1.
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy.
2.
Parsons W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
3.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
4.
Paul A. Sabatier. Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed. Westview Press; 2007.
5.
Parsons W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
6.
Sabatier PA. Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed. Westview Press; 2007. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1451128&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
7.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
8.
Theodore J. Lowi. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review. 32(4):298-310. http://www.jstor.org/stable/974990
9.
Anthony Downs. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy. 65(2):135-150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
10.
Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press; 1992. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
11.
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics. 3(1):15-31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688108
12.
Converse P. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Ideology and Discontent. Vol International yearbook of political behavior research. Free Press of Glencoe; 1964.
13.
Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press; 1996.
14.
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Vol American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press; 1992. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
15.
Lupia A, et al. Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics. 5(4):773-784. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446575
16.
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics. 5(4):785-790. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446576
17.
Larry M. Bartels. The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-). 32(4):44-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40262068
18.
Lupia A, McCubbins MD. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Vol Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
19.
Caplan BD. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton University Press; 2007. https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctvcm4gf2
20.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
21.
Olson M. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press; 1982. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nprdd
22.
Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol Harvard economic studies. Harvard University Press; 1971.
23.
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. Macmillan Education; 1987.
24.
Richardson J. The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics. 1995;18(1):116-139. doi:10.1080/01402389508425060
25.
Grant W. Pressure Groups and British Politics. Vol Contemporary political studies. Macmillan Press; 2000.
26.
Richardson J. Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies. 48(5):1006-1025. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00292
27.
Iain McLean. Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science. 30(4):651-668. http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
28.
Coen D. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy. 14(3):333-345. doi:10.1080/13501760701243731
29.
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. Macmillan Education; 1987.
30.
Strøm K, Müller WC. Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Vol Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge University Press; 1999. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/policy-office-or-votes/4E6EBD04A1E3E470552AA62542365236
31.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
32.
Paul Burstein. Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces. 77(1):27-62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3006009
33.
Brooks C, Manza J. Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review. 71(3):474-494. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039000
34.
Hakhverdian A. Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science. 40(4):835-856. doi:10.1017/S000712341000013X
35.
Warwick PV. Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 44(12):1675-1699. doi:10.1177/0010414011407475
36.
Kaare Strom. *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science. 34(2):565-598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111461?origin=crossref
37.
Parsons W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
38.
Herbert A. Simon. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69(1):99-118. doi:10.2307/1884852
39.
James G. March. Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics. 9(2):587-608. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3003600?origin=crossref
40.
Charles E. Lindblom. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. 39(6):517-526. http://www.jstor.org/stable/976178
41.
Charles E. Lindblom. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19(2):79-88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
42.
Braybrooke D, Lindblom CE. A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. Free Press; 1963.
43.
Aaron Wildavsky. If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences. 4(2):127-153. doi:10.1007/BF01405729
44.
Butler D, Adonis A, Travers T. Failure in British Government: The Politics of the Poll Tax. Oxford University Press; 1994.
45.
Patrick Dunleavy. Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration. 10(2):52-70. doi:10.1177/095207679501000205
46.
Parsons W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
47.
Terry M. Moe. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science. 28(4):739-777. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2110997?origin=crossref
48.
Wilson JQ. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books; 1989.
49.
Pressman JL, Wildavsky AB. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Vol Oakland Project series. 3rd ed. University of California Press; 1984.
50.
Niskanen WA. Bureaucracy & Representative Government. Aldine Transaction; 2007.
51.
Lipsky M. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation; 1980. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610443623/
52.
Weingast BR, Moran MJ. Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy. 91(5):765-800. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1837369
53.
Fabio Franchino. Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science. 34(2):269-293. doi:10.1017/S0007123404000055
54.
Richard E. Matland. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. 5(2):145-174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674
55.
Schofield J, Sausman C. Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration. 82(2):235-248. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x
56.
Saetren H. Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal. 33(4):559-582. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x
57.
Hicks T. Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration.:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/padm.12100
58.
Rosenberg GN. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Vol American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago; 1991.
59.
Stone Sweet A. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press; 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
60.
Boix C, Stokes SC. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001
61.
Epp CR. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press; 1998.
62.
Ruger TW, et al. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review. 104(4):1150-1210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4099370?origin=crossref
63.
Friedman B. The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review. 84(2). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=19469113&site=ehost-live&scope=site
64.
Vanhala L. Making Rights a Reality?: Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Vol Cambridge disability law and policy series. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
65.
Derthick M. Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics. 3rd ed. CQ Press; 2012.
66.
Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences. 21(2-3):129-168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
67.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 60(4):781-810. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
68.
Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 5(1):98-130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051
69.
Shipan CR, Volden C. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science. 52(4):840-857. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
70.
Baccaro L, Simoni M. Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies. 41(10):1323-1348. doi:10.1177/0010414008315861
71.
Cao X. *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly. 53(4):1095-1130. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x
72.
Meseguer C. *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy. 24(3):299-325. doi:10.1017/S0143814X04000182
73.
Schmitt C. What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy. 31(1):95-117. doi:10.1017/S0143814X11000018
74.
Pierson P. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics. 45(4):595-628. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2950710?origin=crossref
75.
Mettler S, Soss J. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 2(1):55-73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688340
76.
Christopher Wlezien. The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science. 39(4):981-1000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111666?origin=crossref
77.
Joe Soss. Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review. 93(2):363-380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2585401?origin=crossref
78.
Christopher Wlezien. Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics. 66(1):1-24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449770
79.
Soss J, Schram SF. A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review. 101(1). doi:10.1017/S0003055407070049
80.
Mettler S. Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics. 8(3):803-824. doi:10.1017/S1537592710002045
81.
Campbell AL. Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 15(1):333-351. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
82.
Hicks T. Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics. 45(2):207-226. doi:10.5129/001041513804634244
83.
Parsons W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
84.
Downs A. Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest. 28(1):38-50. http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/up-and-down-with-ecologythe-issue-attention-cycle
85.
Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Vol Longman classics in political science. 2nd ed. Longman; 2003.
86.
Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press; 1992. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
87.
Iyengar S. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Vol American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press; 1991.
88.
McCombs ME. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Polity; 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745672748
89.
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Vol Chicago studies in American politics. Updated ed. University of Chicago Press; 2010.
90.
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Vol American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press; 1992. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
91.
Soroka SN. The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics. 74(2):514-528. doi:10.1017/S002238161100171X
92.
Soroka S, et al. Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science. 43(4):719-739. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000555