[1]
‘POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy’. .
[2]
W. Parsons, Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
[3]
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
[4]
Paul A. Sabatier, Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 2007.
[5]
W. Parsons, Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
[6]
P. A. Sabatier, Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1451128&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[7]
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
[8]
Theodore J. Lowi, ‘Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice’, Public Administration Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 298–310 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/974990
[9]
Anthony Downs, ‘An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 135–150 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
[10]
J. Zaller, The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
[11]
Larry M. Bartels, ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–31 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688108
[12]
P. Converse, ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in Ideology and discontent, vol. International yearbook of political behavior research, London: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
[13]
M. X. Delli Carpini and S. Keeter, What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press, 1996.
[14]
B. I. Page and R. Y. Shapiro, The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences, vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
[15]
A. Lupia and et al, ‘Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters “Simply Ignorant?” A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in “Homer Gets a Tax Cut”’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 773–784 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446575
[16]
Larry M. Bartels, ‘Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 785–790 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446576
[17]
Larry M. Bartels, ‘The Irrational Electorate’, The Wilson Quarterly (1976-), vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 44–50 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40262068
[18]
A. Lupia and M. D. McCubbins, The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know?, vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[19]
B. D. Caplan, The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctvcm4gf2
[20]
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
[21]
M. Olson, The rise and decline of nations. London: Yale University Press, 1982 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nprdd
[22]
M. Olson, The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups, vol. Harvard economic studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1971.
[23]
P. Dunleavy and B. O’Leary, Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1987.
[24]
J. Richardson, ‘The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties’, West European Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116–139, 1995, doi: 10.1080/01402389508425060.
[25]
W. Grant, Pressure groups and British politics, vol. Contemporary political studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 2000.
[26]
J. Richardson, ‘Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change’, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1006–1025, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00292.
[27]
Iain McLean, ‘Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 651–668 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
[28]
D. Coen, ‘Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 333–345, doi: 10.1080/13501760701243731.
[29]
P. Dunleavy and B. O’Leary, Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1987.
[30]
K. Strøm and W. C. Müller, Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions, vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/policy-office-or-votes/4E6EBD04A1E3E470552AA62542365236
[31]
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
[32]
Paul Burstein, ‘Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?’, Social Forces, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 27–62 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3006009
[33]
C. Brooks and J. Manza, ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’, American Sociological Review, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 474–494 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039000
[34]
A. Hakhverdian, ‘Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 835–856, doi: 10.1017/S000712341000013X.
[35]
P. V. Warwick, ‘Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1675–1699, doi: 10.1177/0010414011407475.
[36]
Kaare Strom, ‘*A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 565–598 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111461?origin=crossref
[37]
W. Parsons, Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
[38]
Herbert A. Simon, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118, doi: 10.2307/1884852. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1884852
[39]
James G. March, ‘Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice’, The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 587–608 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3003600?origin=crossref
[40]
Charles E. Lindblom, ‘Still Muddling, Not Yet Through’, Public Administration Review, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 517–526 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/976178
[41]
Charles E. Lindblom, ‘The Science of “Muddling Through”’, Public Administration Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 79–88 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
[42]
D. Braybrooke and C. E. Lindblom, A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. New York: Free Press, 1963.
[43]
Aaron Wildavsky, ‘If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing’, Policy Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127–153, doi: 10.1007/BF01405729. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4531522
[44]
D. Butler, A. Adonis, and T. Travers, Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
[45]
Patrick Dunleavy, ‘Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record’, Public Policy and Administration, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 52–70, doi: 10.1177/095207679501000205. [Online]. Available: http://ppa.sagepub.com/content/10/2.toc
[46]
W. Parsons, Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
[47]
Terry M. Moe, ‘The New Economics of Organization’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 739–777 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2110997?origin=crossref
[48]
J. Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. [New York]: Basic Books, 1989.
