1.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
2.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
3.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
4.
Gladwell, Malcolm. Starting Over. The New Yorker [Internet]. (24). Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1710005035/5DF956BAF60842A3PQ/8?accountid=14511
5.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
6.
Schatz E. Introduction to Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power [Internet]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
7.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
8.
James Mahoney and Gary Goertz. A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Political Analysis [Internet]. 2006;14(3):227–49. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
9.
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2010.
10.
Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery [Internet]. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge; 2002. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627
11.
Lisa Wedeen. Ideology and Humor in Dark Times: Notes from Syria. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 2013;39(4):841–73. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671358
12.
Lakatos I. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1970. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139171434
13.
Freedman D. Statistical models and shoe leather. Mathematical Social Sciences. 1989 Oct;18(2).
14.
McKeown TJ. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization. 1999 Dec;53(01):161–90.
15.
Gabriel A. Almond and Stephen J. Genco. Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics. World Politics [Internet]. 1977;29(4):489–522. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010037?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16.
Posner, Daniel N. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review [Internet]. (4):529–45. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60734132?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
17.
Hansen L. ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics: a Feminist Introduction to International Relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics [Internet]. Routledge; 2009. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203864944
18.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
19.
Geddes B. Big Questions, Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get, Chapter 2. In: Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2003.
20.
Ian Shapiro. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It. Political Theory [Internet]. 2002;30(4):596–619. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
21.
Giovanni Sartori. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1970;64(4):1033–53. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958356?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22.
John Gerring. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity [Internet]. 1999;31(3):357–93. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3235246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23.
Robert Adcock and David Collier. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2001;95(3):529–46. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
24.
Schatz E. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power [Internet]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
25.
Schatz, Edward. Chapters 1 & 3. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.
26.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
27.
Dunne C. The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011 Mar;14(2):111–24.
28.
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 2006 Feb 1;6(1):9–25.
29.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. (Fall 2012). Available from: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
30.
BLATTMAN C, HARTMAN AC, BLAIR RA. How to Promote Order and Property Rights under Weak Rule of Law? An Experiment in Changing Dispute Resolution Behavior through Community Education. American Political Science Review. 2014 Feb;108(01):100–20.
31.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
32.
Wood E. ‘Field Research’ in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less. Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
33.
Hollander JA. The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2004 Oct 1;33(5):602–37.
34.
Lofland J. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 2006.
35.
ELIZABETH LEVY PALUCK and DONALD P. GREEN. Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention Using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2009;103(4):622–44. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36.
Shapiro M. ‘Textualising Global Politics’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader [Internet]. London: Sage; 2001. p. 318–22. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78669.pdf
37.
Amoore L. Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror. Security Dialogue. 2007 Jun 1;38(2):215–32.
38.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
39.
David Collier. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 2011;44(4):823–30. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319974
40.
Andrew Bennett, Jeffrey T. Checkel, editors. Process Tracing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139858472
41.
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, James A. Robinson. An African Success Story: Botswana. Available from: http://economics.mit.edu/files/284
42.
Renwick A. DO ‘WRONG WINNER’ ELECTIONS TRIGGER ELECTORAL REFORM? LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND. Representation. 2009 Nov;45(4):357–67.
43.
Nicholas Sambanis. Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2004;2(2):259–79. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
44.
George, Alexander L., Bennett, Andrew. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005.
45.
George AL, Bennett A. A Pedagogical note to parts II and III. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79382.pdf
46.
George AL, Bennett A. Chapter 3: The method of structured, focused comparison. In: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79376.pdf
47.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;61(2):294–308. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48.
Wood EJ. Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare? Politics & Society. 2009 Mar 1;37(1):131–61.
49.
Deborah J. Yashar. Contesting Citizenship: Indigenous Movements and Democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics [Internet]. 1998;31(1):23–42. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422104?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
50.
Lawrence A. Triggering Nationalist Violence: Competition and Conflict in Uprisings against Colonial Rule. International Security [Internet]. 35(2):88–122. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v035/35.2.lawrence.html
51.
Bakke, Kristin M. Bakke. The turn to violence in self- determination struggles in Chechnya and Punjab in Rethinking Violence. In: Lawrence A, Chenoweth E, editors. 2010. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&indx=2&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84895088005&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bakke%20chechnya&dstmp=1448463208978
52.
