Bibliography for PUBLG057: Parliaments, Political Parties and Policy Making BETA

Africa All Party Parliamentary Group. ‘Strengthening Parliaments in Africa: Improving Support’. 2008 : n. pag. Print.

Akirav, Osnat. ‘Candidate Selection and a Crowded Parliament: The Israeli Knesset, 1988–2006’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.1 (2010): 96–120. Web.

Allern, Elin H., and Karina Pedersen. ‘The Impact of Party Organisational Changes on Democracy’. West European Politics 30.1 (2007): 68–92. Web.

Alvarez, R. M., and B. Sinclair. ‘Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes’. Political Research Quarterly 65.3 (2012): 544–557. Web.

Andeweg, Rudy B. ‘Roles in Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-025>.

Andre, A., S. Depauw, and S. Martin. ‘Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability’. Comparative Political Studies 48.4 (2015): 464–496. Web.

Andrews, Josephine T. ‘Legislatures in Central and Eastern Europe’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-018>.

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Philip Edward Jones. ‘Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting’. American Journal of Political Science 54.3 (2010): 583–597. Web.

Arter, D. ‘From “Parliamentary Control” to “Accountable Government”? The Role of Public Committee Hearings in the Swedish Riksdag’. Parliamentary Affairs 61.1 (2008): 122–143. Web.

Arter, David. ‘Committee Cohesion and the “corporate Dimension” of Parliamentary Committees: A Comparative Analysis’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9.4 (2003): 73–87. Web.

Arter, David. The Nordic Parliaments: A Comparative Analysis. London: Hurst, 1984. Print.

Azevedo-Harman, Elisabete. ‘Parliaments in Africa: Representative Institutions in the Land of the “Big Man”’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17.1 (2011): 65–85. Web.

B. L. Shankar and Valerian Rodrigues. The Indian Parliament : A Democracy at Work. N.p., 2011. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198067726.001.0001>.

Bacchi, C. ‘Arguing for and against Quotas: Theoretical Issues’. Women, Quotas and Politics. Ed. Drude Dahlerup. N.p., 2006. 32–51. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3b18dcc9-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Bach, Stanley. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Department of the Senate, Canberra, 2003. Web. <https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/platparl>.

Barkan, Joel D. ‘African Legislatures and the “Third Wave” of Democratization’. Legislative Power in Emerging African Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2009. 1–31. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e330302f-7f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Barkan, Joel D. Legislative Power in Emerging African Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2009. Print.

Barkan, Joel D. ‘Legislatures on the Rise?’ Journal of Democracy 19.2 (2008): 124–137. Web.

Barnea, S., and G. Rahat. ‘Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach’. Party Politics 13.3 (2007): 375–394. Web.

Barnes, T. D., and S. M. Burchard. ‘“Engendering” Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa’. Comparative Political Studies 46.7 (2013): 767–790. Web.

Bates, S. R. et al. ‘Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron’. Parliamentary Affairs 67.2 (2014): 253–280. Web.

Bauer, Gretchen. ‘“Let There Be a Balance”: Women in African Parliaments’. Political Studies Review 10.3 (2012): 370–384. Web.

Bean, Clive, and Martin Wattenberg. ‘Attitudes Towards Divided Government and Ticket-Splitting in Australia and the United States’. Australian Journal of Political Science 33.1 (1998): 25–36. Web.

Bengtsson, Asa, and Hanna Wass. ‘Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect?’ Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20.1 (2010): 55–81. Web.

Benton, M., and M. Russell. ‘Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons’. Parliamentary Affairs (2012): n. pag. Web.

Bergman, Torbjorn, Muller, Wolfgang C., and Strom, Kaare. ‘Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy’. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1093/019829784X.001.0001>.

---. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.

Best, Heinrich, and Lars Vogel. ‘The Sociology of Legislators and Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-003>.

Bevan, Shaun, and Peter John. ‘Policy Representation by Party Leaders and Followers: What Drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions’. Government and Opposition (2015): 1–25. Web.

Blidook, Kelly. ‘Exploring the Role of “Legislators” in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.1 (2010): 32–56. Web.

Bloemraad, Irene, and Karen Schonwalder. ‘Immigrant and Ethnic Minority Representation in Europe: Conceptual Challenges and Theoretical Approaches’. West European Politics 36.3 (2013): 564–579. Web.

Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. ‘Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies’. Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science. London: Routledge, 2012. 8–36. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6735baae-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Blondel, J. . ‘Representation: Legislatures and Parliaments’. Comparative Government: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 1995. 248–266. Print.

Blondel, Jean , and Jaakko Nousianen. ‘Governments, Supporting Parties and Policy-Making’. The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. New York: Palgrave, 2000. 161–195. Print.

Blondel, Jean and Cotta, Maurizio. The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. New York: Palgrave, 2000. Print.

Bochel, John, and David Denver. ‘Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek’. British Journal of Political Science 13.01 (1983): n. pag. Web.

Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Introduction’. Representatives of the People? Parliamentarians and Constituents in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Gower, 1985. 1–12. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4fa6d32d-5d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Bolton, Alexander, and Sharece Thrower. ‘Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism’. American Journal of Political Science (2015): n/a-n/a. Web.

Bowen, D. C., and C. J. Clark. ‘Revisiting Descriptive Representation in Congress: Assessing the Effect of Race on the Constituent-Legislator Relationship’. Political Research Quarterly 67.3 (2014): 695–707. Web.

Bowler, Shaun. ‘Private Members’ Bills in the UK Parliament: Is There an “Electoral Connection”?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.4 (2010): 476–494. Web.

Brauninger, Thomas, and Marc Debus. ‘Legislative Agenda-Setting in Parliamentary Democracies’. European Journal of Political Research 48.6 (2009): 804–839. Web.

Broockman, David E. ‘Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives’. American Journal of Political Science 57.3 (2013): 521–536. Web.

Bruhn, Kathleen. ‘Electing Extremists? Party Primaries and Legislative Candidates in Mexico’. Comparative Politics 45.4 (2013): 398–417. Web. <http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cuny/cp/2013/00000045/00000004/art00003>.

Buckley, Fiona. ‘How Ireland Legislated for Candidate Sex Quotas to Increase Women’s Representation’. Democratic Audit UK (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=1848>.

Burnham, Peter et al. ‘Comparative Methodology’. Research Methods in Politics. Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004. 58–79. Print.

Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987. Print.

Cairney, Paul. ‘The Analysis of Scottish Parliament Committee Influence: Beyond Capacity and Structure in Comparing West European Legislatures’. European Journal of Political Research 45.2 (2006): 181–208. Web.

Canon, David T. ‘Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures ’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24.3 (1999): 331–385. Print.

Carey, J., and A. Reynolds. ‘Parties and Accountable Government in New Democracies’. Party Politics 13.2 (2007): 255–274. Web.

Carey, J, and M Shugart. ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’. Electoral Studies 14.4 (1995): 417–439. Web.

Carey, John M. ‘Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting’. American Journal of Political Science 51.1 (2007): 92–107. Web.

Carey, John M. ‘Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America’. Comparative Politics 35.2 (2003): 191–211. Print.

---. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

Carey, John M., Formanek, Frantisek, and Karpowicz, Ewa. ‘Legislative Autonomy in New Regimes: The Czech and Polish Cases’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24.4 (1999): 569–603. Print.

Carman, Christopher Jan. ‘Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link?’ Political Studies 54.1 (2006): 103–122. Web.

