[1]
Aaron Wildavsky If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences. 4, 2, 127–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405729.
[2]
Anthony Downs An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy. 65, 2, 135–150.
[3]
Baccaro, L. and Simoni, M. Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 10, 1323–1348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008315861.
[4]
Beth A. Simmons et al. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 60, 4, 781–810.
[5]
Boix, C. and Stokes, S.C. 2007. The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C.E. 1963. A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. Free Press.
[7]
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review. 71, 3, 474–494.
[8]
Butler, D. et al. 1994. Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Campbell, A.L. Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 15, 1, 333–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.
[10]
Cao, X. *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly. 53, 4, 1095–1130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x.
[11]
Caplan, B.D. 2007. The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press.
[12]
Charles E. Lindblom Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. 39, 6, 517–526.
[13]
Charles E. Lindblom The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 2, 79–88.
[14]
Christopher Wlezien Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics. 66, 1, 1–24.
[15]
Christopher Wlezien The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science. 39, 4, 981–1000.
[16]
Coen, D. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 3, 333–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731.
[17]
Converse, P. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ideology and discontent. Free Press of Glencoe.
[18]
Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
[19]
Derthick, M. 2012. Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics. CQ Press.
[20]
Downs, A. Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest. 28, 1, 38–50.
[21]
Dunleavy, P. and O’Leary, B. 1987. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education.
[22]
Dunleavy, P. and O’Leary, B. 1987. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education.
[23]
Epp, C.R. 1998. The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press.
[24]
Fabio Franchino Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science. 34, 2, 269–293. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000055.
[25]
Friedman, B. The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review. 84, 2.
[26]
Grant, W. 2000. Pressure groups and British politics. Macmillan Press.
[27]
Hakhverdian, A. Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science. 40, 4, 835–856. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341000013X.
[28]
Herbert A. Simon A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69, 1, 99–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.
[29]
Hicks, T. Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration. n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12100.
[30]
Hicks, T. Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics. 45, 2, 207–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5129/001041513804634244.
[31]
Iain McLean Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science. 30, 4, 651–668.
[32]
Iyengar, S. 1991. Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
[33]
Iyengar, S. and Kinder, D.R. 2010. News that matters: television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
[34]
James G. March Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics. 9, 2, 587–608.
[35]
Joe Soss Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review. 93, 2, 363–380.
[36]
Kaare Strom *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science. 34, 2, 565–598.
[37]
Kingdon, J.W. 2003. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
[38]
Larry M. Bartels Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics. 3, 1, 15–31.
[39]
Larry M. Bartels Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 4, 785–790.
[40]
Larry M. Bartels The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-). 32, 4, 44–50.
[41]
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
[42]
Lupia, A. and et al Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 4, 773–784.
[43]
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M.D. 1998. The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge University Press.
[44]
McCombs, M.E. 2004. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Polity.
[45]
Meseguer, C. *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy. 24, 3, 299–325. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X04000182.
[46]
Mettler, S. Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics. 8, 3, 803–824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710002045.
[47]
Mettler, S. and Soss, J. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 2, 1, 55–73.
[48]
Niskanen, W.A. 2007. Bureaucracy & representative government. Aldine Transaction.
[49]
Olson, M. 1971. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
[50]
Olson, M. 1982. The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press.
[51]
Page, B.I. and Shapiro, R.Y. 1992. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
[52]
Page, B.I. and Shapiro, R.Y. 1992. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
[53]
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
[54]
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
[55]
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
[56]
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
[57]
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
[58]
Patrick Dunleavy Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration. 10, 2, 52–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000205.
[59]
Paul A. Sabatier 2007. Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.
[60]
Paul Burstein Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces. 77, 1, 27–62.
[61]
Pierson, P. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics. 45, 4, 595–628.
[62]
Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A.B. 1984. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
[63]
Richard E. Matland Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. 5, 2, 145–174.
[64]
Richardson, J. Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies. 48, 5, 1006–1025. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00292.
[65]
Richardson, J. 1995. The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics. 18, 1 (1995), 116–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425060.
[66]
Rosenberg, G.N. 1991. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change?. University of Chicago.
[67]
Ruger, T.W. and et al The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review. 104, 4, 1150–1210.
[68]
Sabatier, P.A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences. 21, 2–3, 129–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
[69]
Sabatier, P.A. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 5, 1, 98–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051.
[70]
Sabatier, P.A. 2007. Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.
[71]
Saetren, H. Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal. 33, 4, 559–582. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x.
[72]
Schmitt, C. What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy. 31, 1, 95–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000018.
[73]
Schofield, J. and Sausman, C. Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration. 82, 2, 235–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x.
[74]
Shipan, C.R. and Volden, C. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 4, 840–857. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
[75]
Soroka, S. and et al Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science. 43, 4, 719–739. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000555.
[76]
Soroka, S.N. The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics. 74, 2, 514–528. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100171X.
[77]
Soss, J. and Schram, S.F. A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review. 101, 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049.
[78]
Stone Sweet, A. 2000. Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University Press.
[79]
Strøm, K. and Müller, W.C. 1999. Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge University Press.
[80]
Terry M. Moe The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science. 28, 4, 739–777.
[81]
Theodore J. Lowi Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review. 32, 4, 298–310.
[82]
Vanhala, L. 2011. Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization. Cambridge University Press.
[83]
Warwick, P.V. Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 12, 1675–1699. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407475.
[84]
Weingast, B.R. and Moran, M.J. Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy. 91, 5, 765–800.
[85]
Wilson, J.Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
[86]
Zaller, J. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
[87]
Zaller, J. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
[88]
2012. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
[89]
2012. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
[90]
2012. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
[91]
2012. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
[92]
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy.