[1]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[2]
D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. .
[3]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, Eds., Process Tracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
[4]
Gladwell, Malcolm, ‘Starting Over’, The New Yorker, no. 24 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511
[5]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[6]
E. Schatz, ‘Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power’, in Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
[7]
D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. .
[8]
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz, ‘A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research’, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 227–249, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[9]
Collier, David and Brady, Henry E., Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards, 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.
[10]
K. R. Popper, The logic of scientific discovery, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627
[11]
Lisa Wedeen, ‘Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 841–873, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358
[12]
I. Lakatos, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge’, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139171434
[13]
D. Freedman, ‘Statistical models and shoe leather’, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, Oct. 1989, doi: 10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4.
[14]
T. J. McKeown, ‘Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research’, International Organization, vol. 53, no. 01, pp. 161–190, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1162/002081899550841.
[15]
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco, ‘Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics’, World Politics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 489–522, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[16]
Posner, Daniel N, ‘The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi’, American Political Science Review, no. 4, pp. 529–545 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[17]
L. Hansen, ‘“Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies” in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations’, in Gender Matters in Global Politics, Routledge, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203864944
[18]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[19]
B. Geddes, ‘Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2’, in Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics, vol. Analytical perspectives on politics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
[20]
Ian Shapiro, ‘Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It’, Political Theory, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 596–619, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[21]
Giovanni Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1033–1053, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[22]
John Gerring, ‘What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, Polity, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 357–393, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[23]
Robert Adcock and David Collier, ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 529–546, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[24]
E. Schatz, ‘Chapters 1 & 3’, in Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
[25]
Schatz, Edward, ‘Chapters 1 & 3’, in Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[26]
D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. .
[27]
C. Dunne, ‘The place of the literature review in grounded theory research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 111–124, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.
[28]
J. Mason, ‘Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way’, Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–25, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1468794106058866.
[29]
‘“Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes”’, no. Fall 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
[30]
C. BLATTMAN, A. C. HARTMAN, and R. A. BLAIR, ‘How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education’, American Political Science Review, vol. 108, no. 01, pp. 100–120, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000543.
[31]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[32]
E. Wood, ‘“Field Research” in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics’, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
[33]
J. A. Hollander, ‘The Social Contexts of Focus Groups’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 602–637, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1177/0891241604266988.
[34]
J. Lofland, Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2006.
[35]
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN, ‘Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 622–644, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[36]
M. Shapiro, ‘“Textualising Global Politics” in Discourse theory and practice: a reader’, in Discourse theory and practice: a reader, London: Sage, 2001, pp. 318–322 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf
[37]
L. Amoore, ‘Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror’, Security Dialogue, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 215–232, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0967010607078526.
[38]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, Eds., Process Tracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
[39]
David Collier, ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 823–830, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974
[40]
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, Eds., Process Tracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
[41]
D. Acemoglu, S. Johnson, and James A. Robinson, ‘An African Success Story: Botswana’ [Online]. Available: http://economics.mit.edu/files/284
[42]
A. Renwick, ‘DO “WRONG WINNER” ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND’, Representation, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 357–367, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00344890903235256.
[43]
Nicholas Sambanis, ‘Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 259–279, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[44]
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, vol. BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005.
[45]
A. L. George and A. Bennett, ‘A Pedagogical note to parts II and III’, in Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, vol. BCSIA studies in international security, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf
[46]
A. L. George and A. Bennett, ‘Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison’, in Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, vol. BCSIA studies in international security, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf
[47]
Jason Seawright and John Gerring, ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 294–308, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[48]
E. J. Wood, ‘Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?’, Politics & Society, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 131–161, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0032329208329755.
[49]
Deborah J. Yashar, ‘Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[50]
A. Lawrence, ‘Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule’, International Security, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 88–122 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html
[51]
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke, ‘The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence’, A. Lawrence and E. Chenoweth, Eds. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&indx=2&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&dstmp=1448463208978
[52]
E. Schatz, ‘Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion’, in Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
[53]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[54]
D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. .
[55]
M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson, Ethnography: principles in practice, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769
[56]
Scott, James C., Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. 1985 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
[57]
‘Multi-Author Symposium “Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad” in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR’ [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026
[58]
Lisa Wedeen, ‘Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 713–728, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[59]
John D. Brewer, ‘THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC’, Sociology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 231–244, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
R. M. Emerson, R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw, Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
[61]
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz, ‘From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[62]
J. Okley, ‘“Thinking through fieldwork” in Analyzing qualitative data’, in Analyzing qualitative data, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1994.
[63]
M. Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf
[64]
P. T. Jackson, Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/
[65]
D. Campbell, ‘Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity’, in Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity, Rev. ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998, pp. 1–13 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf
[66]
S. VUCETIC, ‘Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 37, no. 03, pp. 1295–1312, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000938.