Carnes, Nicholas. ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 37.1 (2012): 5–34. Web.

Carroll, Royce, and Keith T. Poole. ‘Roll-Call Analysis and the Study of Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-026>.

Carson, Jamie L. et al. ‘The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress’. American Journal of Political Science 54.3 (2010): 598–616. Web.

Carty, R. Kenneth, and William Cross. ‘Can Stratarchically Organized Parties Be Democratic? The Canadian Case’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 16.2 (2006): 93–114. Web.

Caul, M. ‘Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties’. Party Politics 5.1 (1999): 79–98. Web.

Caul, Miki. ‘Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis’. The Journal of Politics 63.04 (2008): n. pag. Web.

Celis, Karen, and Sarah Childs. ‘The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?’ Political Studies 60.1 (2012): 213–225. Web.

Ceron, A. ‘Brave Rebels Stay Home: Assessing the Effect of Intra-Party Ideological Heterogeneity and Party Whip on Roll-Call Votes’. Party Politics 21.2 (2015): 246–258. Web.

Cheibub, Jose Antonio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.

Cheibub, José Antonio, Zachary Elkins, and Tom Ginsburg. ‘Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism’. British Journal of Political Science 44.03 (2014): 515–544. Web.

Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Fernando Limongi. ‘Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidental Democracies Reconsidered’. Annual Review of Political Science 5.1 (2002): 151–179. Web.

Childs, Sarah. ‘A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6.1 (2004): 3–19. Web.

Childs, Sarah, and Mona Lena Krook. ‘Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors’. Government and Opposition 44.2 (2009): 125–145. Web.

Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. ‘The Elusive Search for Presidential Power’. American Journal of Political Science 58.3 (2014): 653–668. Web.

Chiva, C. ‘The Institutionalisation of Post-Communist Parliaments: Hungary and Romania in Comparative Perspective’. Parliamentary Affairs 60.2 (2007): 187–211. Web.

Clark Wilson, Walter, and William Curtis Ellis. ‘Surrogates Beyond Borders: Black Members of the United States Congress and the Representation of African Interests on the Congressional Foreign-Policy Agenda’. Polity 46.2 (2014): 255–273. Web.

Clinton, Joshua D. ‘Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 15.1 (2012): 79–99. Web.

Clinton, Joshua D., David E. Lewis, and Jennifer L. Selin. ‘Influencing the Bureaucracy: The Irony of Congressional Oversight’. American Journal of Political Science 58.2 (2014): 387–401. Web.

Close, David. Legislatures and the New Democracies in Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers, 1995. Print.

---. Legislatures and the New Democracies in Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers, 1995. Print.

Coakley, John. ‘The Strange Revival of Bicameralism’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20.4 (2014): 542–572. Web.

Coman, Emanuel Emil. ‘Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 21.3 (2015): 360–389. Web.

‘Commonwealth Parliamentary Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.cpahq.org/>.

Congleton, R. D. . ‘On the Merits of Bicameral Legislatures: Intragovernmental Bargaining and Policy Stability’. Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006. Print.

‘Constitutional and Parliamentary Information | ASGP’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://asgp.co/constitutional-and-parliamentary-information>.

Copeland, Gary, and Samuel Charles Patterson. ‘Parliaments and Legislatures’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

Cowley , Philip. ‘It’s a Bit More Complicated than That’. The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority. London: Politico’s, 2005. 21–48. Print.

Cowley, Philip. Conscience and Parliament. The library of legislative studies. London: F. Cass, 1998. Print.

---. Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under Blair. London: Politico’s, 2002. Print.

Cowley, Philip. ‘Why Not Ask the Audience? Understanding the Public’s Representational Priorities’. British Politics 8.2 (2013): 138–163. Web.

Cross, W. ‘Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account’. Party Politics 14.5 (2008): 596–619. Web.

Cross, William P., Richard S. Katz, and European Consortium for Political Research. The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

Curini, Luigi, and Francesco Zucchini. ‘The Institutional Foundations of Committee Cohesion in a (Changing) Parliamentary Democracy’. European Political Science Review (2013): 1–21. Web.

Dahlerup, Drude. ‘From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics’. Scandinavian Political Studies 11.4 (1988): 275–298. Web.

Damgaard, Erik. Parliamentary Change in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian library. New York: Scandinavian University Press, 1992. Print.

David Samuels and Matthew Shugart. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. N.p., 2010. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/presidents-parties-and-prime-ministers/2CB12EF33F51236B06BC1B4E0485BD8B>.

Davidson, Roger H. The Postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992. Print.

Davidson, Roger H. and Longley, Lawrence D. The New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. The library of legislative studies. London: Frank Cass, 1998. Print.

De Giorgi, Elisabetta, and Francesco Marangoni. ‘Government Laws and the Opposition Parties’ Behaviour in Parliament’. Acta Politica 50.1 (2015): 64–81. Web.

Devlin, C., and R. Elgie. ‘The Effect of Increased Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Case of Rwanda’. Parliamentary Affairs 61.2 (2008): 237–254. Web.

Dodd, Lawrence C. Thinking about Congress: Essays on Congressional Change. London: Routledge, 2012. Print.

Dogan, Mattei and Pelassy, Dominique. How to Compare Nations: Strategies in Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. Chatham, N.J: Chatham House, 1990. Print.

Doring, Herbert. ‘Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda’. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995. Web. <https://www.uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin01/projects/vergleichende-politikwissenschaft/D%C3%B6ring/PMR-W-Europe.pdf>.

Dovi, Suzanne. ‘Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?’ American Political Science Review 96.04 (2003): n. pag. Web.

Druckman, James, Lanny Martin, and Michael Thies. ‘Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30.4 (2005): 529–548. Web.

Druckman, James N., and Michael F. Thies. ‘The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration’. American Journal of Political Science 46.4 (2002): n. pag. Web.

Elgie, R. . ‘What Is Divided Government?’ Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford scholarship online. [Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2001. Print.

Elgie, Robert. ‘From Linz to Tsebelis: Three Waves of Presidential/Parliamentary Studies?’ Democratization 12.1 (2005): 106–122. Web.

---. ‘The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated?’ Democratization 15.1 (2008): 49–66. Web.

Elling, Richard C. ‘The Utility of State Legislative Casework as a Means of Oversight’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4.3 (1979): 353–379. Print.

‘Engaging and Supporting Parliaments Worldwide: Strategies and Methodologies for EC Action in Support to Parliaments’. Web. <https://www.agora-parl.org/resources/library/engaging-and-supporting-parliaments-worldwide-strategies-and-methodologies-ec>.

Esaiasson, Peter and Heidar, Knut. Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2000. Print.

Fenno, Richard F. Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. Print.

---. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman and Co, 1978. Print.

Fenno, Richard F. and University of California, Berkeley. Congressmen in Committees. The Study of Congress series. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1973. Print.

Field, B. N., and P. M. Siavelis. ‘Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note’. Party Politics 14.5 (2008): 620–639. Web.

Fiorina, Morris P. and Mayhew, David R. Divided Government. 2nd ed. Longman classics in political science. London: Longman, 2003. Print.

Fish, M. Steven. ‘Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies’. Journal of Democracy 17.1 (2006): 5–20. Web.

Fish, M. Steven and Kroenig, Matthew. The Handbook of National Legislatures: A Global Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

Fortin-Rittberger, J., and B. Rittberger. ‘Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women’s Representation in the European Parliament’. European Union Politics 15.4 (2014): 496–520. Web.

Fujimura, N. ‘The Influence of Electoral Institutions on Legislative Representation: Evidence from Japan’s Single Non-Transferable Vote and Single-Member District Systems’. Party Politics 21.2 (2015): 209–221. Web.

Fukuyama, Francis, Dressel, Bjorn, and Chang, Boo-Seung. ‘Facing the Perils of Presidentialism?’ Journal of Democracy 16.2 (2005): 102–116. Web.

Gallagher, Michael . ‘Conclusion’. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. Sage modern politics series. London: Sage, 1988. 236–283. Print.

Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. Sage modern politics series. London: Sage, 1988. Print.

Gamm, G., and J. Huber. ‘Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress’. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Centennial ed. London: W.W. Norton, 2002. Print.

Ganghof, Steffen. ‘Is the “Constitution of Equality” Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid?’ Political Studies (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.

Garner, Christopher, and Letki, Natalia. ‘Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 38.2 (2005): 463–482. Print.

Gauja, Anika. ‘The Construction of Party Membership’. European Journal of Political Research 54.2 (2015): 232–248. Web.

---. ‘The Individualisation of Party Politics: The Impact of Changing Internal Decision-Making Processes on Policy Development and Citizen Engagement’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations (2014): n/a-n/a. Web.

Gay, Oonagh. ‘MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies’. The Political Quarterly 76.1 (2005): 57–66. Web.

Gherghina, Sergiu. ‘One-Shot Party Primaries: The Case of the Romanian Social Democrats’. Politics 33.3 (2013): 185–195. Web.

Goot, Murray. ‘Whose Mandate? Policy Promises, Strong Bicameralism and Polled Opinion’. Australian Journal of Political Science 34.3 (1999): 327–352. Web.

Grey, S. ‘Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs’. Parliamentary Affairs 55.1 (2002): 19–29. Web.

Griffin, John D. ‘When and Why Minority Legislators Matter’. Annual Review of Political Science 17.1 (2014): 327–336. Web. <http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-205028>.

Griffith, J. A. G., Political and Economic Planning, and Study of Parliament Group. Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills. London: Allen and Unwin [for] PEP and the Study of Parliament Group, 1974. Print.

Gunther, Richard, Montero, José R., and Linz, Juan J. Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199246742.001.0001>.

Hage, Frank M., and Michael Kaeding. ‘Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures’. Journal of European Integration 29.3 (2007): 341–361. Web.

Hagopian, F., C. Gervasoni, and J. A. Moraes. ‘From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil’. Comparative Political Studies 42.3 (2008): 360–391. Web.

Hague, Rod , and Martin Harrop. ‘Legislatures’. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 6th ed. Comparative government and politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 247–267. Print.

Haider-Markel, Donald. ‘Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32.1 (2007): 107–133. Web.

Hazan, Reuven Y. ‘Candidate Selection: Implications and Challenges for Legislative Behaviour’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. N.p., 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-005>.

Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gidʻon Rahaṭ. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572540.001.0001>.

Heller, William B. ‘Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22.4 (1997): 485–516. Print.

Hellmann, O. ‘Outsourcing Candidate Selection: The Fight against Clientelism in East Asian Parties’. Party Politics 20.1 (2014): 52–62. Web.

Hibbing, John R. ‘Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons’. American Journal of Political Science 32.3 (1988): 681–712. Print.

Hindmoor, Andrew, Phil Larkin, and Andrew Kennon. ‘Assessing the Influence of Select Committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee, 1997-2005’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 15.1 (2009): 71–89. Web.

Hiroi, T. ‘The Dynamics of Lawmaking in a Bicameral Legislature: The Case of Brazil’. Comparative Political Studies 41.12 (2008): 1583–1606. Web.

Hiroi, Taeko, and Sawa Omori. ‘Perils of Parliamentarism? Political Systems and the Stability of Democracy Revisited’. Democratization 16.3 (2009): 485–507. Web.

Hofnung, M. ‘Unaccounted Competition: The Finance of Intra-Party Elections’. Party Politics 14.6 (2008): 726–744. Web.

Holliday, Ian, Webb, Paul, and Farrell, David M. Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print.

Huber, John D. ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’. The American Political Science Review 90.2 (1996): 269–282. Print.

Hug, Simon. ‘Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes’. British Journal of Political Science 40.01 (2009): n. pag. Web.

Hughes, Melanie. ‘Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide’. American Political Science Review 105.03 (2011): 604–620. Web.

Ichino, Nahomi, and Noah L. Nathan. ‘Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra-Party Conflict in Ghana’. American Journal of Political Science 57.2 (2013): 428–441. Web.

Indrithason, I. H., and G. H. Kristinsson. ‘Primary Consequences: The Effects of Candidate Selection through Party Primaries in Iceland’. Party Politics 21.4 (2015): 565–576. Web.

Ingall, Rachael E., and Crisp, Brian F. ‘Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26.3 (2001): 487–512. Print.

‘International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)’. N.p., n.d. Print.

Inter-Parliamentary Union. ‘Ten Years of Strengthening Parliaments in Africa 1991-2000: Lessons Learnt and the Way Forward’. 2003 : n. pag. Print.

‘Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)’. N.p., n.d. Print.

‘Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Materials on Women in Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Print.

Jenkins, Jeffery A., and Nathan W. Monroe. ‘On Measuring Legislative Agenda-Setting Power’. American Journal of Political Science (2015): n/a-n/a. Web.

Johannes, John. ‘Casework as a Technique of U. S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4.3 (1979): 325–351. Print.

Johnson, J., and R. Nakamura. ‘A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance’. 1999 : n. pag. Print.

Johnson, John K. ‘The Role of Parliament in Government’. 2005 : n. pag. Print.

Judge, David. ‘Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow?’ Government and Opposition 38.4 (2003): 497–516. Web.

---. ‘Trustee Theory and Practice’. Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain. Theory and practice in British politics. London: Routledge, 1999. 47–69. Print.

Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Robert R. Preuhs. ‘Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century’. American Journal of Political Science 56.3 (2012): 705–715. Web.

Kalitowski, S. ‘Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation’. Parliamentary Affairs 61.4 (2008): 694–708. Web.

Kam, C. ‘Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7.4 (2001): 89–126. Web.

Kam, Christopher. ‘Party Discipline’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-020>.

Kam, Christopher J. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

Katz, R. S. ‘Party Government and Its Alternatives’. Party Governments: European and American Experiences. European University Institute = Institut Universitaire Europeen = Europaisches Hochschulinstitut = Istituto Universitario Europeo : Series C--Political and social sciences = Sciences politiques et sociales = Politik-und Sozialwissenschaften = Scienze politiche e sociali. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1987. Print.

Katz, R. S., and P. Mair. ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’. Party Politics 1.1 (1995): 5–28. Web.

Katz, Richard S. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Print.

---. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195044294.001.0001>.

---. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999. Print.

Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. ‘The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement’. Perspectives on Politics 7.04 (2009): n. pag. Web.

Kennedy, Fiachra, Pat Lyons, and Peter Fitzgerald. ‘Pragmatists, Ideologues and the General Law of Curvilinear Disparity: The Case of the Irish Labour Party’. Political Studies 54.4 (2006): 786–805. Web.

Kenworthy , Lane, and Malami, Melissa. ‘Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis ’. Social Forces 78.1 (1999): 235–268. Print.

Khmelko, Irina S., Vladimir A. Pigenko And, and Charles R. Wise. ‘Assessing Committee Roles in a Developing Legislature: The Case of the Ukrainian Parliament’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13.2 (2007): 210–234. Web.

