[1]
Africa All Party Parliamentary Group 2008. Strengthening Parliaments in Africa: Improving Support. Africa All Party Parliamentary Group.
[2]
Akirav, O. 2010. Candidate Selection and a Crowded Parliament: The Israeli Knesset, 1988–2006. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 1 (2010), 96–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903542142.
[3]
Allern, E.H. and Pedersen, K. 2007. The impact of party organisational changes on democracy. West European Politics. 30, 1 (2007), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019688.
[4]
Alvarez, R.M. and Sinclair, B. 2012. Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes. Political Research Quarterly. 65, 3 (2012), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911411098.
[5]
Andeweg, R.B. 2014. Roles in Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Andre, A. et al. 2015. Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies. 48, 4 (2015), 464–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014545512.
[7]
Andrews, J.T. 2014. Legislatures in Central and Eastern Europe. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Ansolabehere, S. and Jones, P.E. 2010. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science. 54, 3 (2010), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00448.x.
[9]
Arter, D. 2003. Committee cohesion and the ‘corporate dimension’ of parliamentary committees: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 9, 4 (2003), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000306263.
[10]
Arter, D. 2008. From ‘Parliamentary Control’ to ‘Accountable Government’? The Role of Public Committee Hearings in the Swedish Riksdag. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 1 (2008), 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm058.
[11]
Arter, David 1984. The Nordic parliaments: a comparative analysis. Hurst.
[12]
Azevedo-Harman, E. 2011. Parliaments in Africa: Representative Institutions in the Land of the ‘Big Man’. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 17, 1 (2011), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545180.
[13]
B. L. Shankar and Valerian Rodrigues 2011. The Indian Parliament : a democracy at work.
[14]
Bacchi, C. 2006. Arguing for and against quotas: theoretical issues. Women, quotas and politics. D. Dahlerup, ed. 32–51.
[15]
Bach, S. 2003. Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice. Department of the Senate, Canberra.
[16]
Barkan, J.D. 2009. African Legislatures and the ‘third wave’ of democratization. Legislative power in emerging African democracies. Lynne Rienner. 1–31.
[17]
Barkan, J.D. 2008. Legislatures on the Rise? Journal of Democracy. 19, 2 (2008), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2008.0020.
[18]
Barkan, Joel D. 2009. Legislative power in emerging African democracies. Lynne Rienner.
[19]
Barnea, S. and Rahat, G. 2007. Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach. Party Politics. 13, 3 (2007), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807075942.
[20]
Barnes, T.D. and Burchard, S.M. 2013. ‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies. 46, 7 (2013), 767–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463884.
[21]
Bates, S.R. et al. 2014. Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs. 67, 2 (2014), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss044.
[22]
Bauer, G. 2012. ‘Let there be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments. Political Studies Review. 10, 3 (2012), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00272.x.
[23]
Bean, C. and Wattenberg, M. 1998. Attitudes Towards Divided Government and Ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States. Australian Journal of Political Science. 33, 1 (1998), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361149850705.
[24]
Bengtsson, A. and Wass, H. 2010. Styles of Political Representation: What Do Voters Expect? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 20, 1 (2010), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903450724.
[25]
Benton, M. and Russell, M. 2012. Assessing the Impact of Parliamentary Oversight Committees: The Select Committees in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss009.
[26]
Bergman, Torbjorn et al. 2003. Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford University Press.
[27]
Bergman, Torbjorn et al. 2003. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Best, H. and Vogel, L. 2014. The Sociology of Legislators and Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Bevan, S. and John, P. 2015. Policy Representation by Party Leaders and Followers: What Drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions. Government and Opposition. (2015), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.16.
[30]
van Biezen, I. 2000. On the Internal Balance of Party Power: Party Organizations in New Democracies. Party Politics. 6, 4 (2000), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006004001.
[31]
Blidook, K. 2010. Exploring the Role of ‘Legislators’ in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 1 (2010), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903541979.
[32]
Bloemraad, I. and Schonwalder, K. 2013. Immigrant and Ethnic Minority Representation in Europe: Conceptual Challenges and Theoretical Approaches. West European Politics. 36, 3 (2013), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.773724.
[33]
Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. 2012. Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. Parliamentary roles in modern legislatures. Routledge. 8–36.
[34]
Blondel, J. 1995. Representation: legislatures and parliaments. Comparative government: an introduction. Pearson Education. 248–266.
[35]
Blondel, J. and Nousianen, J. 2000. Governments, Supporting Parties and Policy-making. The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective. Palgrave. 161–195.
[36]
Blondel, Jean and Cotta, Maurizio 2000. The nature of party government: a comparative European perspective. Palgrave.
[37]
Bochel, J. and Denver, D. 1983. Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek. British Journal of Political Science. 13, 01 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003136.
[38]
Bogdanor, V. 1985. Introduction. Representatives of the people? Parliamentarians and constituents in Western democracies. Gower. 1–12.
[39]
Bolton, A. and Thrower, S. 2015. Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism. American Journal of Political Science. (2015), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12190.
[40]
Bowen, D.C. and Clark, C.J. 2014. Revisiting Descriptive Representation in Congress: Assessing the Effect of Race on the Constituent-Legislator Relationship. Political Research Quarterly. 67, 3 (Sept. 2014), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914531658.
[41]
Bowler, S. 2010. Private Members’ Bills in the UK Parliament: Is there an ‘Electoral Connection’? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 4 (2010), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2010.519457.
[42]
Brauninger, T. and Debus, M. 2009. Legislative agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research. 48, 6 (2009), 804–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00850.x.
[43]
Broockman, D.E. 2013. Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives. American Journal of Political Science. 57, 3 (2013), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12018.
[44]
Bruhn, K. 2013. Electing Extremists? Party Primaries and Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Comparative Politics. 45, 4 (2013), 398–417.
[45]
Buckley, F. 2013. How Ireland legislated for candidate sex quotas to increase women’s representation. Democratic Audit UK. (Nov. 2013).
[46]
Burnham, P. et al. 2004. Comparative Methodology. Research methods in politics. Palgrave. 58–79.
[47]
Cain, Bruce E. et al. 1987. The personal vote: constituency service and electoral independence. Harvard University Press.
[48]
Cairney, P. 2006. The analysis of Scottish Parliament committee influence: Beyond capacity and structure in comparing West European legislatures. European Journal of Political Research. 45, 2 (2006), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00295.x.
[49]
Canon, David T. 1999. Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly . 24, 3 (1999), 331–385.
[50]
Carey, J. and Reynolds, A. 2007. Parties and Accountable Government in New Democracies. Party Politics. 13, 2 (2007), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073866.
[51]
Carey, J. and Shugart, M. 1995. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies. 14, 4 (1995), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.
[52]
Carey, J.M. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science. 51, 1 (2007), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x.
[53]
Carey, John M. 2003. Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 35, 2 (2003), 191–211.
[54]
Carey, John M. et al. 1999. Legislative Autonomy in New Regimes: The Czech and Polish Cases. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 24, 4 (1999), 569–603.
[55]
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative voting and accountability. Cambridge University Press.
