Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson, ‘An African Success Story: Botswana’ <http://economics.mit.edu/files/284>
Ackerly, Brooke A., Maria Stern, and Jacqui True, eds., Feminist Methodologies for International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690>
Agius, C., ‘Performing Identity: The Danish Cartoon Crisis and Discourses of Identity and Security’, Security Dialogue, 44.3 (2013), 241–58 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485871>
Ahmed, Amel, and Rudra Sil, ‘When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research’, Perspectives on Politics, 10.04 (2012), 935–53 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002836>
Amoore, L., ‘Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror’, Security Dialogue, 38.2 (2007), 215–32 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078526>
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman, ‘Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence’, Political Analysis, 14.3 (2006), 250–67 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds., Process Tracing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472>
———, eds., Process Tracing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472>
———, eds., Process Tracing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472>
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke, ‘The Turn to Violence in Self- Determination Struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence’, ed. by Adria Lawrence and Erica Chenoweth, 2010 <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&amp;ct=display&amp;fn=search&amp;doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&amp;indx=2&amp;recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&amp;recIdxs=1&amp;elementId=1&amp;renderMode=poppedOut&amp;displayMode=full&amp;frbrVersion=&amp;frbg=&amp;&amp;dscnt=0&amp;scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&amp;tb=t&amp;vid=UCL_VU1&amp;mode=Basic&amp;srt=rank&amp;tab=local&amp;dum=true&amp;vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&amp;dstmp=1448463208978>
Barrett, Christopher B., and Jeffrey W. Cason, Overseas Research: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed (London: Routledge, 2010)
Belsey, Catherine, Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), Very short introductions
Bennett, Andrew, and Colin Elman, ‘QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods’, Annual Review of Political Science, 9.1 (2006), 455–76 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918>
Benson, Michaela, ‘On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review’ <http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html>
BLATTMAN, CHRISTOPHER, ALEXANDRA C. HARTMAN, and ROBERT A. BLAIR, ‘How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education’, American Political Science Review, 108.01 (2014), 100–120 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000543>
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris, Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058>
Bourgois, Philippe, In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, 2nd ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562>
Brady, Henry E., and David Collier, ‘Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards’, in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004)
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke, ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3.2 (2008), 77–101 <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk>
Bullock, John G.1, ‘Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer)’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98.4 <http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;CSC=Y&amp;NEWS=N&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;AN=00005205-201004000-00002&amp;LSLINK=80&amp;D=ovft>
Campbell, David, ‘Introduction to Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity’, in Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Rev. ed (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), pp. 1–13 <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf>
Carabine, Jean, ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (Los Angeles: Sage, 2001)
Charmaz, Kathy, Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed (Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2014), Introducing qualitative methods
Christina Goulding, Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002) <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209236>
Clark, T., ‘On “Being Researched”: Why Do People Engage with Qualitative Research?’, Qualitative Research, 10.4 (2010), 399–419 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796>
Collier, David and Brady, Henry E., Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed (Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010)
Cousins, Ken, and Wayne Mcintosh, ‘More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research’, Quality & Quantity, 39.5 (2005), 581–614 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z>
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson, ‘Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking Fieldwork and Theory’, Ethnography, 4.2 (2003), 181–200 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
David Collier, ‘Understanding Process Tracing’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 44.4 (2011), 823–30 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974>
David Smilde, ‘A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1’, American Journal of Sociology, 111.3 (2005), 757–96 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.>
Dean, Mitchell, Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology (London: Routledge, 1994)
Deborah J. Yashar, ‘Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, 31.1 (1998), 23–42 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Deloria, Vine, ‘“Custer Died for Your Sins” in Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader’, in Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader (Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2007), Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology
Dijk, Teun Adrianus van, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (London: SAGE, 1997)
van Dijk, Teun, ‘What Is Political Discourse Analysis?’ <http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf>
Dohan, Daniel, and Martín Sánchez-Jankowski, ‘Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24.1 (1998), 477–98 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477>
Dunne, Ciarán, ‘The Place of the Literature Review in Grounded Theory Research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14.2 (2011), 111–24 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930>
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN, ‘Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda’, The American Political Science Review, 103.4 (2009), 622–44 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing
———, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing
Evan S. Lieberman, ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, The American Political Science Review, 99.3 (2005), 435–52 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough, Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students (London: Routledge, 2012)
Fairclough, Norman, Language and Power, 2nd ed (Harlow, Eng: Longman, 2001), Language in social life series
Fielding, N. G., and R. M. Lee, ‘New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software’, Field Methods, 14.2 (2002), 197–216 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02014002005>
Fontana, Andrea, and James Frey, ‘“The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text” in The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues’, in The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1998)
Foucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ <http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf>
Freedman, David, ‘Statistical Models and Shoe Leather’, Mathematical Social Sciences, 18.2 (1989) <https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4>
Fujii, Lee Ann, ‘Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 45.04 (2012), 717–23 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819>
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco, ‘Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics’, World Politics, 29.4 (1977), 489–522 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Geddes, Barbara, ‘Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2’, in Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003), Analytical perspectives on politics
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett, ‘A Pedagogical Note to Parts II and III’, in Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005), BCSIA studies in international security <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf>
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005), BCSIA studies in international security
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005), BCSIA studies in international security
———, ‘Chapter 3: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’, in Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005), BCSIA studies in international security <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf>
Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982)
Giovanni Sartori, ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, The American Political Science Review, 64.4 (1970), 1033–53 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Gladwell, Malcolm, ‘Starting Over’, The New Yorker, 24 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511>
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967)
Goffman, Alice, On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014), Fieldwork encounters and discoveries <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf>
Goodwin, Jeff, and Ruth Horowitz, ‘Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas’, Qualitative Sociology, 25.1 (2002), 33–47 <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014300123105>
Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods, 18.1 (2006), 59–82 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903>
Hacking, Ian, The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999)
Hall, Stuart, ‘“The Spectacle of ‘The Other’” in Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader’, in Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (London: Sage, 2001)
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver, Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
———, Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
———, Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
———, Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
———, Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Hammersley, M., ‘On the Ethics of Interviewing for Discourse Analysis’, Qualitative Research, 14.5 (2014), 529–41 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495039>
Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson, Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed (London: Routledge, 2007) <https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769>
Hansen, L., ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 29.2 (2000), 285–306 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501>
Hansen, Lene, ‘“Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies” in Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations’, in Gender Matters in Global Politics (Routledge, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944>
———, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006), The new international relations
———, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006), The new international relations
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright, ‘Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology’, Political Analysis, 14.3 (2006), 353–68 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Hollander, J. A., ‘The Social Contexts of Focus Groups’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33.5 (2004), 602–37 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988>
Howarth, David R., Discourse (Buckinghamshire: Open University Press, 2000), Concepts in the social sciences
Hudson, H., ‘“Doing” Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist        Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security’, Security Dialogue, 36.2 (2005), 155–74 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605054642>
Hutchings, Kimberley, ‘“Ethics” in Gender Matters in Global Politics’, in Gender Matters in Global Politics (Routledge, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944>
Hutchison, Emma, ‘A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami’, International Political Sociology, 8.1 (2014), 1–19 <https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037>
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author), ‘Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development’ <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401>
Ian Shapiro, ‘Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It’, Political Theory, 30.4 (2002), 596–619 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006) <http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/>
———, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (London: Routledge, 2011), The new international relations
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz, ‘A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research’, Political Analysis, 14.3 (2006), 227–49 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Jason Seawright and John Gerring, ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, 61.2 (2008), 294–308 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, 61.2 (2008), 294–308 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
John D. Brewer, ‘THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC’, Sociology, 28.1 (1994), 231–44 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC’, Sociology, 28.1 (1994), 231–44 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
John Gerring, ‘What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, Polity, 31.3 (1999), 357–93 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Johnston, Lynne, ‘Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9.5 (2006), 379–91 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600659433>
Kelle, Udo, ‘“Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis” in Qualitative Research Practice’, in Qualitative Research Practice (1 Oliver’s Yard,  55 City Road,  London  England  EC1Y 1SP  United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004) <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191>
Kelle, Udo, Gerald Prein, and Katherine Bird, Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice (London: Sage Publications, 1995)