Kim, D. H., and G. Loewenberg. ‘The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments: Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners in the German Bundestag’. Comparative Political Studies 38.9 (2005): 1104–1129. Web.

King, Anthony. ‘Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1.1 (1976): n. pag. Print.

King JR., Marvin P. ‘Bill Preference: The Continued Relevance of the Congressional Black Caucus’. Politics & Policy 39.3 (2011): 421–439. Web.

Kinyondo, Abel, and Riccardo Pelizzo. ‘Strengthening Legislatures: Some Lessons from the Pacific Region’. Politics & Policy 41.3 (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12020/abstract>.

Kitschelt, H. ‘Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities’. Comparative Political Studies 33.6–7 (2000): 845–879. Web.

Kittilson, Miki Caul. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Parliaments and legislatures. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006. Print.

Knut Heidar, and R. A Koole. ‘Approaches to the Study of Parliamentary Party Groups’. Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies: Political Parties behind Closed Doors. Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science. London: Routledge, 2000. 4–22. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=62059f7c-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Kölln, Ann-Kristin. ‘The Value of Political Parties to Representative Democracy’. European Political Science Review (2014): 1–21. Web.

Kopecky, Petr. ‘Introduction: Transition, Consolidation and Parliamentary Institutionalisation’. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. 1–21. Print.

Kopecky, Petr. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. Print.

Krehbiel, Keith. ‘Paradoxes of Parties in Congress’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24.1 (1999): 31–64. Print.

Kreppel, A. ‘Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence’. Comparative Political Studies 35.7 (2002): 784–813. Web.

Kreppel, Amie. ‘Legislatures’. Comparative Politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 113–130. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=595f1cd2-4d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Typologies and Classifications’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-032>.

Krook, M. L. ‘Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis’. Comparative Political Studies 47.9 (2014): 1268–1293. Web.

Krook, Mona Lena. ‘Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis’. European Journal of Political Research 46.3 (2007): 367–394. Web.

Krook, Mona Lena, and Pippa Norris. ‘Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office’. Political Studies 62.1 (2014): 2–20. Web.

Kunicova, J., and T. F. Remington. ‘Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003’. Party Politics 14.5 (2008): 555–574. Web.

Landman, Todd. ‘Comparing Many Countries’. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2003. 51–65. Print.

---. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. Fourth edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4756274>.

Laver, M. ‘Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context’. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.

Laver, Michael. ‘Divided Parties, Divided Government’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24.1 (1999): 5–29. Print.

Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth A. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Print.

Lawrence, E., T. Donovan, and S. Bowler. ‘The Adoption of Direct Primaries in the United States’. Party Politics 19.1 (2013): 3–18. Web.

‘Legislative Studies Quarterly ’. n. pag. Print.

‘Legislative Studies Quarterly - Special Issue on Representative Roles’. 4.4 485–655. Print.

‘Legislative Studies Section | The American Political Science Association’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://legislativestudies.org/>.

Leston-Bandeira, C. ‘Dissent in a Party-Based Parliament: The Portuguese Case’. Party Politics 15.6 (2009): 695–713. Web.

Leston-Bandeira, Cristina. ‘The Portuguese Parliament during the First Two Decades of Democracy’. West European Politics 24.1 (2001): 137–156. Web.

Levmore, Saul. ‘Bicameralism: When Are Two Decisions Better than One?’ International Review of Law and Economics 12.2 (1992): 145–162. Web.

Liebert, Ulrike, and Maurizio Cotta. ‘Parliament as a Central Site in Democratic Consolidation’. Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. London: Pinter, 1990. 3–30. Print.

Lijphart, A. ‘Executive-Legislative Relations’. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. London: Yale University Press, 1999. Print.

---. ‘Presidentialism and Majoritarian Democracy’. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Vol. 1: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994. Print.

Lijphart, Arend. ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method’. The American Political Science Review 65.3 (1971): 682–693. Print.

---. ‘Introduction ’. Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 1–27. Print.

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press, 2012. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt32bg23>.

Lijphart, Arendt. ‘The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research’. Comparative political studies 8.2 (1975): 158–177. Web. <http://cps.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/8/2/158.full.pdf html>.

Linz, J. J. ‘The Virtues of Parliamentarism’. Journal of Democracy 1.4 (1990): 84–91. Print.

Linz, J.J. ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’. Journal of Democracy 1.1 (1990): 51–69. Print.

Llanos, Mariana, and Detlef Nolte. ‘Bicameralism in the Americas: Around the Extremes of Symmetry and Incongruence’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9.3 (2003): 54–86. Web.

Loewenberg, G., and S. C. Patterson. ‘Linkage’. Comparing Legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1979. Print.

Loewenberg, Gerhard. ‘Agenda-Setting in the German Bundestag: Origins and Consequences of Party Dominance’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9.3 (2003): 17–31. Web.

---. On Legislatures: The Puzzle of Representation. On politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2011. Print.

Loewenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel Charles. Comparing Legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1979. Print.

---. Comparing Legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1979. Print.

---. ‘Functions of Legislatures’. Comparing Legislatures. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1979. Print.

Lovenduski, Joni. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Print.

Loxbo, K. ‘The Fate of Intra-Party Democracy: Leadership Autonomy and Activist Influence in the Mass Party and the Cartel Party’. Party Politics 19.4 (2013): 537–554. Web.

Luciano Bardi. ‘Special Issue of Party Politics on Political Party Change’. 20 151–159. Web. <http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/20/2.toc>.

Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=197447&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site&amp;custid=s8454451>.

Lundell, Krister. ‘Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective’. Party Politics 10.1 (2004): 25–47. Web.

Luther, Kurt Richard and Muller-Rommel, Ferdinand. Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print.

Lyne, Mona M. ‘Proffering Pork: How Party Leaders Build Party Reputations in Brazil’. American Journal of Political Science 52.2 (2008): 290–303. Web.

M. Brito Vieira, and D. Runciman. ‘Representing Individuals’. Representation. Key concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008. 66–83. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c5a29a2f-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

M. S., Shugart. ‘Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations’. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.

Maddison, Sarah. ‘White Parliament, Black Politics: The Dilemmas of Indigenous Parliamentary Representation’. Australian Journal of Political Science 45.4 (2010): 663–680. Web.

Mainwaring, S. ‘Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination’. Comparative Political Studies 26.2 (1993): 198–228. Web.

Mainwaring, Scott. ‘Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America : Rethinking the Terms of the Debate’. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 12–54. Print.

Mainwaring, Scott. ‘Presidentialism in Latin America’. Latin American Research Review 25.1 (1995): 157–179. Print.

Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174800>.

Mair, Peter. ‘The Challenge to Party Government’. West European Politics 31.1–2 (2008): 211–234. Web.

Mair, Peter. The West European Party System. Oxford readings in politics and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Print.

Mair, Peter, and Richard Katz. ‘Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State’. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage Publications, 1994. 1–22. Print.

‘Making an Impact: Effective Parliamentary Committees | Global Partners Governance’. N.p., 2014. Web. <http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/making-an-impact-effective-parliamentary-committees/>.

Manning, N, and R Stapenhurst. ‘Strengthening Oversight by Legislatures’. 2002. Web. <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/11336/267480premnote74.pdf?sequence=1>.

Manow, Philip, and Simone Burkhart. ‘Legislative Self-Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976-2002’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32.2 (2007): 167–191. Web.

