Aaron Wildavsky. n.d. ‘If Planning Is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing’. Policy Sciences 4(2):127–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01405729.
Anon. 2012a. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
Anon. 2012b. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
Anon. 2012c. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
Anon. 2012d. Analyzing Public Policy. Routledge.
Anon. n.d. ‘POLS6023: Introduction to Public Policy’.
Anthony Downs. n.d. ‘An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy’. Journal of Political Economy 65(2):135–50.
Baccaro, Lucio, and Marco Simoni. n.d. ‘Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice’. Comparative Political Studies 41(10):1323–48. doi: 10.1177/0010414008315861.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett. n.d. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60(4):781–810.
Boix, Carles, and Susan Carol Stokes. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braybrooke, David, and Charles Edward Lindblom. 1963. A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press.
Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza. n.d. ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’. American Sociological Review 71(3):474–94.
Butler, David, Andrew Adonis, and Tony Travers. 1994. Failure in British Government: The Politics of the Poll Tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. n.d. ‘Policy Makes Mass Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1):333–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.
Cao, Xun. n.d. ‘*Networks of Intergovernmental Organizations and Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies’. International Studies Quarterly 53(4):1095–1130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.x.
Caplan, Bryan Douglas. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Charles E. Lindblom. n.d.-a. ‘Still Muddling, Not Yet Through’. Public Administration Review 39(6):517–26.
Charles E. Lindblom. n.d.-b. ‘The Science of “Muddling Through”’. Public Administration Review 19(2):79–88.
Christopher Wlezien. n.d.-a. ‘Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy’. The Journal of Politics 66(1):1–24.
Christopher Wlezien. n.d.-b. ‘The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending’. American Journal of Political Science 39(4):981–1000.
Coen, David. n.d. ‘Empirical and Theoretical Studies in EU Lobbying’. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3):333–45. doi: 10.1080/13501760701243731.
Converse, Philip. 1964. ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’. in Ideology and discontent. Vol. International yearbook of political behavior research. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Derthick, Martha. 2012. Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Downs, Anthony. n.d. ‘Up and down with Ecology—the “Issue-Attention Cycle”’. Public Interest 28(1):38–50.
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Brendan O’Leary. 1987a. Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Brendan O’Leary. 1987b. Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fabio Franchino. n.d. ‘Delegating Powers in the European Community’. British Journal of Political Science 34(2):269–93. doi: 10.1017/S0007123404000055.
Friedman, Barry. n.d. ‘The Politics of Judicial Review’. Texas Law Review 84(2).
Grant, Wyn. 2000. Pressure Groups and British Politics. Vol. Contemporary political studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Hakhverdian, Armen. n.d. ‘Political Representation and Its Mechanisms: A Dynamic Left–Right Approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006’. British Journal of Political Science 40(4):835–56. doi: 10.1017/S000712341000013X.
Herbert A. Simon. n.d. ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1):99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852.
Hicks, Timothy. n.d.-a. ‘Partisan Governance and Policy Implementation: The Politics of Academy Conversion amongst English Schools’. Public Administration n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/padm.12100.
Hicks, Timothy. n.d.-b. ‘Partisan Strategy and Path Dependence: The Post-War Emergence of Health Systems in the UK and Sweden’. Comparative Politics 45(2):207–26. doi: 10.5129/001041513804634244.
Iain McLean. n.d. ‘Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson’. British Journal of Political Science 30(4):651–68.
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 2010. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Vol. Chicago studies in American politics. Updated ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
James G. March. n.d. ‘Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice’. The Bell Journal of Economics 9(2):587–608.
Joe Soss. n.d. ‘Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action’. The American Political Science Review 93(2):363–80.
Kaare Strom. n.d. ‘*A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’. American Journal of Political Science 34(2):565–98.
Kingdon, John W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Vol. Longman classics in political science. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Larry M. Bartels. n.d.-a. ‘Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind’. Perspectives on Politics 3(1):15–31.
