas of Indigenous Parliamentary Representation. Australian Journal of Political Science. 2010;45:663–80. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2010.517180
240
Bloemraad I, Schonwalder K. Immigrant and Ethnic Minority Representation in Europe: Conceptual Challenges and Theoretical Approaches. West European Politics. 2013;36:564–79. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773724
241
Wüst AM. A Lasting Impact? On the Legislative Activities of Immigrant-origin Parliamentarians in Germany. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2014;20:495–515. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.907601
242
King JR., Marvin P. Bill Preference: The Continued Relevance of the Congressional Black Caucus. Politics & Policy. 2011;39:421–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00297.x
243
Minta M. Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2009;34:193–218. doi: 10.3162/036298009788314336
244
Fenno, Richard F. Going home: Black representatives and their constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2003.
245
Bowen DC, Clark CJ. Revisiting Descriptive Representation in Congress: Assessing the Effect of Race on the Constituent-Legislator Relationship. Political Research Quarterly. 2014;67:695–707. doi: 10.1177/1065912914531658
246
Clark Wilson W, Curtis Ellis W. Surrogates Beyond Borders: Black Members of the United States Congress and the Representation of African Interests on the Congressional Foreign-Policy Agenda. Polity. 2014;46:255–73. doi: 10.1057/pol.2014.3
247
Juenke EG, Preuhs RR. Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century. American Journal of Political Science. 2012;56:705–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00584.x
248
REYNOLDS A. Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review. 2013;107:259–74. doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000051
249
Haider-Markel D. Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2007;32:107–33. doi: 10.3162/036298007X202001
250
Carnes N. Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2012;37:5–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x
251
Murray R. Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All. American Political Science Review. 2014;108:520–32. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000239
252
Paxton P, Hughes MM. The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990-2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2015;40:331–62. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12079
253
Bacchi C. Arguing for and against quotas: theoretical issues. In: Dahlerup D, ed. Women, quotas and politics. 2006:32–51.
254
Krook ML. Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research. 2007;46:367–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00704.x
255
Hughes M. Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review. 2011;105:604–20. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000293
256
Krook ML. Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis. Comparative Political Studies. 2014;47:1268–93. doi: 10.1177/0010414013495359
257
Krook ML, Norris P. Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office. Political Studies. 2014;62:2–20. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12116
258
Murray R. How Parties Evaluate Compulsory Quotas: A Study of the Implementation of the ‘Parity’ Law in France. Parliamentary Affairs. 2007;60:568–84. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm039
259
Caul M. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis. The Journal of Politics. 2008;63. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00107
260
Buckley F. How Ireland legislated for candidate sex quotas to increase women’s representation. Democratic Audit UK. Published Online First: 27 November 2013.
261
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) materials on women in parliament.
262
Strom K. Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 1997;3:155–74. doi: 10.1080/13572339708420504
263
Norris P. Constituency Service. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004:230–46.
264
Andeweg RB. Roles in Legislatures. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
265
Loewenberg G, Patterson SC. Linkage. Comparing legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America 1979.
266
Norris P. The puzzle of constituency service. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 1997;3:29–49. doi: 10.1080/13572339708420508
267
Carey J, Shugart M. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies. 1995;14:417–39. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
268
Norton P. Introduction: Linking Parliaments and Citizens. Parliaments and citizens in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass 2002:1–18.
269
Searing DD. Introduction: Roles, Rules and Rationality. Westminster’s world: understanding political roles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1994:1–30.
270
Thomassen J, Esaiasson P. Role Orientations of Members of Parliament. Acta Politica. 2006;41:217–31. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500157
271
Johannes J. Casework as a Technique of U. S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1979;4:325–51.
272
Power G. Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation. 2012.
273
Rolef SH. Defining the Job of the Member of the Knesset. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2014;20:588–607. doi: 10.1080/17411912.2014.910338
274
Best H, Vogel L. The Sociology of Legislators and Legislatures. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
275
Saalfeld T. Rational-choice theory in legislative studies: Models of politics without romanticism. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 1995;1:32–64. doi: 10.1080/13572339508420414
276
Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. Parliamentary roles in modern legislatures. London: Routledge 2012:8–36.
