Aaron Wildavsky. (n.d.). If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405729
Analyzing Public Policy. (2012a). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
Analyzing Public Policy. (2012b). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
Analyzing Public Policy. (2012c). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
Analyzing Public Policy. (2012d). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136218
Anthony Downs. (n.d.). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369
Baccaro, L., & Simoni, M. (n.d.). Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice. Comparative Political Studies, 41(10), 1323–1348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008315861
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, & Geoffrey Garrett. (n.d.). Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Boix, C., & Stokes, S. C. (2007). The Oxford handbook of comparative politics: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001
Braybrooke, D., & Lindblom, C. E. (1963). A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. Free Press.
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (n.d.). Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 474–494. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039000
Butler, D., Adonis, A., & Travers, T. (1994). Failure in British government: the politics of the poll tax. Oxford University Press.
Campbell, A. L. (n.d.). Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202
Cao, X. (n.d.). *Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1095–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x
Caplan, B. D. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press. https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctvcm4gf2
Charles E. Lindblom. (n.d.-a). Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526. http://www.jstor.org/stable/976178
Charles E. Lindblom. (n.d.-b). The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/973677
Christopher Wlezien. (n.d.-a). Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 1–24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449770
Christopher Wlezien. (n.d.-b). The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981–1000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111666?origin=crossref
Coen, D. (n.d.). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731
Converse, P. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and discontent: Vol. International yearbook of political behavior research. Free Press of Glencoe.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
Derthick, M. (2012). Up in smoke: from legislation to litigation in tobacco politics (3rd ed). CQ Press.
Downs, A. (n.d.). Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’. Public Interest, 28(1), 38–50. http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/up-and-down-with-ecologythe-issue-attention-cycle
Dunleavy, P., & O’Leary, B. (1987a). Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education.
Dunleavy, P., & O’Leary, B. (1987b). Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. Macmillan Education.
Epp, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Fabio Franchino. (n.d.). Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000055
Friedman, B. (n.d.). The Politics of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review, 84(2). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=19469113&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Grant, W. (2000). Pressure groups and British politics: Vol. Contemporary political studies. Macmillan Press.
Hakhverdian, A. (n.d.). Political Representation and its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341000013X
Herbert A. Simon. (n.d.). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Hicks, T. (n.d.-a). Partisan governance and policy implementation: the politics of academy conversion amongst English schools. Public Administration, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12100
Hicks, T. (n.d.-b). Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden. Comparative Politics, 45(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041513804634244
Iain McLean. (n.d.). Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 651–668. http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: how television frames political issues: Vol. American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: television and American opinion: Vol. Chicago studies in American politics (Updated ed). University of Chicago Press.
James G. March. (n.d.). Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3003600?origin=crossref
Joe Soss. (n.d.). Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2585401?origin=crossref
Kaare Strom. (n.d.). *A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2111461?origin=crossref
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies: Vol. Longman classics in political science (2nd ed). Longman.
Larry M. Bartels. (n.d.-a). Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3(1), 15–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688108
Larry M. Bartels. (n.d.-b). Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 785–790. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446576
Larry M. Bartels. (n.d.-c). The Irrational Electorate. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-), 32(4), 44–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40262068
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610443623/
Lupia, A., & et al. (n.d.). Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters ‘Simply Ignorant?’ A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut’. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 773–784. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20446575
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Polity. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780745672748
Meseguer, C. (n.d.). *What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy, 24(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X04000182
Mettler, S. (n.d.). Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era. Perspectives on Politics, 8(3), 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710002045
Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (n.d.). The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3688340
Niskanen, W. A. (2007). Bureaucracy & representative government. Aldine Transaction.
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups: Vol. Harvard economic studies. Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nprdd
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992a). The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences: Vol. American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992b). The rational public: fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences: Vol. American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226644806
Parsons, W. (1995a). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Parsons, W. (1995b). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Parsons, W. (1995c). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Parsons, W. (1995d). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Parsons, W. (1995e). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar.
Patrick Dunleavy. (n.d.). Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000205
Paul A. Sabatier. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed). Westview Press.
Paul Burstein. (n.d.). Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces, 77(1), 27–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3006009
Pierson, P. (n.d.). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2950710?origin=crossref
POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy. (n.d.).
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Vol. Oakland Project series (3rd ed). University of California Press.
Richard E. Matland. (n.d.). Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 5(2), 145–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674
Richardson, J. (n.d.). Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change. Political Studies, 48(5), 1006–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00292
Richardson, J. (1995). The market for political activism: Interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics, 18(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425060
Rosenberg, G. N. (1991). The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? Vol. American politics and political economy series. University of Chicago.
Ruger, T. W., & et al. (n.d.). The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review, 104(4), 1150–1210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/4099370?origin=crossref
Sabatier, P. A. (n.d.-a). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
Sabatier, P. A. (n.d.-b). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed). Westview Press. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1451128&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
Saetren, H. (n.d.). Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x
Schmitt, C. (n.d.). What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Public Policy, 31(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000018
Schofield, J., & Sausman, C. (n.d.). Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction. Public Administration, 82(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (n.d.). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
Soroka, S., & et al. (n.d.). Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000555
Soroka, S. N. (n.d.). The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100171X
Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (n.d.). A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review, 101(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
Strøm, K., & Müller, W. C. (1999). Policy, office, or votes?: how political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions: Vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge University Press. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/policy-office-or-votes/4E6EBD04A1E3E470552AA62542365236
Terry M. Moe. (n.d.). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2110997?origin=crossref
Theodore J. Lowi. (n.d.). Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310. http://www.jstor.org/stable/974990
Vanhala, L. (2011). Making rights a reality?: disability rights activists and legal mobilization: Vol. Cambridge disability law and policy series. Cambridge University Press.
Warwick, P. V. (n.d.). Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies, 44(12), 1675–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407475
Weingast, B. R., & Moran, M. J. (n.d.). Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91(5), 765–800. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1837369
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
Zaller, J. (1992a). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A
Zaller, J. (1992b). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/nature-and-origins-of-mass-opinion/70B1485D3A9CFF55ADCCDD42FC7E926A