1.
Loewenberg, Gerhard & Patterson, Samuel Charles. Comparing Legislatures. (University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1979).
2.
Olson, David M. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. vol. Comparative politics series (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 1994).
3.
Norton, Philip. Legislatures and Legislators. vol. The international library of politics and comparative government (Ashgate, Aldershot, 1998).
4.
Norton, Philip. Legislatures. vol. Oxford readings in politics and government (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990).
5.
Norton, Philip. Parliaments in Western Europe. (Cass, London, 1990).
6.
Patterson, Samuel Charles & Copeland, Gary W. Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions. (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1994).
7.
Loewenberg, G. On Legislatures: The Puzzle of Representation. vol. On politics (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO, 2011).
8.
Fish, M. Steven & Kroenig, Matthew. The Handbook of National Legislatures: A Global Survey. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009).
9.
The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. vol. Oxford handbooks in politics&international relations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014).
10.
Davidson, Roger H. The Postreform Congress. (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1992).
11.
McCubbins, Mathew D. & Sullivan, Terry. Congress: Structure and Policy. vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
12.
Dodd, Lawrence C. Thinking about Congress: Essays on Congressional Change. (Routledge, London, 2012).
13.
Power, Timothy J. & Rae, Nicol C. Exporting Congress?: The Influence of the U.S. Congress on World Legislatures. (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006).
14.
Norton, P. Parliament in British Politics. vol. Contemporary political studies series (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2013).
15.
Rush, Michael. Parliament Today. vol. Politics today (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2005).
16.
Kopecky, Petr. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2001).
17.
Olson, David M. & Norton, Philip. The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. (Frank Cass, London, 1996).
18.
Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, 2000).
19.
Uhr, John. Deliberative Democracy in Australia: The Changing Place of Parliament. vol. Reshaping Australian institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
20.
Bach, S. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Parliament of Australia (Department of the Senate, Canberra, 2003).
21.
Patapan, Haig, Wanna, John, & Weller, Patrick Moray. Westminster Legacies: Democracy and Responsible Government in Asia and the Pacific. vol. ANZOG program on government, politics and public management (UNSW Press, Sydney, 2005).
22.
Norton, Philip & Ahmed, Nizam U. Parliaments in Asia. vol. The library of legislative studies (Frank Cass, London, 1999).
23.
B. L. Shankar & Valerian Rodrigues. The Indian Parliament : A Democracy at Work. (2011).
24.
Rahman, Taiabur. Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. vol. Routledge advances in South Asian studies series (Routledge, London, 2008).
25.
Ruland, Jurgen & Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Parliaments and Political Change in Asia. (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 2005).
26.
Shankar, B. L. & Rodrigues, Valerian. The Indian Parliament: A Democracy at Work. (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2011).
27.
Barkan, Joel D. Legislative Power in Emerging African Democracies. (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 2009).
28.
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. African Parliaments: Between Governance and Government. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005).
29.
Close, David. Legislatures and the New Democracies in Latin America. (L. Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 1995).
30.
Morgenstern, Scott & Nacif, Benito. Legislative Politics in Latin America. vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
31.
Esaiasson, Peter & Heidar, Knut. Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, 2000).
32.
Matthews, Donald R. & Valen, Henry. Parliamentary Representation: The Case of the Norwegian Storting. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus [Ohio], 1999).
33.
Arter, David. The Nordic Parliaments: A Comparative Analysis. (Hurst, London, 1984).
34.
Damgaard, Erik. Parliamentary Change in the Nordic Countries. vol. Scandinavian library (Scandinavian University Press, New York, 1992).
35.
Landman, T. Comparing Many Countries. in Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction 51–65 (Routledge, London, 2003).
36.
Landman, T. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, 2017).
37.
Dogan, Mattei & Pelassy, Dominique. How to Compare Nations: Strategies in Comparative Politics. (Chatham House, Chatham, N.J, 1990).
38.
Burnham, P., Gilland, K., Grant, W. & Layton-Henry, Z. Comparative Methodology. in Research methods in politics vol. Political analysis 58–79 (Palgrave, Basingstoke, 2004).
39.
Sartori, G. Compare why and how. in Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance 14–34 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1994).
40.
Sartori, G. Compare why and how. in Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance (Blackwell, Oxford, 1994).
41.
Sartori, Giovanni. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review 64, 1033–1053 (1970).
42.
Lijphart, Arendt. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative political studies 8, 158–177 (1975).
43.
Lijphart, Arend. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review 65, 682–693 (1971).
44.
Nassmacher, H. The Dilemma of Depth Versus Breadth in Comparing Political Systems Empirically...and How to Overcome It. European Political Science 7, 113–125 (2008).
45.
Legislative Studies Quarterly .
46.
The Journal of Legislative Studies.
47.
Parliamentary Affairs .
49.
The Parliamentarian - The Journal of Commonwealth Parliamentarians and Legislatures. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
50.
Constitutional and parliamentary information | ASGP. http://asgp.co/constitutional-and-parliamentary-information.
51.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU).
52.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).
53.
Research and Education – Parliament of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education.
54.
Legislative Studies Section | The American Political Science Association. http://legislativestudies.org/.
55.
Parliaments specialist group | The Political Studies Association (PSA). https://psaparliaments.org/.
56.
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. https://www.cpahq.org/.
57.
UK Parliament. http://www.parliament.uk/.
58.
Mezey, M. Defining the Legislature. in Comparative legislatures vol. Publications of the Consortium for Comparative Legislative Studies 3–20 (Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 1979).
59.
Mezey, M. Classifying legislatures. in Legislatures vol. Oxford readings in politics and government 149–176 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979).
60.
Mezey, M. Classifying Legislatures. in Comparative legislatures vol. Publications of the Consortium for Comparative Legislative Studies 149–176 (Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 1979).
61.
Norton, P. Introduction: The institution of parliaments. in Parliaments and governments in Western Europe vol. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe 1–15 (Frank Cass, London, 1998).
62.
Loewenberg, Gerhard & Patterson, Samuel Charles. Functions of Legislatures. in Comparing legislatures (University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1979).
63.
Olson, D. Legislatures in Today’s Democracies. in Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view vol. Comparative politics series (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 1994).
64.
Hague, R. & Harrop, M. Legislatures. in Comparative government and politics: an introduction vol. Comparative government and politics 247–267 (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2004).
65.
Blondel, J. Representation: legislatures and parliaments. in Comparative government: an introduction 248–266 (Pearson Education, Harlow, 1995).
66.