277
Ward H. Rational Choice. Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2010.
278
Pitkin H. The Mandate-Independence Controversy. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press 1972.
279
Judge D. Trustee theory and practice. Representation: theory and practice in Britain. London: Routledge 1999:47–69.
280
Wood DM. Legislators and Constituents. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
281
Norton, Philip. Parliaments and citizens in Western Europe. London: Frank Cass 2002.
282
Muller, Wolfgang C., Saalfeld, Thomas. Members of parliament in Western Europe: roles and behaviour. London: F. Cass 1997.
283
Kitschelt H. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies. 2000;33:845–79. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300607
284
Andre A, Depauw S, Martin S. Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies. 2015;48:464–96. doi: 10.1177/0010414014545512
285
Regional & Federal Studies (Special Issue: Constituency Representation, Devolution and MMP Electoral Systems: Comparative and UK Perspectives). 2007;17.
286
Tobin Grant J, Rudolph TJ. The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2004;29:431–45.
287
Legislative Studies Quarterly - Special Issue on Representative Roles. ;4:485–655.
288
Bogdanor V. Introduction. Representatives of the people? Parliamentarians and constituents in Western democracies. Aldershot: Gower 1985:1–12.
289
Mayhew, David R. Congress: the electoral connection. London: Yale University Press 1974.
290
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., Fiorina, Morris P. The personal vote: constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1987.
291
Elling, Richard C. The Utility of State Legislative Casework as a Means of Oversight. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 1979;4:353–79.
292
Fenno, Richard F. Home style: House members in their districts. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman and Co 1978.
293
Searing, D. Backbench and Leadership Roles in The House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 1995;48:418–37.
294
Gay O. MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies. The Political Quarterly. 2005;76:57–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00656.x
295
Carman CJ. Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link? Political Studies. 2006;54:103–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00568.x
296
Bengtsson A, Wass H. Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2010;20:55–81. doi: 10.1080/17457280903450724
297
Tavits M. Effect of Local Ties On Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour: The Case of Estonia. Party Politics. 2009;16:215–35. doi: 10.1177/1354068809341053
298
Stratmann , Thomas, Baur , Martin. Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science. 2002;46:506–14.
299
Fujimura N. The influence of electoral institutions on legislative representation: Evidence from Japan’s single non-transferable vote and single-member district systems. Party Politics. 2015;21:209–21. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472578
300
Ingall, Rachael E., Crisp, Brian F. Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2001;26:487–512.
301
Soroka S, Penner E, Blidook K. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 2009;42. doi: 10.1017/S0008423909990059
302
Martin, Shane. Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case. Political Studies. 2011;59:472–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x
303
Bowler S. Private Members’ Bills in the UK Parliament: Is there an ‘Electoral Connection’? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:476–94. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2010.519457
304
The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures: Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance). 2003;9.
305
Cowley P. It’s a bit more complicated than that. The rebels: how Blair mislaid his majority. London: Politico’s 2005:21–48.
306
Gunther, Richard, Montero, José R., Linz, Juan J. Political parties: old concepts and new challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
307
Sieberer U. Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2006;12:150–78. doi: 10.1080/13572330600739413
308
Saalfeld T, Strøm KW. Political Parties and Legislators. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
309
Russell M. Parliamentary party cohesion: Some explanations from psychology. Party Politics. 2014;20:712–23. doi: 10.1177/1354068812453367
310
Carey J, Reynolds A. Parties and Accountable Government in New Democracies. Party Politics. 2007;13:255–74. doi: 10.1177/1354068807073866
311
Kölln A-K. The value of political parties to representative democracy. European Political Science Review. 2014;1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000344
312
Stokes SC. Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2:243–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243
313
Cross WP, Katz RS, European Consortium for Political Research. The challenges of intra-party democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
314
Loxbo K. The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics. 2013;19:537–54. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407583
315
van Biezen I. On the Internal Balance of Party Power: Party Organizations in New Democracies. Party Politics. 2000;6:395–417. doi: 10.1177/1354068800006004001
316
Blondel J, Nousianen J. Governments, Supporting Parties and Policy-making. The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective. New York: Palgrave 2000:161–95.