Larry M. Bartels. n.d.-b. ‘Homer Gets a Warm Hug: A Note on Ignorance and Extenuation’. Perspectives on Politics 5(4):785–90.
Larry M. Bartels. n.d.-c. ‘The Irrational Electorate’. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-) 32(4):44–50.
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lupia, Arthur, and et al. n.d. ‘Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters “Simply Ignorant?” A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in “Homer Gets a Tax Cut”’. Perspectives on Politics 5(4):773–84.
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, Maxwell E. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity.
Meseguer, Covadonga. n.d. ‘*What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries’. Journal of Public Policy 24(3):299–325. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X04000182.
Mettler, Suzanne. n.d. ‘Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era’. Perspectives on Politics 8(3):803–24. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710002045.
Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. n.d. ‘The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics’. Perspectives on Politics 2(1):55–73.
Niskanen, William A. 2007. Bureaucracy & Representative Government. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction.
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Vol. Harvard economic studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. London: Yale University Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992a. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992b. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Parsons, Wayne. 1995a. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Parsons, Wayne. 1995b. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Parsons, Wayne. 1995c. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Parsons, Wayne. 1995d. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Parsons, Wayne. 1995e. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Patrick Dunleavy. n.d. ‘Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record’. Public Policy and Administration 10(2):52–70. doi: 10.1177/095207679501000205.
Paul A. Sabatier. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Paul Burstein. n.d. ‘Bringing the Public Back in: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?’ Social Forces 77(1):27–62.
Pierson, Paul. n.d. ‘When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’. World Politics 45(4):595–628.
Pressman, Jeffrey Leonard, and Aaron B. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Vol. Oakland Project series. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Richard E. Matland. n.d. ‘Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 5(2):145–74.
Richardson, Jeremy. 1995. ‘The Market for Political Activism: Interest Groups as a Challenge to Political Parties’. West European Politics 18(1):116–39. doi: 10.1080/01402389508425060.
Richardson, Jeremy. n.d. ‘Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change’. Political Studies 48(5):1006–25. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00292.
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Vol. American politics and political economy series. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Ruger, Theodore W., and et al. n.d. ‘The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking’. Columbia Law Review 104(4):1150–1210.
Sabatier, Paul A. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul A. n.d.-a. ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein’. Policy Sciences 21(2–3):129–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00136406.
Sabatier, Paul A. n.d.-b. ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy 5(1):98–130. doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051.
Saetren, Harald. n.d. ‘Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of-Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant’. Policy Studies Journal 33(4):559–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00133.x.
Schmitt, Carina. n.d. ‘What Drives the Diffusion of Privatization Policy? Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector’. Journal of Public Policy 31(1):95–117. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X11000018.
Schofield, Jill, and Charlotte Sausman. n.d. ‘Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice. Introduction’. Public Administration 82(2):235–48. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00392.x.
Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. n.d. ‘The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion’. American Journal of Political Science 52(4):840–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
Soroka, Stuart, and et al. n.d. ‘Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge’. British Journal of Political Science 43(4):719–39. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000555.
Soroka, Stuart N. n.d. ‘The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World’. The Journal of Politics 74(2):514–28. doi: 10.1017/S002238161100171X.
Soss, Joe, and Sanford F. Schram. n.d. ‘A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback’. American Political Science Review 101(1). doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070049.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terry M. Moe. n.d. ‘The New Economics of Organization’. American Journal of Political Science 28(4):739–77.
Theodore J. Lowi. n.d. ‘Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice’. Public Administration Review 32(4):298–310.
Vanhala, Lisa. 2011. Making Rights a Reality?: Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Vol. Cambridge disability law and policy series. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warwick, Paul V. n.d. ‘Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy’. Comparative Political Studies 44(12):1675–99. doi: 10.1177/0010414011407475.
Weingast, Barry R., and Mark J. Moran. n.d. ‘Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission’. Journal of Political Economy 91(5):765–800.
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. [New York]: Basic Books.
Zaller, John. 1992a. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992b. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.