Mansbridge, Jane. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”’. The Journal of Politics 61.03 (1999): n. pag. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2647821>.

Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford Scholarship, 2011. Web.

Martin, Shane. ‘Committees’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-006>.

Martin, Shane. ‘Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case’. Political Studies 59.2 (2011): 472–488. Web.

Martin, Shane, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare Strøm, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford handbooks in politics&international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

Martin, Shane, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. ‘Introduction’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-001>.

Mateo Diaz, Mercedes. Representing Women?: Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. ECPR monographs. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005. Print.

Matland, Richard E. ‘Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23.1 (1998): 109–125. Print.

Matland, Richard E. and Montgomery, Kathleen A. Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. Gender and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.

Matthews, Donald R. and Valen, Henry. Parliamentary Representation: The Case of the Norwegian Storting. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus [Ohio]: Ohio State University Press, 1999. Print.

Mattson, I., and K. Strom. ‘Committee Effects on Legislation’. Patterns of Parliamentary Behavior: Passage of Legislation across Western Europe. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 2004. 91–111. Print.

May, John D. ‘Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity’. Political Studies 21.2 (1973): 135–151. Web.

Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale studies in political science. London: Yale University Press, 1974. Print.

McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry. Congress: Structure and Policy. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Print.

McGhee, Eric et al. ‘A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology’. American Journal of Political Science 58.2 (2014): 337–351. Web.

McKenzie, Robert. ‘Power in the Labour Party: The Issue of Intra-Party Democracy’. The Politics of the Labour Party. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982. 191–201. Print.

Mendelberg, Tali, Christopher F. Karpowitz, and Nicholas Goedert. ‘Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation’. American Journal of Political Science 58.2 (2014): 291–306. Web.

Messick, R. ‘Strengthening Legislatures: Implications from Industrial Countries’. 2002. Web. <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/11354/multi0page.pdf?sequence=1>.

Mezey, M. ‘Classifying Legislatures’. Legislatures. Oxford readings in politics and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. 149–176. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2cdbbe02-4d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Mezey, M. ‘Classifying Legislatures’. Comparative Legislatures. Publications of the Consortium for Comparative Legislative Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1979. 149–176. Print.

---. ‘Defining the Legislature’. Comparative Legislatures. Publications of the Consortium for Comparative Legislative Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1979. 3–20. Print.

Mezey, M. L. ‘Executive-Legislative Relations’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

---. ‘Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance’. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Centennial ed. London: W.W. Norton, 2002. Print.

Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press, 1962. Print.

Mikulska, Anna B., and Susan E. Scarrow. ‘Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20.3 (2010): 311–333. Web.

Minta, Michael. ‘Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34.2 (2009): 193–218. Web.

Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. ‘Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19.1 (1994): 5–32. Print.

Mona Lena Krook. ‘International Political Science Review’. 35 3–11. Web. <http://ips.sagepub.com/content/35/1.toc>.

Money, Jeannette, and Tsebelis, George. ‘Cicero’s Puzzle: Upper House Power in Comparative Perspective ’. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 13.1 (1992): 25–43. Print.

Monk, David. ‘A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Committees in Westminster Parliaments’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.1 (2010): 1–13. Web.

Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Print.

Mughan, Anthony and Patterson, Samuel Charles. Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999. Print.

---. Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999. Print.

Muller, Wolfgang C. and Saalfeld, Thomas. Members of Parliament in Western Europe: Roles and Behaviour. Library of legislative studies. London: F. Cass, 1997. Print.

Müller, Wolfgang C., and Ulrich Sieberer. ‘Procedure and Rules in Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-023>.

Murray, R. ‘How Parties Evaluate Compulsory Quotas: A Study of the Implementation of the “Parity” Law in France’. Parliamentary Affairs 60.4 (2007): 568–584. Web.

Murray, Rainbow. ‘Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All’. American Political Science Review 108.03 (2014): 520–532. Web.

Musolf, Lloyd D., Kornberg, Allan, and American Society for Public Administration. Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Comparative Administration Group series. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1970. Print.

Narud, Hanne Marthe, Pedersen, Mogens N., and Valen, Henry. Party Sovereignty and Citizen Control: Selecting Candidates for Parliamentary Elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. University of Southern Denmark studies in history and social sciences. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 2002. Print.

Nassmacher, Hiltrud. ‘The Dilemma of Depth Versus Breadth in Comparing Political Systems Empirically...and How to Overcome It’. European Political Science 7.1 (2008): 113–125. Web.

Nijzink, Lia, Shaheen Mozaffar, and Elisabete Azevedo. ‘Parliaments and the Enhancement of Democracy on the African Continent: An Analysis of Institutional Capacity and Public Perceptions’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12.3–4 (2006): 311–335. Web.

Norris , Pippa . ‘Introduction: Theories of Recruitment’. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 1–14. Print.

---. ‘Legislative Recruitment’. Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspectives. London: Sage Publications, 1996. 184–215. Print.

Norris, P. ‘May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties’. Party Politics 1.1 (1995): 29–47. Web.

Norris, P., and J. Lovenduski. ‘Comparative Candidate Recruitment’. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 183–205. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cfbd0a7c-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Norris, Pippa. ‘Constituency Service’. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 230–246. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780511313615>.

Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.

Norris, Pippa. ‘The Puzzle of Constituency Service’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 3.2 (1997): 29–49. Web.

Norris, Pippa, and Joni Lovenduski. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598609>.

Norton, P. ‘Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis’. Parliaments in Western Europe. London: Cass, 1990. Print.

---. ‘Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7.3 (2001): 13–33. Web.

Norton, Philip. ‘How Many Bicameral Legislatures Are There?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies 10.4 (2004): 1–9. Web.

---. ‘Introduction: Linking Parliaments and Citizens’. Parliaments and Citizens in Western Europe. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe. London: Frank Cass, 2002. 1–18. Print.

Norton, Philip. Legislatures. Oxford readings in politics and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Print.

---. Legislatures and Legislators. The international library of politics and comparative government. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998. Print.

Norton, Philip. Parliament in British Politics. 2nd ed. Contemporary political studies series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://read.kortext.com/reader/pdf/616520/Cover>.

Norton, Philip. Parliaments and Citizens in Western Europe. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe. London: Frank Cass, 2002. Print.

---. Parliaments in Western Europe. London: Cass, 1990. Print.

Norton, Philip . ‘Introduction: The Institution of Parliaments’. Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe. London: Frank Cass, 1998. 1–15. Print.

Norton, Philip and Ahmed, Nizam U. Parliaments in Asia. The library of legislative studies. London: Frank Cass, 1999. Print.

Norton, Philip, and Cristina Leston-Bandeira. ‘The Impact of Democratic Practice on the Parliaments of Southern Europe’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9.2 (2003): 177–185. Web.

Norton, Philip, and David M. Olson. ‘Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Legislatures: Beyond Transition’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13.1 (2007): 1–11. Web.

Olivella, Santiago, and Margit Tavits. ‘Legislative Effects of Electoral Mandates’. British Journal of Political Science 44.02 (2014): 301–321. Web.

Olson, D. ‘Legislatures in Today’s Democracies’. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Comparative politics series. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1994. Print.

Olson, D. M. ‘The Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of Central Europe’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

Olson, David. ‘Legislatures in the Policy Process’. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Comparative politics series. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1994. Print.

Olson, David M. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Comparative politics series. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1994. Print.

Olson, David M. , and Lawrence D. Longley. Two into One: The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. San Francisco: Westview Press, 1991. Print.