317
McKenzie R. Power in the Labour Party: The Issue of Intra-Party Democracy. The politics of the Labour Party. London: Allen & Unwin 1982:191–201.
318
May JD. Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies. 1973;21:135–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01423.x
319
Luciano Bardi. Special issue of Party Politics on political party change. ;20:151–9.
320
Knut Heidar, R. A Koole. Approaches to the study of parliamentary party groups. Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: political parties behind closed doors. London: Routledge 2000:4–22.
321
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on The Uneasy Relationship Between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. 1999;5:1–332.
322
Blondel, Jean, Cotta, Maurizio. The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective. New York: Palgrave 2000.
323
Krehbiel, Keith. Paradoxes of Parties in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999;24:31–64.
324
Laver, Michael. Divided Parties, Divided Government. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999;24:5–29.
325
Katz, Richard S., Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., et al. Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press 1999.
326
Saalfeld T. Legislative Voting Behaviour. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
327
Kam C. Party Discipline. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
328
Katz, Richard S. Democracy and elections. New York: Oxford University Press 1997.
329
Ozbudun, Ergun. Party cohesion in western democracies: a causal analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications 1970.
330
Kam, Christopher J. Party discipline and parliamentary politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009.
331
Coman EE. Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2015;21:360–89. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2015.1040246
332
Kam C. Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2001;7:89–126. doi: 10.1080/714003894
333
Carey JM. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science. 2007;51:92–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
334
Carey, John M. Legislative voting and accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press 2009.
335
Leston-Bandeira C. Dissent in a Party-Based Parliament: The Portuguese Case. Party Politics. 2009;15:695–713. doi: 10.1177/1354068809334556
336
Kunicova J, Remington TF. Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003. Party Politics. 2008;14:555–74. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093390
337
Rich TS. Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2014;39:113–35. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12035
338
Olivella S, Tavits M. Legislative Effects of Electoral Mandates. British Journal of Political Science. 2014;44:301–21. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000828
339
Tavits M. The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:793–815. doi: 10.1177/0010414008329900
340
Cowley, Philip. Revolts and rebellions: parliamentary voting under Blair. London: Politico’s 2002.
341
Cowley, Philip. Conscience and parliament. London: F. Cass 1998.
342
Vivyan N, Wagner M. Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research. 2012;51:235–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01998.x
343
Sieberer U. Using MP statements to explain voting behaviour in the German Bundestag: An individual level test of the Competing Principals Theory. Party Politics. 2015;21:284–94. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472584
344
Ceron A. Brave rebels stay home: Assessing the effect of intra-party ideological heterogeneity and party whip on roll-call votes. Party Politics. 2015;21:246–58. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472581
345
Ansolabehere S, Jones PE. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science. 2010;54:583–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00448.x
346
Carson JL, Koger G, Lebo MJ, et al. The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science. 2010;54:598–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00449.x
347
Garner, Christopher, Letki, Natalia. Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments. Canadian Journal of Political Science . 2005;38:463–82.
348
Skjaeveland A. Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2001;7:35–56. doi: 10.1080/714003872
349
Skjaeveland A. A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle. Scandinavian Political Studies. 1999;22:121–36. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00008
350
Carey, John M. Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 2003;35:191–211.
351
Hagopian F, Gervasoni C, Moraes JA. From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies. 2008;42:360–91. doi: 10.1177/0010414008325572
352
Lyne MM. Proffering Pork: How Party Leaders Build Party Reputations in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52:290–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00313.x
353
Rahat G. Determinants of Party Cohesion: Evidence from the Case of the Israeli Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 2007;60:279–96. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm003
354
Clinton JD. Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2012;15:79–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-043010-095836
355
Hug S. Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;40. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409990160
356
Roberts J. The Statistical Analysis Of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2007;32:341–60. doi: 10.3162/036298007781699636
357
Carroll R, Poole KT. Roll-Call Analysis and the Study of Legislatures. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
358
Scarrow SE. Beyond party members: changing approaches to partisan mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.