[56]
Carman, C.J. 2006. Public Preferences for Parliamentary Representation in the UK: An Overlooked Link? Political Studies. 54, 1 (2006), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00568.x.
[57]
Carnes, N. 2012. Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 37, 1 (2012), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x.
[58]
Carroll, R. and Poole, K.T. 2014. Roll-Call Analysis and the Study of Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Carson, J.L. et al. 2010. The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science. 54, 3 (2010), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00449.x.
[60]
Carty, R.K. and Cross, W. 2006. Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 16, 2 (2006), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880600715912.
[61]
Caul, M. 2008. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis. The Journal of Politics. 63, 04 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00107.
[62]
Caul, M. 1999. Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics. 5, 1 (1999), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068899005001005.
[63]
Celis, K. and Childs, S. 2012. The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? Political Studies. 60, 1 (2012), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x.
[64]
Ceron, A. 2015. Brave rebels stay home: Assessing the effect of intra-party ideological heterogeneity and party whip on roll-call votes. Party Politics. 21, 2 (2015), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472581.
[65]
Cheibub, J.A. et al. 2014. Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science. 44, 03 (2014), 515–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341300032X.
[66]
Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. 2002. Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidental Democracies Reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science. 5, 1 (2002), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.102301.084508.
[67]
Cheibub, Jose Antonio 2007. Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[68]
Childs, S. 2004. A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 6, 1 (2004), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00124.x.
[69]
Childs, S. and Krook, M.L. 2009. Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition. 44, 2 (2009), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x.
[70]
Chiou, F.-Y. and Rothenberg, L.S. 2014. The Elusive Search for Presidential Power. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 3 (2014), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12057.
[71]
Chiva, C. 2007. The Institutionalisation of Post-Communist Parliaments: Hungary and Romania in Comparative Perspective. Parliamentary Affairs. 60, 2 (2007), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm012.
[72]
Clark Wilson, W. and Curtis Ellis, W. 2014. Surrogates Beyond Borders: Black Members of the United States Congress and the Representation of African Interests on the Congressional Foreign-Policy Agenda. Polity. 46, 2 (2014), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2014.3.
[73]
Clinton, J.D. et al. 2014. Influencing the Bureaucracy: The Irony of Congressional Oversight. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 2 (2014), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12066.
[74]
Clinton, J.D. 2012. Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 15, 1 (2012), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-043010-095836.
[75]
Close, David 1995. Legislatures and the new democracies in Latin America. L. Rienner Publishers.
[76]
Close, David 1995. Legislatures and the new democracies in Latin America. L. Rienner Publishers.
[77]
Coakley, J. 2014. The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 20, 4 (2014), 542–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168.
[78]
Coman, E.E. 2015. Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 21, 3 (2015), 360–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2015.1040246.
[79]
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association: https://www.cpahq.org/.
[80]
Congleton, R.D. 2006. On the merits of bicameral legislatures: intragovernmental bargaining and policy stability. Democratic constitutional design and public policy: analysis and evidence. MIT Press.
[81]
Constitutional and parliamentary information | ASGP: http://asgp.co/constitutional-and-parliamentary-information.
[82]
Copeland, G. and Patterson, S.C. 1998. Parliaments and Legislatures. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[83]
Cowley , P. 2005. It’s a bit more complicated than that. The rebels: how Blair mislaid his majority. Politico’s. 21–48.
[84]
Cowley, P. 2013. Why not ask the audience? Understanding the public’s representational priorities. British Politics. 8, 2 (2013), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.28.
[85]
Cowley, Philip 1998. Conscience and parliament. F. Cass.
[86]
Cowley, Philip 2002. Revolts and rebellions: parliamentary voting under Blair. Politico’s.
[87]
Cross, W. 2008. Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account. Party Politics. 14, 5 (2008), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093392.
[88]
Cross, W.P. et al. 2013. The challenges of intra-party democracy. Oxford University Press.
[89]
Curini, L. and Zucchini, F. 2013. The institutional foundations of committee cohesion in a (changing) parliamentary democracy. European Political Science Review. (2013), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000222.
[90]
Dahlerup, D. 1988. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies. 11, 4 (Dec. 1988), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x.
[91]
Damgaard, Erik 1992. Parliamentary change in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian University Press.
[92]
David Samuels and Matthew Shugart 2010. Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: how the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior.
[93]
Davidson, Roger H. 1992. The postreform Congress. St. Martin’s Press.
[94]
Davidson, Roger H. and Longley, Lawrence D. 1998. The new roles of parliamentary committees. Frank Cass.
[95]
De Giorgi, E. and Marangoni, F. 2015. Government laws and the opposition parties’ behaviour in parliament. Acta Politica. 50, 1 (2015), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2013.34.
[96]
Devlin, C. and Elgie, R. 2008. The Effect of Increased Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 2 (2008), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn007.
[97]
Dodd, Lawrence C. 2012. Thinking about Congress: essays on Congressional change. Routledge.
[98]
Dogan, Mattei and Pelassy, Dominique 1990. How to compare nations: strategies in comparative politics. Chatham House.
[99]
Doring, H. 1995. Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. St. Martin’s Press.
[100]
Dovi, S. 2003. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review. 96, 04 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000412.
[101]
Druckman, J. et al. 2005. Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 30, 4 (2005), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201662.
[102]
Druckman, J.N. and Thies, M.F. 2002. The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science. 46, 4 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/3088432.
[103]
Elgie, R. 2005. From Linz to Tsebelis: three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization. 12, 1 (2005), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000317989.
[104]
Elgie, R. 2008. The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated? Democratization. 15, 1 (2008), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701768125.
[105]
Elgie, R. 2001. What is divided government? Divided government in comparative perspective. Oxford Scholarship Online.
[106]
Elling, Richard C. 1979. The Utility of State Legislative Casework as a Means of Oversight. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 4, 3 (1979), 353–379.
[107]
Esaiasson, Peter and Heidar, Knut 2000. Beyond Westminster and Congress: the Nordic experience. Ohio State University Press.
[108]
Fenno, Richard F. 2003. Going home: Black representatives and their constituents. University of Chicago Press.
[109]
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. Scott, Foresman and Co.
[110]
Fenno, Richard F. and University of California, Berkeley 1973. Congressmen in committees. Little, Brown and Company.
[111]
Field, B.N. and Siavelis, P.M. 2008. Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note. Party Politics. 14, 5 (2008), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093393.
[112]
Fiorina, Morris P. and Mayhew, David R. 2003. Divided government. Longman.
[113]
Fish, M. Steven and Kroenig, Matthew 2009. The handbook of national legislatures: a global survey. Cambridge University Press.
[114]
Fish, M.S. 2006. Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies. Journal of Democracy. 17, 1 (2006), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2006.0008.
[115]
Fortin-Rittberger, J. and Rittberger, B. 2014. Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics. 15, 4 (Dec. 2014), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116514527179.
[116]
Fujimura, N. 2015. The influence of electoral institutions on legislative representation: Evidence from Japan’s single non-transferable vote and single-member district systems. Party Politics. 21, 2 (2015), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472578.