Kelman, Herbert C., ‘The Rights of the Subject in Social Research: An Analysis in Terms of Relative Power and Legitimacy.’, American Psychologist, 27.11 (1972), 989–1016 <https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033995>
Kendall, Gavin, and Gary Wickham, Using Foucault’s Methods (6 Bonhill Street,  London  England  EC2A 4PU  United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd, 1999) <https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020239>
Kimmel, Allan, Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research (2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc., 1988) <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984096>
King, Gary, Sidney Verba, and Robert O. Keohane, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994)
———, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994)
King, Nigel, and Christine Horrocks, Interviews in Qualitative Research (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010)
———, Interviews in Qualitative Research (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010)
Kratochwil, Friedrich, ‘Constructivism: What Is Not and How It Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences’, in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, ed. by Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938>
Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 3rd ed (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013)
Kvale, Steinar, Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1996)
Laitin, David D., ‘The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science’, Politics & Society, 31.1 (2003), 163–84 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202250167>
Lakatos, Imre, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge’, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434>
Lareau, Annette, and Jeffrey Shultz, Journeys through Ethnography: Realistic Accounts of Fieldwork (Oxford: Westview, 1996)
Lawrence, Adria, ‘Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule’, International Security, 35.2, 88–122 <https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html>
LIEBERMAN, EVAN S., ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, American Political Science Review, 99.03 (2005) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762>
Lisa Wedeen, ‘Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science’, The American Political Science Review, 96.4 (2002), 713–28 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science’, The American Political Science Review, 96.4 (2002), 713–28 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria’, Critical Inquiry, 39.4 (2013), 841–73 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358>
Lofland, John, Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th ed (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2006)
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz, ‘From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37.2 (2004), 267–71 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37.2 (2004), 267–71 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Lubet, Steven, ‘Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review’ <http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run>
Lundy, P., ‘The Ethics of Silence: Action Research, Community “truth-Telling” and Post-Conflict Transition in the North of Ireland’, Action Research, 4.1 (2006), 49–64 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542>
MacMillan, Katie, ‘More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6.3 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>
Mahoney, James, ‘Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis’ <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842>
Mason, J., ‘Mixing Methods in a Qualitatively Driven Way’, Qualitative Research, 6.1 (2006), 9–25 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866>
———, ‘Mixing Methods in a Qualitatively Driven Way’, Qualitative Research, 6.1 (2006), 9–25 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866>
McKeown, Timothy J., ‘Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research’, International Organization, 53.01 (1999), 161–90 <https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550841>
McLellan, Eleanor, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Judith L. Neidig, ‘Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription’, Field Methods, 15.1 (2003), 63–84 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573>
Michael Burawoy, ‘The Extended Case Method’, Sociological Theory, 16.1 (1998), 4–33 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Michel Foucault, ‘“Truth and Power”’, in The Foucault Reader (London: Penguin, 1991), Penguin social sciences
MILLIKEN, J., ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5.2 (1999), 225–54 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003>
Miri Song and David Parker, ‘COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING’, Sociology, 29.2 (1995), 241–56 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires, ‘Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship’, British Journal of Political Science, 39.4 (2009), 781–803 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Multi-Author Symposium, ‘Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 42.2 (2009), 287–328 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
‘Multi-Author Symposium “Fieldwork, Identities and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality and Age in the Research Field Abroad” in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR’ <http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026>
Neuendorf, Kimberly A., The Content Analysis Guidebook (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2002)
Nicholas Sambanis, ‘Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War’, Perspectives on Politics, 2.2 (2004), 259–79 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Okley, Judith, ‘“Thinking through Fieldwork” in Analyzing Qualitative Data’, in Analyzing Qualitative Data (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1994)
———, ‘“Thinking through Fieldwork” in Analyzing Qualitative Data’, in Analyzing Qualitative Data (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 1994)
Oliver, Paul, The Student’s Guide to Research Ethics (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003)
Pimple, K.D., ‘Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research’ <http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf>
Popper, Karl R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Routledge, 2002), Routledge classics <https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627>
Posner, Daniel N, ‘The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi’, American Political Science Review, 4, 529–45 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>
Punch, Maurice, ‘“Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research” in The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues’, in The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1998)
Puwar, Nirmal, ‘Reflections on Interviewing Women MPs’ <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167>
Rabinow, Paul, and William M. Sullivan, Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1987)
Ramazanoglu, Caroline, and Janet Holland, Feminist Methodology (6 Bonhill Street,  London  England  EC2A 4PU  United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd., 2002) <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209144>
