1.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
2.
Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P.: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
3.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel eds: Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.
4.
Gladwell, Malcolm: Starting Over. The New Yorker.
5.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
6.
Schatz, E.: Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).
7.
Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P.: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
8.
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz: A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis. 14, 227–249 (2006).
9.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E.: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Md (2010).
10.
Popper, K.R.: The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London (2002).
11.
Lisa Wedeen: Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry. 39, 841–873 (2013).
12.
Lakatos, I.: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. In: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434.
13.
Freedman, D.: Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences. 18, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4.
14.
McKeown, T.J.: Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization. 53, 161–190 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550841.
15.
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco: Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics. 29, 489–522 (1977).
16.
Posner, Daniel N: The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review. 529–545.
17.
Hansen, L.: ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge (2009). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944.
18.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
19.
Geddes, B.: Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. In: Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2003).
20.
Ian Shapiro: Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory. 30, 596–619 (2002).
21.
Giovanni Sartori: Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review. 64, 1033–1053 (1970).
22.
John Gerring: What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity. 31, 357–393 (1999).
23.
Robert Adcock and David Collier: Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review. 95, 529–546 (2001).
24.
Schatz, E.: Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).
25.
Schatz, Edward: Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).
26.
Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P.: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
27.
Dunne, C.: The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 111–124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.
28.
Mason, J.: Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 6, 9–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866.
29.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’.
30.
BLATTMAN, C., HARTMAN, A.C., BLAIR, R.A.: How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review. 108, 100–120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000543.
31.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
32.
Wood, E.: ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy (2008).
33.
Hollander, J.A.: The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 33, 602–637 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988.
34.
Lofland, J.: Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA (2006).
35.
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN: Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review. 103, 622–644 (2009).
36.
Shapiro, M.: ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. pp. 318–322. Sage, London (2001).
37.
Amoore, L.: Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 38, 215–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078526.
38.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel eds: Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.
39.
David Collier: Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics. 44, 823–830 (2011).
40.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel eds: Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.
41.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., James A. Robinson: An African Success Story: Botswana.
42.
Renwick, A.: DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation. 45, 357–367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256.
43.
Nicholas Sambanis: Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics. 2, 259–279 (2004).
44.
George, Alexander L., Bennett, Andrew: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2005).
45.
George, A.L., Bennett, A.: A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2005).
46.
George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2005).
47.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring: Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 294–308 (2008).
48.
Wood, E.J.: Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society. 37, 131–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755.
49.
Deborah J. Yashar: Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics. 31, 23–42 (1998).
50.
Lawrence, A.: Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security. 35, 88–122.
51.
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke: The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence. Presented at the (2010).
52.
Schatz, E.: Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).
53.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
54.
Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P.: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
55.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London (2007).
56.
Scott, James C.: Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. (1985).
57.
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR.
58.
Lisa Wedeen: Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 96, 713–728 (2002).
59.
John D. Brewer: THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 28, 231–244 (1994).
60.
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., Shaw, L.L.: Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995).
61.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz: From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 37, 267–271 (2004).
62.
Okley, J.: ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (1994).
63.
Foucault, M.: Nietzsche, Genealogy, History, http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf.
64.
Jackson, P.T.: Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2006).
65.
Campbell, D.: Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. In: Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. pp. 1–13. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1998).
66.
VUCETIC, S.: Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 1295–1312 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
67.
Kendall, G., Wickham, G.: Using Foucault’s Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd, 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom (1999). https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020239.
68.
Carabine, J.: ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage, Los Angeles (2001).
69.
Hutchison, E.: A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 8, 1–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037.
70.
Hall, S.: ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage, London (2001).
71.
Schreier, M.: Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE, Los Angeles (2012).
72.
Stritzel, H.: Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 43, 549–567 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953.
73.
Hansen, L.: The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 29, 285–306 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501.
74.
Hudson, H.: ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue. 36, 155–174 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605054642.
75.
Hansen, L.: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge, London (2006).
76.
Silverman, D.: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE, Los Angeles (2011).
77.
Taylor, S.: What is discourse analysis? Bloomsbury, London (2013).
78.
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 77–101 (2008).
79.
Agius, C.: Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 44, 241–258 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485871.
80.
MILLIKEN, J.: The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, 225–254 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.
81.
Richards, L.: Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials, http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf.
82.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’.
83.
Goffman, A.: On the run: fugitive life in an American city. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2014).
84.
Lubet, S.: Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review, http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run.
85.
Singal, J.: I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us, http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#.
86.
Benson, M.: On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review, http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html.
87.
Wiles, R.: What are qualitative research ethics? Bloomsbury, London (2013).
88.
Clark, T.: On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 10, 399–419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796.
89.
Hammersley, M.: On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 14, 529–541 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495039.
90.
Fujii, L.A.: Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 45, 717–723 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819.
91.
Lundy, P.: The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research. 4, 49–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542.
92.
Jackson, P.T.: The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge, London (2011).
93.
Belsey, C.: Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
94.
Michel Foucault: ‘Truth and Power’. In: The Foucault reader. Penguin, London (1991).
95.
Hacking, I.: The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).
96.
Kratochwil, F.: Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. In: Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.
97.
Rabinow, P., Sullivan, W.M.: Interpretive social science: a second look. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (1987).
98.
King, G., Verba, S., Keohane, R.O.: Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1994).
99.
Rogers M. Smith: Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics. 35, 199–201 (2002).
100.
Terence Ball: From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 20, 151–177 (1976).