[117]
Fukuyama, Francis et al. 2005. Facing the Perils of Presidentialism? Journal of Democracy. 16, 2 (2005), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0026.
[118]
Gallagher, M. 1988. Conclusion. Candidate selection in comparative perspective: the secret garden of politics. Sage. 236–283.
[119]
Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael 1988. Candidate selection in comparative perspective: the secret garden of politics. Sage.
[120]
Gamm, G. and Huber, J. 2002. Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress. Political science: the state of the discipline. W.W. Norton.
[121]
Ganghof, S. 2014. Is the ‘Constitution of Equality’ Parliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid? Political Studies. (2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12124.
[122]
Garner, Christopher and Letki, Natalia 2005. Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments. Canadian Journal of Political Science . 38, 2 (2005), 463–482.
[123]
Gauja, A. 2015. The construction of party membership. European Journal of Political Research. 54, 2 (2015), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12078.
[124]
Gauja, A. 2014. The Individualisation of Party Politics: The Impact of Changing Internal Decision-Making Processes on Policy Development and Citizen Engagement. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. (2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12035.
[125]
Gay, O. 2005. MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies. The Political Quarterly. 76, 1 (2005), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00656.x.
[126]
Gherghina, S. 2013. One-Shot Party Primaries: The Case of the Romanian Social Democrats. Politics. 33, 3 (2013), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12007.
[127]
Goot, M. 1999. Whose Mandate? Policy Promises, Strong Bicameralism and Polled Opinion. Australian Journal of Political Science. 34, 3 (1999), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361149950263.
[128]
Grey, S. 2002. Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs. 55, 1 (2002), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.1.19.
[129]
Griffin, J.D. 2014. When and Why Minority Legislators Matter. Annual Review of Political Science. 17, 1 (2014), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-205028.
[130]
Griffith, J. A. G. et al. 1974. Parliamentary scrutiny of Government bills. Allen and Unwin [for] PEP and the Study of Parliament Group.
[131]
Gunther, Richard et al. 2002. Political parties: old concepts and new challenges. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Hage, F.M. and Kaeding, M. 2007. Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures. Journal of European Integration. 29, 3 (2007), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701442356.
[133]
Hagopian, F. et al. 2008. From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 3 (2008), 360–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325572.
[134]
Hague, R. and Harrop, M. 2004. Legislatures. Comparative government and politics: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. 247–267.
[135]
Haider-Markel, D. 2007. Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 32, 1 (2007), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007X202001.
[136]
Hazan, R.Y. 2014. Candidate Selection: Implications and Challenges for Legislative Behaviour. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies.
[137]
Hazan, R.Y. and Rahaṭ, G. 2010. Democracy within parties: candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford University Press.
[138]
Heller, William B. 1997. Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 22, 4 (1997), 485–516.
[139]
Hellmann, O. 2014. Outsourcing candidate selection: The fight against clientelism in East Asian parties. Party Politics. 20, 1 (2014), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436039.
[140]
Hibbing, John R. 1988. Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science. 32, 3 (1988), 681–712.
[141]
Hindmoor, A. et al. 2009. Assessing the Influence of Select Committees in the UK: The Education and Skills Committee, 1997-2005. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 15, 1 (2009), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330802666844.
[142]
Hiroi, T. 2008. The Dynamics of Lawmaking in a Bicameral Legislature: The Case of Brazil. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 12 (2008), 1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007308536.
[143]
Hiroi, T. and Omori, S. 2009. Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited. Democratization. 16, 3 (2009), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902884598.
[144]
Hofnung, M. 2008. Unaccounted Competition: The Finance of Intra-Party Elections. Party Politics. 14, 6 (2008), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093408.
[145]
Holliday, Ian et al. 2002. Political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
[146]
Huber, John D. 1996. The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. The American Political Science Review. 90, 2 (1996), 269–282.
[147]
Hug, S. 2009. Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes. British Journal of Political Science. 40, 01 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990160.
[148]
Hughes, M. 2011. Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review. 105, 03 (2011), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000293.
[149]
Ichino, N. and Nathan, N.L. 2013. Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra-Party Conflict in Ghana. American Journal of Political Science. 57, 2 (2013), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00624.x.
[150]
Indrithason, I.H. and Kristinsson, G.H. 2015. Primary consequences: The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics. 21, 4 (2015), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813487117.
[151]
Ingall, Rachael E. and Crisp, Brian F. 2001. Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 26, 3 (2001), 487–512.
[152]
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA): .
[153]
Inter-Parliamentary Union 2003. Ten Years of Strengthening Parliaments in Africa 1991-2000: Lessons Learnt and the Way Forward. Inter-Parliamentary Union.
[154]
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU): .
[155]
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) materials on women in parliament: .
[156]
Jenkins, J.A. and Monroe, N.W. 2015. On Measuring Legislative Agenda-Setting Power. American Journal of Political Science. (2015), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12191.
[157]
Johannes, J. 1979. Casework as a Technique of U. S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 4, 3 (1979), 325–351.
[158]
Johnson, J. and Nakamura, R. 1999. A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance. UNDP.
[159]
Johnson, J.K. 2005. The Role of Parliament in Government. World Bank.
[160]
Judge, D. 2003. Legislative Institutionalization: A Bent Analytical Arrow? Government and Opposition. 38, 4 (2003), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00026.
[161]
Judge, D. 1999. Trustee theory and practice. Representation: theory and practice in Britain. Routledge. 47–69.
[162]
Juenke, E.G. and Preuhs, R.R. 2012. Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century. American Journal of Political Science. 56, 3 (2012), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00584.x.
[163]
Kalitowski, S. 2008. Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 4 (2008), 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn030.
[164]
Kam, C. 2001. Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 7, 4 (2001), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003894.
[165]
Kam, C. 2014. Party Discipline. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[166]
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party discipline and parliamentary politics. Cambridge University Press.
[167]
Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and elections. Oxford University Press.
[168]
Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and elections. Oxford University Press.
[169]
Katz, Richard S. et al. 1999. Party discipline and parliamentary government. Ohio State University Press.
[170]
Katz, R.S. 1987. Party Government and its Alternatives. Party governments: European and American experiences. W. de Gruyter.
[171]
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1, 1 (1995), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001.
[172]
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. 2009. The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 04 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709991782.
[173]
Kennedy, F. et al. 2006. Pragmatists, Ideologues and the General Law of Curvilinear Disparity: The Case of the Irish Labour Party. Political Studies. 54, 4 (2006), 786–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00630.x.
[174]
Kenworthy , Lane and Malami, Melissa 1999. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis . Social Forces. 78, 1 (1999), 235–268.
[175]
Khmelko, I.S. et al. 2007. Assessing Committee Roles in a Developing Legislature: The Case of the Ukrainian Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 13, 2 (2007), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330701334312.
[176]
Kim, D.H. and Loewenberg, G. 2005. The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments: Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners in the German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies. 38, 9 (2005), 1104–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005276307.
[177]
King, Anthony 1976. Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1, 1 (1976).