Reason, Peter, and John Rowan, eds., Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981)
Renwick, Alan, ‘DO “WRONG WINNER” ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND’, Representation, 45.4 (2009), 357–67 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256>
Ribbens, Jane, ‘Interviewing—An "unnatural Situation”?’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 12.6 (1989), 579–92 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2>
Richards, Lyn, ‘Teach-Yourself NVivo 7: The Introductory Tutorials’ <http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf>
Riffe, Daniel, Stephen Lacy, and Frederick Fico, Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, 2nd ed (Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005), LEA communication series
Robert Adcock and David Collier, ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, The American Political Science Review, 95.3 (2001), 529–46 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Robert Aunger, ‘On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science?’, Current Anthropology, 36.1 (1995), 97–130 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Rogers M. Smith, ‘Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 35.2 (2002), 199–201 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
ROTH, W. D., and J. D. MEHTA, ‘The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events’, Sociological Methods & Research, 31.2 (2002), 131–73 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031002002>
Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene Rubin, Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd ed (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2005)
Ryan, Mary, ‘Making Visible the Coding Process: Using Qualitative Data Software in a Post-Structural Study’ <http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850>
Schatz, Edward, ‘Chapters 1 & 3’, in Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009) <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320>
Schatz, Edward, ‘Chapters 1 & 3’, in Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009)
Schatz, Edward, ‘Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion’, in Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009) <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320>
———, ‘Introduction to Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power’, in Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009) <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320>
Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, eds., The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005) <https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460>
Schreier, Margrit, Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012)
Scott, James C., Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, 1985 <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001>
———, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, 1985 <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001>
Seale, Clive, ‘“Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data”’, in Doing Qualitative Research, 4th ed (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013)
Shapiro, Michael, ‘“Textualising Global Politics” in  Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader’, in Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (London: Sage, 2001), pp. 318–22 <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf>
Silverman, David, Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice, 3rd ed (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2011)
Singal, Jesse, ‘I Fact-Checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us’ <http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#>
Sluka, Jeffrey, ‘Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader’, in Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader (Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2007), Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology
Snyder, Richard, ‘Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 36.1 (2001), 93–110 <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687586>
Stritzel, H., ‘Securitization, Power, Intertextuality: Discourse Theory and the Translations of Organized Crime’, Security Dialogue, 43.6 (2012), 549–67 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953>
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis <http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf>
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines <http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf>
——— <http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf>
‘“Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes”’, Fall 2012 <http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf>
‘———’, Fall 2012 <http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf>
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier <http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf>
Taylor, Stephanie, What Is Discourse Analysis? (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), ‘What is?’ research methods series
Taylor, Stephanie and Open University, Ethnographic Research: A Reader (London: SAGE, 2001)
Terence Ball, ‘From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science’, American Journal of Political Science, 20.1 (1976), 151–77 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
‘The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’)’ <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html>
VUCETIC, SRDJAN, ‘Genealogy as a Research Tool in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 37.03 (2011), 1295–1312 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938>
Wetherell, Margaret, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (Los Angeles: Sage, 2001)
———, Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (Los Angeles: Sage, 2001)
Wetherell, Margaret, Stephanie Taylor, Simeon Yates, and Open University, Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (London: Sage, 2001)
———, Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (London: Sage, 2001)
Wickham-Crowley, T. P., ‘Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures’, Politics & Society, 17.4 (1989), 511–30 <https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700404>
Wiles, Rose, What Are Qualitative Research Ethics? (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), ‘What is?’ research methods series
Wood, E. J., ‘Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?’, Politics & Society, 37.1 (2009), 131–61 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755>
Wood, Elisabeth, ‘“Field Research” in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics’, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics                      Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective Actioninstitutionselectoral Systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy, 2008 <http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020>
Wood, Elisabeth Jean, ‘The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones’, Qualitative Sociology, 29.3 (2006), 373–86 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8>
Yanow, Dvora, and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes
———, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes
———, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes
———, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes