1
Ward S, Eden C. Chapter 1: Introduction: education and the state. Key issues in education policy. Los Angeles: SAGE 2009:1–12.
2
Lightfoot N. Policy research: In defence of ad hocery? In: O’Grady A, Cottle V, eds. Exploring education at postgraduate level: policy, theory and practice. London: Routledge 2016.
3
Adams P. Chapter 2: Education policy and policy-making. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
4
Ball S. Introduction. The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press 2013.
5
Rizvi F, Lingard B. Chapter 1: Conceptions of education policy. Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge 2010:1–21.
6
Adams P. Chapter 1: Political Ideology. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
7
Apple MW. Understanding and Interrupting Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism in Education. Pedagogies: An International Journal. 2006;1:21–6. doi: 10.1207/s15544818ped0101_4
8
Sellar S, Lingard B. The OECD and the expansion of PISA: new global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal. 2014;40:917–36. doi: 10.1002/berj.3120
9
Braun A, Ball SJ, Maguire M, et al. Taking context seriously: towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 2011;32:585–96. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
10
Adams P. Education policy and policy-making. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014:23–37.
11
Wilkins A. Citizens and/or consumers: mutations in the construction of concepts and practices of school choice. Journal of Education Policy. 2010;25:171–89. doi: 10.1080/02680930903447671
12
Raveaud M, Zanten A van. Choosing the local school: middle class parents’ values and social and ethnic mix in London and Paris. Journal of Education Policy. 2007;22:107–24. doi: 10.1080/02680930601065817
13
Harland T. The university, neoliberal reform and the liberal educational ideal. The Routledge international handbook of higher education. New York: Routledge 2009.
14
Bradbury A, Roberts-Holmes G. Chapter 5: Schools’ responses to datafication and the visibility of performance. The datafication of primary and early years education: playing with numbers. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2018.
15
Lingard B, Sellar S. ‘Catalyst data’: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy. 2013;28:634–56. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2012.758815
16
Ball SJ. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy. 2003;18:215–28. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
17
Adams P. Chapter 7: Professionalism. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
18
Olmedo A, Bailey PLJ, Ball SJ. To Infinity and beyond …: Heterarchical Governance, the Teach for All Network in Europe and the Making of Profits and Minds. European Educational Research Journal. 2013;12:492–512. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2013.12.4.492
19
Ball S. Current Policy Models and the UK government’s approach to public sector reform. The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press 2013.
20
Bangay C, Latham M. Are we asking the right questions? Moving beyond the state vs non-state providers debate: Reflections and a Case Study from India. International Journal of Educational Development. 2013;33:244–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.004
21
Adams P. Chapter 5: Markets. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
22
Garratt D, Forrester G. Economics of Education. Education policy unravelled. London: Continuum 2012:108–31.
23
Boronski T, Hassan N. Chapter 12: Transformations. Sociology of education. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015:226–44.
24
Adams P. Chapter 8: Performance and accountablity. Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
25
Adams P. Chapter 9: The future? Policy and education. London: Routledge 2014.