Paper 2. How Parliaments Work: Parliamentary processes and procedures. | Global Partners Governance. https://gpgovernance.net/publications/guide-to-parliaments-paper-2-how-parliaments-work-parliamentary-processes-and-procedures/.
67.
Kreppel, A. Legislatures. in Comparative politics 113–130 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014).
68.
Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W. Introduction. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0001.
69.
Kreppel, A. Typologies and Classifications. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0032.
70.
Copeland, G. & Patterson, S. C. Parliaments and Legislatures. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
71.
Judge, D. Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow? Government and Opposition 38, 497–516 (2003).
72.
Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A. & Rockman, B. A. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. vol. The Oxford handbooks of political science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
73.
Laver, M. Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context. in The Oxford handbook of political institutions vol. The Oxford handbooks of political science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
74.
Mezey, M. L. Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance. in Political science: the state of the discipline (W.W. Norton, London, 2002).
75.
Polsby, N. Legislatures. in Handbook of Political Science vol. Oxford readings in politics and government (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975).
76.
Power, G. Annex to the IPU’s Global Parliamentary Report.
77.
Hibbing, John R. Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science 32, 681–712 (1988).
78.
Owens, J. E. & Loomis, B. A. Qualified exceptionalism: The US Congress in comparative perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12, 258–290 (2006).
79.
Polsby, N. The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives. in Legislatures and legislators vol. The international library of politics and comparative government 76–101 (Ashgate, Aldershot, 1998).
80.
Norton, P. Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis. in Parliaments in Western Europe (Cass, London, 1990).
81.
Gamm, G. & Huber, J. Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress. in Political science: the state of the discipline (W.W. Norton, London, 2002).
82.
Przeworski, A., Asadurian, T. & Thomas Bohlken, A. The origins of parliamentary responsibility. in Comparative constitutional design (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012).
83.
Lijphart, Arend. Introduction . in Parliamentary versus presidential government 1–27 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).
84.
Elgie, R. From Linz to Tsebelis: three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization 12, 106–122 (2005).
85.
King, Anthony. Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1, (1976).
86.
M. S., S. Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. in The Oxford handbook of political institutions vol. The Oxford handbooks of political science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
87.
Sartori , G. Presidentialism. in Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes 83–100 (Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, 1997).
88.
Lijphart, A. Presidentialism and majoritarian democracy. in The failure of presidential democracy: Vol. 1: Comparative perspectives (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994).
89.
Linz, J. J. The Virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy 1, 84–91 (1990).
90.
Linz, J.J. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1, 51–69 (1990).
91.
Stepan, A. & Skach, C. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism. World Politics 46, (1993).
92.
Shugart, M. S. & Carey, J. M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
93.
Hiroi, T. & Omori, S. Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited. Democratization 16, 485–507 (2009).
94.
Bergman, Torbjorn, Muller, Wolfgang C., & Strom, Kaare. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
95.
Elgie, R. What is divided government? in Divided government in comparative perspective vol. Oxford scholarship online (Oxford Scholarship Online, [Oxford], 2001).
96.
Mezey, M. L. Executive-legislative relations. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
97.
Cheibub, J. A., Elkins, Z. & Ginsburg, T. Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 44, 515–544 (2014).
98.
David Samuels & Matthew Shugart. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. (2010).
99.
Ganghof, S. Is the ‘Constitution of Equality’ Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid? Political Studies n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12124.
100.
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Legislatures and executives: an investigation into the relationship at the heart of government. 10, (2004).
101.
Lijphart, A. Executive-legislative relations. in Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (Yale University Press, London, 1999).
102.
Tsebelis, George & Russell Sage Foundation. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. (Princeton University Press, New York, 2002).
103.
Fiorina, Morris P. & Mayhew, David R. Divided Government. vol. Longman classics in political science (Longman, London, 2003).
104.
Riggs, Fred W. Presidentialism versus Parliamentarism: Implications for Representativeness and Legitimacy . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 18, 253–278 (1997).
105.
Mainwaring, S. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 198–228 (1993).
106.
Cheibub, J. A. & Limongi, F. Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidental Democracies Reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 5, 151–179 (2002).
107.
Cheibub, Jose Antonio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
108.
Mainwaring, Scott. Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 25, 157–179 (1995).
109.
Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. vol. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
110.
Mainwaring, S. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America : rethinking the terms of the debate. in Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics 12–54 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
111.
Siaroff, A. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review 24, 445–464 (2003).
112.
Elgie, R. The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated? Democratization 15, 49–66 (2008).
113.
Schleiter, P. & Morgan-Jones, E. Review Article: Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science 39, (2009).
114.
Fukuyama, Francis, Dressel, Bjorn & Chang, Boo-Seung. Facing the Perils of Presidentialism? Journal of Democracy 16, 102–116 (2005).
115.
Huber, John D. The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. The American Political Science Review 90, 269–282 (1996).
116.
Strom, K. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 17, 199–227 (1984).
117.
Laver, Michael & Shepsle, Kenneth A. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
118.
Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. (Yale University Press, New Haven [Conn.], 2012).
119.
Russell, M. Bicameralism in Theory & Comparative Perspective. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).
120.
Russell, M. What are Second Chambers for? Parliamentary Affairs 54, 442–458 (2001).
121.
Mughan, Anthony & Patterson, Samuel Charles. Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1999).
122.
Tsebelis, G. & Money, J. Bicameralism. vol. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
123.
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Second Chambers. vol. 7 (2001).
124.
Russell, M. & Sandford, M. Why are Second Chambers so Difficult to Reform? The Journal of Legislative Studies 8, 79–89 (2002).
125.
Levmore, S. Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one? International Review of Law and Economics 12, 145–162 (1992).
126.
Tsebelis, G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25, (1995).
127.
Druckman, J. N. & Thies, M. F. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science 46, (2002).
128.
Shell, D. Second chambers. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
129.
Norton, P. How many bicameral legislatures are there? The Journal of Legislative Studies 10, 1–9 (2004).
130.
Mughan, Anthony & Patterson, Samuel Charles. Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1999).
131.
Russell, M. Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach. The Journal of Legislative Studies 19, 370–391 (2013).
132.
Russell, M. Elected Second Chambers and Their Powers: An International Survey. The Political Quarterly 83, 117–129 (2012).
133.
Coakley, J. The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 542–572 (2014).
134.
The Journal of Legislative Studies . 8, (2002).
135.
Llanos, M. & Nolte, D. Bicameralism in the Americas: around the extremes of symmetry and incongruence. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9, 54–86 (2003).
136.
Roller, E. Reforming the Spanish Senate: Mission Impossible? West European Politics 25, 69–92 (2002).
137.