Olson, David M. and Crowther, William E. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press, 2002. Print.

Olson, David M., and Michael L. Mezey, eds. Legislatures in the Policy Process: The Dilemmas of Economic Policy. Advances in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521621>.

Olson, David M. and Norton, Philip. The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. London: Frank Cass, 1996. Print.

Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2000. Print.

---. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Parliaments and legislatures series. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2000. Print.

‘Overseas Development Institute - Parliamentary Strengthening and the Paris Principles’. N.p., 2007. Print.

Owens, John E., and Burdett A. Loomis. ‘Qualified Exceptionalism: The US Congress in Comparative Perspective’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12.3–4 (2006): 258–290. Web.

Ozbudun, Ergun. Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Causal Analysis. Sage professional papers in comparative politics. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1970. Print.

Pakenham, R. A. ‘Legislatures and Political Development’. Legislatures. Oxford readings in politics and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. Print.

Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge studies in modern political economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Print.

‘Paper 1. Why Engage With Parliaments? International Assistance and Parliamentary Strengthening - an Overview. | Global Partners Governance’. N.p., 2013. Web. <https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CDgQw7AJahcKEwjw2uOtmdKAAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fgpgovernance.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FGuide-to-Parliaments.-Paper-1.pdf&amp;psig=AOvVaw3qh0yqgQDD4CcEMTpN4yDy&amp;ust=1691760564108513&amp;opi=89978449>.

‘Paper 2. How Parliaments Work: Parliamentary Processes and Procedures. | Global Partners Governance’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://gpgovernance.net/publications/guide-to-parliaments-paper-2-how-parliaments-work-parliamentary-processes-and-procedures/>.

‘Paper 4. Show Me the Money. Improving Financial Oversight. | Global Partners Governance’. N.p., 2014. Web. <http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/paper-4-show-me-the-money/>.

‘Parliamentary Affairs ’. n. pag. Print.

‘Parliamentary Questions’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17.3 (2011): 259–270. Web. <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fjls20/17/3?nav=tocList>.

‘Parliamentary Strengthening: Government Response to the International Development Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2014-15’. N.p., 2015. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/1125/112504.htm#a2>.

‘Parliaments Specialist Group | The Political Studies Association (PSA)’. The Political Studies Association (PSA), n.d. Web. <https://psaparliaments.org/>.

‘Party Politics’. n. pag. Print.

‘Party Politics - Special Issue on Candidate Selection’. 7.3 (2001): n. pag. Print.

Patapan, Haig, Wanna, John, and Weller, Patrick Moray. Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia and the Pacific. ANZOG program on government, politics and public management. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2005. Print.

Patterson, Samuel Charles and Copeland, Gary W. Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994. Print.

Patzelt, Werner J. ‘Recruitment and Retention in Western European Parliaments’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24.2 (1999): 239–279. Print.

Paxton, Pamela, and Melanie M. Hughes. ‘The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990-2010’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40.3 (2015): 331–362. Web.

Pearson, Kathryn, and Logan Dancey. ‘Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era’. Politics & Gender 7.04 (2011): 493–519. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/speaking-for-the-underrepresented-in-the-house-of-representatives-voicing-womens-interests-in-a-partisan-era/C4DFA00F057A8DCEBDE3579147132CD7>.

Pedersen, Helene Helboe. ‘Differences and Changes in Danish Party Organisations: Central Party Organisation versus Parliamentary Party Group Power’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.2 (2010): 233–250. Web.

Pelizzo, Riccardo and Stapenhurst, Frederick. ‘Legislative Oversight Tools’. Parliamentary Oversight Tools: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge research in comparative politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. 28-56-157–159. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=78bb01cd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Pelizzo, Riccardo, and Abel Kinyondo. ‘Public Accounts Committees in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis’. Politics & Policy 42.1 (2014): 77–102. Web.

Pettitt, Robin T. Contemporary Party Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Print.

Phillips , Anne . ‘Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should It Matter Who Our Representatives Are?’ Feminism and Politics. Oxford readings in feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 224–240. Print.

Phillips, Anne. The Politics of Presence. Oxford University Press, 1998. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294158.001.0001/acprof-9780198294153>.

Piscopo, J. M. ‘Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates’. Parliamentary Affairs 64.3 (2011): 448–472. Web.

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972. Print.

Pitkin, Hannah. ‘The Mandate-Independence Controversy’. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972. Print.

Polsby, N. ‘The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives’. Legislatures and Legislators. The international library of politics and comparative government. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998. 76–101. Print.

Polsby, Nelson. ‘Legislatures’. Handbook of Political Science. Oxford readings in politics and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. Print.

Power, Greg. ‘Annex to the IPU’s Global Parliamentary Report’. Web. <http://www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/gpr2012-full-e.pdf>.

---. ‘Global Parliamentary Report: The Changing Nature of Parliamentary Representation’. 2012. Web. <http://www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/gpr2012-full-e.pdf>.

---. ‘The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding Political Incentives and Institutional Behaviour in Parliamentary Support Strategies’. 2011. Web. <http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/the-politics-of-parliamentary-strengthening/>.

Power, Timothy J. and Rae, Nicol C. Exporting Congress?: The Influence of the U.S. Congress on World Legislatures. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006. Print.

Przeworski, Adam, Tamar Asadurian, and Anjali Thomas Bohlken. ‘The Origins of Parliamentary Responsibility’. Comparative Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/comparative-constitutional-design/origins-of-parliamentary-responsibility/6E5F94D8066519887516B9F5E1B075F3>.

R. Dalton, D. Farrell, and I. McAllister. ‘Party Policies and Policy Outputs’. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 193–212. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199599356.001.0001/acprof-9780199599356>.

Rahat, G. ‘Determinants of Party Cohesion: Evidence from the Case of the Israeli Parliament’. Parliamentary Affairs 60.2 (2007): 279–296. Web.

Rahat, Gideon. ‘Which Candidate Selection Method Is the Most Democratic?’ Government and Opposition 44.1 (2009): 68–90. Web.

Rahman, Taiabur. Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Routledge advances in South Asian studies series. London: Routledge, 2008. Print.

---. Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Routledge advances in South Asian studies series. London: Routledge, 2008. Print.

Rai, S. M. ‘Political Representation, Democratic Institutions and Women’s Empowerment: The Quota’. Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World. Routledge/Warwick studies in globalisation. London: Routledge, 2002. 133–146. Print.

Rasch, Bjørn Erik. ‘Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-Setting’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-010>.

Rasch, Bjorn Erik. ‘Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25.1 (2000): 3–23. Print.

‘Regional & Federal Studies (Special Issue: Constituency Representation, Devolution and MMP Electoral Systems: Comparative and UK Perspectives)’. 17.1 (2007): n. pag. Print.

Remington, Thomas F. Parliaments in Transition: The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSR and Eastern Europe. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994. Print.

‘Report from the UK House of Commons International Development Committee on Parliamentary Strengthening’. N.p., 2015. Web. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/704/704.pdf#>.

‘Research and Education – Parliament of Australia’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education>.

REYNOLDS, ANDREW. ‘Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective’. American Political Science Review 107.02 (2013): 259–274. Web.

Reynolds, Andrew. ‘Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Research Note’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30.2 (2005): 301–310. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598674>.

Rhodes, R. A. W., Sarah A. Binder, and Bert A. Rockman. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.001.0001>.

Rich, Timothy S. ‘Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39.1 (2014): 113–135. Web.

Richard L. Hall. ‘Measuring Legislative Influence’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17.2 (1992): 205–231. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/440058>.