[67]
G. Kendall and G. Wickham, Using Foucault’s Methods. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/using-foucaults-methods/SAGE.xml
[68]
J. Carabine, ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 2001.
[69]
E. Hutchison, ‘A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami’, International Political Sociology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1111/ips.12037.
[70]
S. Hall, ‘“The Spectacle of ‘The Other’” in Discourse theory and practice: a reader’, in Discourse theory and practice: a reader, London: Sage, 2001.
[71]
M. Schreier, Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012.
[72]
H. Stritzel, ‘Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime’, Security Dialogue, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 549–567, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0967010612463953.
[73]
L. Hansen, ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 285–306, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/03058298000290020501.
[74]
H. Hudson, ‘“Doing” Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security’, Security Dialogue, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 155–174, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0967010605054642.
[75]
L. Hansen, Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war, vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge, 2006.
[76]
D. Silverman, Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2011.
[77]
S. Taylor, What is discourse analysis?, vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
[78]
V. Braun and V. Clarke, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jul. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk
[79]
C. Agius, ‘Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security’, Security Dialogue, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 241–258, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0967010613485871.
[80]
J. MILLIKEN, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 225–254, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003.
[81]
L. Richards, ‘Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials’. [Online]. Available: http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf
[82]
‘“Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes”’, no. Fall 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
[83]
A. Goffman, On the run: fugitive life in an American city, vol. Fieldwork encounters and discoveries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf
[84]
S. Lubet, ‘Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review’. [Online]. Available: http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
[85]
J. Singal, ‘I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us’. [Online]. Available: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#
[86]
M. Benson, ‘On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review’. [Online]. Available: http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html
[87]
R. Wiles, What are qualitative research ethics?, vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
[88]
T. Clark, ‘On “being researched”: why do people engage with qualitative research?’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 399–419, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794110366796.
[89]
M. Hammersley, ‘On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis’, Qualitative Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 529–541, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1468794113495039.
[90]
L. A. Fujii, ‘Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities’, PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 45, no. 04, pp. 717–723, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1017/S1049096512000819.
[91]
P. Lundy, ‘The ethics of silence: Action research, community “truth-telling” and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland’, Action Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–64, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1476750306060542.
[92]
P. T. Jackson, The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics, vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge, 2011.
[93]
C. Belsey, Poststructuralism: a very short introduction, vol. Very short introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[94]
Michel Foucault, ‘“Truth and Power”’, in The Foucault reader, vol. Penguin social sciences, London: Penguin, 1991.
[95]
I. Hacking, The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[96]
F. Kratochwil, ‘Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences’, in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, D. Della Porta and M. Keating, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511801938
[97]
P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan, Interpretive social science: a second look. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1987.
[98]
G. King, S. Verba, and R. O. Keohane, Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[99]
Rogers M. Smith, ‘Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 199–201, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[100]
Terence Ball, ‘From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 151–177, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[101]
D. D. Laitin, ‘The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science’, Politics & Society, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 163–184, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1177/0032329202250167.
[102]
N. King and C. Horrocks, Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010.
[103]
H. E. Brady and D. Collier, ‘Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards’, in Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
[104]
A. L. George and A. Bennett, Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, vol. BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005.
[105]
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright, ‘Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology’, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 353–368, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[106]
G. King, S. Verba, and R. O. Keohane, Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[107]
J. Goodwin and R. Horowitz, ‘Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2002, doi: 10.1023/A:1014300123105.
[108]
Robert Aunger, ‘On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science?’, Current Anthropology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 97–130, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[109]
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson, ‘Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory’, Ethnography, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 181–200, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[110]
B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
[111]
K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory, 2nd ed., vol. Introducing qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2014.
[112]
Christina Goulding, Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/grounded-theory/SAGE.xml
[113]
R. Snyder, ‘Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93–110, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1007/BF02687586.
[114]
Jason Seawright and John Gerring, ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 294–308, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[115]
A. Bennett and C. Elman, ‘QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 455–476, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918.
[116]
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman, ‘Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence’, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 250–267, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[117]
Michael Burawoy, ‘The Extended Case Method’, Sociological Theory, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4–33, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[118]
Mahoney, James, ‘Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis’ [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842
[119]
Bullock, John G.1, ‘Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer)’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 98, no. 4 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
[120]
S. Taylor and Open University, Ethnographic research: a reader. London: SAGE, 2001.
[121]
J. Okley, ‘“Thinking through fieldwork” in Analyzing qualitative data’, in Analyzing qualitative data, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1994.
[122]
Lisa Wedeen, ‘Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 713–728, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[123]
John D. Brewer, ‘THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC’, Sociology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 231–244, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[124]
R. M. Emerson, R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw, Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
[125]
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz, ‘From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[126]
A. Lareau and J. Shultz, Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Oxford: Westview, 1996.
[127]
P. Bourgois, In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, 2nd ed., vol. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
[128]
Scott, James C., Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. 1985 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
[129]
C. B. Barrett and J. W. Cason, Overseas research: a practical guide, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2010.
