[1]
Acemoglu, D. et al. An African Success Story: Botswana.
[2]
Ackerly, B.A. et al. eds. 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Agius, C. 2013. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 44, 3 (Jun. 2013), 241–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485871.
[4]
Ahmed, A. and Sil, R. 2012. When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics. 10, 04 (Dec. 2012), 935–953. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002836.
[5]
Amoore, L. 2007. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 38, 2 (Jun. 2007), 215–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078526.
[6]
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman 2006. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 14, 3 (2006), 250–267.
[7]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel eds. 2014. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel eds. 2014. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press.
[9]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel eds. 2014. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press.
[10]
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke 2010. The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence. A. Lawrence and E. Chenoweth, eds.
[11]
Barrett, C.B. and Cason, J.W. 2010. Overseas research: a practical guide. Routledge.
[12]
Belsey, C. 2002. Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Bennett, A. and Elman, C. 2006. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 9, 1 (Jun. 2006), 455–476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918.
[14]
BLATTMAN, C. et al. 2014. How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review. 108, 01 (Feb. 2014), 100–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000543.
[15]
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges.
[16]
Bourgois, P. 2002. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. 2004. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield.
[18]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2008. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jul. 2008), 77–101.
[19]
Bullock, John G.1 Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98, 4.
[20]
Campbell, D. 1998. Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Manchester University Press. 1–13.
[21]
Carabine, J. 2001. ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
[22]
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.
[23]
Christina Goulding 2002. Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[24]
Clark, T. 2010. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 10, 4 (Aug. 2010), 399–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796.
[25]
Collier, David and Brady, Henry E. 2010. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[26]
Cousins, K. and Mcintosh, W. 2005. More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity. 39, 5 (Oct. 2005), 581–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z.
[27]
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson 2003. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography. 4, 2 (2003), 181–200.
[28]
David Collier 2011. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics. 44, 4 (2011), 823–830.
[29]
David Smilde 2005. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology. 111, 3 (2005), 757–796.
[30]
Dean, M. 1994. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge.
[31]
Deborah J. Yashar 1998. Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 31, 1 (1998), 23–42.
[32]
Deloria, V. 2007. ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Blackwell.
[33]
van Dijk, T. What is Political Discourse Analysis?
[34]
Dijk, T.A. van 1997. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE.
[35]
Dohan, D. and Sánchez-Jankowski, M. 1998. Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology. 24, 1 (Aug. 1998), 477–498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477.
[36]
Dunne, C. 2011. The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 2 (Mar. 2011), 111–124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.
[37]
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN 2009. Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review. 103, 4 (2009), 622–644.
[38]
Emerson, R.M. et al. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
[39]
Emerson, R.M. et al. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
[40]
Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review: http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run.
[41]
Evan S. Lieberman 2005. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review. 99, 3 (2005), 435–452.
[42]
Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. 2012. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Routledge.
[43]
Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and power. Longman.
[44]
Fielding, N.G. and Lee, R.M. 2002. New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods. 14, 2 (May 2002), 197–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02014002005.
[45]
Fontana, A. and Frey, J. 1998. ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications.
[46]
Foucault, M. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.
[47]
Freedman, D. 1989. Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences. 18, 2 (Oct. 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4.
[48]
Fujii, L.A. 2012. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 45, 04 (Oct. 2012), 717–723. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819.
[49]
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco 1977. Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics. 29, 4 (1977), 489–522.
[50]
Geddes, B. 2003. Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press.
[51]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2005. A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[52]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[53]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2005. Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[54]
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[55]
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
[56]
Giovanni Sartori 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. 64, 4 (1970), 1033–1053.
[57]
Gladwell, Malcolm Starting Over. The New Yorker. 24.
[58]
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
[59]
Goffman, A. 2014. On the run: fugitive life in an American city. The University of Chicago Press.
[60]
Goodwin, J. and Horowitz, R. 2002. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology. 25, 1 (2002), 33–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014300123105.
[61]
Guest, G. et al. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 18, 1 (Feb. 2006), 59–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
[62]
Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what?. Harvard University Press.