[178]
King JR., Marvin P. 2011. Bill Preference: The Continued Relevance of the Congressional Black Caucus. Politics & Policy. 39, 3 (2011), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00297.x.
[179]
Kinyondo, A. and Pelizzo, R. 2013. Strengthening Legislatures: Some Lessons from the Pacific Region. Politics & Policy. 41, 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12020.
[180]
Kitschelt, H. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies. 33, 6–7 (Sept. 2000), 845–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607.
[181]
Kittilson, Miki Caul 2006. Challenging parties, changing parliaments: women and elected office in contemporary Western Europe. Ohio State University Press.
[182]
Knut Heidar and R. A Koole 2000. Approaches to the study of parliamentary party groups. Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: political parties behind closed doors. Routledge. 4–22.
[183]
Kölln, A.-K. 2014. The value of political parties to representative democracy. European Political Science Review. (2014), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000344.
[184]
Kopecky, P. 2001. Introduction: transition, consolidation and parliamentary institutionalisation. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: party competition and parliamentary institutionalization. Ashgate. 1–21.
[185]
Kopecky, Petr 2001. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak republics: party competition and parliamentary institutionalization. Ashgate.
[186]
Krehbiel, Keith 1999. Paradoxes of Parties in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 24, 1 (1999), 31–64.
[187]
Kreppel, A. 2014. Legislatures. Comparative politics. Oxford University Press. 113–130.
[188]
Kreppel, A. 2002. Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Studies. 35, 7 (2002), 784–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035007002.
[189]
Kreppel, A. 2014. Typologies and Classifications. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[190]
Krook, M.L. 2007. Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research. 46, 3 (2007), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00704.x.
[191]
Krook, M.L. 2014. Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis. Comparative Political Studies. 47, 9 (2014), 1268–1293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013495359.
[192]
Krook, M.L. and Norris, P. 2014. Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office. Political Studies. 62, 1 (2014), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12116.
[193]
Kunicova, J. and Remington, T.F. 2008. Mandates, Parties and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994-2003. Party Politics. 14, 5 (2008), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093390.
[194]
Landman, T. 2003. Comparing Many Countries. Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. Routledge. 51–65.
[195]
Landman, T. 2017. Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction. Routledge.
[196]
Laver, M. 2006. Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
[197]
Laver, Michael 1999. Divided Parties, Divided Government. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 24, 1 (1999), 5–29.
[198]
Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1999. Making and breaking governments: cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge University Press.
[199]
Lawrence, E. et al. 2013. The adoption of direct primaries in the United States. Party Politics. 19, 1 (2013), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810393264.
[200]
Legislative Studies Section | The American Political Science Association: http://legislativestudies.org/.
[201]
Leston-Bandeira, C. 2009. Dissent in a Party-Based Parliament: The Portuguese Case. Party Politics. 15, 6 (2009), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809334556.
[202]
Leston-Bandeira, C. 2001. The Portuguese parliament during the first two decades of democracy. West European Politics. 24, 1 (2001), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425421.
[203]
Levmore, S. 1992. Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one? International Review of Law and Economics. 12, 2 (1992), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(92)90031-L.
[204]
Liebert, U. and Cotta, M. 1990. Parliament as a central site in democratic consolidation. Parliament and democratic consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. Pinter. 3–30.
[205]
Lijphart, A. 1999. Executive-legislative relations. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
[206]
Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
[207]
Lijphart, A. 1994. Presidentialism and majoritarian democracy. The failure of presidential democracy: Vol. 1: Comparative perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[208]
Lijphart, Arend 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review. 65, 3 (1971), 682–693.
[209]
Lijphart, Arend 1992. Introduction . Parliamentary versus presidential government. Oxford University Press. 1–27.
[210]
Lijphart, Arendt 1975. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative political studies. 8, 2 (1975), 158–177.
[211]
Linz, J. J. 1990. The Virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy. 1, 4 (1990), 84–91.
[212]
Linz, J.J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy. 1, 1 (1990), 51–69.
[213]
Llanos, M. and Nolte, D. 2003. Bicameralism in the Americas: around the extremes of symmetry and incongruence. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 9, 3 (2003), 54–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000246864.
[214]
Loewenberg, G. 2003. Agenda-setting in the German Bundestag: origins and consequences of party dominance. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 9, 3 (2003), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000246846.
[215]
Loewenberg, G. 2011. On legislatures: the puzzle of representation. Paradigm Publishers.
[216]
Loewenberg, G. and Patterson, S.C. 1979. Linkage. Comparing legislatures. University Press of America.
[217]
Loewenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel Charles 1979. Comparing legislatures. University Press of America.
[218]
Loewenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel Charles 1979. Comparing legislatures. University Press of America.
[219]
Loewenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel Charles 1979. Functions of Legislatures. Comparing legislatures. University Press of America.
[220]
Lovenduski, Joni 2005. Feminizing politics. Polity Press.
[221]
Loxbo, K. 2013. The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics. 19, 4 (2013), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407583.
[222]
Luciano Bardi Special issue of Party Politics on political party change. 20, 151–159.
[223]
Lukes, S. 2005. Power: a radical view. Palgrave Macmillan.
[224]
Lundell, K. 2004. Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective. Party Politics. 10, 1 (2004), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039119.
[225]
Luther, Kurt Richard and Muller-Rommel, Ferdinand 2002. Political parties in the new Europe: political and analytical challenges. Oxford University Press.
[226]
Lyne, M.M. 2008. Proffering Pork: How Party Leaders Build Party Reputations in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 2 (2008), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00313.x.
[227]
M. Brito Vieira and D. Runciman 2008. Representing Individuals. Representation. Polity Press. 66–83.
[228]
M. S., S. 2006. Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
[229]
Maddison, S. 2010. White Parliament, Black Politics: The Dilemmas of Indigenous Parliamentary Representation. Australian Journal of Political Science. 45, 4 (2010), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517180.
[230]
Mainwaring, S. 1997. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America : rethinking the terms of the debate. Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press. 12–54.
[231]
Mainwaring, S. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies. 26, 2 (1993), 198–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002003.
[232]
Mainwaring, S. and Shugart, M.S. eds 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
[233]
Mainwaring, Scott 1995. Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review. 25, 1 (1995), 157–179.
[234]
Mair, P. 2008. The Challenge to Party Government. West European Politics. 31, 1–2 (2008), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835033.
[235]
Mair, P. and Katz, R. 1994. Party organizations: from civil society to the state. How parties organize: change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies. Sage Publications. 1–22.
[236]
Mair, Peter 1990. The West European party system. Oxford University Press.
[237]
Making an Impact: Effective Parliamentary Committees | Global Partners Governance: 2014. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/making-an-impact-effective-parliamentary-committees/.
[238]
Manning, N. and Stapenhurst, R. 2002. Strengthening Oversight by Legislatures.
[239]
Manow, P. and Burkhart, S. 2007. Legislative Self-Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976-2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 32, 2 (2007), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007780907941.
[240]
Mansbridge, J. 1999. Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’. The Journal of Politics. 61, 03 (1999).
[241]
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford Scholarship.
