1.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Oxford University Press; 2012.
2.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
3.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press; 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
4.
Gladwell, Malcolm. Starting Over. The New Yorker. (24). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511
5.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Oxford University Press; 2012.
6.
Schatz E. Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. In: Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. The University of Chicago Press; 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
7.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
8.
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis. 2006;14(3):227-249. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
9.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2010.
10.
Popper KR. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Vol Routledge classics. Routledge; 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627
11.
Lisa Wedeen. Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry. 2013;39(4):841-873. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358
12.
Lakatos I. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press; 1970. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171434
13.
Freedman D. Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences. 1989;18(2). doi:10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4
14.
McKeown TJ. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization. 1999;53(01):161-190. doi:10.1162/002081899550841
15.
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco. Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics. 1977;29(4):489-522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16.
Posner, Daniel N. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review. (4):529-545. http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
17.
Hansen L. ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge; 2009. doi:10.4324/9780203864944
18.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Oxford University Press; 2012.
19.
Geddes B. Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. In: Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Vol Analytical perspectives on politics. University of Michigan Press; 2003.
20.
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 2002;30(4):596-619. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
21.
Giovanni Sartori. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. 1970;64(4):1033-1053. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22.
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 1999;31(3):357-393. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23.
Robert Adcock and David Collier. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review. 2001;95(3):529-546. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
24.
Schatz E. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. The University of Chicago Press; 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
25.
Schatz, Edward. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. University of Chicago Press; 2009.
26.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
27.
Dunne C. The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011;14(2):111-124. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
28.
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 2006;6(1):9-25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
29.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. (Fall 2012). http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
30.
BLATTMAN C, HARTMAN AC, BLAIR RA. How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review. 2014;108(01):100-120. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000543
31.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Oxford University Press; 2012.
32.
Wood E. ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective Actioninstitutionselectoral Systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy. ; 2008. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
33.
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2004;33(5):602-637. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
34.
Lofland J. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 4th ed. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2006.
35.
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN. Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review. 2009;103(4):622-644. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36.
Shapiro M. ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage; 2001:318-322. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf
37.
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 2007;38(2):215-232. doi:10.1177/0967010607078526
38.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press; 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
39.
David Collier. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2011;44(4):823-830. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974
40.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press; 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
41.
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, James A. Robinson. An African Success Story: Botswana. http://economics.mit.edu/files/284
42.
Renwick A. DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation. 2009;45(4):357-367. doi:10.1080/00344890903235256
43.
Nicholas Sambanis. Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics. 2004;2(2):259-279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
44.
George, Alexander L., Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2005.
45.
George AL, Bennett A. A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. In: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf
46.
George AL, Bennett A. Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. In: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf
47.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61(2):294-308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48.
Wood EJ. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society. 2009;37(1):131-161. doi:10.1177/0032329208329755
49.
Deborah J. Yashar. Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 1998;31(1):23-42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
50.
Lawrence A. Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security. 35(2):88-122. https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html
51.
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke. The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence. In: Lawrence A, Chenoweth E, eds. ; 2010. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&indx=2&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&dstmp=1448463208978
52.
Schatz E. Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. In: Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. The University of Chicago Press; 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
53.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Oxford University Press; 2012.
54.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
55.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769
56.
Scott, James C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance.; 1985. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
57.
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026
58.
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96(4):713-728. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 1994;28(1):231-244. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Vol Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. University of Chicago Press; 1995.
61.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2004;37(2):267-271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
62.
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge; 1994.
63.
Foucault M. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf
64.
Jackson PT. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. University of Michigan Press; 2006. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/
65.
Campbell D. Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. In: Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester University Press; 1998:1-13. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf
66.
VUCETIC S. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 2011;37(03):1295-1312. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000938
67.
Kendall G, Wickham G. Using Foucault’s Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd; 1999. doi:10.4135/9780857020239
68.
Carabine J. ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. (Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, eds.). Sage; 2001.
69.
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 2014;8(1):1-19. doi:10.1111/ips.12037
70.
Hall S. ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage; 2001.
71.
Schreier M. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE; 2012.
72.
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 2012;43(6):549-567. doi:10.1177/0967010612463953
73.
Hansen L. The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2000;29(2):285-306. doi:10.1177/03058298000290020501
74.
Hudson H. ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue. 2005;36(2):155-174. doi:10.1177/0967010605054642
75.
Hansen L. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 2006.
76.
Silverman D. Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2011.
77.
Taylor S. What Is Discourse Analysis? Vol ‘What is?’ research methods series. Bloomsbury; 2013.
78.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2008;3(2):77-101. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk
79.
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 2013;44(3):241-258. doi:10.1177/0967010613485871
80.
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5(2):225-254. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
81.
Richards L. Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials. http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf
82.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. (Fall 2012). http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
83.
Goffman A. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Vol Fieldwork encounters and discoveries. The University of Chicago Press; 2014. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf
84.
Lubet S. Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review. http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
85.
Singal J. I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us. http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#
86.
Benson M. On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review. http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html
87.
Wiles R. What Are Qualitative Research Ethics? Vol ‘What is?’ research methods series. Bloomsbury; 2013.
88.
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 2010;10(4):399-419. doi:10.1177/1468794110366796
89.
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 2014;14(5):529-541. doi:10.1177/1468794113495039
90.
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2012;45(04):717-723. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000819
91.
Lundy P. The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research. 2006;4(1):49-64. doi:10.1177/1476750306060542
92.
Jackson PT. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 2011.
93.
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. Vol Very short introductions. Oxford University Press; 2002.
94.
Michel Foucault. ‘Truth and Power’. In: The Foucault Reader. Vol Penguin social sciences. Penguin; 1991.