Hiroi, T. The Dynamics of Lawmaking in a Bicameral Legislature: The Case of Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 41, 1583–1606 (2008).
138.
Bean, C. & Wattenberg, M. Attitudes Towards Divided Government and Ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States. Australian Journal of Political Science 33, 25–36 (1998).
139.
Goot, M. Whose Mandate? Policy Promises, Strong Bicameralism and Polled Opinion. Australian Journal of Political Science 34, 327–352 (1999).
140.
Sartori, Giovanni. Problems with Parliamentary Systems. in Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes (New York University Press, Washington Square, N.Y., 1997).
141.
Swenden, Wilfried. Federalism and Second Chambers: Regional Representation in Parliamentary Federations : The Australian Senate and German Bundesrat Compared. vol. Regionalism&federalism (P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels, 2004).
142.
Olson, D. M. & Longley, L. D. Two into One: The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. (Westview Press, San Francisco, 1991).
143.
Congleton, R. D. On the merits of bicameral legislatures: intragovernmental bargaining and policy stability. in Democratic constitutional design and public policy: analysis and evidence (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2006).
144.
Riker, William H. The Justification of Bicameralism. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 13, 101–116 (1992).
145.
Money, Jeannette & Tsebelis, George. Cicero’s Puzzle: Upper House Power in Comparative Perspective . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 13, 25–43 (1992).
146.
Rogers, J. R. An Informational Rationale for Congruent Bicameralism. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13, 123–151 (2001).
147.
Druckman, J., Martin, L. & Thies, M. Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30, 529–548 (2005).
148.
Vatter, A. Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of cameral structure in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies 11, 194–215 (2005).
149.
Heller, William B. Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22, 485–516 (1997).
150.
Norris , P. Legislative recruitment. in Comparing democracies: elections and voting in global perspectives 184–215 (Sage Publications, London, 1996).
151.
Hazan, R. Y. & Rahaṭ, G. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
152.
Cross, W. Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account. Party Politics 14, 596–619 (2008).
153.
Party Politics - Special Issue on Candidate Selection. 7, (2001).
154.
Gallagher, M. Conclusion. in Candidate selection in comparative perspective: the secret garden of politics vol. Sage modern politics series 236–283 (Sage, London, 1988).
155.
Field, B. N. & Siavelis, P. M. Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note. Party Politics 14, 620–639 (2008).
156.
Norris, P. & Lovenduski, J. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
157.
Norris, P. & Lovenduski, J. Comparative candidate recruitment. in Political recruitment: gender, race, and class in the British parliament 183–205 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
158.
Shomer, Y. What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics 20, 533–546 (2014).
159.
Norris , P. Introduction: theories of recruitment. in Passages to power: legislative recruitment in advanced democracies 1–14 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
160.
Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P. & Farrell, D. M. From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties. in Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies vol. Oxford scholarship online (Oxford Scholarship Online, [Oxford], 2002).
161.
Indrithason, I. H. & Kristinsson, G. H. Primary consequences: The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics 21, 565–576 (2015).
162.
Ware, A. The Selection of Candidates and Leaders. in Political parties and party systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
163.
Alvarez, R. M. & Sinclair, B. Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes. Political Research Quarterly 65, 544–557 (2012).
164.
McGhee, E., Masket, S., Shor, B., Rogers, S. & McCarty, N. A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology. American Journal of Political Science 58, 337–351 (2014).
165.
Gallagher, Michael & Marsh, Michael. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. vol. Sage modern politics series (Sage, London, 1988).
166.
Lundell, K. Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective. Party Politics 10, 25–47 (2004).
167.
Akirav, O. Candidate Selection and a Crowded Parliament: The Israeli Knesset, 1988–2006. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 96–120 (2010).
168.
Barnea, S. & Rahat, G. Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach. Party Politics 13, 375–394 (2007).
169.
Rahat, G. Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic? Government and Opposition 44, 68–90 (2009).
170.
Hazan, R. Y. Candidate Selection: Implications and Challenges for Legislative Behaviour. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (2014).
171.
Shomer, Y. Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior. Comparative Political Studies 42, 945–970 (2009).
172.
Hofnung, M. Unaccounted Competition: The Finance of Intra-Party Elections. Party Politics 14, 726–744 (2008).
173.
Bochel, J. & Denver, D. Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek. British Journal of Political Science 13, (1983).
174.
Shaw, E. New Labour: new pathways to parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 54, 35–53 (2001).
175.
Russell, M. Selection under Blair. in Building new Labour: the politics of party organisation 67–95 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2005).
176.
Mikulska, A. B. & Scarrow, S. E. Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20, 311–333 (2010).
177.
Narud, Hanne Marthe, Pedersen, Mogens N., & Valen, Henry. Party Sovereignty and Citizen Control: Selecting Candidates for Parliamentary Elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. vol. University of Southern Denmark studies in history and social sciences (University Press of Southern Denmark, Odense, 2002).
178.
Bruhn, K. Electing Extremists? Party Primaries and Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Comparative Politics 45, 398–417 (2013).
179.
Gherghina, S. One-Shot Party Primaries: The Case of the Romanian Social Democrats. Politics 33, 185–195 (2013).
180.
Hellmann, O. Outsourcing candidate selection: The fight against clientelism in East Asian parties. Party Politics 20, 52–62 (2014).
181.
Spies, D. C. & Kaiser, A. Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics (2012) doi:10.1177/1354068811436066.
182.
Katz, Richard S. Democracy and Elections. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
183.
Patzelt, Werner J. Recruitment and Retention in Western European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24, 239–279 (1999).
184.
Lawrence, E., Donovan, T. & Bowler, S. The adoption of direct primaries in the United States. Party Politics 19, 3–18 (2013).
185.
Ichino, N. & Nathan, N. L. Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra-Party Conflict in Ghana. American Journal of Political Science 57, 428–441 (2013).
186.
Mansbridge, J. Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. The Journal of Politics 61, (1999).
187.
Wangnerud, L. Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 51–69 (2009).
188.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The Concept of Representation. (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1972).
189.
Phillips, A. The Politics of Presence. (Oxford University Press, 1998). doi:10.1093/0198294158.001.0001.
190.
M. Brito Vieira & D. Runciman. Representing Individuals. in Representation vol. Key concepts 66–83 (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2008).
191.
Celis, K. & Childs, S. The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? Political Studies 60, 213–225 (2012).
192.
Childs, S. A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6, 3–19 (2004).
193.
Wangnerud, L. Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies 23, 67–91 (2000).
194.
Swers, Michele L. Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23, (1998).
195.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 5–28 (2009).
