1.
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy.
2.
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
3.
Analyzing Public Policy [Internet]. Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
4.
Paul A. Sabatier. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 2007.
5.
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
6.
Sabatier PA. Theories of the policy process [Internet]. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 2007. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1451128&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
7.
Analyzing Public Policy [Internet]. Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
8.
Theodore J. Lowi. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review [Internet]. Wiley; 32(4):298–310. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/974990
9.
Anthony Downs. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 65(2):135–150. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
10.
Zaller J. The nature and origins of mass opinion [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
11.
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 3(1):15–31. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688108
12.
Converse P. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ideology and discontent. London: Free Press of Glencoe; 1964.
13.
Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 1996.
14.
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
15.
Lupia A, et al. Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 5(4):773–784. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446575
16.
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 5(4):785–790. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446576
17.
Larry M. Bartels. The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-) [Internet]. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; 32(4):44–50. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40262068
18.
Lupia A, McCubbins MD. The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
19.
Caplan BD. The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctvcm4gf2
20.
Analyzing Public Policy [Internet]. Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
21.
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations [Internet]. London: Yale University Press; 1982. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nprdd
22.
Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1971.
23.
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1987.
24.
Richardson J. The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics. 1995;18(1):116–139.
25.
Grant W. Pressure groups and British politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 2000.
26.
Richardson J. Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies. 48(5):1006–1025.
27.
Iain McLean. Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 30(4):651–668. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
28.
Coen D. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy. 14(3):333–345.
29.
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1987.
30.
Strøm K, Müller WC. Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/policy-office-or-votes/4E6EBD04A1E3E470552AA62542365236
31.
Analyzing Public Policy [Internet]. Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
32.
Paul Burstein. Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 77(1):27–62. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3006009
33.
Brooks C, Manza J. Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review [Internet]. American Sociological Association; 71(3):474–494. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039000
34.
Hakhverdian A. Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science. 40(4):835–856.
35.
Warwick PV. Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 44(12):1675–1699.
36.
Kaare Strom. *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Midwest Political Science Association; 34(2):565–598. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111461?origin=crossref
37.
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
38.
Herbert A. Simon. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 69(1):99–118. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1884852
39.
James G. March. Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics [Internet]. RAND Corporation; 9(2):587–608. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3003600?origin=crossref
40.
Charles E. Lindblom. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review [Internet]. Wiley; 39(6):517–526. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/976178
41.
Charles E. Lindblom. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review [Internet]. Wiley; 19(2):79–88. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
42.
Braybrooke D, Lindblom CE. A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. New York: Free Press; 1963.
43.
Aaron Wildavsky. If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences [Internet]. Springer; 4(2):127–153. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4531522
44.
Butler D, Adonis A, Travers T. Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
45.
Patrick Dunleavy. Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 10(2):52–70. Available from: http://ppa.sagepub.com/content/10/2.toc
46.
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
47.
Terry M. Moe. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Midwest Political Science Association; 28(4):739–777. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2110997?origin=crossref
48.
Wilson JQ. Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. [New York]: Basic Books; 1989.
49.
Pressman JL, Wildavsky AB. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.
50.
Niskanen WA. Bureaucracy & representative government. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction; 2007.
51.
Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services [Internet]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1980. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610443623/
52.
Weingast BR, Moran MJ. Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 91(5):765–800. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1837369
53.
Fabio Franchino. Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 34(2):269–293. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=204887&fileId=S0007123404000055
54.
Richard E. Matland. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 5(2):145–174. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674
55.
Schofield J, Sausman C. Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration. 82(2):235–248.
56.
Saetren H. Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal. 33(4):559–582.
57.
Hicks T. Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration. :n/a-n/a.
58.
Rosenberg GN. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago; 1991.
59.
Stone Sweet A. Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
60.
Boix C, Stokes SC. The Oxford handbook of comparative politics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001
61.
Epp CR. The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1998.
62.
Ruger TW, et al. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.; 104(4):1150–1210. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4099370?origin=crossref
63.
Friedman B. The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review [Internet]. 84(2). Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=19469113&site=ehost-live&scope=site
64.
Vanhala L. Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
65.
Derthick M. Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2012.
66.
Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences. 21(2–3):129–168.
67.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization [Internet]. 60(4):781–810. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
68.
Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 5(1):98–130.
69.
Shipan CR, Volden C. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science. 52(4):840–857.
70.
Baccaro L, Simoni M. Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies. 41(10):1323–1348.
71.
Cao X. *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly. 53(4):1095–1130.
72.
Meseguer C. *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy. 24(3):299–325.
73.
Schmitt C. What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy. 31(1):95–117.
74.
Pierson P. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics [Internet]. 45(4):595–628. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2950710?origin=crossref
75.
Mettler S, Soss J. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 2(1):55–73. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688340
76.
Christopher Wlezien. The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. Midwest Political Science Association; 39(4):981–1000. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111666?origin=crossref
77.
Joe Soss. Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. American Political Science Association; 93(2):363–380. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2585401?origin=crossref
78.
Christopher Wlezien. Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 66(1):1–24. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449770
79.
Soss J, Schram SF. A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review. 101(1).
80.
Mettler S. Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics. 8(3):803–824.
81.
Campbell AL. Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science [Internet]. 15(1):333–351. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
82.
Hicks T. Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics. 45(2):207–226.
83.
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
84.
Downs A. Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest [Internet]. 28(1):38–50. Available from: http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/up-and-down-with-ecologythe-issue-attention-cycle
85.
Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman; 2003.
86.
Zaller J. The nature and origins of mass opinion [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
87.
Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
88.
McCombs ME. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2004. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745672748
89.
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News that matters: television and American opinion. Updated ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010.
90.
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
91.
Soroka SN. The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics. 74(2):514–528.
92.
Soroka S, et al. Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science. 43(4):719–739.