101.
Laitin, D.D.: The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 31, 163–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202250167.
102.
King, N., Horrocks, C.: Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2010).
103.
Brady, H.E., Collier, D.: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. In: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2004).
104.
George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2005).
105.
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright: Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis. 14, 353–368 (2006).
106.
King, G., Verba, S., Keohane, R.O.: Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1994).
107.
Goodwin, J., Horowitz, R.: Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology. 25, 33–47 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014300123105.
108.
Robert Aunger: On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology. 36, 97–130 (1995).
109.
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson: Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography. 4, 181–200 (2003).
110.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, N.Y (1967).
111.
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2014).
112.
Christina Goulding: Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd (2002). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209236.
113.
Snyder, R.: Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 36, 93–110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687586.
114.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring: Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 294–308 (2008).
115.
Bennett, A., Elman, C.: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 9, 455–476 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918.
116.
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman: Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis. 14, 250–267 (2006).
117.
Michael Burawoy: The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory. 16, 4–33 (1998).
118.
Mahoney, James: Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis.
119.
Bullock, John G.1: Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98,.
120.
Taylor, S., Open University: Ethnographic research: a reader. SAGE, London (2001).
121.
Okley, J.: ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (1994).
122.
Lisa Wedeen: Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 96, 713–728 (2002).
123.
John D. Brewer: THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology. 28, 231–244 (1994).
124.
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., Shaw, L.L.: Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995).
125.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz: From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics. 37, 267–271 (2004).
126.
Lareau, A., Shultz, J.: Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Westview, Oxford (1996).
127.
Bourgois, P.: In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
128.
Scott, James C.: Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. (1985).
129.
Barrett, C.B., Cason, J.W.: Overseas research: a practical guide. Routledge, London (2010).
130.
Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2005).
131.
King, N., Horrocks, C.: Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2010).
132.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L.: How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 18, 59–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
133.
Ribbens, J.: Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum. 12, 579–592 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2.
134.
Miri Song and David Parker: COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology. 29, 241–256 (1995).
135.
McLellan, E., MacQueen, K.M., Neidig, J.L.: Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods. 15, 63–84 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573.
136.
Kvale, S.: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1996).
137.
Puwar, Nirmal: Reflections on interviewing women MPs.
138.
ROTH, W.D., MEHTA, J.D.: The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research. 31, 131–173 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031002002.
139.
Wickham-Crowley, T.P.: Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society. 17, 511–530 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700404.
140.
David Smilde: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology. 111, 757–796 (2005).
141.
Evan S. Lieberman: Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review. 99, 435–452 (2005).
142.
Neuendorf, K.A.: The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2002).
143.
Krippendorff, K.: Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013).
144.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F.: Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J. (2005).
145.
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris: Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges.
146.
Hansen, L.: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge, London (2006).
147.
Dean, M.: Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge, London (1994).
148.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S.: Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage, Los Angeles (2001).
149.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S., Open University: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage, London (2001).
150.
Howarth, D.R.: Discourse. Open University Press, Buckinghamshire (2000).
151.
Fairclough, I., Fairclough, N.: Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Routledge, London (2012).
152.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S.: Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage, Los Angeles (2001).
153.
Dijk, T.A. van: Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE, London (1997).
154.
van Dijk, T.: What is Political Discourse Analysis?
155.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E. eds: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts, USA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.
156.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S., Open University: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage, London (2001).
157.
Fairclough, N.: Language and power. Longman, Harlow, Eng (2001).
158.
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis.
159.
Seale, C.: ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. In: Doing qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013).
160.
Dohan, D., Sánchez-Jankowski, M.: Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology. 24, 477–498 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477.
161.
Cousins, K., Mcintosh, W.: More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity. 39, 581–614 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z.
162.
Fielding, N.G., Lee, R.M.: New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods. 14, 197–216 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02014002005.
163.
Johnston, L.: Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 9, 379–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600659433.
164.
Kelle, U.: ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. In: Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom (2004). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.
165.
MacMillan, Katie: More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6,.
166.
Ryan, Mary: Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study.
167.
Kelle, U., Prein, G., Bird, K.: Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. Sage Publications, London (1995).
168.
LIEBERMAN, E.S.: Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review. 99, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762.
169.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines.
170.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines.
171.
Mason, J.: Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 6, 9–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866.
172.
Ahmed, A., Sil, R.: When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics. 10, 935–953 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002836.
173.
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier.
174.
Kimmel, A.: Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America (1988). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984096.
175.
Oliver, P.: The student’s guide to research ethics. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2003).
176.
Pimple, K.D.: Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.
177.
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’), http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html.
178.
Punch, M.: ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1998).
179.
Wood, E.J.: The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology. 29, 373–386 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
180.
Deloria, V.: ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2007).
181.
Kelman, H.C.: The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist. 27, 989–1016 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033995.
182.
Fontana, A., Frey, J.: ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1998).
183.
Sluka, J.: Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2007).
184.
Hutchings, K.: ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge (2009). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944.
185.
Multi-Author Symposium: Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics. 42, 287–328 (2009).
186.
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires: Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science. 39, 781–803 (2009).
187.
Ramazanoglu, C., Holland, J.: Feminist Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd., 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom (2002). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209144.
188.
Gilligan, C.: In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1982).
189.
Ackerly, B.A., Stern, M., True, J. eds: Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690.
190.
Reason, P., Rowan, J. eds: Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1981).
191.
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author): Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development.