196.
Reynolds, A. Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Research Note. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30, 301–310 (2005).
197.
Tate, K. The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, (2001).
198.
Broockman, D. E. Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives. American Journal of Political Science 57, 521–536 (2013).
199.
Ruedin, D. Why Aren’t They There?: The Political Representation of Women, Ethnic Groups and Issue Positions in Legislatures. vol. ECPR monographs (Ecpr Press, Colchester, 2013).
200.
Phillips , A. Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should it Matter Who our Representatives Are? in Feminism and politics vol. Oxford readings in feminism 224–240 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
201.
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. (2000).
202.
Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
203.
Williams, Melissa S. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1998).
204.
Urbinati, Nadia. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, 2006).
205.
Mona Lena Krook. International Political Science Review. 35, 3–11.
206.
Dovi, S. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review 96, (2003).
207.
Cowley, P. Why not ask the audience? Understanding the public’s representational priorities. British Politics 8, 138–163 (2013).
208.
Taylor-Robinson, M. M. Gender and Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0009.
209.
Childs, S. & Krook, M. L. Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition 44, 125–145 (2009).
210.
Lovenduski, Joni. Feminizing Politics. (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2005).
211.
Tremblay, Manon, Trimble, Linda J., & Sawer, Marian. Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. vol. Routledge research in comparative politics (Routledge, London, 2006).
212.
Weldon, S. L. Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking. The Journal of Politics 64, (2008).
213.
Dahlerup, D. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11, 275–298 (1988).
214.
Caul, M. Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics 5, 79–98 (1999).
215.
Salmond, R. Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31, 175–204 (2006).
216.
Fortin-Rittberger, J. & Rittberger, B. Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 15, 496–520 (2014).
217.
Matland, Richard E. Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23, 109–125 (1998).
218.
Tremblay, M. Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis. Democratization 14, 533–553 (2007).
219.
Kenworthy , Lane & Malami, Melissa. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis . Social Forces 78, 235–268 (1999).
220.
Kittilson, Miki Caul. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. vol. Parliaments and legislatures (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 2006).
221.
Roberts, A., Seawright, J. & Cyr, J. Do Electoral Laws Affect Women’s Representation? Comparative Political Studies 46, 1555–1581 (2013).
222.
Schneider, M. C. & Bos, A. L. Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians. Political Psychology 35, 245–266 (2014).
223.
Mendelberg, T., Karpowitz, C. F. & Goedert, N. Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science 58, 291–306 (2014).
224.
Rai, S. M. Political representation, democratic institutions and women’s empowerment: the quota. in Rethinking empowerment: gender and development in a global/local world vol. Routledge/Warwick studies in globalisation 133–146 (Routledge, London, 2002).
225.
Mateo Diaz, Mercedes. Representing Women?: Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. vol. ECPR monographs (ECPR Press, Colchester, 2005).
226.
Swers, Michele L. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002).
227.
Pearson, K. & Dancey, L. Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era. Politics & Gender 7, 493–519 (2011).
228.
Grey, S. Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs 55, 19–29 (2002).
229.
Matland, Richard E. & Montgomery, Kathleen A. Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. vol. Gender and politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
230.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science 50, 570–585 (2006).
231.
Piscopo, J. M. Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates. Parliamentary Affairs 64, 448–472 (2011).
232.
Bauer, G. ‘Let there be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments. Political Studies Review 10, 370–384 (2012).
233.
Devlin, C. & Elgie, R. The Effect of Increased Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs 61, 237–254 (2008).
234.
Barnes, T. D. & Burchard, S. M. ‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies 46, 767–790 (2013).
235.
Stockemer, D. Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments. Political Studies 59, 693–712 (2011).
236.
Sater, J. N. Changing Politics from Below? Women Parliamentarians in Morocco. Democratization 14, 723–742 (2007).
237.
Griffin, J. D. When and Why Minority Legislators Matter. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 327–336 (2014).
238.
Canon, David T. Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly 24, 331–385 (1999).
239.
Maddison, S. White Parliament, Black Politics: The Dilemmas of Indigenous Parliamentary Representation. Australian Journal of Political Science 45, 663–680 (2010).
240.
Bloemraad, I. & Schonwalder, K. Immigrant and Ethnic Minority Representation in Europe: Conceptual Challenges and Theoretical Approaches. West European Politics 36, 564–579 (2013).
241.
Wüst, A. M. A Lasting Impact? On the Legislative Activities of Immigrant-origin Parliamentarians in Germany. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 495–515 (2014).
242.
King JR., Marvin P. Bill Preference: The Continued Relevance of the Congressional Black Caucus. Politics & Policy 39, 421–439 (2011).
243.
Minta, M. Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 193–218 (2009).
244.
Fenno, Richard F. Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2003).
245.
Bowen, D. C. & Clark, C. J. Revisiting Descriptive Representation in Congress: Assessing the Effect of Race on the Constituent-Legislator Relationship. Political Research Quarterly 67, 695–707 (2014).
246.
Clark Wilson, W. & Curtis Ellis, W. Surrogates Beyond Borders: Black Members of the United States Congress and the Representation of African Interests on the Congressional Foreign-Policy Agenda. Polity 46, 255–273 (2014).
247.
Juenke, E. G. & Preuhs, R. R. Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century. American Journal of Political Science 56, 705–715 (2012).
248.
REYNOLDS, A. Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 107, 259–274 (2013).
249.
Haider-Markel, D. Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, 107–133 (2007).
250.
Carnes, N. Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly 37, 5–34 (2012).
251.
Murray, R. Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All. American Political Science Review 108, 520–532 (2014).
252.
Paxton, P. & Hughes, M. M. The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990-2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40, 331–362 (2015).
253.
Bacchi, C. Arguing for and against quotas: theoretical issues. in Women, quotas and politics (ed. Dahlerup, D.) 32–51 (2006).
254.
Krook, M. L. Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research 46, 367–394 (2007).
255.
Hughes, M. Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review 105, 604–620 (2011).
256.
Krook, M. L. Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 47, 1268–1293 (2014).
257.
Krook, M. L. & Norris, P. Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office. Political Studies 62, 2–20 (2014).
258.
Murray, R. How Parties Evaluate Compulsory Quotas: A Study of the Implementation of the ‘Parity’ Law in France. Parliamentary Affairs 60, 568–584 (2007).
259.
Caul, M. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis. The Journal of Politics 63, (2008).
260.
Buckley, F. How Ireland legislated for candidate sex quotas to increase women’s representation. Democratic Audit UK (2013).
261.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) materials on women in parliament.
262.
Strom, K. Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 155–174 (1997).
263.