[242]
Martin, S. 2014. Committees. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[243]
Martin, S. et al. 2014. Introduction. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[244]
Martin, S. et al. eds 2014. The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford University Press.
[245]
Martin, Shane 2011. Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case. Political Studies. 59, 2 (2011), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x.
[246]
Mateo Diaz, Mercedes 2005. Representing women?: female legislators in West European parliaments. ECPR Press.
[247]
Matland, Richard E. 1998. Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 23, 1 (1998), 109–125.
[248]
Matland, Richard E. and Montgomery, Kathleen A. 2003. Women’s access to political power in post-communist Europe. Oxford University Press.
[249]
Matthews, Donald R. and Valen, Henry 1999. Parliamentary representation: the case of the Norwegian Storting. Ohio State University Press.
[250]
Mattson, I. and Strom, K. 2004. Committee effects on legislation. Patterns of parliamentary behavior: passage of legislation across Western Europe. Ashgate. 91–111.
[251]
May, J.D. 1973. Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies. 21, 2 (1973), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01423.x.
[252]
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: the electoral connection. Yale University Press.
[253]
McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry 1987. Congress: structure and policy. Cambridge University Press.
[254]
McGhee, E. et al. 2014. A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 2 (2014), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12070.
[255]
McKenzie, R. 1982. Power in the Labour Party: The Issue of Intra-Party Democracy. The politics of the Labour Party. Allen & Unwin. 191–201.
[256]
Mendelberg, T. et al. 2014. Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 2 (2014), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12077.
[257]
Messick, R. 2002. Strengthening Legislatures: Implications from Industrial Countries.
[258]
Mezey, M. 1979. Classifying legislatures. Legislatures. Oxford University Press. 149–176.
[259]
Mezey, M. 1979. Classifying Legislatures. Comparative legislatures. Duke University Press. 149–176.
[260]
Mezey, M. 1979. Defining the Legislature. Comparative legislatures. Duke University Press. 3–20.
[261]
Mezey, M. L. 1998. Executive-legislative relations. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[262]
Mezey, M. L. 2002. Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance. Political science: the state of the discipline. W.W. Norton.
[263]
Michels, Robert 1962. Political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Free Press.
[264]
Mikulska, A.B. and Scarrow, S.E. 2010. Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 20, 3 (2010), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2010.490712.
[265]
Minta, M. 2009. Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34, 2 (2009), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009788314336.
[266]
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard 1994. Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 19, 1 (1994), 5–32.
[267]
Mona Lena Krook International Political Science Review. 35, 3–11.
[268]
Money, Jeannette and Tsebelis, George 1992. Cicero’s Puzzle: Upper House Power in Comparative Perspective . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 13, 1 (1992), 25–43.
[269]
Monk, D. 2010. A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Committees in Westminster Parliaments. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 1 (2010), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903541904.
[270]
Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito 2002. Legislative politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
[271]
Mughan, Anthony and Patterson, Samuel Charles 1999. Senates: bicameralism in the contemporary world. Ohio State University Press.
[272]
Mughan, Anthony and Patterson, Samuel Charles 1999. Senates: bicameralism in the contemporary world. Ohio State University Press.
[273]
Müller, W.C. and Sieberer, U. 2014. Procedure and Rules in Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[274]
Muller, Wolfgang C. and Saalfeld, Thomas 1997. Members of parliament in Western Europe: roles and behaviour. F. Cass.
[275]
Murray, R. 2007. How Parties Evaluate Compulsory Quotas: A Study of the Implementation of the ‘Parity’ Law in France. Parliamentary Affairs. 60, 4 (2007), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm039.
[276]
Murray, R. 2014. Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All. American Political Science Review. 108, 03 (2014), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000239.
[277]
Musolf, Lloyd D. et al. 1970. Legislatures in developmental perspective. Duke University Press.
[278]
Narud, Hanne Marthe et al. 2002. Party sovereignty and citizen control: selecting candidates for parliamentary elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. University Press of Southern Denmark.
[279]
Nassmacher, H. 2008. The Dilemma of Depth Versus Breadth in Comparing Political Systems Empirically...and How to Overcome It. European Political Science. 7, 1 (2008), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210179.
[280]
Nijzink, L. et al. 2006. Parliaments and the enhancement of democracy on the African continent: An analysis of institutional capacity and public perceptions. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 12, 3–4 (2006), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600875563.
[281]
Norris , P. 1997. Introduction: theories of recruitment. Passages to power: legislative recruitment in advanced democracies. Cambridge University Press. 1–14.
[282]
Norris , P. 1996. Legislative recruitment. Comparing democracies: elections and voting in global perspectives. Sage Publications. 184–215.
[283]
Norris, P. 2004. Constituency Service. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge University Press. 230–246.
[284]
Norris, P. 1995. May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties. Party Politics. 1, 1 (1995), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001002.
[285]
Norris, P. 1997. The puzzle of constituency service. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 3, 2 (1997), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420508.
[286]
Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. 1995. Comparative candidate recruitment. Political recruitment: gender, race, and class in the British parliament. Cambridge University Press. 183–205.
[287]
Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. 1994. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
[288]
Norris, Pippa 2004. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
[289]
Norton, P. 2004. How many bicameral legislatures are there? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 10, 4 (2004), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000322436.
[290]
Norton, P. 2002. Introduction: Linking Parliaments and Citizens. Parliaments and citizens in Western Europe. Frank Cass. 1–18.
[291]
Norton, P. 1998. Introduction: The institution of parliaments. Parliaments and governments in Western Europe. Frank Cass. 1–15.
[292]
Norton, P. 2013. Parliament in British politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[293]
Norton, P. 1990. Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis. Parliaments in Western Europe. Cass.
[294]
Norton, P. 2001. Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 7, 3 (2001), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003882.
[295]
Norton, P. and Leston-Bandeira, C. 2003. The impact of democratic practice on the parliaments of Southern Europe. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 9, 2 (2003), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233032000250680.
[296]
Norton, P. and Olson, D.M. 2007. Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Legislatures: Beyond Transition. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 13, 1 (2007), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330601165154.
[297]
Norton, Philip 1990. Legislatures. Oxford University Press.
[298]
Norton, Philip 1998. Legislatures and legislators. Ashgate.
[299]
Norton, Philip 2002. Parliaments and citizens in Western Europe. Frank Cass.
[300]
Norton, Philip 1990. Parliaments in Western Europe. Cass.
[301]
Norton, Philip and Ahmed, Nizam U. 1999. Parliaments in Asia. Frank Cass.
[302]
Olivella, S. and Tavits, M. 2014. Legislative Effects of Electoral Mandates. British Journal of Political Science. 44, 02 (Apr. 2014), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000828.
[303]
Olson, D. 1994. Legislatures in the Policy Process. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. M.E. Sharpe.
[304]
Olson, D. 1994. Legislatures in Today’s Democracies. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. M.E. Sharpe.
[305]
Olson, David M. 1994. Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view. M.E. Sharpe.
[306]
Olson, David M. and Crowther, William E. 2002. Committees in post-Communist democratic parliaments: comparative institutionalization. The Ohio State University Press.
