1.
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy.
2.
Parsons, W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
3.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge (2012).
4.
Paul A. Sabatier: Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (2007).
5.
Parsons, W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
6.
Sabatier, P.A.: Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (2007).
7.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge (2012).
8.
Theodore J. Lowi: Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review. 32, 298–310.
9.
Anthony Downs: An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy. 65, 135–150.
10.
Zaller, J.: The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
11.
Larry M. Bartels: Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics. 3, 15–31.
12.
Converse, P.: The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Ideology and discontent. Free Press of Glencoe, London (1964).
13.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Keeter, S.: What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press, New Haven, [Conn.] (1996).
14.
Page, B.I., Shapiro, R.Y.: The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992).
15.
Lupia, A., et al: Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 773–784.
16.
Larry M. Bartels: Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 785–790.
17.
Larry M. Bartels: The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-). 32, 44–50.
18.
Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D.: The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
19.
Caplan, B.D.: The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007).
20.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge (2012).
21.
Olson, M.: The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, London (1982).
22.
Olson, M.: The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1971).
23.
Dunleavy, P., O’Leary, B.: Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education, Basingstoke (1987).
24.
Richardson, J.: The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics. 18, 116–139 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425060.
25.
Grant, W.: Pressure groups and British politics. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke (2000).
26.
Richardson, J.: Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies. 48, 1006–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00292.
27.
Iain McLean: Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science. 30, 651–668.
28.
Coen, D.: Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731.
29.
Dunleavy, P., O’Leary, B.: Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education, Basingstoke (1987).
30.
Strøm, K., Müller, W.C.: Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
31.
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge (2012).
32.
Paul Burstein: Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces. 77, 27–62.
33.
Brooks, C., Manza, J.: Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review. 71, 474–494.
34.
Hakhverdian, A.: Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science. 40, 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341000013X.
35.
Warwick, P.V.: Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 1675–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407475.
36.
Kaare Strom: *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science. 34, 565–598.
37.
Parsons, W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
38.
Herbert A. Simon: A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.
39.
James G. March: Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics. 9, 587–608.
40.
Charles E. Lindblom: Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. 39, 517–526.
41.
Charles E. Lindblom: The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 79–88.
42.
Braybrooke, D., Lindblom, C.E.: A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. Free Press, New York (1963).
43.
Aaron Wildavsky: If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences. 4, 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405729.
44.
Butler, D., Adonis, A., Travers, T.: Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994).
45.
Patrick Dunleavy: Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration. 10, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000205.
46.
Parsons, W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
47.
Terry M. Moe: The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science. 28, 739–777.
48.
Wilson, J.Q.: Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, [New York] (1989).
49.
Pressman, J.L., Wildavsky, A.B.: Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984).
50.
Niskanen, W.A.: Bureaucracy & representative government. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, N.J. (2007).
51.
Lipsky, M.: Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1980).
52.
Weingast, B.R., Moran, M.J.: Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy. 91, 765–800.
53.
Fabio Franchino: Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science. 34, 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000055.
54.
Richard E. Matland: Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. 5, 145–174.
55.
Schofield, J., Sausman, C.: Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration. 82, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x.
56.
Saetren, H.: Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal. 33, 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x.
57.
Hicks, T.: Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration. n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12100.
58.
Rosenberg, G.N.: The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? University of Chicago, Chicago (1991).
59.
Stone Sweet, A.: Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).
60.
Boix, C., Stokes, S.C.: The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
61.
Epp, C.R.: The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998).
62.
Ruger, T.W., et al: The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review. 104, 1150–1210.
63.
Friedman, B.: The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review. 84,.
64.
Vanhala, L.: Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011).
65.
Derthick, M.: Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2012).
66.
Sabatier, P.A.: An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences. 21, 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
67.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, Geoffrey Garrett: Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 60, 781–810.
68.
Sabatier, P.A.: The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. 5, 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051.
69.
Shipan, C.R., Volden, C.: The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
70.
Baccaro, L., Simoni, M.: Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 1323–1348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008315861.
71.
Cao, X.: *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly. 53, 1095–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x.
72.
Meseguer, C.: *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy. 24, 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X04000182.
73.
Schmitt, C.: What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy. 31, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000018.
74.
Pierson, P.: When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics. 45, 595–628.
75.
Mettler, S., Soss, J.: The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics. 2, 55–73.
76.
Christopher Wlezien: The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science. 39, 981–1000.
77.
Joe Soss: Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review. 93, 363–380.
78.
Christopher Wlezien: Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics. 66, 1–24.
79.
Soss, J., Schram, S.F.: A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review. 101,. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049.
80.
Mettler, S.: Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics. 8, 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710002045.
81.
Campbell, A.L.: Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 15, 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.
82.
Hicks, T.: Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics. 45, 207–226. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041513804634244.
83.
Parsons, W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
84.
Downs, A.: Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest. 28, 38–50.
85.
Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman, New York (2003).
86.
Zaller, J.: The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
87.
Iyengar, S.: Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991).
88.
McCombs, M.E.: Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Polity, Cambridge (2004).
89.
Iyengar, S., Kinder, D.R.: News that matters: television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010).
90.
Page, B.I., Shapiro, R.Y.: The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992).
91.
Soroka, S.N.: The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics. 74, 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100171X.
92.
Soroka, S., et al: Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science. 43, 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000555.