359
Rosenblum, Nancy L. On the side of the angels: an appreciation of parties and partisanship. Oxford: Princeton University Press 2008.
360
Pettitt RT. Contemporary party politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
361
Mair P. The Challenge to Party Government. West European Politics. 2008;31:211–34. doi: 10.1080/01402380701835033
362
Mair P, Katz R. Party organizations: from civil society to the state. How parties organize: change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies. London: Sage Publications 1994:1–22.
363
Ware A. Party organizations. Political parties and party systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996:93–123.
364
R. Dalton, D. Farrell, I. McAllister. Party policies and policy outputs. Political parties and democratic linkage: how parties organize democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011:193–212.
365
Whiteley PF. Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics. 2010;17:21–44. doi: 10.1177/1354068810365505
366
Allern EH, Pedersen K. The impact of party organisational changes on democracy. West European Politics. 2007;30:68–92. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019688
367
Katz RS. Party Government and its Alternatives. Party governments: European and American experiences. Berlin: W. de Gruyter 1987.
368
Katz RS, Mair P. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1995;1:5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001001
369
Katz RS, Mair P. The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics. 2009;7. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709991782
370
Scarrow SE. Parties and Their Members : Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
371
Panebianco, Angelo. Political parties: organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988.
372
Michels, Robert. Political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Free Press 1962.
373
Mair, Peter. The West European party system. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990.
374
Norris P. May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties. Party Politics. 1995;1:29–47. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001002
375
Kennedy F, Lyons P, Fitzgerald P. Pragmatists, Ideologues and the General Law of Curvilinear Disparity: The Case of the Irish Labour Party. Political Studies. 2006;54:786–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00630.x
376
Carty RK, Cross W. Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2006;16:93–114. doi: 10.1080/13689880600715912
377
Luther, Kurt Richard, Muller-Rommel, Ferdinand. Political parties in the new Europe: political and analytical challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
378
Tavits M. Power within Parties: The Strength of the Local Party and MP Independence in Postcommunist Europe. American Journal of Political Science. 2011;55:923–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00520.x
379
Gauja A. The construction of party membership. European Journal of Political Research. 2015;54:232–48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12078
380
Gauja A. The Individualisation of Party Politics: The Impact of Changing Internal Decision-Making Processes on Policy Development and Citizen Engagement. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.12035
381
Pedersen HH. Differences and Changes in Danish Party Organisations: Central Party Organisation versus Parliamentary Party Group Power. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:233–50. doi: 10.1080/13572331003740131
382
Holliday, Ian, Webb, Paul, Farrell, David M. Political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
383
Rose, Richard. Do parties make a difference? Expanded 2nd ed. London: Macmillan 1984.
384
Shaw M. Parliamentary committees: a global perspective. The new roles of parliamentary committees. London: Frank Cass 1998:225–51.
385
Russo F, Wiberg M. Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:215–32. doi: 10.1080/13572331003740115
386
Müller WC, Sieberer U. Procedure and Rules in Legislatures. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
387
Wehner J. Legislatures and Public Finance. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
388
Shaw, Malcolm N., Lees, J. D. Committees in Legislatures. 1979.
389
Arter D. Committee cohesion and the ‘corporate dimension’ of parliamentary committees: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003;9:73–87. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000306263
390
Pelizzo, Riccardo and Stapenhurst, Frederick. Legislative oversight tools. Parliamentary oversight tools: a comparative analysis. Abingdon: Routledge 2012:28-56-157–9.
391
Parliamentary Questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2011;17:259–70.
392
Martin S. Committees. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
393
Shaw M. Legislative Committees. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
394
Mattson I, Strom K. Committee effects on legislation. Patterns of parliamentary behavior: passage of legislation across Western Europe. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate 2004:91–111.
