Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & James A. Robinson. (n.d.). An African Success Story: Botswana. http://economics.mit.edu/files/284
Ackerly, B. A., Stern, M., & True, J. (Eds.). (2006). Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617690
Agius, C. (2013). Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue, 44(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485871
Ahmed, A., & Sil, R. (2012). When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics, 10(04), 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002836
Amoore, L. (2007). Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue, 38(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078526
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. (2006). Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Andrew Bennett & Jeffrey T. Checkel (Eds.). (2014a). Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Andrew Bennett & Jeffrey T. Checkel (Eds.). (2014b). Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Andrew Bennett & Jeffrey T. Checkel (Eds.). (2014c). Process Tracing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke. (2010). The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence (A. Lawrence & E. Chenoweth, Eds.). http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&indx=2&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&dstmp=1448463208978
Barrett, C. B., & Cason, J. W. (2010). Overseas research: a practical guide (2nd ed). Routledge.
Belsey, C. (2002). Poststructuralism: a very short introduction: Vol. Very short introductions. Oxford University Press.
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
Benson, M. (n.d.). On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review. http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html
BLATTMAN, C., HARTMAN, A. C., & BLAIR, R. A. (2014). How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review, 108(01), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000543
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris. (n.d.). Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058
Bourgois, P. (2002). In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio: Vol. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. In Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk
Bullock, John G.1. (n.d.). Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Campbell, D. (1998). Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. In Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Rev. ed, pp. 1–13). Manchester University Press. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf
Carabine, J. (2001). ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: Vol. Introducing qualitative methods (2nd ed). SAGE.
Christina Goulding. (2002). Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209236
Clark, T. (2010). On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796
Collier, David & Brady, Henry E. (2010). Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Cousins, K., & Mcintosh, W. (2005). More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity, 39(5), 581–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson. (2003). Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography, 4(2), 181–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
David Collier. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974
David Smilde. (2005). A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 757–796. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.
Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge.
Deborah J. Yashar. (1998). Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 31(1), 23–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Deloria, V. (2007). ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader: Vol. Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology. Blackwell.
Dijk, T. A. van. (1997). Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE.
Dohan, D., & Sánchez-Jankowski, M. (1998). Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.477
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN. (2009). Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review, 103(4), 622–644. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995a). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes: Vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. University of Chicago Press.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995b). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes: Vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. University of Chicago Press.
Evan S. Lieberman. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power: Vol. Language in social life series (2nd ed). Longman.
Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (2002). New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods, 14(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02014002005
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1998). ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications.
Foucault, M. (n.d.). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf
Freedman, D. (1989). Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90047-4
Fujii, L. A. (2012). Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(04), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco. (1977). Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics, 29(4), 489–522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Geddes, B. (2003). Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. In Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics: Vol. Analytical perspectives on politics. University of Michigan Press.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005a). A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. In Case studies and theory development in the social sciences: Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005b). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences: Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005c). Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. In Case studies and theory development in the social sciences: Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf
George, Alexander L. & Bennett, Andrew. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences: Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Giovanni Sartori. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Gladwell, Malcolm. (n.d.). Starting Over. The New Yorker, 24. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
Goffman, A. (2014). On the run: fugitive life in an American city: Vol. Fieldwork encounters and discoveries. The University of Chicago Press. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf
Goodwin, J., & Horowitz, R. (2002). Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology, 25(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014300123105
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
Hall, S. (2001). ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
Halperin, Sandra & Heath, Oliver. (2012a). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
Halperin, Sandra & Heath, Oliver. (2012b). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
Halperin, Sandra & Heath, Oliver. (2012c). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
Halperin, Sandra & Heath, Oliver. (2012d). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
Halperin, Sandra & Heath, Oliver. (2012e). Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
Hammersley, M. (2014). On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495039
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: principles in practice (3rd ed). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769
Hansen, L. (2000). The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501
Hansen, L. (2006a). Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
Hansen, L. (2006b). Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
Hansen, L. (2009). ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. In Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. (2006). Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis, 14(3), 353–368. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Hollander, J. A. (2004). The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 602–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988
Howarth, D. R. (2000). Discourse: Vol. Concepts in the social sciences. Open University Press.
Hudson, H. (2005). ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue, 36(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605054642
Hutchings, K. (2009). ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. In Gender Matters in Global Politics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864944
Hutchison, E. (2014). A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12037
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author). (n.d.). Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401
Ian Shapiro. (2002). Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory, 30(4), 596–619. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jackson, P. T. (2006). Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West. University of Michigan Press. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/
Jackson, P. T. (2011). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz. (2006). A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. (2008a). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. (2008b). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
John D. Brewer. (1994a). THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology, 28(1), 231–244. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
John D. Brewer. (1994b). THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology, 28(1), 231–244. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
John Gerring. (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Johnston, L. (2006). Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600659433
Kelle, U. (2004). ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. In Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191
Kelle, U., Prein, G., & Bird, K. (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. Sage Publications.
