1
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
2
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
3
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
4
Gladwell, Malcolm. Starting Over. The New Yorkerhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511
5
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
6
Schatz E. Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
7
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
8
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis 2006;14:227–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
9
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.
10
Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery. London: : Routledge 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627
11
Lisa Wedeen. Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry 2013;39:841–73.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358
12
Lakatos I. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1970. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139171434
13
Freedman D. Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences 1989;18. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4
14
McKeown TJ. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization 1999;53:161–90. doi:10.1162/002081899550841
15
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco. Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics 1977;29:489–522.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16
Posner, Daniel N. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review;:529–45.http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
17
Hansen L. ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge 2009. doi:10.4324/9780203864944
18
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
19
Geddes B. Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. In: Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2003.
20
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory 2002;30:596–619.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
21
Giovanni Sartori. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review 1970;64:1033–53.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 1999;31:357–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23
Robert Adcock and David Collier. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review 2001;95:529–46.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
24
Schatz E. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
25
Schatz, Edward. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2009.
26
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
27
Dunne C. The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2011;14:111–24. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
28
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research 2006;6:9–25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
29
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
30
BLATTMAN C, HARTMAN AC, BLAIR RA. How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review 2014;108:100–20. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000543
31
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
32
Wood E. ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy. 2008. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
33
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2004;33:602–37. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
34
Lofland J. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning 2006.
35
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN. Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review 2009;103:622–44.http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36
Shapiro M. ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : Sage 2001. 318–22.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf
37
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue 2007;38:215–32. doi:10.1177/0967010607078526
38
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
39
David Collier. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics 2011;44:823–30.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974
40
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139858472
41
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, James A. Robinson. An African Success Story: Botswana. http://economics.mit.edu/files/284
42
Renwick A. DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation 2009;45:357–67. doi:10.1080/00344890903235256
43
Nicholas Sambanis. Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics 2004;2:259–79.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
44
George, Alexander L., Bennett, Andrew. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005.
45
George AL, Bennett A. A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf
46
George AL, Bennett A. Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf
47
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 2008;61:294–308.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48
Wood EJ. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society 2009;37:131–61. doi:10.1177/0032329208329755
49
Deborah J. Yashar. Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics 1998;31:23–42.http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
50
Lawrence A. Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security;35:88–122.https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html
51
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke. The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence. In: Lawrence A, Chenoweth E, eds. . 2010. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&indx=2&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&dstmp=1448463208978
52
Schatz E. Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2009. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
53
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
54
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
55
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: : Routledge 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769
56
Scott, James C. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. 1985. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
57
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026
58
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review 2002;96:713–28.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology 1994;28:231–44.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1995.
61
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics 2004;37:267–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
62
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 1994.
63
Foucault M. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf
64
Jackson PT. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2006. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/
65
Campbell D. Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. In: Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1998. 1–13.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf
66
VUCETIC S. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies 2011;37:1295–312. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000938
67
Kendall G, Wickham G. Using Foucault’s Methods. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications Ltd 1999. doi:10.4135/9780857020239
68
Carabine J. ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: : Sage 2001.
69
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology 2014;8:1–19. doi:10.1111/ips.12037
70
Hall S. ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : Sage 2001.
71
Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012.
72
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue 2012;43:549–67. doi:10.1177/0967010612463953
73
Hansen L. The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2000;29:285–306. doi:10.1177/03058298000290020501
74
Hudson H. ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue 2005;36:155–74. doi:10.1177/0967010605054642
75
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: : Routledge 2006.
76
Silverman D. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2011.
77
Taylor S. What is discourse analysis? London: : Bloomsbury 2013.
78
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2008;3:77–101.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk
79
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue 2013;44:241–58. doi:10.1177/0967010613485871
80
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 1999;5:225–54. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
81
Richards L. Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials. http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf
82
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
83
Goffman A. On the run: fugitive life in an American city. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2014. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf
84
Lubet S. Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review. http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
85
Singal J. I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us. http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#
86
Benson M. On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review. http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html
87
Wiles R. What are qualitative research ethics? London: : Bloomsbury 2013.
88
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research 2010;10:399–419. doi:10.1177/1468794110366796
89
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research 2014;14:529–41. doi:10.1177/1468794113495039
90
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics 2012;45:717–23. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000819
91
Lundy P. The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research 2006;4:49–64. doi:10.1177/1476750306060542
92
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: : Routledge 2011.
93
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
94
Michel Foucault. ‘Truth and Power’. In: The Foucault reader. London: : Penguin 1991.
95
Hacking I. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
96
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801938
97
Rabinow P, Sullivan WM. Interpretive social science: a second look. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 1987.
98
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
99
Rogers M. Smith. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics 2002;35:199–201.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
100
Terence Ball. From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 1976;20:151–77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
101
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society 2003;31:163–84. doi:10.1177/0032329202250167
102
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2010.