395
Making an Impact: Effective Parliamentary Committees | Global Partners Governance. 2014. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/making-an-impact-effective-parliamentary-committees/
396
Davidson, Roger H., Longley, Lawrence D. The new roles of parliamentary committees. London: Frank Cass 1998.
397
Shaw, Malcolm N., Lees, John D. Committees in legislatures: a comparative analysis. [Durham, N.C.]: Duke University Press 1979.
398
Shepsle, Kenneth A., Weingast, Barry R. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 1994;19:149–79.
399
Olson, David M., Crowther, William E. Committees in post-Communist democratic parliaments: comparative institutionalization. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press 2002.
400
Khmelko IS, Pigenko And VA, Wise CR. Assessing Committee Roles in a Developing Legislature: The Case of the Ukrainian Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2007;13:210–34. doi: 10.1080/13572330701334312
401
Monk D. A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Committees in Westminster Parliaments. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:1–13. doi: 10.1080/13572330903541904
402
Arter D. From ‘Parliamentary Control’ to ‘Accountable Government’? The Role of Public Committee Hearings in the Swedish Riksdag. Parliamentary Affairs. 2008;61:122–43. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm058
403
Cairney P. The analysis of Scottish Parliament committee influence: Beyond capacity and structure in comparing West European legislatures. European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45:181–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00295.x
404
Kim DH, Loewenberg G. The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments: Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners in the German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies. 2005;38:1104–29. doi: 10.1177/0010414005276307
405
Curini L, Zucchini F. The institutional foundations of committee cohesion in a (changing) parliamentary democracy. European Political Science Review. 2013;1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1755773913000222
406
Rahman, Taiabur. Parliamentary control and government accountability in South Asia: a comparative analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. London: Routledge 2008.
407
Fenno, Richard F., University of California, Berkeley. Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown and Company 1973.
408
Paper 4. Show Me the Money. Improving financial oversight. | Global Partners Governance. 2014. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/paper-4-show-me-the-money/
409
Manning N, Stapenhurst R. Strengthening Oversight by Legislatures. 2002.
410
Schick A. Can National Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budget Policy? Journal on Budgeting. 2002;1.
411
Wehner J. Back from the Sidelines? Redefining the Contribution of Legislatures to the Budget Cycle. World Bank Institute. 2006.
412
Stapenhurst, et al. R. Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective. 2008.
413
Messick R. Strengthening Legislatures: Implications from Industrial Countries. 2002.
414
Pelizzo R, Kinyondo A. Public Accounts Committees in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Politics & Policy. 2014;42:77–102. doi: 10.1111/polp.12062
415
Santiso C. Legislatures and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Finance Accountability in Emerging Economies. Journal on Budgeting. 2004;4.
416
Soroka S, Penner E, Blidook K. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 2009;42. doi: 10.1017/S0008423909990059
417
Vliegenthart R, Walgrave S. Content Matters: The Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies. 2011;44:1031–59. doi: 10.1177/0010414011405168
418
Bates SR, Kerr P, Byrne C, et al. Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs. 2014;67:253–80. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss044
419
Bevan S, John P. Policy Representation by Party Leaders and Followers: What Drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions. Government and Opposition. 2015;1–25. doi: 10.1017/gov.2015.16
420
Wiberg M. Chapter 6 Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? In: Doring H, ed. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. University of Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES) 1995.
421
Salmond R. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Mass Political Engagement. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2014;20:321–41. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.895121
422
Rasch BE. Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-Setting. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
423
Doring H. Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press 1995.
424
Rasch, Bjorn Erik. Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2000;25:3–23.
425
Loewenberg G. Agenda-setting in the German Bundestag: origins and consequences of party dominance. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003;9:17–31. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000246846
426
Brauninger T, Debus M. Legislative agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research. 2009;48:804–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00850.x
427
Zucchini F. Government alternation and legislative agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research. 2011;50:749–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01983.x
428
Russell, Meg, Paun, Akash, University College, London. The House rules? International lessons for enhancing the autonomy of the House of Commons. 2007.
429
Uhr, John. How Democratic is Parliament? 2005.