Riggs, Fred W. ‘Presidentialism versus Parliamentarism: Implications for Representativeness and Legitimacy ’. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 18.3 (1997): 253–278. Print.

Riker, William H. ‘The Justification of Bicameralism’. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 13.1 (1992): 101–116. Print.

Roberts, A., J. Seawright, and J. Cyr. ‘Do Electoral Laws Affect Women’s Representation?’ Comparative Political Studies 46.12 (2013): 1555–1581. Web.

Roberts, Jason. ‘The Statistical Analysis Of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32.3 (2007): 341–360. Web.

Rogers, J. R. ‘An Informational Rationale for Congruent Bicameralism’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13.2 (2001): 123–151. Web.

Rolef, Susan Hattis. ‘Defining the Job of the Member of the Knesset’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20.4 (2014): 588–607. Web.

Roller, E. ‘Reforming the Spanish Senate: Mission Impossible?’ West European Politics 25.4 (2002): 69–92. Web.

Rose, Richard. Do Parties Make a Difference? Expanded 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1984. Print.

Rosenblum, Nancy L. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008. Print.

Ruedin, Didier. Why Aren’t They There?: The Political Representation of Women, Ethnic Groups and Issue Positions in Legislatures. ECPR monographs. Colchester: Ecpr Press, 2013. Print.

Ruland, Jurgen and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Parliaments and Political Change in Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2005. Print.

Rush, Michael. Parliament Today. Politics today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005. Print.

Russell, M. ‘Parliamentary Party Cohesion: Some Explanations from Psychology’. Party Politics 20.5 (2014): 712–723. Web.

---. ‘What Are Second Chambers For?’ Parliamentary Affairs 54.3 (2001): 442–458. Web. <https://academic.oup.com/pa/article-abstract/54/3/442/1461945?redirectedFrom=PDF>.

Russell, M., D. Gover, and K. Wollter. ‘Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process?: Six Reasons for Doubt’. Parliamentary Affairs (2015): n. pag. Web.

Russell, Meg. Bicameralism in Theory & Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671564.001.0001>.

---. ‘Elected Second Chambers and Their Powers: An International Survey’. The Political Quarterly 83.1 (2012): 117–129. Web.

---. ‘Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 19.3 (2013): 370–391. Web.

---. ‘Selection under Blair’. Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 67–95. Print.

Russell, Meg, and Meghan Benton. ‘Assessing the Policy Impact of Parliament: Methodological Challenges and Possible Future Approaches’. 2009. Web. <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b191/3bce50cbc3ed8780ac51a8f13b9d1b89d585.pdf>.

---. ‘(Re)Assessing Parliamentary Policy Impact: The Case of the Australian Senate’. Australian Journal of Political Science 45.2 (2010): 159–174. Web.

Russell, Meg, Paun, Akash, and University College, London. ‘The House Rules? International Lessons for Enhancing the Autonomy of the House of Commons’. 2007. Web. <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/publications/unit-publications/142.pdf>.

Russell, Meg, and Mark Sandford. ‘Why Are Second Chambers so Difficult to Reform?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies 8.3 (2002): 79–89. Web. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/714003926>.

Russo, Federico, and Matti Wiberg. ‘Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.2 (2010): 215–232. Web.

Saalfeld, T. ‘Legislative Voting Behaviour’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

Saalfeld, Thomas. ‘Rational-Choice Theory in Legislative Studies: Models of Politics without Romanticism’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 1.1 (1995): 32–64. Web.

Saalfeld, Thomas, and Kaare W. Strøm. ‘Political Parties and Legislators’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-022>.

Saiegh, Sebastian M. ‘LawMaking’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-012>.

Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. African Parliaments: Between Governance and Government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.

---. African Parliaments: Between Governance and Government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.

Salmond, Rob. ‘Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Mass Political Engagement’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20.3 (2014): 321–341. Web.

---. ‘Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31.2 (2006): 175–204. Web.

Santiso, C. ‘Legislatures and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Finance Accountability in Emerging Economies’. Journal on Budgeting 4.2 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43488676.pdf>.

Sartori , Giovanni. ‘Presidentialism’. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1997. 83–100. Print.

Sartori, Giovanni. ‘Compare Why and How’. Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. 14–34. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2938f567-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Sartori, Giovanni. ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’. The American Political Science Review 64.4 (1970): 1033–1053. Print.

---. ‘Problems with Parliamentary Systems’. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press, 1997. Print.

Sartori, Giovanni . ‘Compare Why and How’. Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. Print.

Sater, James N. ‘Changing Politics from Below? Women Parliamentarians in Morocco’. Democratization 14.4 (2007): 723–742. Web.

Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P., and Farrell, D. M. ‘From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties’. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford scholarship online. [Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2002. Print.

Scarrow, Susan E. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661862.001.0001>.

---. Parties and Their Members : Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.

Schick, A. ‘Can National Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budget Policy?’ Journal on Budgeting 1.3 (2002): n. pag. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43514045.pdf>.

Schleiter, Petra, and Edward Morgan-Jones. ‘Review Article: Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz’. British Journal of Political Science 39.04 (2009): n. pag. Web.

Schneider, Monica C., and Angela L. Bos. ‘Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians’. Political Psychology 35.2 (2014): 245–266. Web.

Schuler, Paul, and Edmund Malesky. ‘Authoritarian Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. N.p., 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-004>.

Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. ‘Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34.1 (2009): 5–28. Web.

Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. ‘Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators’. American Journal of Political Science 50.3 (2006): 570–585. Web.

Searing, D. ‘Backbench and Leadership Roles in The House of Commons’. Parliamentary Affairs 48.3 (1995): 418–437. Print.

Searing, Donald D. . ‘Introduction: Roles, Rules and Rationality’. Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1994. 1–30. Print.

Shankar, B. L. and Rodrigues, Valerian. The Indian Parliament: A Democracy at Work. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.

Shaw, E. ‘New Labour: New Pathways to Parliament’. Parliamentary Affairs 54.1 (2001): 35–53. Web.

Shaw, M. ‘Legislative Committees’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

Shaw, Malcolm . ‘Parliamentary Committees: A Global Perspective’. The New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. The library of legislative studies. London: Frank Cass, 1998. 225–251. Print.

Shaw, Malcolm N., and Lees, J. D. Committees in Legislatures. N.p., 1979. Print.

Shaw, Malcolm N. and Lees, John D. Committees in Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis. [Durham, N.C.]: Duke University Press, 1979. Print.

Shell, D. ‘Second Chambers’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

Shephard, Mark, and Paul Cairney. ‘The Impact of the Scottish Parliament in Amending Executive Legislation’. Political Studies 53.2 (2005): 303–319. Web.

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R. ‘Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19.2 (1994): 149–179. Print.

Shomer, Y. ‘Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior’. Comparative Political Studies 42.7 (2009): 945–970. Web.

---. ‘What Affects Candidate Selection Processes? A Cross-National Examination’. Party Politics 20.4 (2014): 533–546. Web.

Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John M. Carey. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988>.

Siaroff, Alan. ‘Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies’. International Political Science Review 24.4 (2003): 445–464. Web.

Sieberer, U. ‘Using MP Statements to Explain Voting Behaviour in the German Bundestag: An Individual Level Test of the Competing Principals Theory’. Party Politics 21.2 (2015): 284–294. Web.

Sieberer, Ulrich. ‘Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12.2 (2006): 150–178. Web.