[130]
H. J. Rubin and I. Rubin, Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2005.
[131]
N. King and C. Horrocks, Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010.
[132]
G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–82, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
[133]
J. Ribbens, ‘Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”?’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 579–592, Jan. 1989, doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2.
[134]
Miri Song and David Parker, ‘COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING’, Sociology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[135]
E. McLellan, K. M. MacQueen, and J. L. Neidig, ‘Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription’, Field Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 63–84, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1177/1525822X02239573.
[136]
S. Kvale, Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1996.
[137]
Puwar, Nirmal, ‘Reflections on interviewing women MPs’ [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167
[138]
W. D. ROTH and J. D. MEHTA, ‘The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events’, Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 131–173, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0049124102031002002.
[139]
T. P. Wickham-Crowley, ‘Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures’, Politics & Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 511–530, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.1177/003232928901700404.
[140]
David Smilde, ‘A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 757–796, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.
[141]
Evan S. Lieberman, ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 435–452, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[142]
K. A. Neuendorf, The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2002.
[143]
K. Krippendorff, Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013.
[144]
D. Riffe, S. Lacy, and F. Fico, Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research, 2nd ed., vol. LEA communication series. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.
[145]
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris, Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058
[146]
L. Hansen, Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war, vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge, 2006.
[147]
M. Dean, Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge, 1994.
[148]
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. Yates, Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 2001.
[149]
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. Yates, and Open University, Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage, 2001.
[150]
D. R. Howarth, Discourse, vol. Concepts in the social sciences. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press, 2000.
[151]
I. Fairclough and N. Fairclough, Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. London: Routledge, 2012.
[152]
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. Yates, Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 2001.
[153]
T. A. van Dijk, Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE, 1997.
[154]
T. van Dijk, ‘What is Political Discourse Analysis?’ [Online]. Available: http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
[155]
D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton, Eds., The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470753460
[156]
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. Yates, and Open University, Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage, 2001.
[157]
N. Fairclough, Language and power, 2nd ed., vol. Language in social life series. Harlow, Eng: Longman, 2001.
[158]
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis. [Online]. Available: http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf
[159]
C. Seale, ‘“Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data”’, in Doing qualitative research, 4th ed., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013.
[160]
D. Dohan and M. Sánchez-Jankowski, ‘Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 477–498, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477.
[161]
K. Cousins and W. Mcintosh, ‘More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research’, Quality & Quantity, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 581–614, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z.
[162]
N. G. Fielding and R. M. Lee, ‘New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software’, Field Methods, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 197–216, May 2002, doi: 10.1177/1525822X02014002005.
[163]
L. Johnston, ‘Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 379–391, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1080/13645570600659433.
[164]
U. Kelle, ‘“Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis” in Qualitative Research Practice’, in Qualitative Research Practice, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/qualitative-research-practice/SAGE.xml
[165]
MacMillan, Katie, ‘More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 6, no. 3 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[166]
Ryan, Mary, ‘Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study’ [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850
[167]
U. Kelle, G. Prein, and K. Bird, Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
[168]
E. S. LIEBERMAN, ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 03, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051762.
[169]
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. [Online]. Available: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
[170]
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. [Online]. Available: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
[171]
J. Mason, ‘Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way’, Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–25, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1468794106058866.
[172]
A. Ahmed and R. Sil, ‘When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, no. 04, pp. 935–953, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1017/S1537592712002836.
[173]
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier. [Online]. Available: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
[174]
A. Kimmel, Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc., 1988 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/ethics-and-values-in-applied-social-research/SAGE.xml
[175]
P. Oliver, The student’s guide to research ethics. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003.
[176]
K. D. Pimple, ‘Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research’ [Online]. Available: http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf
[177]
‘The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
[178]
M. Punch, ‘“Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research” in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues’, in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1998.
[179]
E. J. Wood, ‘The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 373–386, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8.
[180]
V. Deloria, ‘“Custer Died for Your Sins” in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader’, in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader, vol. Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2007.
[181]
H. C. Kelman, ‘The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy.’, American Psychologist, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 989–1016, 1972, doi: 10.1037/h0033995.
[182]
A. Fontana and J. Frey, ‘“The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text” in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues’, in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1998.
[183]
J. Sluka, ‘Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader’, in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader, vol. Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2007.
[184]
K. Hutchings, ‘“Ethics” in Gender Matters in Global Politics’, in Gender Matters in Global Politics, Routledge, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203864944
[185]
Multi-Author Symposium, ‘Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 287–328, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[186]
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires, ‘Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 781–803, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[187]
C. Ramazanoglu and J. Holland, Feminist Methodology. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd., 2002 [Online]. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/feminist-methodology/SAGE.xml
[188]
C. Gilligan, In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[189]
B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True, Eds., Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511617690
[190]
P. Reason and J. Rowan, Eds., Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
[191]
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author), ‘Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development’ [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401