[63]
Hall, S. 2001. ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
[64]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[65]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[66]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[67]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[68]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[69]
Hammersley, M. 2014. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 14, 5 (Oct. 2014), 529–541. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495039.
[70]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 2007. Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
[71]
Hansen, L. 2009. ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge.
[72]
Hansen, L. 2006. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.
[73]
Hansen, L. 2006. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.
[74]
Hansen, L. 2000. The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 29, 2 (Jun. 2000), 285–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501.
[75]
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright 2006. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 14, 3 (2006), 353–368.
[76]
Hollander, J.A. 2004. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 33, 5 (Oct. 2004), 602–637. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988.
[77]
Howarth, D.R. 2000. Discourse. Open University Press.
[78]
Hudson, H. 2005. ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue. 36, 2 (Jun. 2005), 155–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605054642.
[79]
Hutchings, K. 2009. ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge.
[80]
Hutchison, E. 2014. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 8, 1 (Mar. 2014), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037.
[81]
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author) Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development.
[82]
I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#.
[83]
Ian Shapiro 2002. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 30, 4 (2002), 596–619.
[84]
Jackson, P.T. 2006. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. University of Michigan Press.
[85]
Jackson, P.T. 2011. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[86]
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz 2006. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis. 14, 3 (2006), 227–249.
[87]
Jason Seawright and John Gerring 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 2 (2008), 294–308.
[88]
Jason Seawright and John Gerring 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 2 (2008), 294–308.
[89]
John D. Brewer 1994. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 28, 1 (1994), 231–244.
[90]
John D. Brewer 1994. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 28, 1 (1994), 231–244.
[91]
John Gerring 1999. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 31, 3 (1999), 357–393.
[92]
Johnston, L. 2006. Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 9, 5 (Dec. 2006), 379–391. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600659433.
[93]
Kelle, U. et al. 1995. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. Sage Publications.
[94]
Kelle, U. 2004. ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[95]
Kelman, H.C. 1972. The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist. 27, 11 (1972), 989–1016. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033995.
[96]
Kendall, G. and Wickham, G. 1999. Using Foucault’s Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[97]
Kimmel, A. 1988. Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[98]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[99]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[100]
King, N. and Horrocks, C. 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE.
[101]
King, N. and Horrocks, C. 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE.
[102]
Kratochwil, F. 2008. Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. D. Della Porta and M. Keating, eds. Cambridge University Press.
[103]
Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
[104]
Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
[105]
Laitin, D.D. 2003. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 31, 1 (Mar. 2003), 163–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202250167.
[106]
Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. Cambridge University Press.
[107]
Lareau, A. and Shultz, J. 1996. Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Westview.
[108]
Lawrence, A. Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security. 35, 2, 88–122.
[109]
LIEBERMAN, E.S. 2005. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review. 99, 03 (Aug. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762.
[110]
Lisa Wedeen 2002. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 96, 4 (2002), 713–728.
[111]
Lisa Wedeen 2002. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 96, 4 (2002), 713–728.
[112]
Lisa Wedeen 2013. Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry. 39, 4 (2013), 841–873.
[113]
Lofland, J. 2006. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
[114]
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz 2004. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 37, 2 (2004), 267–271.
[115]
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz 2004. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 37, 2 (2004), 267–271.
[116]
Lundy, P. 2006. The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research. 4, 1 (Mar. 2006), 49–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542.
[117]
MacMillan, Katie More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, 3.
[118]
Mahoney, James Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis.
[119]
Mason, J. 2006. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 6, 1 (Feb. 2006), 9–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866.
[120]
Mason, J. 2006. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 6, 1 (Feb. 2006), 9–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866.
[121]
McKeown, T.J. 1999. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization. 53, 01 (Dec. 1999), 161–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550841.
[122]
McLellan, E. et al. 2003. Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods. 15, 1 (Feb. 2003), 63–84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573.
[123]
Michael Burawoy 1998. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 16, 1 (1998), 4–33.
[124]
Michel Foucault 1991. ‘Truth and Power’. The Foucault reader. Penguin.