Norris, P. Constituency Service. in Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour 230–246 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
264.
Andeweg, R. B. Roles in Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0025.
265.
Loewenberg, G. & Patterson, S. C. Linkage. in Comparing legislatures (University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1979).
266.
Norris, P. The puzzle of constituency service. The Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 29–49 (1997).
267.
Carey, J. & Shugart, M. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14, 417–439 (1995).
268.
Norton, P. Introduction: Linking Parliaments and Citizens. in Parliaments and citizens in Western Europe vol. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe 1–18 (Frank Cass, London, 2002).
269.
Searing, D. D. Introduction: Roles, Rules and Rationality. in Westminster’s world: understanding political roles 1–30 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1994).
270.
Thomassen, J. & Esaiasson, P. Role Orientations of Members of Parliament. Acta Politica 41, 217–231 (2006).
271.
Johannes, J. Casework as a Technique of U. S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4, 325–351 (1979).
272.
Power, G. Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation. (2012).
273.
Rolef, S. H. Defining the Job of the Member of the Knesset. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 588–607 (2014).
274.
Best, H. & Vogel, L. The Sociology of Legislators and Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0003.
275.
Saalfeld, T. Rational-choice theory in legislative studies: Models of politics without romanticism. The Journal of Legislative Studies 1, 32–64 (1995).
276.
Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. in Parliamentary roles in modern legislatures vol. Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science 8–36 (Routledge, London, 2012).
277.
Ward, H. Rational Choice. in Theory and methods in political science vol. Political analysis (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2010).
278.
Pitkin, H. The Mandate-Independence Controversy. in The concept of representation (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1972).
279.
Judge, D. Trustee theory and practice. in Representation: theory and practice in Britain vol. Theory and practice in British politics 47–69 (Routledge, London, 1999).
280.
Wood, D. M. Legislators and Constituents. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
281.
Norton, Philip. Parliaments and Citizens in Western Europe. vol. Parliaments in contemporary Western Europe (Frank Cass, London, 2002).
282.
Muller, Wolfgang C. & Saalfeld, Thomas. Members of Parliament in Western Europe: Roles and Behaviour. vol. Library of legislative studies (F. Cass, London, 1997).
283.
Kitschelt, H. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33, 845–879 (2000).
284.
Andre, A., Depauw, S. & Martin, S. Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies 48, 464–496 (2015).
285.
Regional & Federal Studies (Special Issue: Constituency Representation, Devolution and MMP Electoral Systems: Comparative and UK Perspectives). 17, (2007).
286.
Tobin Grant, J. & Rudolph, T. J. The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, 431–445 (2004).
287.
Legislative Studies Quarterly - Special Issue on Representative Roles. 4, 485–655.
288.
Bogdanor, V. Introduction. in Representatives of the people? Parliamentarians and constituents in Western democracies 1–12 (Gower, Aldershot, 1985).
289.
Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. vol. Yale studies in political science (Yale University Press, London, 1974).
290.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., & Fiorina, Morris P. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1987).
291.
Elling, Richard C. The Utility of State Legislative Casework as a Means of Oversight. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4, 353–379 (1979).
292.
Fenno, Richard F. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. (Scott, Foresman and Co, Glenview, Ill, 1978).
293.
Searing, D. Backbench and Leadership Roles in The House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs 48, 418–437 (1995).
294.
Gay, O. MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies. The Political Quarterly 76, 57–66 (2005).
295.
Carman, C. J. Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link? Political Studies 54, 103–122 (2006).
296.
Bengtsson, A. & Wass, H. Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20, 55–81 (2010).
297.
Tavits, M. Effect of Local Ties On Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour: The Case of Estonia. Party Politics 16, 215–235 (2009).
298.
Stratmann , Thomas & Baur , Martin. Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 46, 506–514 (2002).
299.
Fujimura, N. The influence of electoral institutions on legislative representation: Evidence from Japan’s single non-transferable vote and single-member district systems. Party Politics 21, 209–221 (2015).
300.
Ingall, Rachael E. & Crisp, Brian F. Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, 487–512 (2001).
301.
Soroka, S., Penner, E. & Blidook, K. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, (2009).
302.
Martin, Shane. Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case. Political Studies 59, 472–488 (2011).
303.
Bowler, S. Private Members’ Bills in the UK Parliament: Is there an ‘Electoral Connection’? The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 476–494 (2010).
304.
The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures: Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance). 9, (2003).
305.
Cowley , P. It’s a bit more complicated than that. in The rebels: how Blair mislaid his majority 21–48 (Politico’s, London, 2005).
306.
Gunther, Richard, Montero, José R., & Linz, Juan J. Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
307.
Sieberer, U. Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12, 150–178 (2006).
308.
Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W. Political Parties and Legislators. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0022.
309.
Russell, M. Parliamentary party cohesion: Some explanations from psychology. Party Politics 20, 712–723 (2014).
310.
Carey, J. & Reynolds, A. Parties and Accountable Government in New Democracies. Party Politics 13, 255–274 (2007).
311.
Kölln, A.-K. The value of political parties to representative democracy. European Political Science Review 1–21 (2014) doi:10.1017/S1755773914000344.
312.
Stokes, S. C. Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 243–267 (1999).
313.
Cross, W. P., Katz, R. S., & European Consortium for Political Research. The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).
314.
Loxbo, K. The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics 19, 537–554 (2013).
315.
van Biezen, I. On the Internal Balance of Party Power: Party Organizations in New Democracies. Party Politics 6, 395–417 (2000).
316.
Blondel, J. & Nousianen, J. Governments, Supporting Parties and Policy-making. in The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective 161–195 (Palgrave, New York, 2000).
317.
McKenzie, R. Power in the Labour Party: The Issue of Intra-Party Democracy. in The politics of the Labour Party 191–201 (Allen & Unwin, London, 1982).
318.
May, J. D. Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies 21, 135–151 (1973).
319.
Luciano Bardi. Special issue of Party Politics on political party change. 20, 151–159.
320.
Knut Heidar & R. A Koole. Approaches to the study of parliamentary party groups. in Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: political parties behind closed doors vol. Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science 4–22 (Routledge, London, 2000).
321.
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on The Uneasy Relationship Between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. 5, 1–332 (1999).
322.
Blondel, Jean & Cotta, Maurizio. The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. (Palgrave, New York, 2000).
323.
Krehbiel, Keith. Paradoxes of Parties in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24, 31–64 (1999).
324.
Laver, Michael. Divided Parties, Divided Government. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24, 5–29 (1999).
325.
Katz, Richard S., Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., & European Consortium for Political Research. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1999).