Kelman, H. C. (1972). The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist, 27(11), 989–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033995
Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020239
Kimmel, A. (1988). Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984096
King, G., Verba, S., & Keohane, R. O. (1994a). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
King, G., Verba, S., & Keohane, R. O. (1994b). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010a). Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010b). Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE.
Kratochwil, F. (2008). Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (3rd ed). SAGE.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
Laitin, D. D. (2003). The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society, 31(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202250167
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171434
Lareau, A., & Shultz, J. (1996). Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Westview.
Lawrence, A. (n.d.). Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security, 35(2), 88–122. https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html
LIEBERMAN, E. S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 99(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762
Lisa Wedeen. (2002a). Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 713–728. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lisa Wedeen. (2002b). Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 713–728. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lisa Wedeen. (2013). Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 841–873. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358
Lofland, J. (2006). Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. (2004a). From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 267–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. (2004b). From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 267–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lubet, S. (n.d.). Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review. http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
Lundy, P. (2006). The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research, 4(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060542
MacMillan, Katie. (n.d.). More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Mahoney, James. (n.d.). Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842
Mason, J. (2006a). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866
Mason, J. (2006b). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866
McKeown, T. J. (1999). Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization, 53(01), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550841
McLellan, E., MacQueen, K. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2003). Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573
Michael Burawoy. (1998). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Michel Foucault. (1991). ‘Truth and Power’. In The Foucault reader: Vol. Penguin social sciences. Penguin.
MILLIKEN, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003
Miri Song and David Parker. (1995). COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology, 29(2), 241–256. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires. (2009). Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 781–803. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Multi-Author Symposium. (2009). Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(2), 287–328. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR. (n.d.). http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
Nicholas Sambanis. (2004). Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics, 2(2), 259–279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Okley, J. (1994a). ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.
Okley, J. (1994b). ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.
Oliver, P. (2003). The student’s guide to research ethics. Open University Press.
Pimple, K. D. (n.d.). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery: Vol. Routledge classics. Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627
Posner, Daniel N. (n.d.). The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review, 4, 529–545. http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Punch, M. (1998). ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Sage Publications.
Puwar, Nirmal. (n.d.). Reflections on interviewing women MPs. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167
Rabinow, P., & Sullivan, W. M. (1987). Interpretive social science: a second look. University of California Press.
Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209144
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (Eds.). (1981). Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. John Wiley & Sons.
Renwick, A. (2009). DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation, 45(4), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256
Ribbens, J. (1989). Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum, 12(6), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(89)90002-2
Richards, L. (n.d.). Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials. http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2005). Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research: Vol. LEA communication series (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Robert Adcock and David Collier. (2001). Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Robert Aunger. (1995). On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology, 36(1), 97–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Rogers M. Smith. (2002). Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(2), 199–201. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
ROTH, W. D., & MEHTA, J. D. (2002). The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research, 31(2), 131–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031002002
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (2nd ed). Sage Publications.
Ryan, Mary. (n.d.). Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850
Schatz, E. (2009a). Chapters 1 & 3. In Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
Schatz, E. (2009b). Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. In Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
Schatz, E. (2009c). Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. In Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. The University of Chicago Press. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
Schatz, Edward. (2009). Chapters 1 & 3. In Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2005). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.
Scott, James C. (1985a). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
Scott, James C. (1985b). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
Seale, C. (2013). ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. In Doing qualitative research (4th ed). SAGE.
Shapiro, M. (2001). ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In Discourse theory and practice: a reader (pp. 318–322). Sage. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf
Silverman, D. (2011). Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice (3rd ed). SAGE.
Singal, J. (n.d.). I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us. http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#
Sluka, J. (2007). Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader: Vol. Blackwell anthologies in social&cultural anthropology. Blackwell.
Snyder, R. (2001). Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687586
Stritzel, H. (2012). Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue, 43(6), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612463953
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis. (n.d.). http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. (n.d.-a). http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines. (n.d.-b). http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. (n.d.-a). Fall 2012. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. (n.d.-b). Fall 2012. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier. (n.d.). http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
Taylor, S. (2013). What is discourse analysis? Vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. Bloomsbury.
Taylor, S. & Open University. (2001). Ethnographic research: a reader. SAGE.
Terence Ball. (1976). From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 151–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’). (n.d.). http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
van Dijk, T. (n.d.). What is Political Discourse Analysis? http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
VUCETIC, S. (2011). Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 37(03), 1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (2001a). Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (2001b). Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Sage.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S., & Open University. (2001a). Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S., & Open University. (2001b). Discourse theory and practice: a reader. Sage.
Wickham-Crowley, T. P. (1989). Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society, 17(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700404
Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? Vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. Bloomsbury.
Wood, E. (2008). ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
Wood, E. J. (2006). The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8
Wood, E. J. (2009). Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society, 37(1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (n.d.-a). Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (n.d.-b). Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (n.d.-c). Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (n.d.-d). Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