Schatz E. Chapters 6, 9 and Conclusion. In: Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power [Internet]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038320
53.
Halperin, Sandra, Heath, Oliver. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
54.
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
55.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice [Internet]. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203944769
56.
Scott, James C. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
57.
Multi-Author Symposium ‘Fieldwork, identities and intersectionality: negotiating gender, race, class, religion, nationality and age in the research field abroad’ in Vol. 42, No. 2, April 2009 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40028026
58.
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2002;96(4):713–28. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology [Internet]. 1994;28(1):231–44. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
61.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 2004;37(2):267–71. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
62.
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 1994.
63.
Foucault M. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/CLAS/Departments/philosophy/Students/Documents/’Nietzsche,%20Genealogy,%20History’%20by%20Michel%20Foucault.pdf
64.
Jackson PT. Civilizing the enemy: German reconstruction and the invention of the West [Internet]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2006. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022281/
65.
Campbell D. Introduction to Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. In: Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity [Internet]. Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998. p. 1–13. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_78420.pdf
66.
VUCETIC S. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 2011 Jul;37(03):1295–312.
67.
Kendall G, Wickham G. Using Foucault’s Methods [Internet]. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd; 1999. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/using-foucaults-methods/SAGE.xml
68.
Carabine J. ‘Unmarried Motherhood 1830 - 1990: A Genealogical Analysis’ in Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, editors. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage; 2001.
69.
Hutchison E. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity after the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology. 2014 Mar;8(1):1–19.
70.
Hall S. ‘The Spectacle of “The Other”’ in Discourse theory and practice: a reader. In: Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage; 2001.
71.
Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2012.
72.
Stritzel H. Securitization, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue. 2012 Dec 1;43(6):549–67.
73.
Hansen L. The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2000 Jun 1;29(2):285–306.
74.
Hudson H. ‘Doing’ Security As Though Humans Matter: A Feminist Perspective on Gender and the Politics of Human Security. Security Dialogue. 2005 Jun 1;36(2):155–74.
75.
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge; 2006.
76.
Silverman D. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2011.
77.
Taylor S. What is discourse analysis? Vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. London: Bloomsbury; 2013.
78.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology [Internet]. 2008 Jul 21;3(2):77–101. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa#.VlhoytjhCUk
79.
Agius C. Performing identity: The Danish cartoon crisis and discourses of identity and security. Security Dialogue. 2013 Jun 1;44(3):241–58.
80.
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations:: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 1999 Jun 1;5(2):225–54.
81.
Richards L. Teach-yourself NVivo 7: the introductory tutorials [Internet]. Available from: http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Richards.pdf
82.
‘Symposium: Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow’s Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes’. Qualitative Methods Newsletter of the American Political Science Association. (Fall 2012). Available from: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
83.
Goffman A. On the run: fugitive life in an American city [Internet]. Vol. Fieldwork encounters and discoveries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2014. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/PUBLG105_79379.pdf
84.
Lubet S. Ethics On The Run - New Rambler Review [Internet]. Available from: http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
85.
Singal J. I Fact-checked Alice Goffman With Her Subjects -- Science of Us [Internet]. Available from: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/06/i-fact-checked-alice-goffman-with-her-subjects.html#
86.
Benson M. On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care | Blog | The Sociological Review [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/information/blog/on-goffman-ethnography-and-the-ethics-of-care.html
87.
Wiles R. What are qualitative research ethics? Vol. ‘What is?’ research methods series. London: Bloomsbury; 2013.
88.
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 2010 Aug 1;10(4):399–419.
89.
Hammersley M. On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research. 2014 Oct 1;14(5):529–41.
90.
Fujii LA. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2012 Oct;45(04):717–23.
91.
Lundy P. The ethics of silence: Action research, community ‘truth-telling’ and post-conflict transition in the North of Ireland. Action Research. 2006 Mar 1;4(1):49–64.
92.
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge; 2011.
93.
Belsey C. Poststructuralism: a very short introduction. Vol. Very short introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
94.
Michel Foucault. ‘Truth and Power’. In: The Foucault reader. London: Penguin; 1991.
95.
Hacking I. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1999.
96.
Kratochwil F. Constructivism: What is Not and How it Matters in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511801938
97.
Rabinow P, Sullivan WM. Interpretive social science: a second look. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1987.
98.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1994.
99.
Rogers M. Smith. Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More about Politics? PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 2002;35(2):199–201. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1554718?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
100.