[49]
J. L. Pressman and A. B. Wildavsky, Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland, 3rd ed., vol. Oakland Project series. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
[50]
W. A. Niskanen, Bureaucracy & representative government. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction, 2007.
[51]
M. Lipsky, Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610443623/
[52]
B. R. Weingast and M. J. Moran, ‘Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 765–800 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1837369
[53]
Fabio Franchino, ‘Delegating Powers in the European Community’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 269–293, doi: 10.1017/S0007123404000055. [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=204887&fileId=S0007123404000055
[54]
Richard E. Matland, ‘Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 145–174 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674
[55]
J. Schofield and C. Sausman, ‘Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction’, Public Administration, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 235–248, doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x.
[56]
H. Saetren, ‘Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant’, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 559–582, doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x.
[57]
T. Hicks, ‘Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools’, Public Administration, p. n/a-n/a, doi: 10.1111/padm.12100.
[58]
G. N. Rosenberg, The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change?, vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1991.
[59]
A. Stone Sweet, Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
[60]
C. Boix and S. C. Stokes, The Oxford handbook of comparative politics, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001
[61]
C. R. Epp, The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
[62]
T. W. Ruger and et al, ‘The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking’, Columbia Law Review, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1150–1210 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4099370?origin=crossref
[63]
B. Friedman, ‘The Politics of Judicial Review’, Texas Law Review, vol. 84, no. 2 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=19469113&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[64]
L. Vanhala, Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization, vol. Cambridge disability law and policy series. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[65]
M. Derthick, Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2012.
[66]
P. A. Sabatier, ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein’, Policy Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 129–168, doi: 10.1007/BF00136406.
[67]
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett, ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 781–810 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[68]
P. A. Sabatier, ‘The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 98–130, doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051.
[69]
C. R. Shipan and C. Volden, ‘The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 840–857, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
[70]
L. Baccaro and M. Simoni, ‘Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1323–1348, doi: 10.1177/0010414008315861.
[71]
X. Cao, ‘*Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1095–1130, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x.
[72]
C. Meseguer, ‘*What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 299–325, doi: 10.1017/S0143814X04000182.
[73]
C. Schmitt, ‘What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 95–117, doi: 10.1017/S0143814X11000018.
[74]
P. Pierson, ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 595–628 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2950710?origin=crossref
[75]
S. Mettler and J. Soss, ‘The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–73 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688340
[76]
Christopher Wlezien, ‘The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 981–1000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111666?origin=crossref
[77]
Joe Soss, ‘Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 363–380 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2585401?origin=crossref
[78]
Christopher Wlezien, ‘Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–24 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449770
[79]
J. Soss and S. F. Schram, ‘A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback’, American Political Science Review, vol. 101, no. 1, doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070049.
[80]
S. Mettler, ‘Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 803–824, doi: 10.1017/S1537592710002045.
[81]
A. L. Campbell, ‘Policy Makes Mass Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 333–351, doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202. [Online]. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
[82]
T. Hicks, ‘Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden’, Comparative Politics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 207–226, doi: 10.5129/001041513804634244.
[83]
W. Parsons, Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.
[84]
A. Downs, ‘Up and down with ecology—the “issue-attention cycle”’, Public Interest, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 38–50 [Online]. Available: http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/up-and-down-with-ecologythe-issue-attention-cycle
[85]
J. W. Kingdon, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd ed., vol. Longman classics in political science. New York: Longman, 2003.
[86]
J. Zaller, The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
[87]
S. Iyengar, Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues, vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[88]
M. E. McCombs, Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745672748
[89]
S. Iyengar and D. R. Kinder, News that matters: television and American opinion, Updated ed., vol. Chicago studies in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
[90]
B. I. Page and R. Y. Shapiro, The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences, vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
[91]
S. N. Soroka, ‘The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 514–528, doi: 10.1017/S002238161100171X.
[92]
S. Soroka and et al, ‘Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 719–739, doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000555.