[125]
MILLIKEN, J. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, 2 (Jun. 1999), 225–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.
[126]
Miri Song and David Parker 1995. COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology. 29, 2 (1995), 241–256.
[127]
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires 2009. Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science. 39, 4 (2009), 781–803.
[128]
Multi-Author Symposium 2009. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics. 42, 2 (2009), 287–328.
[129]
Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
[130]
Nicholas Sambanis 2004. Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics. 2, 2 (2004), 259–279.
[131]
Okley, J. 1994. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.
[132]
Okley, J. 1994. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.
[133]
Oliver, P. 2003. The student’s guide to research ethics. Open University Press.
[134]
On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review: http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html.
[135]
Pimple, K.D. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.
[136]
Popper, K.R. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
[137]
Posner, Daniel N The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review. 4, 529–545.
[138]
Punch, M. 1998. ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications.
[139]
Puwar, Nirmal Reflections on interviewing women MPs.
[140]
Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W.M. 1987. Interpretive social science: a second look. University of California Press.
[141]
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. 2002. Feminist Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[142]
Reason, P. and Rowan, J. eds. 1981. Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. John Wiley & Sons.
[143]
Renwick, A. 2009. DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation. 45, 4 (Nov. 2009), 357–367. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256.
[144]
Ribbens, J. 1989. Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum. 12, 6 (Jan. 1989), 579–592. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2.
[145]
Riffe, D. et al. 2005. Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum.
[146]
Robert Adcock and David Collier 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review. 95, 3 (2001), 529–546.
[147]
Robert Aunger 1995. On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology. 36, 1 (1995), 97–130.
[148]
Rogers M. Smith 2002. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics. 35, 2 (2002), 199–201.
[149]
ROTH, W.D. and MEHTA, J.D. 2002. The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research. 31, 2 (Nov. 2002), 131–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031002002.
[150]
Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications.
[151]
Ryan, Mary Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study.
[152]
Schatz, E. 2009. Chapters 1 & 3. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press.
[153]
Schatz, E. 2009. Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press.
[154]
Schatz, E. 2009. Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press.
[155]
Schatz, Edward 2009. Chapters 1 & 3. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press.
[156]
Schiffrin, D. et al. eds. 2005. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
[157]
Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
[158]
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance.
[159]
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance.
[160]
Seale, C. 2013. ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. Doing qualitative research. SAGE.
[161]
Shapiro, M. 2001. ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage. 318–322.
[162]
Silverman, D. 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[163]
Sluka, J. 2007. Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Blackwell.
[164]
Snyder, R. 2001. Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 36, 1 (Mar. 2001), 93–110. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687586.
[165]
Stritzel, H. 2012. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 43, 6 (Dec. 2012), 549–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953.
[166]
Taylor, S. 2013. What is discourse analysis?. Bloomsbury.
[167]
Taylor, S. and Open University 2001. Ethnographic research: a reader. SAGE.
[168]
Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials: http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf.
[169]
Terence Ball 1976. From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 20, 1 (1976), 151–177.
[170]
VUCETIC, S. 2011. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 03 (Jul. 2011), 1295–1312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
[171]
Wetherell, M. et al. 2001. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
[172]
Wetherell, M. et al. 2001. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
[173]
Wetherell, M. et al. 2001. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
[174]
Wetherell, M. et al. 2001. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
[175]
Wickham-Crowley, T.P. 1989. Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society. 17, 4 (Dec. 1989), 511–530. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700404.
[176]
Wiles, R. 2013. What are qualitative research ethics?. Bloomsbury.
[177]
Wood, E. 2008. ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy.
[178]
Wood, E.J. 2009. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society. 37, 1 (Mar. 2009), 131–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755.
[179]
Wood, E.J. 2006. The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology. 29, 3 (Sep. 2006), 373–386. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
[180]
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[181]
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[182]
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[183]
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
[184]
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR.
[185]
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis.
[186]
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines.
[187]
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines.
[188]
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. Fall 2012.
[189]
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. Fall 2012.
[190]
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier.
[191]
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’).