Terence Ball. From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post-Kuhnian Political Science. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 1976;20(1):151–77. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110515?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
101.
Laitin DD. The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. Politics & Society. 2003 Mar 1;31(1):163–84.
102.
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2010.
103.
Brady HE, Collier D. Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. In: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
104.
George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2005.
105.
Henry E. Brady, David Collier and Jason Seawright. Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis [Internet]. 2006;14(3):353–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
106.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1994.
107.
Goodwin J, Horowitz R. Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas. Qualitative Sociology. 2002;25(1):33–47.
108.
Robert Aunger. On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science? Current Anthropology [Internet]. 1995;36(1):97–130. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744226?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109.
David A. Snow, Calvin Morrill and Leon Anderson. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography [Internet]. 2003;4(2):181–200. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
111.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Vol. Introducing qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2014.
112.
Christina Goulding. Grounded Theory [Internet]. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2002. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/grounded-theory/SAGE.xml
113.
Snyder R. Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies in Comparative International Development. 2001 Mar;36(1):93–110.
114.
Jason Seawright and John Gerring. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;61(2):294–308. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20299733?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
115.
Bennett A, Elman C. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 2006 Jun;9(1):455–76.
116.
Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis [Internet]. 2006;14(3):250–67. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25791852?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
117.
Michael Burawoy. The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory [Internet]. 1998;16(1):4–33. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/202212?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
118.
Mahoney, James. Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=7&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest208057218&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest208057218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=7&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=mahoney%20strategies%20of%20causal%20inference&dstmp=1448981918842
119.
Bullock, John G.1. Yes, But What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 98(4). Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-201004000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
120.
Taylor S, Open University. Ethnographic research: a reader. London: SAGE; 2001.
121.
Okley J. ‘Thinking through fieldwork’ in Analyzing qualitative data. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 1994.
122.
Lisa Wedeen. Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2002;96(4):713–28. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
123.
John D. Brewer. THE ETHNOGRAPHIC CRITIQUE OF ETHNOGRAPHY: SECTARIANISM IN THE RUC. Sociology [Internet]. 1994;28(1):231–44. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855325?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
124.
Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
125.
Lorraine Bayard de Volo and Edward Schatz. From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research. PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 2004;37(2):267–71. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4488818?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
126.
Lareau A, Shultz J. Journeys through ethnography: realistic accounts of fieldwork. Oxford: Westview; 1996.
127.
Bourgois P. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
128.
Scott, James C. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02471.0001.001
129.
Barrett CB, Cason JW. Overseas research: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2010.
130.
Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2005.
131.
King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2010.
132.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 2006 Feb 1;18(1):59–82.
133.
Ribbens J. Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum. 1989 Jan;12(6):579–92.
134.
Miri Song and David Parker. COMMONALITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF DISCLOSURE IN IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING. Sociology [Internet]. 1995;29(2):241–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42855549?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135.
McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Neidig JL. Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods. 2003 Feb 1;15(1):63–84.
136.
Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1996.
137.
Puwar, Nirmal. Reflections on interviewing women MPs. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=5&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest839041637&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest839041637&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=5&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=puwar%20interviewing%20women%20MPs&dstmp=1448984676167
138.
ROTH WD, MEHTA JD. The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events. Sociological Methods & Research. 2002 Nov 1;31(2):131–73.
139.
Wickham-Crowley TP. Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador: A Comparative Analysis of Regime Types and Social Structures. Politics & Society. 1989 Dec 1;17(4):511–30.
140.
David Smilde. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Conversion to Venezuelan Evangelicalism: How Networks Matter1. American Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 2005;111(3):757–96. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497306?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:3&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00029602&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:757&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:111&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2005&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A3%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00029602%2BAND%2Bsp%253A757%2BAND%2Bvo%253A111%2BAND%2Byear%253A2005%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.
141.
Evan S. Lieberman. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2005;99(3):435–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038950?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
142.
Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2002.
143.
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2013.
144.
Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico F. Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. 2nd ed. Vol. LEA communication series. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005.
145.
Bletsas , Angelique ; Beasley , Chris. Engaging with Carol Bacchi. Strategic Interventions and Exchanges [Internet]. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_oapen560097&indx=1&recIds=TN_oapen560097&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=bletsas%20beasley&dstmp=1448976206058
146.
Hansen L. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge; 2006.
147.