326.
Saalfeld, T. Legislative Voting Behaviour. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
327.
Kam, C. Party Discipline. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0020.
328.
Katz, Richard S. Democracy and Elections. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
329.
Ozbudun, Ergun. Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Causal Analysis. vol. Sage professional papers in comparative politics (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif, 1970).
330.
Kam, Christopher J. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009).
331.
Coman, E. E. Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers. The Journal of Legislative Studies 21, 360–389 (2015).
332.
Kam, C. Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7, 89–126 (2001).
333.
Carey, J. M. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51, 92–107 (2007).
334.
Carey, John M. Legislative Voting and Accountability. vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009).
335.
Leston-Bandeira, C. Dissent in a Party-Based Parliament: The Portuguese Case. Party Politics 15, 695–713 (2009).
336.
Kunicova, J. & Remington, T. F. Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003. Party Politics 14, 555–574 (2008).
337.
Rich, T. S. Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39, 113–135 (2014).
338.
Olivella, S. & Tavits, M. Legislative Effects of Electoral Mandates. British Journal of Political Science 44, 301–321 (2014).
339.
Tavits, M. The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection. Comparative Political Studies 42, 793–815 (2009).
340.
Cowley, Philip. Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under Blair. (Politico’s, London, 2002).
341.
Cowley, Philip. Conscience and Parliament. vol. The library of legislative studies (F. Cass, London, 1998).
342.
Vivyan, N. & Wagner, M. Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research 51, 235–264 (2012).
343.
Sieberer, U. Using MP statements to explain voting behaviour in the German Bundestag: An individual level test of the Competing Principals Theory. Party Politics 21, 284–294 (2015).
344.
Ceron, A. Brave rebels stay home: Assessing the effect of intra-party ideological heterogeneity and party whip on roll-call votes. Party Politics 21, 246–258 (2015).
345.
Ansolabehere, S. & Jones, P. E. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 54, 583–597 (2010).
346.
Carson, J. L., Koger, G., Lebo, M. J. & Young, E. The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 54, 598–616 (2010).
347.
Garner, Christopher & Letki, Natalia. Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments. Canadian Journal of Political Science 38, 463–482 (2005).
348.
Skjaeveland, A. Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7, 35–56 (2001).
349.
Skjaeveland, A. A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle. Scandinavian Political Studies 22, 121–136 (1999).
350.
Carey, John M. Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America. Comparative Politics 35, 191–211 (2003).
351.
Hagopian, F., Gervasoni, C. & Moraes, J. A. From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 42, 360–391 (2008).
352.
Lyne, M. M. Proffering Pork: How Party Leaders Build Party Reputations in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science 52, 290–303 (2008).
353.
Rahat, G. Determinants of Party Cohesion: Evidence from the Case of the Israeli Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 60, 279–296 (2007).
354.
Clinton, J. D. Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 79–99 (2012).
355.
Hug, S. Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes. British Journal of Political Science 40, (2009).
356.
Roberts, J. The Statistical Analysis Of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, 341–360 (2007).
357.
Carroll, R. & Poole, K. T. Roll-Call Analysis and the Study of Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0026.
358.
Scarrow, S. E. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
359.
Rosenblum, Nancy L. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. (Princeton University Press, Oxford, 2008).
360.
Pettitt, R. T. Contemporary Party Politics. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014).
361.
Mair, P. The Challenge to Party Government. West European Politics 31, 211–234 (2008).
362.
Mair, P. & Katz, R. Party organizations: from civil society to the state. in How parties organize: change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies 1–22 (Sage Publications, London, 1994).
363.
Ware, A. Party organizations. in Political parties and party systems 93–123 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
364.
R. Dalton, D. Farrell & I. McAllister. Party policies and policy outputs. in Political parties and democratic linkage: how parties organize democracy 193–212 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011).
365.
Whiteley, P. F. Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics 17, 21–44 (2010).
366.
Allern, E. H. & Pedersen, K. The impact of party organisational changes on democracy. West European Politics 30, 68–92 (2007).
367.
Katz, R. S. Party Government and its Alternatives. in Party governments: European and American experiences vol. European University Institute = Institut Universitaire Europeen = Europaisches Hochschulinstitut = Istituto Universitario Europeo : Series C--Political and social sciences = Sciences politiques et sociales = Politik-und Sozialwissenschaften = Scienze politiche e sociali (W. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1987).
368.
Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1, 5–28 (1995).
369.
Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics 7, (2009).
370.
Scarrow, S. E. Parties and Their Members : Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
371.
Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. vol. Cambridge studies in modern political economies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
372.
Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. (Free Press, New York, 1962).
373.
Mair, Peter. The West European Party System. vol. Oxford readings in politics and government (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990).
374.
Norris, P. May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties. Party Politics 1, 29–47 (1995).
375.
Kennedy, F., Lyons, P. & Fitzgerald, P. Pragmatists, Ideologues and the General Law of Curvilinear Disparity: The Case of the Irish Labour Party. Political Studies 54, 786–805 (2006).
376.
Carty, R. K. & Cross, W. Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 16, 93–114 (2006).
377.
Luther, Kurt Richard & Muller-Rommel, Ferdinand. Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
378.
Tavits, M. Power within Parties: The Strength of the Local Party and MP Independence in Postcommunist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 55, 923–936 (2011).
379.
Gauja, A. The construction of party membership. European Journal of Political Research 54, 232–248 (2015).
380.
Gauja, A. The Individualisation of Party Politics: The Impact of Changing Internal Decision-Making Processes on Policy Development and Citizen Engagement. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations n/a-n/a (2014) doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12035.
381.
Pedersen, H. H. Differences and Changes in Danish Party Organisations: Central Party Organisation versus Parliamentary Party Group Power. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 233–250 (2010).
382.
Holliday, Ian, Webb, Paul, & Farrell, David M. Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
383.
Rose, Richard. Do Parties Make a Difference? (Macmillan, London, 1984).
384.
Shaw, M. Parliamentary committees: a global perspective. in The new roles of parliamentary committees vol. The library of legislative studies 225–251 (Frank Cass, London, 1998).
385.
Russo, F. & Wiberg, M. Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 215–232 (2010).
386.
Müller, W. C. & Sieberer, U. Procedure and Rules in Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0023.
387.
Wehner, J. Legislatures and Public Finance. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0017.
388.
Shaw, Malcolm N. & Lees, J. D. Committees in Legislatures. (1979).
389.
Arter, D. Committee cohesion and the ‘corporate dimension’ of parliamentary committees: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9, 73–87 (2003).
390.