[307]
Olson, David M. and Norton, Philip 1996. The new parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. Frank Cass.
[308]
Olson, D.M. 1998. The Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of Central Europe. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[309]
Olson, D.M. and Longley, L.D. 1991. Two into One: The Politics and Processes of National Legislative Cameral Change. Westview Press.
[310]
Olson, D.M. and Mezey, M.L. eds 1991. Legislatures in the Policy Process: The Dilemmas of Economic Policy. Cambridge University Press.
[311]
Ostrow, Joel M. 2000. Comparing post-Soviet legislatures: a theory of institutional design and political conflict. Ohio State University Press.
[312]
Ostrow, Joel M. 2000. Comparing post-Soviet legislatures: a theory of institutional design and political conflict. Ohio State University Press.
[313]
Overseas Development Institute - Parliamentary Strengthening and the Paris Principles: 2007. .
[314]
Owens, J.E. and Loomis, B.A. 2006. Qualified exceptionalism: The US Congress in comparative perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 12, 3–4 (2006), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600875464.
[315]
Ozbudun, Ergun 1970. Party cohesion in western democracies: a causal analysis. Sage Publications.
[316]
Pakenham, R. A. 1970. Legislatures and political development. Legislatures. Oxford University Press.
[317]
Panebianco, Angelo 1988. Political parties: organization and power. Cambridge University Press.
[318]
Paper 1. Why Engage With Parliaments? International assistance and parliamentary strengthening - an overview. | Global Partners Governance: 2013. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDgQw7AJahcKEwjw2uOtmdKAAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgpgovernance.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FGuide-to-Parliaments.-Paper-1.pdf&psig=AOvVaw3qh0yqgQDD4CcEMTpN4yDy&ust=1691760564108513&opi=89978449.
[319]
Paper 2. How Parliaments Work: Parliamentary processes and procedures. | Global Partners Governance: https://gpgovernance.net/publications/guide-to-parliaments-paper-2-how-parliaments-work-parliamentary-processes-and-procedures/.
[320]
Paper 4. Show Me the Money. Improving financial oversight. | Global Partners Governance: 2014. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/paper-4-show-me-the-money/.
[321]
Parliamentary Strengthening: Government Response to the International Development Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2014-15: 2015. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/1125/112504.htm#a2.
[322]
Parliaments specialist group | The Political Studies Association (PSA): https://psaparliaments.org/.
[323]
Patapan, Haig et al. 2005. Westminster legacies: democracy and responsible government in Asia and the Pacific. UNSW Press.
[324]
Patterson, Samuel Charles and Copeland, Gary W. 1994. Parliaments in the modern world: changing institutions. University of Michigan Press.
[325]
Patzelt, Werner J. 1999. Recruitment and Retention in Western European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 24, 2 (1999), 239–279.
[326]
Paxton, P. and Hughes, M.M. 2015. The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990-2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 40, 3 (2015), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12079.
[327]
Pearson, K. and Dancey, L. 2011. Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era. Politics & Gender. 7, 04 (2011), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1100033X.
[328]
Pedersen, H.H. 2010. Differences and Changes in Danish Party Organisations: Central Party Organisation versus Parliamentary Party Group Power. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 2 (2010), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572331003740131.
[329]
Pelizzo, R. and Kinyondo, A. 2014. Public Accounts Committees in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Politics & Policy. 42, 1 (2014), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12062.
[330]
Pelizzo, Riccardo and Stapenhurst, Frederick 2012. Legislative oversight tools. Parliamentary oversight tools: a comparative analysis. Routledge. 28-56-157–159.
[331]
Pettitt, R.T. 2014. Contemporary party politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[332]
Phillips , A. 1998. Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should it Matter Who our Representatives Are? Feminism and politics. Oxford University Press. 224–240.
[333]
Phillips, A. 1998. The Politics of Presence. Oxford University Press.
[334]
Piscopo, J.M. 2011. Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates. Parliamentary Affairs. 64, 3 (2011), 448–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq061.
[335]
Pitkin, H. 1972. The Mandate-Independence Controversy. The concept of representation. University of California Press.
[336]
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel 1972. The concept of representation. University of California Press.
[337]
Polsby, N. 1975. Legislatures. Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press.
[338]
Polsby, N. 1998. The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives. Legislatures and legislators. Ashgate. 76–101.
[339]
Power, G. Annex to the IPU’s Global Parliamentary Report. United Nations Development Programme.
[340]
Power, G. 2012. Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation.
[341]
Power, G. 2011. The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding political incentives and institutional behaviour in parliamentary support strategies.
[342]
Power, Timothy J. and Rae, Nicol C. 2006. Exporting Congress?: the influence of the U.S. Congress on world legislatures. University of Pittsburgh Press.
[343]
Przeworski, A. et al. 2012. The origins of parliamentary responsibility. Comparative constitutional design. Cambridge University Press.
[344]
R. Dalton et al. 2011. Party policies and policy outputs. Political parties and democratic linkage: how parties organize democracy. Oxford University Press. 193–212.
[345]
Rahat, G. 2007. Determinants of Party Cohesion: Evidence from the Case of the Israeli Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 60, 2 (2007), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm003.
[346]
Rahat, G. 2009. Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic? Government and Opposition. 44, 1 (2009), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.01276.x.
[347]
Rahman, Taiabur 2008. Parliamentary control and government accountability in South Asia: a comparative analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Routledge.
[348]
Rahman, Taiabur 2008. Parliamentary control and government accountability in South Asia: a comparative analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Routledge.
[349]
Rai, S.M. 2002. Political representation, democratic institutions and women’s empowerment: the quota. Rethinking empowerment: gender and development in a global/local world. Routledge. 133–146.
[350]
Rasch, B.E. 2014. Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-Setting. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[351]
Rasch, Bjorn Erik 2000. Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 25, 1 (2000), 3–23.
[352]
Remington, Thomas F. 1994. Parliaments in transition: the new legislative politics in the former USSR and Eastern Europe. Westview Press.
[353]
Report from the UK House of Commons International Development committee on parliamentary strengthening: 2015. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmintdev/704/704.pdf#.
[354]
Research and Education – Parliament of Australia: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education.
[355]
REYNOLDS, A. 2013. Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review. 107, 02 (2013), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000051.
[356]
Reynolds, A. 2005. Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Research Note. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 30, 2 (2005), 301–310.
[357]
Rhodes, R.A.W. et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
[358]
Rich, T.S. 2014. Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 39, 1 (2014), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12035.
[359]
Richard L. Hall 1992. Measuring Legislative Influence. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 17, 2 (1992), 205–231.
[360]
Riggs, Fred W. 1997. Presidentialism versus Parliamentarism: Implications for Representativeness and Legitimacy . International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 18, 3 (1997), 253–278.
[361]
Riker, William H. 1992. The Justification of Bicameralism. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 13, 1 (1992), 101–116.
[362]
Roberts, A. et al. 2013. Do Electoral Laws Affect Women’s Representation? Comparative Political Studies. 46, 12 (2013), 1555–1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463906.
[363]
Roberts, J. 2007. The Statistical Analysis Of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 32, 3 (2007), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007781699636.