95.
Hacking I. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press; 1999.
96.
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press; 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801938
97.
Rabinow P, Sullivan WM. Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. University of California Press; 1987.
98.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994.
99.
Rogers M. Smith. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics. 2002;35(2):199-201. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
100.
Terence Ball. From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 1976;20(1):151-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
101.
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 2003;31(1):163-184. doi:10.1177/0032329202250167
102.
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE; 2010.
103.
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. In: Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
104.
George AL, Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2005.
105.
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 2006;14(3):353-368. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
106.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press; 1994.
107.
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology. 2002;25(1):33-47. doi:10.1023/A:1014300123105
108.
Robert Aunger. On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology. 1995;36(1):97-130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109.
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography. 2003;4(2):181-200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
111.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Vol Introducing qualitative methods. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2014.
112.
Christina Goulding. Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2002. doi:10.4135/9781849209236
113.
Snyder R. Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 2001;36(1):93-110. doi:10.1007/BF02687586
114.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61(2):294-308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
115.
Bennett A, Elman C. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 2006;9(1):455-476. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
116.
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 2006;14(3):250-267. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
117.
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 1998;16(1):4-33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
118.
Mahoney, James. Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842
119.
Bullock, John G.1. Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98(4). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
120.
Taylor S, Open University. Ethnographic Research: A Reader. SAGE; 2001.
121.
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge; 1994.
122.
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96(4):713-728. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
123.
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 1994;28(1):231-244. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
124.
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Vol Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. University of Chicago Press; 1995.
125.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2004;37(2):267-271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
126.
Lareau A, Shultz J. Journeys through Ethnography: Realistic Accounts of Fieldwork. Westview; 1996.
127.
Bourgois P. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Vol Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
128.
Scott, James C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance.; 1985. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
129.
Barrett CB, Cason JW. Overseas Research: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2010.
130.
Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2005.
131.
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE; 2010.
132.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59-82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
133.
Ribbens J. Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum. 1989;12(6):579-592. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2
134.
Miri Song and David Parker. COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology. 1995;29(2):241-256. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135.
McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Neidig JL. Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):63-84. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239573
136.
Kvale S. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications; 1996.
137.
Puwar, Nirmal. Reflections on interviewing women MPs. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167
138.
ROTH WD, MEHTA JD. The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research. 2002;31(2):131-173. doi:10.1177/0049124102031002002
139.
Wickham-Crowley TP. Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society. 1989;17(4):511-530. doi:10.1177/003232928901700404
140.
David Smilde. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology. 2005;111(3):757-796. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.
141.
Evan S. Lieberman. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review. 2005;99(3):435-452. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142.
Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage Publications; 2002.
143.
Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2013.
144.
Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico F. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Vol LEA communication series. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005.
145.
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris. Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058
146.
Hansen L. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 2006.
147.
Dean M. Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology. Routledge; 1994.
148.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Sage; 2001.
149.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, Open University. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage; 2001.
150.
Howarth DR. Discourse. Vol Concepts in the social sciences. Open University Press; 2000.
151.
Fairclough I, Fairclough N. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Routledge; 2012.
152.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Sage; 2001.
153.
Dijk TA van. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. SAGE; 1997.
154.
van Dijk T. What is Political Discourse Analysis? http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
155.
Schiffrin D, Tannen D, Hamilton HE, eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers Ltd; 2005. doi:10.1002/9780470753460
156.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, Open University. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage; 2001.
157.
Fairclough N. Language and Power. Vol Language in social life series. 2nd ed. Longman; 2001.
158.
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis. http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf
159.
Seale C. ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. In: Doing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. SAGE; 2013.
160.
Dohan D, Sánchez-Jankowski M. Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology. 1998;24(1):477-498. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477
161.
Cousins K, Mcintosh W. More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity. 2005;39(5):581-614. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z
162.
Fielding NG, Lee RM. New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods. 2002;14(2):197-216. doi:10.1177/1525822X02014002005
163.
Johnston L. Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2006;9(5):379-391. doi:10.1080/13645570600659433
164.
Kelle U. ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. In: Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004. doi:10.4135/9781848608191
165.
MacMillan, Katie. More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6(3). http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
166.
Ryan, Mary. Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850
167.
Kelle U, Prein G, Bird K. Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice. Sage Publications; 1995.
168.
LIEBERMAN ES. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review. 2005;99(03). doi:10.1017/S0003055405051762
169.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
170.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
171.
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 2006;6(1):9-25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
172.
Ahmed A, Sil R. When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics. 2012;10(04):935-953. doi:10.1017/S1537592712002836
173.
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
174.
Kimmel A. Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1988. doi:10.4135/9781412984096
175.
Oliver P. The Student’s Guide to Research Ethics. Open University Press; 2003.
176.
Pimple KD. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf
177.
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’). http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
178.
Punch M. ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. Sage Publications; 1998.
179.
Wood EJ. The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology. 2006;29(3):373-386. doi:10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8
180.
Deloria V. ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. Vol Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology. Blackwell; 2007.
181.
Kelman HC. The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist. 1972;27(11):989-1016. doi:10.1037/h0033995
182.
Fontana A, Frey J. ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. Sage Publications; 1998.
183.
Sluka J. Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. Vol Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology. Blackwell; 2007.
184.
Hutchings K. ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge; 2009. doi:10.4324/9780203864944
185.
Multi-Author Symposium. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2009;42(2):287-328. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
186.
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires. Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39(4):781-803. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
187.
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2002. doi:10.4135/9781849209144
188.
Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press; 1982.
189.
Ackerly BA, Stern M, True J, eds. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617690
190.
Reason P, Rowan J, eds. Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
191.
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author). Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401