430
Norton P. Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2001;7:13–33. doi: 10.1080/714003882
431
The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Comparing and Classifying Legislatures). 2006;12.
432
Lukes S. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
433
Strøm K, Bergman T, Müller WC. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
434
Olson DM, Mezey ML, editors. Legislatures in the Policy Process: The Dilemmas of Economic Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991.
435
Saiegh SM. LawMaking. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
436
Russell M, Benton M. Assessing the Policy Impact of Parliament: Methodological Challenges and Possible Future Approaches. 2009.
437
Hage FM, Kaeding M. Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures. Journal of European Integration. 2007;29:341–61. doi: 10.1080/07036330701442356
438
Benton M, Russell M. Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. Published Online First: 2012. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss009
439
Russell M, Gover D, Wollter K. Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process?: Six Reasons for Doubt. Parliamentary Affairs. Published Online First: 2015. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsv016
440
Shephard M, Cairney P. The Impact of the Scottish Parliament in Amending Executive Legislation. Political Studies. 2005;53:303–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00530.x
441
Russell M, Benton M. (Re)assessing Parliamentary Policy Impact: The Case of the Australian Senate. Australian Journal of Political Science. 2010;45:159–74. doi: 10.1080/10361141003736117
442
Clinton JD, Lewis DE, Selin JL. Influencing the Bureaucracy: The Irony of Congressional Oversight. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58:387–401. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12066
443
Manow P, Burkhart S. Legislative Self-Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976-2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2007;32:167–91. doi: 10.3162/036298007780907941
444
Martin LW, Vanberg G. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford Scholarship 2011.
445
Blidook K. Exploring the Role of ‘Legislators’ in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2010;16:32–56. doi: 10.1080/13572330903541979
446
Kreppel A. Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Studies. 2002;35:784–813. doi: 10.1177/0010414002035007002
447
Kalitowski S. Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs. 2008;61:694–708. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn030
448
Griffith, J. A. G., Political and Economic Planning, Study of Parliament Group. Parliamentary scrutiny of Government bills. London: Allen and Unwin [for] PEP and the Study of Parliament Group 1974.
449
Thompson L. More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 2013;66:459–79. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss016
450
Tsebelis G. Governments and Parliaments. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: Princeton University Press 2002.
451
Olson D. Legislatures in the Policy Process. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe 1994.
452
Loewenberg, Gerhard, Patterson, Samuel Charles. Comparing legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America 1979.
453
Hindmoor A, Larkin P, Kennon A. Assessing the Influence of Select Committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee, 1997-2005. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2009;15:71–89. doi: 10.1080/13572330802666844
454
Richard L. Hall. Measuring Legislative Influence. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1992;17:205–31.
455
Whitmore S. Challenges and constraints for post-Soviet committees: exploring the impact of parties on committees in Ukraine. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2006;12:32–53. doi: 10.1080/13572330500484953
456
De Giorgi E, Marangoni F. Government laws and the opposition parties’ behaviour in parliament. Acta Politica. 2015;50:64–81. doi: 10.1057/ap.2013.34
457
Bolton A, Thrower S. Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism. American Journal of Political Science. 2015;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12190
458
Jenkins JA, Monroe NW. On Measuring Legislative Agenda-Setting Power. American Journal of Political Science. 2015;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12191
459
Chiou F-Y, Rothenberg LS. The Elusive Search for Presidential Power. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58:653–68. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12057
460
Liebert U, Cotta M. Parliament as a central site in democratic consolidation. Parliament and democratic consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. London: Pinter 1990:3–30.
461
Fish MS. Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies. Journal of Democracy. 2006;17:5–20. doi: 10.1353/jod.2006.0008
462
Overseas Development Institute - Parliamentary Strengthening and the Paris Principles. 2007.
463
Paper 1. Why Engage With Parliaments? International assistance and parliamentary strengthening - an overview. | Global Partners Governance. 2013. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDgQw7AJahcKEwjw2uOtmdKAAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgpgovernance.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FGuide-to-Parliaments.-Paper-1.pdf&psig=AOvVaw3qh0yqgQDD4CcEMTpN4yDy&ust=1691760564108513&opi=89978449
464
Kopecky P. Introduction: transition, consolidation and parliamentary institutionalisation. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: party competition and parliamentary institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate 2001:1–21.