Dean M. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge; 1994.
148.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage; 2001.
149.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, Open University. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage; 2001.
150.
Howarth DR. Discourse. Vol. Concepts in the social sciences. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press; 2000.
151.
Fairclough I, Fairclough N. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. London: Routledge; 2012.
152.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. Los Angeles: Sage; 2001.
153.
Dijk TA van. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE; 1997.
154.
van Dijk T. What is Political Discourse Analysis? Available from: http://wiki.zirve.edu.tr/sandbox/groups/economicsandadministrativesciences/wiki/4952c/attachments/47c40/What%20is%20Political%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf
155.
Schiffrin D, Tannen D, Hamilton HE, editors. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis [Internet]. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd; 2005. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470753460
156.
Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates S, Open University. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage; 2001.
157.
Fairclough N. Language and power. 2nd ed. Vol. Language in social life series. Harlow, Eng: Longman; 2001.
158.
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter2.1.pdf
159.
Seale C. ‘Using Computers to Analyse Qualitative Data’. In: Doing qualitative research. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2013.
160.
Dohan D, Sánchez-Jankowski M. Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Annual Review of Sociology. 1998 Aug;24(1):477–98.
161.
Cousins K, Mcintosh W. More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Quality & Quantity. 2005 Oct;39(5):581–614.
162.
Fielding NG, Lee RM. New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software. Field Methods. 2002 May 1;14(2):197–216.
163.
Johnston L. Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2006 Dec;9(5):379–91.
164.
Kelle U. ‘Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis’ in Qualitative Research Practice. In: Qualitative Research Practice [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/qualitative-research-practice/SAGE.xml
165.
MacMillan, Katie. More than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 6(3). Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60027767?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
166.
Ryan, Mary. Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do;jsessionid=2883011B94E250DD8CDAFF1DB8C97E61?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-70349292675&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&query=any%2Ccontains%2Cryan+making+visible+the+coding+process&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=ryan%20making%20visible%20the%20coding%20process&dstmp=1449238647850
167.
Kelle U, Prein G, Bird K. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1995.
168.
LIEBERMAN ES. Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review. 2005 Aug;99(03).
169.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines [Internet]. Available from: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
170.
Symposium: Multi-Method Work, Dispatches from the Front Lines [Internet]. Available from: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter5.1.pdf
171.
Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 2006 Feb 1;6(1):9–25.
172.
Ahmed A, Sil R. When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research. Perspectives on Politics. 2012 Dec;10(04):935–53.
173.
Symposium: Reports from the Multi-Method Research Frontier [Internet]. Available from: http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter10_2.pdf
174.
Kimmel A. Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research [Internet]. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1988. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/ethics-and-values-in-applied-social-research/SAGE.xml
175.
Oliver P. The student’s guide to research ethics. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2003.
176.
Pimple KD. Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Available from: http://poynter.indiana.edu/files/3113/4858/3992/see-kdp1.pdf
177.
The Belmont Report ('Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
178.
Punch M. ‘Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
179.
Wood EJ. The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology. 2006 Sep;29(3):373–86.
180.
Deloria V. ‘Custer Died for Your Sins’ in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2007.
181.
Kelman HC. The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist. 1972;27(11):989–1016.
182.
Fontana A, Frey J. ‘The Interview. From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’ in The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. In: The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
183.
Sluka J. Reflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast in Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. In: Ethnographic fieldwork: an anthropological reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2007.
184.
Hutchings K. ‘Ethics’ in Gender Matters in Global Politics. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics [Internet]. Routledge; 2009. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203864944
185.
Multi-Author Symposium. Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad. PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 2009;42(2):287–328. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647527?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
186.
Mona Lena Krook, Joni Lovenduski and Judith Squires. Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2009;39(4):781–803. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
187.
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist Methodology [Internet]. 6 Bonhill Street, London England EC2A 4PU United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2002. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/feminist-methodology/SAGE.xml
188.
Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1982.
189.
Ackerly BA, Stern M, True J, editors. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511617690
190.
Reason P, Rowan J, editors. Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
191.
Huxham, Chris Huxham, Chris (correspondence author). Action Research as a Methodology for Theory Development. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest60690569&indx=2&recIds=TN_proquest60690569&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&query=any%2Ccontains%2Chuxham+action+research+as+a+methodology&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=true&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=huxham%20action%20research%20as%20a%20methodology&dstmp=1449227513401