Skjaeveland, Asbjorn. ‘A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle’. Scandinavian Political Studies 22.2 (1999): 121–136. Web.

---. ‘Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7.2 (2001): 35–56. Web.

Soroka, Stuart, Erin Penner, and Kelly Blidook. ‘Constituency Influence in Parliament’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42.03 (2009): n. pag. Web.

---. ‘Constituency Influence in Parliament’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42.03 (2009): n. pag. Web.

Spies, D. C., and A. Kaiser. ‘Does the Mode of Candidate Selection Affect the Representativeness of Parties?’ Party Politics (2012): n. pag. Web.

Stapenhurst, et al., Rick. Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective. N.p., 2008. Web. <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/6547/456270PUB0Box3101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf?sequence=1>.

Stepan, Alfred, and Cindy Skach. ‘Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism’. World Politics 46.1 (1993): n. pag. Web.

Stockemer, Daniel. ‘Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments’. Political Studies 59.3 (2011): 693–712. Web.

Stokes, S. C. ‘Political Parties and Democracy’. Annual Review of Political Science 2.1 (1999): 243–267. Web.

Stratmann , Thomas, and Baur , Martin. ‘Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems’. American Journal of Political Science 46.3 (2002): 506–514. Print.

Strom, K. ‘Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions’. Comparative Political Studies 17.2 (1984): 199–227. Web.

Strom, Kaare. ‘Rules, Reasons and Routines: Legislative Roles in Parliamentary Democracies’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 3.1 (1997): 155–174. Web.

Strøm, Kaare, Torbjörn Bergman, and Wolfgang C. Müller. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print.

Swenden, Wilfried. Federalism and Second Chambers: Regional Representation in Parliamentary Federations : The Australian Senate and German Bundesrat Compared. Regionalism&federalism. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang, 2004. Print.

Swers, Michele L. ‘Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 23.3 (1998): n. pag. Print.

---. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002. Print.

Tate, Katherine. ‘The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 26.4 (2001): n. pag. Print.

Tavits, M. ‘Effect of Local Ties On Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour: The Case of Estonia’. Party Politics 16.2 (2009): 215–235. Web.

---. ‘The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection’. Comparative Political Studies 42.6 (2009): 793–815. Web.

Tavits, Margit. ‘Power within Parties: The Strength of the Local Party and MP Independence in Postcommunist Europe’. American Journal of Political Science 55.4 (2011): 923–936. Web.

Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M. ‘Gender and Legislatures’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-009>.

‘The Difficult Development of Parliamentary Politics in the Gulf: Parliaments and the Process of Managed Reform in Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman | Global Partners Governance’. N.p., 2012. Web. <http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/politics-in-gulf/>.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies’. n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies ’. 8.3 (2002): n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Legislatures and Executives: An Investigation into the Relationship at the Heart of Government’. 10.2–3 (2004): n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Post-Communist Parliaments: Change and Stability in the Second Decade’. 17.2 (2011): n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Second Chambers’. N.p., 2001. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Southern European Parliaments in Democracy’. 9.2 (2003): n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on The Uneasy Relationship Between Parliamentary Members and Leaders’. 5.3/4 (1999): 1–332. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures: Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance)’. 9.4 (2003): n. pag. Print.

‘The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Comparing and Classifying Legislatures)’. 12.3–4 (2006): n. pag. Print.

‘The Parliamentarian - The Journal of Commonwealth Parliamentarians and Legislatures’. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association n. pag. Web. <https://www.cpahq.org/knowledge-centre/the-parliamentarian/>.

Thomassen, Jacques, and Peter Esaiasson. ‘Role Orientations of Members of Parliament’. Acta Politica 41.3 (2006): 217–231. Web.

Thompson, L. ‘More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons’. Parliamentary Affairs 66.3 (2013): 459–479. Web.

Tobin Grant, J., and Thomas J. Rudolph. ‘The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29.3 (2004): 431–445. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598561>.

Tremblay, Manon. ‘Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis’. Democratization 14.4 (2007): 533–553. Web.

Tremblay, Manon, Trimble, Linda J., and Sawer, Marian. Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. Routledge research in comparative politics. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Tsebelis, George. ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism’. British Journal of Political Science 25.03 (1995): n. pag. Web.

---. ‘Governments and Parliaments’. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Princeton University Press, 2002. Print.

Tsebelis, George, and Jeannette Money. Bicameralism. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609350>.

Tsebelis, George and Russell Sage Foundation. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Princeton University Press, 2002. Print.

Uhr, John. Deliberative Democracy in Australia: The Changing Place of Parliament. Reshaping Australian institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Print.

---. ‘How Democratic Is Parliament?’ 2005 : n. pag. Print.

‘UK Parliament’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.parliament.uk/>.

Urbinati, Nadia. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2006. Print.

van Biezen, I. ‘On the Internal Balance of Party Power: Party Organizations in New Democracies’. Party Politics 6.4 (2000): 395–417. Web.

Vatter, Adrian. ‘Bicameralism and Policy Performance: The Effects of Cameral Structure in Comparative Perspective’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 11.2 (2005): 194–215. Web.

Vivyan, Nick, and Markus Wagner. ‘Do Voters Reward Rebellion? The Electoral Accountability of MPs in Britain’. European Journal of Political Research 51.2 (2012): 235–264. Web.

Vliegenthart, R., and S. Walgrave. ‘Content Matters: The Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark’. Comparative Political Studies 44.8 (2011): 1031–1059. Web.

Wangnerud, Lena. ‘Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag’. Scandinavian Political Studies 23.1 (2000): 67–91. Web.

---. ‘Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation’. Annual Review of Political Science 12.1 (2009): 51–69. Web. <https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839>.

Ward, H. ‘Rational Choice’. Theory and Methods in Political Science. 3rd ed. Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Print.

Ware, Alan. ‘Party Organizations’. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. 93–123. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ffbe153-4d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘The Selection of Candidates and Leaders’. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. Print.

Wehner, Joachim. ‘Back from the Sidelines? Redefining the Contribution of Legislatures to the Budget Cycle’. World Bank Institute 2006. Web. <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/06/23/000009486_20040623161800/Rendered/PDF/286150Sidelines0WBI0WP.pdf>.

---. ‘Legislatures and Public Finance’. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199653010-e-017>.

Weldon, S. Laurel. ‘Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking’. The Journal of Politics 64.04 (2008): n. pag. Web.

Whiteley, P. F. ‘Is the Party over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World’. Party Politics 17.1 (2010): 21–44. Web.

Whitmore, Sarah. ‘Challenges and Constraints for Post-Soviet Committees: Exploring the Impact of Parties on Committees in Ukraine’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12.1 (2006): 32–53. Web.

Wiberg, Matti. ‘Chapter 6 Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication?’ Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Ed. Herbert Doring. University of Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), 1995. Web. <https://www.uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin01/projects/vergleichende-politikwissenschaft/D%C3%B6ring/PMR-W-Europe.pdf>.

Williams, Melissa S. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Print.

Wood, D. M. ‘Legislators and Constituents’. World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998. Print.

‘World Bank Parliamentary Strengthening Programme’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/parliament.pdf>.

Wüst, Andreas M. ‘A Lasting Impact? On the Legislative Activities of Immigrant-Origin Parliamentarians in Germany’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20.4 (2014): 495–515. Web.

Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. N.p., 2000. Print.

Zucchini, Francesco. ‘Government Alternation and Legislative Agenda Setting’. European Journal of Political Research 50.6 (2011): 749–774. Web.