[364]
Rogers, J.R. 2001. An Informational Rationale for Congruent Bicameralism. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 13, 2 (2001), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692801013002001.
[365]
Rolef, S.H. 2014. Defining the Job of the Member of the Knesset. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 20, 4 (2014), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2014.910338.
[366]
Roller, E. 2002. Reforming the Spanish Senate: Mission Impossible? West European Politics. 25, 4 (2002), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601643.
[367]
Rose, Richard 1984. Do parties make a difference?. Macmillan.
[368]
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the side of the angels: an appreciation of parties and partisanship. Princeton University Press.
[369]
Ruedin, D. 2013. Why aren’t they there?: the political representation of women, ethnic groups and issue positions in legislatures. Ecpr Press.
[370]
Ruland, Jurgen and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 2005. Parliaments and political change in Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
[371]
Rush, Michael 2005. Parliament today. Manchester University Press.
[372]
Russell, M. 2013. Bicameralism in Theory & Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
[373]
Russell, M. et al. 2015. Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process?: Six Reasons for Doubt. Parliamentary Affairs. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv016.
[374]
Russell, M. 2012. Elected Second Chambers and Their Powers: An International Survey. The Political Quarterly. 83, 1 (2012), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02275.x.
[375]
Russell, M. 2014. Parliamentary party cohesion: Some explanations from psychology. Party Politics. 20, 5 (2014), 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812453367.
[376]
Russell, M. 2013. Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 19, 3 (2013), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639.
[377]
Russell, M. 2005. Selection under Blair. Building new Labour: the politics of party organisation. Palgrave Macmillan. 67–95.
[378]
Russell, M. 2001. What are Second Chambers for? Parliamentary Affairs. 54, 3 (2001), 442–458.
[379]
Russell, M. and Benton, M. 2009. Assessing the Policy Impact of Parliament: Methodological Challenges and Possible Future Approaches.
[380]
Russell, M. and Benton, M. 2010. (Re)assessing Parliamentary Policy Impact: The Case of the Australian Senate. Australian Journal of Political Science. 45, 2 (2010), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361141003736117.
[381]
Russell, M. and Sandford, M. 2002. Why are Second Chambers so Difficult to Reform? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 8, 3 (2002), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003926.
[382]
Russell, Meg et al. 2007. The House rules? International lessons for enhancing the autonomy of the House of Commons. Constitution Unit, Department of Political Science, UCL.
[383]
Russo, F. and Wiberg, M. 2010. Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16, 2 (2010), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572331003740115.
[384]
Saalfeld, T. 1998. Legislative Voting Behaviour. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[385]
Saalfeld, T. 1995. Rational-choice theory in legislative studies: Models of politics without romanticism. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 1, 1 (1995), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339508420414.
[386]
Saalfeld, T. and Strøm, K.W. 2014. Political Parties and Legislators. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[387]
Saiegh, S.M. 2014. LawMaking. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[388]
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. 2005. African parliaments: between governance and government. Palgrave Macmillan.
[389]
Salih, Mohamed Abdel Rahim M. 2005. African parliaments: between governance and government. Palgrave Macmillan.
[390]
Salmond, R. 2014. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Mass Political Engagement. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 20, 3 (2014), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.895121.
[391]
Salmond, R. 2006. Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 31, 2 (2006), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298006X201779.
[392]
Santiso, C. 2004. Legislatures and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Finance Accountability in Emerging Economies. Journal on Budgeting. 4, 2 (2004).
[393]
Sartori , G. 1997. Presidentialism. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. Macmillan Press. 83–100.
[394]
Sartori, G. 1994. Compare why and how. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance. Blackwell. 14–34.
[395]
Sartori, G. 1994. Compare why and how. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance. Blackwell.
[396]
Sartori, Giovanni 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. 64, 4 (1970), 1033–1053.
[397]
Sartori, Giovanni 1997. Problems with Parliamentary Systems. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. New York University Press.
[398]
Sater, J.N. 2007. Changing Politics from Below? Women Parliamentarians in Morocco. Democratization. 14, 4 (2007), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701398352.
[399]
Scarrow, S. E. et al. 2002. From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties. Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford Scholarship Online.
[400]
Scarrow, S.E. 2015. Beyond party members: changing approaches to partisan mobilization. Oxford University Press.
[401]
Scarrow, S.E. 2003. Parties and Their Members : Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford University Press.
[402]
Schick, A. 2002. Can National Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budget Policy? Journal on Budgeting. 1, 3 (2002).
[403]
Schleiter, P. and Morgan-Jones, E. 2009. Review Article: Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science. 39, 04 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990159.
[404]
Schneider, M.C. and Bos, A.L. 2014. Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians. Political Psychology. 35, 2 (2014), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12040.
[405]
Schuler, P. and Malesky, E. 2014. Authoritarian Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies.
[406]
Schwindt-Bayer, L. 2009. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34, 1 (2009), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500330.
[407]
Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. 2006. Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science. 50, 3 (2006), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x.
[408]
Searing, D. 1995. Backbench and Leadership Roles in The House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 48, 3 (1995), 418–437.
[409]
Searing, D.D. 1994. Introduction: Roles, Rules and Rationality. Westminster’s world: understanding political roles. Harvard University Press. 1–30.
[410]
Shankar, B. L. and Rodrigues, Valerian 2011. The Indian Parliament: a democracy at work. Oxford University Press.
[411]
Shaw, E. 2001. New Labour: new pathways to parliament. Parliamentary Affairs. 54, 1 (2001), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.35.
[412]
Shaw, M. 1998. Legislative Committees. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[413]
Shaw, M. 1998. Parliamentary committees: a global perspective. The new roles of parliamentary committees. Frank Cass. 225–251.
[414]
Shaw, Malcolm N. and Lees, J. D. 1979. Committees in Legislatures.
[415]
Shaw, Malcolm N. and Lees, John D. 1979. Committees in legislatures: a comparative analysis. Duke University Press.
[416]
Shell, D. 1998. Second chambers. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[417]
Shephard, M. and Cairney, P. 2005. The Impact of the Scottish Parliament in Amending Executive Legislation. Political Studies. 53, 2 (2005), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00530.x.
[418]
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R. 1994. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly . 19, 2 (1994), 149–179.
[419]
Shomer, Y. 2009. Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 7 (2009), 945–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008330600.
[420]
Shomer, Y. 2014. What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics. 20, 4 (2014), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436060.
[421]
Shugart, M.S. and Carey, J.M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
[422]
Siaroff, A. 2003. Varieties of Parliamentarianism in the Advanced Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review. 24, 4 (2003), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121030244003.
[423]
Sieberer, U. 2006. Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 12, 2 (2006), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600739413.
[424]
Sieberer, U. 2015. Using MP statements to explain voting behaviour in the German Bundestag: An individual level test of the Competing Principals Theory. Party Politics. 21, 2 (2015), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472584.
[425]
Skjaeveland, A. 1999. A Danish Party Cohesion Cycle. Scandinavian Political Studies. 22, 2 (1999), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00008.