103
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. In: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
104
George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005.
105
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis 2006;14:353–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
106
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
107
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology 2002;25:33–47. doi:10.1023/A:1014300123105
108
Robert Aunger. On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology 1995;36:97–130.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography 2003;4:181–200.http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, N.Y: : Aldine de Gruyter 1967.
111
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE 2014.
112
Christina Goulding. Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd 2002. doi:10.4135/9781849209236
113
Snyder R. Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development 2001;36:93–110. doi:10.1007/BF02687586
114
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 2008;61:294–308.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
115
Bennett A, Elman C. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science 2006;9:455–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
116
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis 2006;14:250–67.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
117
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory 1998;16:4–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
118
Mahoney, James. Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842
119
Bullock, John G.1. Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;98.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
120
Taylor S, Open University. Ethnographic research: a reader. London: : SAGE 2001.
121
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 1994.
122
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review 2002;96:713–28.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
123
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology 1994;28:231–44.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
124
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1995.
125
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics 2004;37:267–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
126
Lareau A, Shultz J. Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Oxford: : Westview 1996.
127
Bourgois P. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
128
Scott, James C. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. 1985. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
129
Barrett CB, Cason JW. Overseas research: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 2010.
130
Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 2005.
131
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2010.
132
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 2006;18:59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
133
Ribbens J. Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum 1989;12:579–92. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2
134
Miri Song and David Parker. COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology 1995;29:241–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135
McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Neidig JL. Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods 2003;15:63–84. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239573
136
Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 1996.
137
Puwar, Nirmal. Reflections on interviewing women MPs. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167
138
ROTH WD, MEHTA JD. The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research 2002;31:131–73. doi:10.1177/0049124102031002002
139
Wickham-Crowley TP. Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society 1989;17:511–30. doi:10.1177/003232928901700404
140
David Smilde. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology 2005;111:757–96.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.
141
Evan S. Lieberman. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review 2005;99:435–52.http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 2002.
143
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2013.
144
Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico F. Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. 2nd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum 2005.
145
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris. Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058
146
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: : Routledge 2006.
147
Dean M. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: : Routledge 1994.
148
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: : Sage 2001.
149
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, et al. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : Sage 2001.
150
Howarth DR. Discourse. Buckinghamshire: : Open University Press 2000.
151
Fairclough I, Fairclough N. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. London: : Routledge 2012.
152
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: : Sage 2001.
153
Dijk TA van. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: : SAGE 1997.
154
van Dijk T. What is Political Discourse Analysis? http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
155
Schiffrin D, Tannen D, Hamilton HE, editors. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: : Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2005. doi:10.1002/9780470753460
156
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, et al. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: : Sage 2001.
157
Fairclough N. Language and power. 2nd ed. Harlow, Eng: : Longman 2001.
158
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis. http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf
159
Seale C. ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. In: Doing qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2013.
160
Dohan D, Sánchez-Jankowski M. Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology 1998;24:477–98. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477
161
Cousins K, Mcintosh W. More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity 2005;39:581–614. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z
162
Fielding NG, Lee RM. New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods 2002;14:197–216. doi:10.1177/1525822X02014002005
163
Johnston L. Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2006;9:379–91. doi:10.1080/13645570600659433
164
Kelle U. ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. In: Qualitative Research Practice. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications Ltd 2004. doi:10.4135/9781848608191
165
MacMillan, Katie. More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research;6.http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
166
Ryan, Mary. Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850
167
Kelle U, Prein G, Bird K. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. London: : Sage Publications 1995.
168
LIEBERMAN ES. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review 2005;99. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051762
169
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
170
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
171
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research 2006;6:9–25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
172
Ahmed A, Sil R. When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics 2012;10:935–53. doi:10.1017/S1537592712002836
173
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
174
Kimmel A. Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America : : SAGE Publications, Inc. 1988. doi:10.4135/9781412984096
175
Oliver P. The student’s guide to research ethics. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2003.
176
Pimple KD. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf
177
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’). http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
178
Punch M. ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 1998.
179
Wood EJ. The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology 2006;29:373–86. doi:10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8
180
Deloria V. ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2007.
181
Kelman HC. The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist 1972;27:989–1016. doi:10.1037/h0033995
182
Fontana A, Frey J. ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 1998.
183
Sluka J. Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2007.
184
Hutchings K. ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge 2009. doi:10.4324/9780203864944
185
Multi-Author Symposium. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics 2009;42:287–328.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
186
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires. Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science 2009;39:781–803.http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
187
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist Methodology. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications Ltd. 2002. doi:10.4135/9781849209144
188
Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1982.
189
Ackerly BA, Stern M, True J, editors. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617690
190
Reason P, Rowan J, editors. Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 1981.
191
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author). Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401