Pelizzo, Riccardo and Stapenhurst, Frederick. Legislative oversight tools. in Parliamentary oversight tools: a comparative analysis vol. Routledge research in comparative politics 28-56-157–159 (Routledge, Abingdon, 2012).
391.
Parliamentary Questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17, 259–270 (2011).
392.
Martin, S. Committees. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0006.
393.
Shaw, M. Legislative Committees. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
394.
Mattson, I. & Strom, K. Committee effects on legislation. in Patterns of parliamentary behavior: passage of legislation across Western Europe 91–111 (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, 2004).
395.
Making an Impact: Effective Parliamentary Committees | Global Partners Governance. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/making-an-impact-effective-parliamentary-committees/ (2014).
396.
Davidson, Roger H. & Longley, Lawrence D. The New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. vol. The library of legislative studies (Frank Cass, London, 1998).
397.
Shaw, Malcolm N. & Lees, John D. Committees in Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis. (Duke University Press, [Durham, N.C.], 1979).
398.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. & Weingast, Barry R. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19, 149–179 (1994).
399.
Olson, David M. & Crowther, William E. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio, 2002).
400.
Khmelko, I. S., Pigenko And, V. A. & Wise, C. R. Assessing Committee Roles in a Developing Legislature: The Case of the Ukrainian Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13, 210–234 (2007).
401.
Monk, D. A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Committees in Westminster Parliaments. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 1–13 (2010).
402.
Arter, D. From ‘Parliamentary Control’ to ‘Accountable Government’? The Role of Public Committee Hearings in the Swedish Riksdag. Parliamentary Affairs 61, 122–143 (2008).
403.
Cairney, P. The analysis of Scottish Parliament committee influence: Beyond capacity and structure in comparing West European legislatures. European Journal of Political Research 45, 181–208 (2006).
404.
Kim, D. H. & Loewenberg, G. The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments: Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners in the German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies 38, 1104–1129 (2005).
405.
Curini, L. & Zucchini, F. The institutional foundations of committee cohesion in a (changing) parliamentary democracy. European Political Science Review 1–21 (2013) doi:10.1017/S1755773913000222.
406.
Rahman, Taiabur. Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. vol. Routledge advances in South Asian studies series (Routledge, London, 2008).
407.
Fenno, Richard F. & University of California, Berkeley. Congressmen in Committees. vol. The Study of Congress series (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1973).
408.
Paper 4. Show Me the Money. Improving financial oversight. | Global Partners Governance. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/paper-4-show-me-the-money/ (2014).
409.
Manning, N. & Stapenhurst, R. Strengthening Oversight by Legislatures. (2002).
410.
Schick, A. Can National Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budget Policy? Journal on Budgeting 1, (2002).
411.
Wehner, J. Back from the Sidelines? Redefining the Contribution of Legislatures to the Budget Cycle. World Bank Institute (2006).
412.
Stapenhurst, et al., R. Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective. (2008).
413.
Messick, R. Strengthening Legislatures: Implications from Industrial Countries. (2002).
414.
Pelizzo, R. & Kinyondo, A. Public Accounts Committees in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Politics & Policy 42, 77–102 (2014).
415.
Santiso, C. Legislatures and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Finance Accountability in Emerging Economies. Journal on Budgeting 4, (2004).
416.
Soroka, S., Penner, E. & Blidook, K. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, (2009).
417.
Vliegenthart, R. & Walgrave, S. Content Matters: The Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies 44, 1031–1059 (2011).
418.
Bates, S. R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C. & Stanley, L. Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs 67, 253–280 (2014).
419.
Bevan, S. & John, P. Policy Representation by Party Leaders and Followers: What Drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions. Government and Opposition 1–25 (2015) doi:10.1017/gov.2015.16.
420.
Wiberg, M. Chapter 6 Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? in Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (ed. Doring, H.) (Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), University of Mannheim, 1995).
421.
Salmond, R. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Mass Political Engagement. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 321–341 (2014).
422.
Rasch, B. E. Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-Setting. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0010.
423.
Doring, H. Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda. in Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1995).
424.
Rasch, Bjorn Erik. Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25, 3–23 (2000).
425.
Loewenberg, G. Agenda-setting in the German Bundestag: origins and consequences of party dominance. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9, 17–31 (2003).
426.
Brauninger, T. & Debus, M. Legislative agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48, 804–839 (2009).
427.
Zucchini, F. Government alternation and legislative agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research 50, 749–774 (2011).
428.
Russell, Meg, Paun, Akash, & University College, London. The House rules? International lessons for enhancing the autonomy of the House of Commons. (2007).
429.
Uhr, John. How Democratic is Parliament? (2005).
430.
Norton, P. Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7, 13–33 (2001).
431.
The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Comparing and Classifying Legislatures). 12, (2006).
432.
Lukes, S. Power: A Radical View. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005).
433.
Strøm, K., Bergman, T. & Müller, W. C. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
434.
Legislatures in the Policy Process: The Dilemmas of Economic Policy. vol. Advances in Political Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
435.
Saiegh, S. M. LawMaking. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0012.
436.
Russell, M. & Benton, M. Assessing the Policy Impact of Parliament: Methodological Challenges and Possible Future Approaches. (2009).
437.
Hage, F. M. & Kaeding, M. Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures. Journal of European Integration 29, 341–361 (2007).
438.
Benton, M. & Russell, M. Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs (2012) doi:10.1093/pa/gss009.
439.
Russell, M., Gover, D. & Wollter, K. Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process?: Six Reasons for Doubt. Parliamentary Affairs (2015) doi:10.1093/pa/gsv016.
440.
Shephard, M. & Cairney, P. The Impact of the Scottish Parliament in Amending Executive Legislation. Political Studies 53, 303–319 (2005).
441.
Russell, M. & Benton, M. (Re)assessing Parliamentary Policy Impact: The Case of the Australian Senate. Australian Journal of Political Science 45, 159–174 (2010).
442.
Clinton, J. D., Lewis, D. E. & Selin, J. L. Influencing the Bureaucracy: The Irony of Congressional Oversight. American Journal of Political Science 58, 387–401 (2014).
443.
Manow, P. & Burkhart, S. Legislative Self-Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976-2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, 167–191 (2007).
444.
Martin, L. W. & Vanberg, G. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford Scholarship Online (Oxford Scholarship, 2011). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199607884.001.0001.
445.
Blidook, K. Exploring the Role of ‘Legislators’ in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy? The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 32–56 (2010).
446.
Kreppel, A. Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Studies 35, 784–813 (2002).
447.
Kalitowski, S. Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs 61, 694–708 (2008).
448.