[426]
Skjaeveland, A. 2001. Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 7, 2 (2001), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003872.
[427]
Soroka, S. et al. 2009. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 42, 03 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990059.
[428]
Soroka, S. et al. 2009. Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 42, 03 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990059.
[429]
Spies, D.C. and Kaiser, A. 2012. Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436066.
[430]
Stapenhurst, et al., R. 2008. Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective.
[431]
Stepan, A. and Skach, C. 1993. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism. World Politics. 46, 1 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2950664.
[432]
Stockemer, D. 2011. Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments. Political Studies. 59, 3 (2011), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x.
[433]
Stokes, S.C. 1999. Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science. 2, 1 (1999), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243.
[434]
Stratmann , Thomas and Baur , Martin 2002. Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science. 46, 3 (2002), 506–514.
[435]
Strøm, K. et al. 2003. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford University Press.
[436]
Strom, K. 1984. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies. 17, 2 (1984), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414084017002004.
[437]
Strom, K. 1997. Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 3, 1 (1997), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420504.
[438]
Swenden, Wilfried 2004. Federalism and second chambers: regional representation in parliamentary federations : the Australian Senate and German Bundesrat compared. P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
[439]
Swers, Michele L. 1998. Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 23, 3 (1998).
[440]
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The difference women make: the policy impact of women in Congress. University of Chicago Press.
[441]
Tate, K. 2001. The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly. 26, 4 (2001).
[442]
Tavits, M. 2009. Effect of Local Ties On Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour: The Case of Estonia. Party Politics. 16, 2 (2009), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809341053.
[443]
Tavits, M. 2011. Power within Parties: The Strength of the Local Party and MP Independence in Postcommunist Europe. American Journal of Political Science. 55, 4 (2011), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00520.x.
[444]
Tavits, M. 2009. The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 6 (2009), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008329900.
[445]
Taylor-Robinson, M.M. 2014. Gender and Legislatures. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[446]
The difficult development of parliamentary politics in the Gulf: Parliaments and the process of managed reform in Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman | Global Partners Governance: 2012. http://www.gpgovernance.net/publication/politics-in-gulf/.
[447]
The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Second Chambers: 2001. .
[448]
Thomassen, J. and Esaiasson, P. 2006. Role Orientations of Members of Parliament. Acta Politica. 41, 3 (2006), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500157.
[449]
Thompson, L. 2013. More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 3 (July 2013), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss016.
[450]
Tobin Grant, J. and Rudolph, T.J. 2004. The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 29, 3 (2004), 431–445.
[451]
Tremblay, M. 2007. Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis. Democratization. 14, 4 (2007), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701398261.
[452]
Tremblay, Manon et al. 2006. Representing women in parliament: a comparative study. Routledge.
[453]
Tsebelis, G. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science. 25, 03 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007225.
[454]
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Governments and Parliaments. Veto players: how political institutions work. Princeton University Press.
[455]
Tsebelis, G. and Money, J. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge University Press.
[456]
Tsebelis, George and Russell Sage Foundation 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. Princeton University Press.
[457]
Uhr, John 1998. Deliberative democracy in Australia: the changing place of Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
[458]
Uhr, John 2005. How Democratic is Parliament? Democratic Audit of Australia.
[459]
UK Parliament: http://www.parliament.uk/.
[460]
Urbinati, Nadia 2006. Representative democracy: principles and genealogy. University of Chicago Press.
[461]
Vatter, A. 2005. Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of cameral structure in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 11, 2 (2005), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500158607.
[462]
Vivyan, N. and Wagner, M. 2012. Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research. 51, 2 (2012), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01998.x.
[463]
Vliegenthart, R. and Walgrave, S. 2011. Content Matters: The Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 8 (2011), 1031–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405168.
[464]
Wangnerud, L. 2000. Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies. 23, 1 (2000), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00031.
[465]
Wangnerud, L. 2009. Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science. 12, 1 (2009), 51–69.
[466]
Ward, H. 2010. Rational Choice. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[467]
Ware, A. 1996. Party organizations. Political parties and party systems. Oxford University Press. 93–123.
[468]
Ware, A. 1996. The Selection of Candidates and Leaders. Political parties and party systems. Oxford University Press.
[469]
Wehner, J. 2006. Back from the Sidelines? Redefining the Contribution of Legislatures to the Budget Cycle. World Bank Institute.
[470]
Wehner, J. 2014. Legislatures and Public Finance. The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. S. Martin et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[471]
Weldon, S.L. 2008. Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking. The Journal of Politics. 64, 04 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00167.
[472]
Whiteley, P.F. 2010. Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics. 17, 1 (2010), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810365505.
[473]
Whitmore, S. 2006. Challenges and constraints for post-Soviet committees: exploring the impact of parties on committees in Ukraine. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 12, 1 (2006), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500484953.
[474]
Wiberg, M. 1995. Chapter 6 Parliamentary Questioning: Control by Communication? Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. H. Doring, ed. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES).
[475]
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton University Press.
[476]
Wood, D.M. 1998. Legislators and Constituents. World encyclopedia of parliaments and legislatures. Congressional Quarterly.
[477]
World Bank Parliamentary Strengthening Programme: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/parliament.pdf.
[478]
Wüst, A.M. 2014. A Lasting Impact? On the Legislative Activities of Immigrant-origin Parliamentarians in Germany. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 20, 4 (2014), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.907601.
[479]
Young, Iris Marion 2000. Inclusion and democracy.
[480]
Zucchini, F. 2011. Government alternation and legislative agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research. 50, 6 (2011), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01983.x.
[481]
Engaging and Supporting Parliaments Worldwide: Strategies and Methodologies for EC Action in Support to Parliaments.
[482]
Legislative Studies Quarterly .
[483]
Legislative Studies Quarterly - Special Issue on Representative Roles. 4, 4, 485–655.
[484]
Parliamentary Affairs .
[485]
2011. Parliamentary Questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 17, 3 (2011), 259–270.
[487]
2001. Party Politics - Special Issue on Candidate Selection. 7, 3 (2001).
[488]
2007. Regional & Federal Studies (Special Issue: Constituency Representation, Devolution and MMP Electoral Systems: Comparative and UK Perspectives). 17, 1 (2007).
[489]
The Journal of Legislative Studies.
[490]
2002. The Journal of Legislative Studies . 8, 3 (2002).
[491]
2004. The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Legislatures and executives: an investigation into the relationship at the heart of government. 10, 2–3 (2004).
[492]
2011. The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Post-Communist Parliaments: Change and Stability in the Second Decade. 17, 2 (2011).
[493]
2003. The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on Southern European Parliaments in Democracy. 9, 2 (2003).
[494]
1999. The Journal of Legislative Studies - Special Issue on The Uneasy Relationship Between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. 5, 3/4 (1999), 1–332.
[495]
2003. The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures: Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance). 9, 4 (2003).
[496]
2006. The Journal of Legislative Studies (Special Issue: Comparing and Classifying Legislatures). 12, 3–4 (2006).
[497]
The Parliamentarian - The Journal of Commonwealth Parliamentarians and Legislatures. Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.
