1
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy.
2
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 1995.
3
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
4
Paul A. Sabatier. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 2007.
5
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 1995.
6
Sabatier PA. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 2007. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1451128&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
7
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
8
Theodore J. Lowi. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review;32:298–310.http://www.jstor.org/stable/974990
9
Anthony Downs. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy;65:135–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
10
Zaller J. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
11
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics;3:15–31.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688108
12
Converse P. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Ideology and discontent. London: : Free Press of Glencoe 1964.
13
Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, [Conn.]: : Yale University Press 1996.
14
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1992. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
15
Lupia A, et al. Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics;5:773–84.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446575
16
Larry M. Bartels. Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics;5:785–90.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446576
17
Larry M. Bartels. The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-);32:44–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40262068
18
Lupia A, McCubbins MD. The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
19
Caplan BD. The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2007. https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctvcm4gf2
20
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
21
Olson M. The rise and decline of nations. London: : Yale University Press 1982. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nprdd
22
Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1971.
23
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1987.
24
Richardson J. The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics 1995;18:116–39. doi:10.1080/01402389508425060
25
Grant W. Pressure groups and British politics. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Press 2000.
26
Richardson J. Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies;48:1006–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00292
27
Iain McLean. Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science;30:651–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
28
Coen D. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy;14:333–45. doi:10.1080/13501760701243731
29
Dunleavy P, O’Leary B. Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1987.
30
Strøm K, Müller WC. Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/policy-office-or-votes/4E6EBD04A1E3E470552AA62542365236
31
Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
32
Paul Burstein. Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces;77:27–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3006009
33
Brooks C, Manza J. Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review;71:474–94.http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039000
34
Hakhverdian A. Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science;40:835–56. doi:10.1017/S000712341000013X
35
Warwick PV. Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies;44:1675–99. doi:10.1177/0010414011407475
36
Kaare Strom. *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science;34:565–98.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111461?origin=crossref
37
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 1995.
38
Herbert A. Simon. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics;69:99–118. doi:10.2307/1884852
39
James G. March. Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics;9:587–608.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3003600?origin=crossref
40
Charles E. Lindblom. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review;39:517–26.http://www.jstor.org/stable/976178
41
Charles E. Lindblom. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review;19:79–88.http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
42
Braybrooke D, Lindblom CE. A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. New York: : Free Press 1963.
43
Aaron Wildavsky. If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences;4:127–53. doi:10.1007/BF01405729
44
Butler D, Adonis A, Travers T. Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1994.
45
Patrick Dunleavy. Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration;10:52–70. doi:10.1177/095207679501000205
46
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 1995.
47
Terry M. Moe. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science;28:739–77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2110997?origin=crossref
48
Wilson JQ. Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. [New York]: : Basic Books 1989.
49
Pressman JL, Wildavsky AB. Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. 3rd ed. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984.
50
Niskanen WA. Bureaucracy & representative government. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Aldine Transaction 2007.
51
Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: : Russell Sage Foundation 1980. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610443623/
52
Weingast BR, Moran MJ. Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy;91:765–800.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1837369
53
Fabio Franchino. Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science;34:269–93. doi:10.1017/S0007123404000055
54
Richard E. Matland. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART;5:145–74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674
55
Schofield J, Sausman C. Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration;82:235–48. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x
56
Saetren H. Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal;33:559–82. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x
57
Hicks T. Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/padm.12100
58
Rosenberg GN. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? Chicago: : University of Chicago 1991.
59
Stone Sweet A. Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
60
Boix C, Stokes SC. The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001
61
Epp CR. The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1998.
62
Ruger TW, et al. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review;104:1150–210.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4099370?origin=crossref
63
Friedman B. The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review;84.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=19469113&site=ehost-live&scope=site
64
Vanhala L. Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2011.
65
Derthick M. Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: : CQ Press 2012.
66
Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences;21:129–68. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
67
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization;60:781–810.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
68
Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy;5:98–130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051
69
Shipan CR, Volden C. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science;52:840–57. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
70
Baccaro L, Simoni M. Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies;41:1323–48. doi:10.1177/0010414008315861
71
Cao X. *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly;53:1095–130. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x
72
Meseguer C. *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy;24:299–325. doi:10.1017/S0143814X04000182
73
Schmitt C. What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy;31:95–117. doi:10.1017/S0143814X11000018
74
Pierson P. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics;45:595–628.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2950710?origin=crossref
75
Mettler S, Soss J. The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics;2:55–73.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688340
76
Christopher Wlezien. The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science;39:981–1000.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111666?origin=crossref
77
Joe Soss. Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review;93:363–80.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2585401?origin=crossref
78
Christopher Wlezien. Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics;66:1–24.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449770
79
Soss J, Schram SF. A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review;101. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070049
80
Mettler S. Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics;8:803–24. doi:10.1017/S1537592710002045
81
Campbell AL. Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science;15:333–51. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
82
Hicks T. Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics;45:207–26. doi:10.5129/001041513804634244
83
Parsons W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 1995.
84
Downs A. Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest;28:38–50.http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/up-and-down-with-ecologythe-issue-attention-cycle
85
Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: : Longman 2003.
86
Zaller J. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
87
Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
88
McCombs ME. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: : Polity 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745672748
89
Iyengar S, Kinder DR. News that matters: television and American opinion. Updated ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2010.
90
Page BI, Shapiro RY. The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1992. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
91
Soroka SN. The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics;74:514–28. doi:10.1017/S002238161100171X
92
Soroka S, et al. Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science;43:719–39. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000555