Griffith, J. A. G., Political and Economic Planning, & Study of Parliament Group. Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills. (Allen and Unwin [for] PEP and the Study of Parliament Group, London, 1974).
449.
Thompson, L. More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs 66, 459–479 (2013).
450.
Tsebelis, G. Governments and Parliaments. in Veto players: how political institutions work (Princeton University Press, New York, 2002).
451.
Olson, D. Legislatures in the Policy Process. in Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view vol. Comparative politics series (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 1994).
452.
Loewenberg, Gerhard & Patterson, Samuel Charles. Comparing Legislatures. (University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1979).
453.
Hindmoor, A., Larkin, P. & Kennon, A. Assessing the Influence of Select Committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee, 1997-2005. The Journal of Legislative Studies 15, 71–89 (2009).
454.
Richard L. Hall. Measuring Legislative Influence. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17, 205–231 (1992).
455.
Whitmore, S. Challenges and constraints for post-Soviet committees: exploring the impact of parties on committees in Ukraine. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12, 32–53 (2006).
456.
De Giorgi, E. & Marangoni, F. Government laws and the opposition parties’ behaviour in parliament. Acta Politica 50, 64–81 (2015).
457.
Bolton, A. & Thrower, S. Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism. American Journal of Political Science n/a-n/a (2015) doi:10.1111/ajps.12190.
458.
Jenkins, J. A. & Monroe, N. W. On Measuring Legislative Agenda-Setting Power. American Journal of Political Science n/a-n/a (2015) doi:10.1111/ajps.12191.
459.
Chiou, F.-Y. & Rothenberg, L. S. The Elusive Search for Presidential Power. American Journal of Political Science 58, 653–668 (2014).
460.
Liebert, U. & Cotta, M. Parliament as a central site in democratic consolidation. in Parliament and democratic consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey 3–30 (Pinter, London, 1990).
461.
Fish, M. S. Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies. Journal of Democracy 17, 5–20 (2006).
462.
Overseas Development Institute - Parliamentary Strengthening and the Paris Principles. (2007).
463.
Paper 1. Why Engage With Parliaments? International assistance and parliamentary strengthening - an overview. | Global Partners Governance. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDgQw7AJahcKEwjw2uOtmdKAAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgpgovernance.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FGuide-to-Parliaments.-Paper-1.pdf&psig=AOvVaw3qh0yqgQDD4CcEMTpN4yDy&ust=1691760564108513&opi=89978449 (2013).
464.
Kopecky, P. Introduction: transition, consolidation and parliamentary institutionalisation. in Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: party competition and parliamentary institutionalization 1–21 (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2001).
465.
Norton, P. & Leston-Bandeira, C. The impact of democratic practice on the parliaments of Southern Europe. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9, 177–185 (2003).
466.
Mishler, William & Rose, Richard. Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19, 5–32 (1994).
467.
Kinyondo, A. & Pelizzo, R. Strengthening Legislatures: Some Lessons from the Pacific Region. Politics & Policy 41, (2013).
468.
Schuler, P. & Malesky, E. Authoritarian Legislatures. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (2014).
469.
Power, G. The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding political incentives and institutional behaviour in parliamentary support strategies. (2011).
470.
Musolf, Lloyd D., Kornberg, Allan, & American Society for Public Administration. Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. vol. Comparative Administration Group series (Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 1970).
471.
Pakenham, R. A. Legislatures and political development. in Legislatures vol. Oxford readings in politics and government (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970).
472.
World Bank Parliamentary Strengthening Programme. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/parliament.pdf.
473.
Engaging and Supporting Parliaments Worldwide: Strategies and Methodologies for EC Action in Support to Parliaments.
474.
Report from the UK House of Commons International Development committee on parliamentary strengthening. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/704/704.pdf# (2015).
475.
Parliamentary Strengthening: Government Response to the International Development Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2014-15. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/1125/112504.htm#a2 (2015).
476.
Bergman, Torbjorn, Muller, Wolfgang C. & Strom, Kaare. Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy. in Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies vol. Comparative politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
477.
Andrews, J. T. Legislatures in Central and Eastern Europe. in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (eds Martin, S., Saalfeld, T. & Strøm, K. W.) (Oxford University Press, 2014). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0018.
478.
Olson, D. M. The Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of Central Europe. in World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C., 1998).
479.
Norton, P. & Olson, D. M. Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Legislatures: Beyond Transition. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13, 1–11 (2007).
480.
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Post-Communist Parliaments: Change and Stability in the Second Decade. 17, (2011).
481.
Carey, John M., Formanek, Frantisek & Karpowicz, Ewa. Legislative Autonomy in New Regimes: The Czech and Polish Cases. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24, 569–603 (1999).
482.
Remington, Thomas F. Parliaments in Transition: The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSR and Eastern Europe. (Westview Press, Boulder, Colo, 1994).
483.
Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. vol. Parliaments and legislatures series (Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, 2000).
484.
Chiva, C. The Institutionalisation of Post-Communist Parliaments: Hungary and Romania in Comparative Perspective. Parliamentary Affairs 60, 187–211 (2007).
485.
Barkan, J. D. Legislatures on the Rise? Journal of Democracy 19, 124–137 (2008).
486.
Barkan, J. D. African Legislatures and the ‘third wave’ of democratization. in Legislative power in emerging African democracies 1–31 (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 2009).
487.
Africa All Party Parliamentary Group. Strengthening Parliaments in Africa: Improving Support. (2008).
488.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. Ten Years of Strengthening Parliaments in Africa 1991-2000: Lessons Learnt and the Way Forward. (2003).
489.
Johnson, J. & Nakamura, R. A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance. (1999).
490.
Johnson, J. K. The Role of Parliament in Government. (2005).
491.
Nijzink, L., Mozaffar, S. & Azevedo, E. Parliaments and the enhancement of democracy on the African continent: An analysis of institutional capacity and public perceptions. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12, 311–335 (2006).
492.
Azevedo-Harman, E. Parliaments in Africa: Representative Institutions in the Land of the ‘Big Man’. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17, 65–85 (2011).
493.
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. African Parliaments: Between Governance and Government. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005).
494.
The difficult development of parliamentary politics in the Gulf: Parliaments and the process of managed reform in Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman | Global Partners Governance. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/politics-in-gulf/ (2012).
495.
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Southern European Parliaments in Democracy. 9, (2003).
496.
Leston-Bandeira, C. The Portuguese parliament during the first two decades of democracy. West European Politics 24, 137–156 (2001).
497.
Close, David. Legislatures and the New Democracies in Latin America. (L. Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 1995).