465
Norton P, Leston-Bandeira C. The impact of democratic practice on the parliaments of Southern Europe. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2003;9:177–85. doi: 10.1080/1357233032000250680
466
Mishler, William, Rose, Richard. Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1994;19:5–32.
467
Kinyondo A, Pelizzo R. Strengthening Legislatures: Some Lessons from the Pacific Region. Politics & Policy. 2013;41. doi: 10.1111/polp.12020
468
Schuler P, Malesky E. Authoritarian Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. 2014.
469
Power G. The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding political incentives and institutional behaviour in parliamentary support strategies. 2011.
470
Musolf, Lloyd D., Kornberg, Allan, American Society for Public Administration. Legislatures in developmental perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 1970.
471
Pakenham, R. A. Legislatures and political development. Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1970.
472
World Bank Parliamentary Strengthening Programme. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/parliament.pdf
473
Engaging and Supporting Parliaments Worldwide: Strategies and Methodologies for EC Action in Support to Parliaments.
474
Report from the UK House of Commons International Development committee on parliamentary strengthening. 2015. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/704/704.pdf#
475
Parliamentary Strengthening: Government Response to the International Development Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2014-15. 2015. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/1125/112504.htm#a2
476
Bergman, Torbjorn, Muller, Wolfgang C., Strom, Kaare. Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
477
Andrews JT. Legislatures in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press 2014.
478
Olson DM. The Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of Central Europe. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly 1998.
479
Norton P, Olson DM. Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Legislatures: Beyond Transition. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2007;13:1–11. doi: 10.1080/13572330601165154
480
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Post-Communist Parliaments: Change and Stability in the Second Decade. 2011;17.
481
Carey, John M., Formanek, Frantisek, Karpowicz, Ewa. Legislative Autonomy in New Regimes: The Czech and Polish Cases. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999;24:569–603.
482
Remington, Thomas F. Parliaments in transition: the new legislative politics in the former USSR and Eastern Europe. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press 1994.
483
Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing post-Soviet legislatures: a theory of institutional design and political conflict. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press 2000.
484
Chiva C. The Institutionalisation of Post-Communist Parliaments: Hungary and Romania in Comparative Perspective. Parliamentary Affairs. 2007;60:187–211. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm012
485
Barkan JD. Legislatures on the Rise? Journal of Democracy. 2008;19:124–37. doi: 10.1353/jod.2008.0020
486
Barkan JD. African Legislatures and the ‘third wave’ of democratization. Legislative power in emerging African democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner 2009:1–31.
487
Africa All Party Parliamentary Group. Strengthening Parliaments in Africa: Improving Support. 2008.
488
Inter-Parliamentary Union. Ten Years of Strengthening Parliaments in Africa 1991-2000: Lessons Learnt and the Way Forward. 2003.
489
Johnson J, Nakamura R. A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance. 1999.
490
Johnson JK. The Role of Parliament in Government. 2005.
491
Nijzink L, Mozaffar S, Azevedo E. Parliaments and the enhancement of democracy on the African continent: An analysis of institutional capacity and public perceptions. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2006;12:311–35. doi: 10.1080/13572330600875563
492
Azevedo-Harman E. Parliaments in Africa: Representative Institutions in the Land of the ‘Big Man’. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 2011;17:65–85. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.545180
493
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. African parliaments: between governance and government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
494
The difficult development of parliamentary politics in the Gulf: Parliaments and the process of managed reform in Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman | Global Partners Governance. 2012. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/politics-in-gulf/
495
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Southern European Parliaments in Democracy. 2003;9.
496
Leston-Bandeira C. The Portuguese parliament during the first two decades of democracy. West European Politics. 2001;24:137–56. doi: 10.1080/01402380108425421
497
Close, David. Legislatures and the new democracies in Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers 1995.
